Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri- Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu is an associate professor in the A. Leon Linton Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence
Paper ID #36999Integration of Professional Publications in the Implementation ofIndustry 4.0 to Augment the Learning Experience in ETAC of ABET ETProgramsProf. Ravi C. Manimaran, Department Chair, Engineering Technology, Austin Peay State University Ravi C. Manimaran is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Technology, Austin Peay State University. His education includes two Master of Science degrees in Electrical & Computer Engi- neering and Electronics and Control Engineering. He has been dynamically involved in higher education leadership as a Dean, Department Chair, Project Director, and a faculty member
dedicated individual, called a Student Support Specialist, sits in on classes with students and meets with them individually to set goals, monitors students’ progress, and facilitates study skill workshops. • Industry Internships: Upon satisfactorily competing calculus readiness, students are qualified for paid internships with partner employers. These internships are project-based and focused on computer science or engineering. To date, STEM Core students have interned at Lawrence Livermore Lab, Tesla, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, SLAC National Accelerator Lab, NASA Jet Propulsion Lab, San Jose State University, and the University of Colorado, among many others.The STEM Core has proven
EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) Student Outcome 5 was also a factor, with teamworkincorporated on graded assignments to achieve ABET EAC Student Outcome 5. Courses withlabs and sizeable design projects, especially those tied to ABET EAC Student Outcome 5, had amuch larger fraction of team-based activity points than those without labs or large courseprojects. To examine teamwork as a teaching method, an evaluation of student grades indicatedthat team-based activities did not equally benefit all students, with lower performing studentsreceiving a larger grade benefit. In similar fashion, group learning exercises did not significantlyimprove student learning for subsequently administered individual exams. When studentlearning related to team selection
outprofessional projects in more than 135 countries around the world. These awards are open tofaculty, artists, and professionals from a wide range of fields. Once an awardee completes theirgrant, they can remain connected with other Fulbrighters and any past US government-sponsoredexchange program recipient through an online platform [2]. There are over 0.4 million Fulbrightalumni who have availed themselves of this opportunity to enhance their skills and make newcollaborations. The Fulbright U.S. Scholar program includes Fulbright Distinguished Scholar Award,Fulbright International Education Administrator Award, Fulbright Postdoctoral Award, andFulbright Scholar Award. The Fulbright Distinguished Scholar Award is considered the mostprestigious award
of The Ohio State University. Challenges arising due to the transition to and fromdistance learning modalities were observed in the first-year engineering courses, Fundamentals ofEngineering I and Fundamentals of Engineering II. These courses are two-credit hours each andintroduce engineering problem-solving, data analysis, project-based learning, computerprogramming, 3-D Modeling and simulation, project management, and teamwork. Teachingstrategies adopted by the instructors including restructuring the course, revisioning the assessmentof course goals, and utilizing alternative approaches to assess student performance will bediscussed in this paper. The findings of this paper will provide an opportunity for educators tolearn from the unique
variability in project andexam grades, respectively, were explained by the Realizeit score. This was a markedimprovement over the relationship of homeworks and quizzes to exams and projects in an earliersemester without AL elements. Student feedback exposed the need for more examples andpractice questions. Faculty reported students were more aware of concepts requiring support andasked more pertinent questions. In addition, faculty perceptions were more positive when ALmaterials were graded elements that substantially replaced non-AL course material compared towhen they were used to supplement existing course materials. These results suggest that AL canenhance connections in the introductory mechanics sequence, but emphasize that adaptivecontent and
engineering information literacy, engineers' information-seeking behaviors, digital library, and information discovery.Weiling Liu Professor and Head of Ofce of Libraries Technology (OLT) at University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. She manages OLT, provides leadership and coordination on technology projects, including evaluation, planning, and implementation, and supports library systems and applications. Her professional interests include statistical analysis, information retrieval, access, systems integration, e-resources management, resource discovery, project management, and data management. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
Paper ID #38006Software Engineering and Security: Lessons LearnedCreating a New Course in Security from a SoftwareEngineering PerspectiveKevin A Gary (Associate Professor) Kevin Gary is an Associate Professor of Software Engineering in the School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence (SCAI) at Arizona State University. He is a founding member of ASU's Software Engineering program, former Program Chair, and current ABET Coordinator of the program. At ASU he has led multiple curricular development efforts in software engineering notably security and agile methods. He is the creator of the Software Enterprise project
analysis on the collaborative use ofAndromeda in an 8th grade technology education class. Students were given two engineeringprojects through WhiteBox Learning: Survival Shelter 2.0 and Dragster 2.0. WhiteBox Learningis a webbased STEM education software that allows students to learn STEM concepts, such asintroductory physics, and practice the engineering design process. Survival Shelter 2.0 andDragster 2.0 are two design projects that let students create an emergency survival shelter forhikers and a CO2 racecar, respectively. In this case, students used WhiteBox Learning to create,analyze, and simulate their project designs. Between design iterations, the class explored theirdesigns in Andromeda with the teacher acting as the facilitator. That
2013 and 2019. Ten stream sites within the upstream area of the Tuscarawassubbasin were identified for surface water sampling and drainage areas delineation. Moreover,forest fragmentation was assessed for the delineated drainage areas. Overall, the focus on asubwatershed allowed us to solely understand the impacts of -production-induced landscapingalteration, and associated changes to water quality. Statistical analysis was used to determine thetemporal and spatial variations in local surface water quality within the sub-basin and aided tocorrelate the changes in water quality with landscaping alteration and energy productionactivities. The project results are also expected to assist the establishment of state guidelines andpolicies to
an assistant professor in the School of Construction and Design at the University of Southern Mississippi. Dr. Song obtained her Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering with a focus in construction engineering and management from UA. Her research interests include occupational safety and health, workforce training and development, engineering educa- tion, Building Information Modeling, machine learning and AI in construction, and construction progress monitoring and simulation. Dr. Song is leading research projects funded by the U.S. Department of Labor and NSF to advance worker safety training and workforce development.Jewoong Moon, University of Alabama Jewoong (Jacob) Moon is an assistant professor of Instructional
the design process on at least process were taught in this one you had seen in at least the design process in a new one assignment or project for class one other class you took at way you had not seen before. this course. XXXX. % % % % % Neither % % Neither
-assessment, was used as part of a solid mechanics course offered to first year engineeringstudents at the University of Waterloo. In this course, first-year engineering students wererequired to complete various hands-on lab activities, and a final project as a group. Oncesubmitting their initial work on the platform, they were then required to individually assess theirpeers’ work, and then individually reflect on the grades that they received. The grade theyreceived for their group work, the quality of their peer evaluations, and the feedback theyprovided on the grades they received from their peers were all factors of their final individualgrade for each assessment. This encouraged students to evaluate each other’s work in a genuinemanner
from the semiconductor industry, and teaches Electrical Engineering, and General En- gineering classes at San Jose State University. He participates in a project to bring applied computing to non engineering majors. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Learning Experiences of Social Science Students in an Interdisciplinary Computing MinorAbstractThe rapid growth of the digital economy and an associated increase in user-generated data hascreated a strong need for interdisciplinary computing professionals possessing both technicalskills and knowledge of human behavior. To help meet this need and with funds from NSF IUSE,we
in differences inethical perspectives. The ongoing collaborative project described in this paper attempts todevelop the cross-cultural sensitivity of Indian and USA students through their reflections oncase studies that present ethical dilemmas in real-world situations. Central questions addressed inthis paper include: 1) How does a pedagogical model based on socio-cultural theory andincorporating cross-cultural activities support undergraduate engineering students in socio-cultural and ethical thinking? and 2) How do engineering students develop their professionalidentities through socio-cultural and ethical discourse? Based on socio-cultural learning theory,the present collaborative effort engages hundreds of students in professional
the new introductory course, andthe first cohort that did. All data evaluated their skill levels during their senior year capstonedesign experience. Therefore, the survey was a direct opportunity to assess the result of an earlyintroduction to the mechanical engineering profession and design process.The paper assesses the effect of the Intro to ME course on student grasp of the design processand their ability to apply the process to their capstone design project. Overall results were mixedwith faculty indicating that students who completed the Intro to ME course differentially appliedthe design process but also had fewer gaps in their knowledge of the tools associated with thedesign process. Furthermore, there were no indications that the
Paper ID #30386Sustainable bridges from campus to campus: Aggregate results forEngineering Ahead Cohorts One to Three (#1525367)Dr. Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Catherine Cohan, Ph.D. has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include engineering education, retention of underrepresented students, measurement, and assessment. She is currently an Assistant Research Professor and coordinates the Sustainable Bridges NSF IUSE project (Peter Butler, PI). Previously, she was the project coordinator the the Toys’n MORE NSF STEP project (Renata Engel, PI).Dr
that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the-art engineering education focused facility; the largest educational building in the state. His expertise in educational pedagogy, student learning, and teaching has impacted thousands of students at the universities for which he has been associated. Imbrie is nationally recognized for his work in ac- tive/collaborative learning pedagogies, teaming and student success modeling. His engineering education leadership has produced fundamental changes in the way students are educated around the world. Imbrie has been a member of ASEE since 2000 and has been
2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Prof. Dominic J Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College Dom Dal Bello is Professor of Engineering at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a California Community College between UC Santa Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is Chair of the Mathematical Sciences
learning projects in human cen- tred design. Her research interests include text analytics, international higher education, and engineering design education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Utility value of an introductory engineering design course: an evaluation among course participants.AbstractThis paper describes an assessment of the implementation of an engineering design class byexploring how valuable students perceive the course in subsequent years in their collegeexperience. This study presents a short overview of students’ perceptions of this course using theusefulness component of the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation
tinkering, social learning, andgroup collaboration on creative and technical projects [9]. The hands on, learning by doingnature of the makerspace experience requires a design approach to problem solving [10].Design is often recognized and taught as a team process. The ABET general engineering criteriaaddress the social aspects of engineering education, such as the need to function onmultidisciplinary teams [2]. Makerspaces provide communities of knowledge sharing and peer-to-peer learning, combined with close instruction and supervision from more advanced peers[11]. In such, students engage in collaborative learning – continuously discussing, debating, andclarifying their understanding of concepts [12, 13]. Through online engagement
lecture and a 100 minute lab that meet each week during a 14 week semester.The curriculum is heavily geared towards project-based and hands-on learning with a goal ofexposing students to many facets of engineering.There are many works out there which show that students, and specifically first-year engineeringstudents, learn by doing and retention can be improved by incorporating hands-on projects andexercises1-4. However, one challenge that can limit the effectiveness of these projects is the factthat many students are not confident with tools. In a curriculum requiring much building ofprojects this is a problem; students may be able to envision great products only to beoverwhelmed when attempting to fabricate. Knowledge of tool use can lead to
intothree broad areas: learning barriers, social challenges, and faculty/instructor issues1, 4.Ashraf4 suggests that TBL in the classroom does not always appropriately simulate the situationin the workplace and the result is that less motivated students may receive better grades andproductive students receive lower grades, relative to the level of effort expended. He summarizeslearning concerns such as lower quality work and stifled individuality as a result of groupprojects in the classroom. Ashraf4 also questions whether group projects result in studentslearning new skills, given that students often “divide and conquer” components of projects,working on the section of the project that they know best. Finally, Ashraf4 suggests that theefficiency
from the mapping of their and their partners’networks. While we appreciate the use of systematic literature reviews as means to map a field ordiscipline, this project hopes to enroll participants beyond those that publish in the field toinclude those that practice, teach, promote, and organize engineering for good [1].This mapping will serve complementary purposes of a traditional literature review. AuthorsBorrego et al [1] provide justification and motivations for a systematic literature review inengineering education or other interdisciplinary fields. These scholars describe how many of thejustifications for a thorough literature review are shared with our proposed mapping strategy—tracing historical development, describing state of
engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Prof. Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University Hamid Mahmoodi received his Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from Purdue Univer- sity, West Lafayette, IN, in 2005. He is currently a professor of electrical and computer engineering in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University. His research interests include low-power, reliable, and high-performance circuit design in nano-electronic
Johns Hopkins University Department of Biomedical EngineeringFreshmen enrolled in Biomedical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University start their academiccareer with “Modeling and Design”, a two-credit course developed to immerse our freshmen intorealistic challenges on day one. Rather than introduce our students to biomedical engineeringthrough lectures, freshmen learn by working in teams of five on modeling and design projectsduring their first semester. The freshmen projects are open ended, providing students with theopportunity to brainstorm many possible solutions, design their own experimental protocols,perform those experiments in lab, and present the results collectively as a team. These projectsincorporate written reports, oral
in a wirelesscommunications course can motivate students. Researchers have found enthusiasm and interestfrom students who participated in lab experiments in wireless communications courses12. Theabstract theory can be effectively conveyed through experiments10. Furthermore, hands-on activities work well with a project-based curricula, which hasbeen successful in research studies5. Guzelgoz and Arslan12 surveyed students before the finalexam in a wireless communications lab course. Their results demonstrated how students canlearn the difficult theoretical knowledge with the help of labs. Also, students agreed that the labcomponent made the course more interesting. Moreover, Dawy, Husseini, Yaacoub, and Al-Kanj11 evaluated a wireless
AC 2007-2437: ALIGNING INDIGENOUS CULTURE WITH SCIENCELeslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development Board Ms. Wilkins is Vice President of the Maui Economic Development Board and is the Founder and Director of its Women Technology Project. An experienced advocate for workplace equity, served as National President of the Business & Professional Women’s organization in 2001. Appointed by the Hawaii governor to two terms on the Hawaii State Commission on the Status of Women, she was Commission Chair from 1996 - 2003.Sheryl Hom, isisHawaii and Women in Technology Ms. Hom is Vice-President and Director of Content Development for isisHawaii. She has served as editor and media
learning with academic programs. Students work in E-teamsand write NCIIA proposals to commercialize innovative product or university/research labdeveloped technology.This paper describes a unique course series in Systems Engineering (SE) Entrepreneurship.Innovation in product/service design and commercialization that enables entrepreneurship can besuccessfully leveraged by applying SE principles/ techniques which parallel entrepreneurshipsteps such as Customer Requirements Engineering and opportunity recognition; Project/QualityEngineering, Decision/Risk Analysis, Systems Modeling, Engineering Economics and businessplanning, Systems Integration and business plan development, Systems Launch considerationsand product/business launch, etc. Concepts