2006-1370: ASSESSING STUDENT OUTCOMES OF NASA RESEARCH INTOUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONIsmail Orabi, University of New Haven ISMAIL I. ORABI, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of New Haven. He received his Ph.D. from Clarkson University, and his MS degree from the State University of New York and B.S. from Cairo Institute of Technology (now Helwan University), all in Mechanical Engineering. He has published over 25 technical articles in refereed journals and conference proceedings. His research interests include theoretical and computational investigation in the area of mechanical vibrations and dynamic systems and control. Professor Orabi has taught courses in
AC 2010-138: STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING CAD AUTOMATION TOENGINEERS AND TECHNOLOGISTSDerek Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Derek Yip-Hoi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Western Washington University and coordinator of the department’s CAD/CAM program. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor where he worked for several years as a Research Scientist in the area of Reconfigurable Manufacturing before moving out to the Pacific Northwest where he spent 3 years at the University of British Columbia before moving to WWU. His teaching interests are in CAD/CAM, CNC, design methodology, mechanical
, Washington State University Dr. Davis received degrees from The Evergreen State College (BA 1976), WSU (BS 1981, MS 1988) and the University of Oregon (Ph.D. 1993). He is currently the Director of the Harold Frank Institute at WSU. He has been the president and CEO of IPM, a medical device company and Total Dynamics LLC a software company. He is also on the board of directors of Developing World Technologies, a company started by former students of the capstone class that he teaches. His interests include engineering and en- trepreneurship pedagogy and assessment, technology development and clinical applications of biomedical instrumentation
Paper ID #9938Issues Surrounding a Heutagogical Approach in Global Engineering Educa-tionDr. Yakut Gazi, Texas A&M University In her 20 years of experience as an instructional designer, media specialist, IT consultant, faculty mem- ber, and technology leader, Dr. Yakut Gazi has worked at higher education institutions in the US, Qatar, Turkey, and Spain. Prior to joining TAMU Engineering as the Assistant Vice Chancellor for Engineering Remote Education in September 2013, she led the distributed learning and classroom technology oper- ations at Texas A&M University-Central Texas and worked at A&M’s branch
of Technology in Everyday Life sponsored by the BurroughsWellcome Fund’s Student Science Enrichment Program[9-11] . This paper examines the impactson Engineering Teaching Fellows of participating in these three programs.From 1999-2003, the Duke-NCSU GK-12 Engineering Teaching Fellows Program placed Page 10.853.1graduate and undergraduate teaching Fellows in 7 schools in 4 counties. Fellows providedProceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationassistance and expertise for teachers in the design and delivery
Gaining International Competence: A Multi-Faceted Approach to International Engineering Education M. B. Eljamal, S. W. Pang, and S. J. Edington College of Engineering The University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109AbstractIn direct alignment with Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology criteria totrain engineers who should be globally competent, the International Programs inEngineering office in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan hascreated a broad palette of international program activities that
form study groups, be a support group for each other, and develop a sense ofcommunity which is especially helpful for Freshman in acclimating to their first year at college. We have expandedour Freshman student advising activities to include career advising and networking (every student is matched with analumni advisor) proactive advising (each academic advisor is the student’s instructor in the Introduction toEngineering class and receives progress reports from all other non-engineering instructors), and multiple one-on-oneprogress interviews with the students (the advisor gets to know the students better so that potential problems areidentified early and remedied) . Additionally, we are experimenting with a flexible technologically
Integrated Environment for Problem Solving and Program Development. Unpublished Ph.D.Dissertation, New Jersey Institute of Technology. Newark NJ (1997).12. Deek, F.P., Hiltz, S.R., Kimmel, H., & Rotter, N. (1999). "Cognitive Assessment of Students’ Problem Solvingand Program Development Skills." Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (3), 317-326.13. Jensen, C, & Helsel, J. D. Fundamentals of Engineering Drawing, Second Edition. New York, McGraw-HillBook Company (1985). Page 6.201.12 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001
technologies inengineering, and design for extreme (and extraterrestrial) habitats. Innovative activities includeusing drones for aerial photography and mapping, identifying tension and compression loads bybuilding a 3D bridge model, tours to Purdue’s innovative research facilities, reviewing theinfrastructure around them and proposing novel improvements, and participating in activities inthe classroom like debates about autonomous vehicle and jigsaw activities. The authorsanticipate similar programs could be instituted at universities and not-for-profits across thecountry to expose diverse students to civil engineering as a career and to the complex, multi-dimensional problems civil engineers get to solve every day. In addition to the means
coursework areas.The combination of these factors can adversely affect the proper selection of an academicdiscipline of study that will provide a stable and satisfying long-term career.Research has indicated that students who are most likely to choose engineering majors andcomplete degree requirements are those who hold positive perceptions toward engineering, haveself-efficacy for the study of engineering, and have interests in science and technology.5, 6, 7, 8 Onthe flip side, lack of confidence in student’s abilities to complete an engineering degree, negativeimpressions of engineering, and little or no enjoyment in studying mathematics and science leadstudents to avoid selecting an engineering major or withdrawing from engineering studies.5, 6
building a model of engineering accreditation for the area.IntroductionEngineering for the Americas (EftA)2 started as a grass roots initiative uniting engineeringeducation organizations, government agencies, professional organization, accreditation agencies,universities and industries, endorsed by the Organization of American States (OAS) in the LimaDeclaration of 20043. EftA is headquartered at the Organization of American States inWashington DC, USA. In 2004, in its Science, Technology, engineering and Innovation forDevelopment: A vision for the Americas in the Twenty First Century5, the OAS cited severaltimes the usefulness of regional accreditation for the mobility of students. The OAS held thefirst Engineering for the Americas Symposium in
Paper ID #8249Exploring Engineering in China in a Global and Societal ContextProf. Keith W Buffinton, Bucknell University Keith W. Buffinton is Dean of the College of Engineering and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Tufts and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford. Following his graduate studies, he worked as a post-doctoral researcher in the Institute for Mechanics at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland. From 2001 through 2004 he served as co-director of Bucknell’s Institute for Leadership in Technology and Management and
&M Engineering Abstract:In the evolving landscape of education, the integration of technology in laboratory learning ispivotal. Traditional lab settings, while foundational, are often hindered by constraints such ascost, accessibility, and safety. This proposal explores the transformative potential of UnrealEngine, a state-of-the-art game engine, in crafting virtual simulations for advanced education labassignments. We present two case studies highlighting Unreal Engine's efficacy in enrichingeducational experiences and propose a dynamic showcase at the ASEE conference todemonstrate this innovative technology. Case Study 1: Nuclear Reactor Pulse SimulationOur first venture
Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, FL 33431 Zhuang@fau.eduAbstractWe report on a multi-year project to use engineering capstone designs to aid elderly and personswith disabilities; and to enhance undergraduate engineering education through multidisciplinarycollaboration and hands-on experience. In their capstone project, students utilize and adaptavailable technologies to create devices to assist persons with disabilities from the users’perspective. To this end, at the first course of the Engineering Design sequence, students are firstreferred to healthcare facilities and local schools that host students with learning disabilities inorder to gather information
department at Lamar University. Since joining Lamar in 1998, he has taught over 12 different courses including management, quality and economics. His research interests include six sigma, facility layout and risk management. Dr. Underdown is the academic advisor of the Industrial Technology academic program at Lamar. He has been a member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers since 1996. Dr. Underdown consults small businesses in the areas of strategic planning, process improvement, and lean manufacturing.Dr. Qin Qian, Lamar University Qin Qian EDUCATION Ph.D. Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Feb., 2008 Dissertation: Solute exchange with sub-aqueous sediments: hydrodynamic interactions with
. At theend, the student would not be in a position to start designing a space ship, but he or she should be able tounderstand why they are designed the way they are. The title of the course was “Faster and Higher: TheRomance and Reality of Space Flight.” The objectives of the course were as follows: 1. Impart a basic knowledge of the capabilities and limitations of scientific inquiry and technological development. 2. Provide an understanding of the relationship between romantic or visionary ideas of space flight and its practical realities. 3. Provide a practical quantitative understanding of the basic scientific and engineering principles of space flight and the limitations they impose
. At theend, the student would not be in a position to start designing a space ship, but he or she should be able tounderstand why they are designed the way they are. The title of the course was “Faster and Higher: TheRomance and Reality of Space Flight.” The objectives of the course were as follows: 1. Impart a basic knowledge of the capabilities and limitations of scientific inquiry and technological development. 2. Provide an understanding of the relationship between romantic or visionary ideas of space flight and its practical realities. 3. Provide a practical quantitative understanding of the basic scientific and engineering principles of space flight and the limitations they impose
Proceedings of 2017 St. Lawrence section of the American Society for Engineering Education & the New York Cyber Security & Engineering Technology Association COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACROSS DISCIPLINES: ENGINEERING WITHIN THE SERVICE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Edward T. Davis, M.S., R.A.: Queensborough Community College, CUNY Tony Monahan, PhD: Queensborough Community College, CUNYAbstract Working within an interdisciplinary service learning environment fosters informationsharing; donning those “many hats” by incorporating contributions of all participatingdisciplines. The “Tiger Trails” project was designed to facilitate collaboration between facultyand students in different departments
-pandemic phase, early-pandemic phase, and full-pandemic phase). It also addresses necessary pedagogical changescoupled with adequate technological advancements which improved the projects despite the newpandemic-imposed constraints.What follows are sections on Previous Work and Justification that justify experiential learning,group learning, project-based learning (PBL), and online learning methods, then, CurricularContext, Curricular Changes due to the Pandemic, Comparative Analysis of Engineering DesignProjects, and Summary and Conclusions.2. Previous Work and Justification This section provides a short review of developments of an experientially-basededucational continuum from its early justifications to online implementations. Modern
Paper ID #38395Anti-Racism Practice in Engineering: Exploring, Learning &Solutions (ARPELS)Kenneth A Connor (Professor Emeritus) Kenneth Connor is an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engi-neering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photonics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. He learned
University’s First- Year Engineering Program with the Network for Nanotechnology (NCN) Educational Research team, the Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) Educational Research team, and a few fellow STEM education graduates for an obtained Discovery, Engagement, and Learning (DEAL) grant. Prior to attending Purdue University, she graduated from Arizona State University with her B.S.E. in Engineering from the College of Technology and Innovation, where she worked on a team conducting research on how students learn LabVIEW through Disassemble, Analyze, Assemble (DAA) activities.Dr. Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville Dr. Angela Thompson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the
, and hy-flex classroom teaching.Dr. Jack Bringardner, New York University Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is also an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department where he teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is the Director of Vertically Integrated Projects at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on Smart Cities Technology with a focus on transportation. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based cur- riculum, first-year
Paper ID #33049”The Road Less Travelled”: Engineering With Vulnerable CommunitiesThrough NGOsDr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Undergraduate Programs at the Col- orado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Sci- entists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University Press of America, 2005
pursue 3rd Offset technologies for strategic advantageWhy it Matters for Tomorrow• Many members care deeply about national security but are less familiar with engineering role in supporting DOD and the defense industrial base through research and workforce dev.• Highlight concerns over large technological investments by adversaries –Engineering support is essential to keeping US superiority and protecting the warfighterInfrastructureOutlook• President pushing major package, proposal expected to have no research and no clear funding source• Democrats want more federal investment and Congressional Republicans are still skeptical about push• Likely will be focus of hearings and legislative activity but prospects for completed deal are lowWhy it
Formorethanhalfacentury,researchersandeducatorshavegrappledwiththephenomenaofgenderinequitiesinvariousSTEMdomains(science,technology,engineering,andmathematics).WhileallstudentscontinuetoshowdecreasedinterestinSTEMbeginninginthemiddleschoolyearsandcontinuingbeyond,thiscrisisisaffectinggirlsdisproportionatelytoboys[iii,v]. 1 Further,thiscrisisisaffectinggirlsdifferentlyacrossthevariousdisciplinesandsub-disciplinesofSTEM[ii].Avarietyoffactors,fromsocietalstereotypestofamilialexpectationsandeducationalstructures,contributetothisdecreaseingirls’STEMengagement,resultinginnotonlydecreasedmotivationthroughouttheirschoolyearsbutinanunder
AC 2009-864: CONNECTOR FACULTY: A FRIENDLY FACE FOR EARLYENGINEERING STUDENTSDaina Briedis, Michigan State University Dr. DAINA BRIEDIS is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of
Session 3260 CQI IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERS: Dynamics, Obligations and Myths S. Y. Eidgahy, Ph.D Jefferson Community College ABSTRACT: Professional development or continuing education of practicing engineers hasbecome paramount to our international competitiveness. Whether such educational efforts aredirected at learning new technologies and processes; simply updating existing skills andknowledge, or even completely retraining engineers for new careers; training is now an integralengineering activity. That is why this issue must be under constant
Division and is currently the Editor and Treasurer of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal. She received her B.S. from Missouri State University, and M.S. and Ph.D. from Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Convergent Validity Study of the Engineering Graphics Concept InventoryIntroductionThis paper is a work in progress describing the ongoing assessment of the validity of theEngineering Graphics Concept Inventory. The Engineering Graphics Concept Inventory (EGCI)was the first instrument developed with the intent of measuring understanding andmisconceptions in the area of engineering graphics. As technology and methods continue
communities-in-need typically focus on creating,implementing, and optimizing innovative technologies that can be universally applied to thedeveloping world. Many of the technological design assumptions are based upon the provider’svalues and cultural experience, and often disregard the conditions and context of the recipientcommunity. This mindset is exacerbated by the characteristic isolation that engineeringeducation maintains with regard to non-technical disciplines such as anthropology, communityhealth, and social development. A year-long course at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, currently in is third year and working with its third community, breaks theisolationism of engineering thinking by combining undergraduate and graduate
planning to start engineering at Loyola University Chicago (LUC), the new Director decidedto integrate social justice with engineering in the curriculum. This decision seemed a naturalextension of Jesuit universities’ emphasis on social justice. LUC’s BS Engineering Scienceprogram began the following year in August, 2015.BackgroundIn his 1968 survey for ASEE, Liberal Learning for the Engineer, Sterling Olmsted counted 93engineering schools that had initiated programs in liberal studies in the last three years. By 1973,as a result of this report, almost 200 technical colleges experimented with curricula to address thesocial implications of technology. Two curricular approaches included “humanizing”engineering through interdisciplinary education and