freshmen and transfer students; 2) creating andmaintaining advisement records and academic plans for advisees; and 3) actively participatingin student orientation, recruitment, and retention activities. In addition to these responsibilities,the advisor / mentor teaches a freshman orientation course. The individual who has theresponsibility for this position must create an atmosphere where students fill comfortable enoughto openly communicate. The advisor’s availability is another key factor that enhances theeffectiveness of the retention process. Even though a position has been created specifically forretention, doesn’t forfeit the responsibilities of other faculty, staff, and/or administrators’responsibilities to the department or university to
Coalition grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF), theseworkshops presented several FED modules developed by NJIT and invited other colleges to re-develop the FED modules. At the workshop, I presented a plan to pilot FED at Essex CountyCollege (ECC) 6. After piloting FED at ECC in the fall 1998 semester, I presented somepreliminary results at a conference held at NJIT in January 1999 7. This paper presents somepreliminary results from the pilot in the fall 1998 and spring 1999 semesters at ECC.2. What Is Covered in FED?Some schools have taught FED to freshmen as an integrated package. For example, NJIT offersFED 101 Fundamentals of Engineering Design I 4, which includes engineering graphics,computer-aided design (CAD), and a design project
limited educational applicationfor teachers and students.An appropriate engineering activity integrated into regular school curriculum can have two majorresults: first, teachers become able to see how engineering can compliment and tie togethertraditional classroom content. When shown how engineering and computer science content canfit into existing lesson plans, teachers become more ready to use the this material, which enrichesstudents’ educational experiences. The second major result of integrating engineering activitiesis that students are shown how engineering relates theoretical science, mathematics, socialstudies, and language arts material being taught. Quite simply, engineering often providesrelevance to students, a factor often lost in
roles, (c) sharing the objective of the research – to identify how girls explore andcome to know engineering profession (what is seen, heard, and discovered), (d) brainstormingideas and research methods and (e) planning data collection. Exploration was encouraged,however, a timeframe and general timeline was agreed upon.Data CollectionAt the Engineering Career Expo held on the researcher’s university campus, all participants’tape-recorded their interviews with company representatives as well as their own personalcomments and observations. To assure the participants are familiar with the purpose of the Expoand floor layout of event including the locations of the companies, background materials aboutthe event were reviewed in advance. I served as
concepts prior to the recitation sessions;iii) efficiency of lecture class time—rather than constructing the notes on the board or overhead Page 7.1015.1the lecture instructor spent class time emphasizing certain details in the notes, offering alternateexplanations, elaborating on subtleties, and connecting the notes to experience. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationWe recognized during the planning stages of the course that this method of delivery wouldprovide some opportunities for
). In line with ABET criteria, itwas decided to develop programming courses which address the unique, specific needs ofET students. Unlike Information Technology or Computer Science students, ET studentsneed to understand hardware and interface issues associated with programming andsoftware development. In addition, it was planned that these courses be structured tobetter prepare RIT’s ET students for success in courses taken later in their programsequence.In June of 2000, the author was assigned responsibility for the development and initialteaching of a three-course C++ technical programming sequence. The courses were to beinitially presented in the classroom environment but that distance learning versions wouldsubsequently be offered.At
that are then downloaded to the robotcontroller via an infrared link. The third phase of this project is a demonstration of each team’srobot. On the demonstration day, the teams show how their robots perform their assignments in theEngineering and Technology Building’s main lobby. In this way, not only students taking thecourse, but also other students, faculty, and staff have the opportunity to appreciate the projects.Teams are also required to write a project journal and a final report (on a web page) that describesthe planning, design, building, programming, testing, and demonstration of the robot. They areasked to include pictures and diagrams of their robots and programs
and faculty to take the first stepto utilize the software in their classes and class work, thereby leveraging the advantages of thispowerful and highly visual CAD system. Subsequently, the intent was to encourage widespreaduse of solid modeling, not only in CAD-based classes requiring creation of technical geometryand/or engineering drawings, but also in other technical classes, non-technical classes or anyexercises, requiring tools for geometry, display, animation, and/or web content creation. Based onthe initial 4-year plan, ultimate success will be indicated when solid modeling use among facultyand students becomes as ubiquitous as spreadsheet use is now.This paper constitutes a follow-up report on the continuation of that initial effort
Different Action Modes FACT FINDER FOLLOW THROUGH QUICK START IMPLEMENTER probe structure invent build define coordinate risk fix calculate arrange challenge practice specify plan originate construct prove budget devise demonstrate evaluate integrate reform form formalize consolidate improvise
-topics mentioned (55 in this case), but they wereconsidered minor topics due to their infrequent mention.The remaining topic areas had several sub-topics also, but essentially none with multiplementions. However, further clarification is in order for most of them. The topic area ofHardware: architecture & circuits included such sub-topics as computer hardware andarchitecture, computer storage, and hardware fundamentals. The topic area of User advocacyincluded the sub-topics of user need identification and analysis, system life cycles, applicationintegration, and seeing things from the user’s perspective.The topic area of Enterprise topics included enterprise resource planning, outsourcing, advancedword processing and spreadsheets, and
library collection. Given the savingsthat was realized when the IHS database was cancelled, the additional reference staff timerequired to monitor the orders generated by the ILI database is acceptable. Typically, the staffspends less than fours a month on ILI database orders.The money that is left over in the standards account each year will be available to thescience/engineering reference unit for current or future purchases. This year the library plans tospend the money in purchasing current ‘hot issues’ standards such as those that deal withlifelines, structural integrity, and anything else that may be pertinent to the issues presented bythe events of September 11. In addition, the teaching faculty will be asked to identify standardsthat will
demonstrated level of performance in most cases. As aresult, this rubric would result in prohibitive levels of effort on the part of an instructor if theinstructor had to determine the level of mastery demonstrated by each student.The second issue, that of course level assessment, has been discussed in the literatureconsiderably in recent years. It is critical for the formation of any meaningful plan for thecontinuous improvement of our courses, as well as being a crucial portion of the programassessment required by ABET. Many assessment instruments have been discussed in theliterature4 and their advantages and disadvantages have been weighed. A number of schoolshave considered student portfolios as a tool for documenting student achievement of
receive classroom instruct ion, meetregularly with faculty members—known in the program as mentors—spend long hours in thefield, and work closely with teammates to develop a solution to the team’s project.Students make 3 presentations to their clients; the final presentation is open to the public. Thepresentations routinely take up to 1 hour, both for delivery of information and for exchanges withthe client. Teams are also responsible for 3 technical reports: a project plan developing thestrategy the students intend to follow to solve their assigned problem; a component breakdown inwhich individual students discuss their particular area of expertise within the larger project; and afinal report, detailing the team’s analysis, actions, and
accreditation, with the caveat that students must improvetheir ability to select appropriate outcomes. Both universities are planning to continue theirassessment processes using EnableOA. Page 6.125.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education1. IntroductionIn theory, educational research shows that measurement of educational outcomes can be used toimprove curricula by providing information about which educational goals are being met andwhich are not. Research also shows that in practice, the measurement of educational outcomes isoften
hiring entry-level engineers. A coupleof sample student resumes for John N. Gine and Sally R. Tide are included with the module, sothat students can compare what John or Sally have to offer with what may be required in anentry-level position. An active learning exercise is given to plan for the types of professionaldevelopment John or Sally need to be more competitive in the job market. The students areasked to go through a similar exercise with their own resume and begin to plan their own careerdevelopment.Additional MaterialThe instructor’s guide describes the three class periods, active learning exercises, and homeworkassignments discussed above in much greater detail. It concludes with a discussion of gradingrubrics for in-class and homework
programs were required to have an assessment plan to measure theeffectiveness of the programs. This has been replaced by criteria 2 and 3 of the EC2000.Criterion 2 requires that each program to have educational objectives that are consistent with themission of the institution and EC2000. These objectives should address one or more needs ofone or more constituencies. Furthermore, the objectives are understandable by the constituencyaddressed.After approving the educational objectives of a program, educators are required by ABET criteria3 to establish the program outcomes. The outcomes should describe an area of knowledge that aperson can possess, be stated such that a student can demonstrate before graduation, and besupportive of one or more
definition of the required additional outputs at the design reviews in the IMC 900 and IMC 906 (Design Project I and II courses), and the production of templates for the planning of the major design project activities for the conceptual design stage and for the preliminary design stage of the PDP.ConclusionsAs the project to unify the approaches to engineering design unfolds, the advantages to futurestudents become obvious. The benefits to the Faculty members involved in the supervision ofthe major design project are clear: a better understanding of each other discipline and anincreased confidence in the supervision of the design of complex systems. It is also clear that theproject will not come to an end with the implementation of the
containingdetailed instructions is posted on the NSERC Web site.Review ProceduresAll eligible applications will be sent out for external review. A Selection Panel, comprised ofdesign experts from academia and industry, will rank the proposals and make the finalrecommendations to NSERC.Selection CriteriaApplications will be evaluated on the basis of the quality of the candidate, the impact of theuniversity design strategy, and the relevance and creativity demonstrated by the action plan inachieving the program goals. Detailed criteria are described in the program’s Guide forApplicants posted on the NSERC Web site. Page 7.628.8 Proceedings of the 2002
can request a PDA to personally use. Faculty whoteach the introduction to computing course that all freshmen must take are highly encouraged touse a PDA. Instructors can also sign out additional PDAs, folding keyboards, GPS modules,camera expansion modules, and wireless ethernet modules for classroom projects, exercises, anddemonstrations. The department has also set up a wireless network so that students in computingcourses can access the school’s local area network and the Internet wirelessly. The department’swireless network is part of the school’s plan to eventually interconnect the entire campus via awireless network.3. Motivation Despite the fact that all freshmen have PDAs, we found that, for the most part, thefreshmen were
Session 1620 Incorporating laptop computers into the classroom takes more planning on the part of theinstructor and makes classroom management more challenging. Given the potential distractionthat the computer can create, the instructor must be well prepared to present a smooth, coherentlesson. There are two different approaches to the use of the computers in the classroom that havebeen discussed in detailed articles lately. In the approach adopted by Poindexter at NMU, shecut down on the amount of lecture, but did not have students focus 100% of their attention to thecomputer screen.2 The instructors at the University of Kentucky opted to modify their teachingformat by presenting all of the notes, discussion and problems through the
students in teamwork and leadership skills, so that they can conduct themselves in the work place according to Biblical principles, function well in project teams, communicate honestly and effectively, plan, schedule, and accomplish tasks effectively, and with experience assume increasing levels of responsibility.• To familiarize students with state-of-the-art engineering equipment and methods, so that they are able to design appropriate experiments including data acquisition and analysis, to select and specify appropriate laboratory procedures, to utilize and develop appropriate software tools, and to interpret computer output wisely
curriculum characteristics, and lessons Page 7.1135.1 “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”learned. The paper also provides examples of AE curricula and touches on assessmentresults.Adventure Based CurriculumIn response to the well-chronicled science and mathematics skill deficiencies in ournations primary and secondary school students, the National Science EducationStandards2 recommended that teachers of science should plan an inquiry-based scienceprogram for their students, guide and facilitate learning
business, industry, orgovernment experience is required to become eligible for admission into this graduate programand documentation of this substitutes for the typically required GRE or GMAT score. Inaddition, all of the School’s other graduate admission criteria, e.g., 3.0 minimum GPA; must bemet.Evaluation DesignThe evaluation plan for the Weekend Masters Degree Program (WMP) is based on a synthesis oftwo powerful evaluation models, namely the Context-Input-Process-Product (CIPP) byStufflebeam (2000) and 360° evaluation. Key principles from each model served to shape theevaluative design evolved by the authors and overviewed in Figure 1. Additionally, becausemultiple cohorts existed, and because they formed an overlapping time series, the
Perry´s Model, with important savings in classroom time.The Experimental Methodology was initially applied in Aeronautical Estructures at the UTN,and according with the results was expanded to Mechanical and Civil Estructures in the UM.During 1999 the Argentine Federal Counsel of Deans of Engineering Schools (CONFEDI),adopted a similar criteria of the ABET 2000, in the Manual for Acreditation of EngineeringCareers.Regarding the Laboratories, this Manual recommends that students must acquire aptitudes to:design and improve components, systems and processes, plan and conduct investigations andexperiments on their own, analyzing and expounding the results, stressing teamwork, whichmatch the objectives of the Experimental Method.After three years
the firsttime armed with only a packet of lecture notes and a recollection of the professors that they hadfound to be most engaging and a vague plan for emulating them. In a situation such as this,material coverage and mere survival become classroom priorities. It is easy for new faculty tooverly concentrate on the academic content of each lecture, not concerning themselves with thecontext in which the classroom resides. Comfortably and confidently creating a dynamic learningenvironment takes more than just command of course material. To be happy and effective in theclassroom, new faculty need to address two issues outside of the classroom: how teaching fitswith personal priorities and career goals, and how teaching is valued and supported in
other mechanics courses(energy methods, stress concentrations, failure criteria, torsion of non-circular shafts, etc.) can beincorporated into this course where appropriate. The authors discuss plans for the integration ofthe course into the required mechanics course sequence, as well as opportunities for inclusion offinite element analysis in subsequent courses.I. IntroductionFinite element analysis (FEA) gained widespread use in specific industries, most notably theaerospace industry, in the 1960’s and 70’s. A mainframe computer was required to run theprograms, so the use of FEA was generally restricted to larger companies. The role of the stressanalyst was fairly specialized. Finite element models typically required days or weeks to
Fall Term 2000 – student activities launched at 11 high schools • November 2000 – mid-year sharing/assessment meeting Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationIV. Description of Key ActivitiesThe thirteen teams met at UDM in August 2000 to plan the fall term’s activities. The teams developedtheir own activities depending on student/teacher needs, interests, and team member expertise. Thisbrainstorming session resulted in an ambitious list of activities. Activities that were executed or initiatedduring the term included the following: • Engineering laboratory demonstrations • Small-scale
in mind the ABET 2000 requirements, in 1996 a group offaculty representing the five engineering programs at that time, worked together to plan fornew introductory engineering courses. The outcome of their efforts resulted in two three-credit freshman courses, ENGS115 and ENGS116. It is noteworthy to mention that 1996was not the first time that the School of Engineering had attempted to have freshmanintroductory courses. Orientation courses were introduced six years earlier, but did notreceive favorable ratings, and consequently, were dropped from the curriculum a few yearslater. The poor acceptance of these courses was mainly due to the large classes, the pass/failgrading method, the fact that it was zero credit, and the lack of hands-on
and students. The problem, again, is that these are soscattered, it is difficult to track the appropriate ones from a designated source. This paper willpresent general information on research sources and will mostly focus on research fundingsources for civil engineering faculty who are interested in doing research in the civil engineeringand related construction technologies. For the field of civil engineering alone, research fundingareas include geotechnical, transportation engineering and planning, land surveying and Page 6.516.1Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright
. Potential applications of process design Application Need Peak-load use at electrical power plants Cleaner burning fuel. Lack of safe, aboveground storage near populated regions of country. Storage and transport of natural gas from If national goal to produce seafloor hydrates future ocean-floor gas hydrate production realized by 2015, means to transport produced gas to shore is needed. Storage and transport of natural gas from Deepwater production that is planned lacks