each outcome will be calculated based on theinstructor’s opinion of how rigorously an outcome was assessed in any given assignment.Having determined outcome scores for each student, a table similar to Table 4 will be generated,with final class grades determined based on weighted averages of all the outcomes. The syllabuswill reflect this new grading scheme. Page 9.977.10 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Student name
Savannah and without having tomatriculate to the Georgia Tech – Atlanta campus. As a result of partnering with Georgia Techfor engineering programs, Savannah State has had to undergo an extensive curriculum reviewand modification to develop new courses and revamp existing courses that reflect the samecontent and rigor as those that are offered on the Georgia – Tech Atlanta campus. One of thecourses developed and taught at the Savannah State campus is Introduction To EngineeringAnalysis (ENGR 1113). ENGR1113 is pre-calculus with an emphasis on an engineeringproblems oriented approach. At SSU we use this course as the gateway into the engineering andengineering technology majors. Along with other indicators, this course is an excellent measureof
fundamental conceptsand equations, but also to understand the flexibility of the design space and iterate their designuntil an acceptable solution is found. The increased flexibility and level of difficulty require adeeper level of understanding from the students and thus these projects have become an essentialpart of an undergraduate engineering education. The scope and difficulty of design problems progress as the student progresses throughhis education. Individual design problems emphasize and amplify the engineering skillsaddressed in classroom lectures and readings. While typically assigned as homework problemsto allow students to reflect and iterate on their design, in the interest of time and efficiency manystudents work together to
design course. The capstone course is a summary and reflection ofthe whole undergraduate curriculum. Therefore, internationalizing this course has special significance.The effort on this course will serve as the basis for discussion and exploration for internationalizing othercourses. In addition, it is reasonable to assume that engineering schools in different countries have somecommon requirements and expectations for graduating mechanical engineers, and some common practiceto achieve these requirements. There are some common practices in this course, including centering ofthe course around a capstone design project, organization of the students into design teams, and therequirement for team presentation and defense of their design at the end
Bederson, Benjamin, Shneiderman, Ben,"The Craft of Information Visualization: Readings and Reflections", Morgan Kaufmann, (2003). 5 Brown, Mark, Jung, John, Salova, Tom, “Using HTML” , Que Corporation, (1996). 6 Homer, Alex, Sussman, Dave, Francis, Brian, “Active Server Pages 3.0” Wrox Press, (1999). 7 Stephens, Ryan K., “Sams’ Teach Yourself SQL in 24 hours”, Sams Publishing, (1998). 8 Ulrich, Katherine, “Macromedia Flash for Windows & Macintosh”, Peachpit Press, (2002).BiographyCHRIS DILORENZOChris Dilorenzo is currently a masters student of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University ofOklahoma. His research work focuses on online information management system development and implementation.He
events, such as a bank account balance or availability ofa library book. As the status of these entities change, an OLTP system must update the databaseto reflect these changes so that the database always represents a snapshot of the current state ofthe world. On the other hand, an online analytical processing (OLAP) system is a database thatkeeps track of historical data and processes more complicated queries involving summaries andtrends rather than individual entities. Table 1 summarizes the two systems.A data warehouse is a common OLAP system in use today. Retail stores use them to keep trackof buying trends. This enables them to stock inventory more accurately. The NationalBasketball Association uses a system called Advanced Scout to record
) Machine Design I (4)Adv. Mechanics of Materials (4) Machine Design II (4)Engineering Design A major component of any engineering program is engineering design.The ELME program has a sequence of five design courses for a total of eighteen credits thatthread throughout the program and constitute approximately 10% of the coursework. Bycomparison, the courses designated design, or contained design in the catalog description, in theEE or ME programs make up no more than eight credits or 6% of these majors. This difference issignificant and reflects the importance that Wentworth places on engineering design. ELME EE MEIntro to Engineering
complexity of the required analyses increased throughout the semester, reflecting new topicscovered in class. For example, risk and uncertainty were introduced through several investmentopportunities. The distinction between risk and uncertainty is that “risk” describes a situation inwhich multiple outcomes are possible but the probability of each is known. Risk was introducedinto the game through examples such as this: A gold mine produces $500 of revenue per turn, starting the turn it is purchased, and continuing for an unknown period determined as follows. Each turn, the owner of the gold mine must roll two six-sided dice. If the total of the two dice is seven, the mine “craps out;” it yields $500 that turn but is
$2000 restriction was to create an examplefor which students would be rationing limited capital, regardless of their bank balance at thatparticular point. Other “fixed-price” investment opportunities introduced later included pirateships, fishing boats, and ice cream trucks. Such examples were important to the game becausethey meant every student would definitely have the opportunity to make investments- relying oncompetitive auctions was not a necessity.The complexity of the required analyses increased throughout the semester, reflecting new topicscovered in class. For example, risk and uncertainty were introduced through several investmentopportunities. The distinction between risk and uncertainty is that “risk” describes a situation inwhich
freestanding programs within newlyemerging colleges of computing.Information technology, as it is practiced at this moment in its evolution, reflects similar growingpains. IT programs exist in colleges of computing, in CS departments, in schools of technology,and in business schools. Professors of information technology possess degrees in informationsystems, electronics, communications, graphics arts, economics, mathematics, computer science,and other disciplines. Few to none of them have a degree in information technology.Procedure for Deciding on an IT CurriculumThe participants of CITC-1 participated in a Delphi study. A Delphi study is characterized byquestions being asked of experts, who then respond freely to them. Their responses to
associated with product and service design,manufacturing, and support, engineers are being called upon to a much greater extent to performthe what-to-do functions that drive technology innovation and fill the front-end of the design-product-service pipeline.” 1Development of the new industrial and entrepreneurial engineering programIn 2006, the faculty initiated a complete review of the IE program. It was decided that no courseor topic was off limits. The objective was to completely revise the IE program and put in place acurriculum that would meet the needs of future graduates. After several meetings and retreats, thefaculty agreed that the new IE curriculum should have the following features: 1. Change the name of the program to reflect the
, using a textthat is internationally recognized and implemented is invaluable to our students.Finally, the SEBoK is available to all of our students online, free of charge. With the rising costof tuition and fees associated with post-secondary education, it is nice to offer students a reprievein the cost of their textbooks. A quick on-line search of some of the top systems engineeringtexts reveal that the cost of a new systems engineering text is in excess of $100, with severalbooks in excess of $150. Also, the fact that the SEBoK is available online offers numerousbenefits. It is accessible anywhere, anytime a student has internet access. It is regularly updatedto reflect the latest processes and techniques important to the implementation of
ACload and either high current load or low current load, etc. To complete the design and the lab,students will be given the options to combine the solar panel control box (as seen in Figure 5)and the wind energy control box (as seen in Figure 2) to emulate the control logic and strategiesbased on the power input and output of the renewable system. Students are encouraged toincorporate virtual instrument (LabView) into their lab design to either display the readings inreal-time or animate the stored readings. Figure 5. solar energy control box B. Fuel cell labIn the course, the fuel cell was first introduced as an alternative energy resource for electricvehicle. The lab was designed to reflect this idea and to
ininterviews that they can influence students to pursue science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) degrees after high school. The research team created a survey to see if a broader sampleof teachers would agree that teachers can influence students to study STEM after high school.The survey listed 18 items that might influence students to study STEM in college.Unbeknownst to respondents, each item reflected one of three factors: 1) teacher instruction andadvising 2) student proclivity, and 3) student traits. The survey was completed by 215 teachers,who identified student proclivity as most influential in students’ decisions whether to pursueSTEM majors in college, followed by teacher instruction & advising. The authors thendistributed a
-BIM teaching Page 24.459.10method.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1140941. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Kelly,W. E. (2008). “General education for civil engineers: Sustainable development.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practices, 134(1), pp. 73-83.2. Kim, J.-L. (2012). “Use of BIM for effective visualization teaching approach in construction education,” Journal of
should note that participation is a somewhat crude measure of student engagement with online materials since it reflects only initiation of an activity. Performance for the purposeof this study was measured by the total score on exam problems. At School S, exams constitute75% of the final grade, while OLI quizzes are 10%; at School P, exams constitute 85% of thefinal grade, while OLI quizzes are 7.5%. Data on students’ participation and course performancehad been collected for the corresponding statics classes in Fall 2012 and for Fall 2013. Due to time constraints performance data from only Fall 2012 have been included in this paper. Data from students who took all exams
98%. Responses from all57 responses were tabulated in the Results section. Percentages and total number of respondents Page 24.487.3are noted to reflect response rates.The majority of the respondents were university students (83%, n = 29), particularly advancedPhD students expecting to graduate in 2013 or 2014 (57%, n = 20). Respondents self-identifiedas follows: 1 self-identified as a PhD student and faculty/staff; 21 classified themselves as PhDstudents; 2 self-identified as PhD and masters students; and 3 as masters students. The remainingstudent sample consisted of 2 undergraduate students and 1 high school student. Fivefaculty/staff also
thiscoming spring for 200 ninth-grade students at the Downingtown STEM Academy. The projectwill focus on educating students about the function of the data center in their everyday lives andthe energy consumption issues that are central to the design of next-generation data centers.Throughout this learning process students will be asked to research and develop new andinnovative ways of addressing the issue. Student teams will present their responses to theessential question in progressively more detailed methods to garner feedback for reflection,revision, and further study. The culminating submission will be a video documentary developed,filmed, and edited by the team. These presentations will be included in a grade-wide live andonline showcase of
. Engineering Camp is institutionally supported and instructedprimarily by faculty from the College of Engineering at Bucknell.This program provides the opportunity to deliver more than an expanded and enhanced versionof the typical one-day outreach program; it affords more time for student-instructor interactionand gives students time to reflect on their on-campus experiences and what they have learned.Currently, few high school programs are properly equipped to conduct educational laboratoriesthat introduce students to topics in engineering and technology. Because Engineering Camp is adynamic program with annual topical changes, students can (and are expected to) repeat theexperience. Also, because the topical sessions are targeted to the audience
rated thediscussion as shown in Table 2. Both sets of feedback reflect positively on the session.One of the results of this panel discussion was to point out that while the cultural perception ofthe different fields are often quite diverse in practice there are similarities to build upon. Theparticipants discussed related concepts such as determining the need for new projects to benefithumanity versus developing the design of such projects. While clearly related, the differencesbetween the knowledge, skill sets, and problem solving approaches of the two sides pointed outthat serious communication issues can develop. It is possible that while working toward thesame goal, the different paradigms of the two sides could lead them to
the measurements necessary to validate a hypothesis, and Page 24.520.2examine the uncertainty and repeatability of the experimental data. The name of the course waschanged from Thermal Fluids Lab I, to Engineering Measurements Laboratory to reflect thisadditional focus. The enhancements to Engineering Measurements Lab provide more extensivepreparation for higher-level courses where students are responsible for modeling a physicalsystem, designing an experimental test facility, and comparing empirical and theoretical results.Technical communication skills are often cited as one of the most desirable hiring criteria forgraduates of engineering
current RMU- designated benchmark for class performance is 80%).Reflection: It can be seen from Figure 7 that the class performance in this course is above the RMU- designated benchmark (at least 80% students in the class score >= 80%) in applicable ABET outcomes 1, 3, 5, and 7. ABET Outcome 8 was not assessed at this time.4.4 ABET Track-Specific OutcomesThe following track-specific outcomes are identified for this course: M2: RMU Graduates have proficiency in process assembly, and product engineering and understand the design of products and the equipment, tooling and environment necessary for their manufacture. M4: RMU Graduates have an ability to design manufacturing systems
closely collaborate with industry. Industry has participatedin this collaboration in two key ways: hosting tours during the summer program and sponsoringprojects. The site visits to companies in Singapore are a highlight of the program. Students areable to observe best practices in design, testing, and manufacturing that provides context for theirdesign efforts and exposes them to additional company/industry design perspectives.Industry partners also gain exposure to students and faculty through the sponsored projects andtours that enable them to reflect on and articulate their own practice. Although the quality ofproject outcomes has varied (as it always does with student projects) the industrial sponsors arepleased with the results. In addition
) conference. (He was also a participant in the 2003 US FOE, and the 2006 German-American FOE, conferences.) He currently serves on the Executive Council of the HFES as its Secretary-Treasurer Page 24.584.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Exploring the Development of Undergraduate Research ExperienceAbstractThis paper describes a multi-year experiential reflection process examining the development ofresearch awareness and integration for an undergraduate industrial engineering student. As asophomore, I approached the faculty
searched for “fatality only”incidents for Standard Industry Codes 8 (SIC) 15, 16, and 17 that reflect building contractors,heavy/civil contactors, and special trade contractors respectively in June 2011. The search isfiltered for incidents in a 10-year span from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2007 resulting in6379 fatality reports that contain SIC codes in the construction industry. While the reports goback to as early as 1990, between the years 1997 and 1998 the reporting method of fatalities wasmodified and more data became available after 1998.As illustrated in Figure 1, the database search results showed that Falls had the highestpercentage of fatal causes with 41%, followed by Struck by with 27%, caught-in/between with10% and electrocution
tester was instrumented as in the spinningwheel. A strip of reflecting tape was placed every 90 degrees with two pieces of tape marking afull revolution. Steel, aluminum and polypropolene were repeatedly tested to illustrate differentfailure modes as well as different shear moduli. During this test, students manually recorded Page 24.610.6torque with respect to time, while their robot collected time and revolution information. Theparticipants analyzed the data and calculated various material and mechanical properties.Figure 1: Representative Robot with attached non-contact displacement sensor (sound) androtation sensor (light). The associated
around the question: Do students’ perceptions of theflipped classroom reflect coherence in the course?Theoretical BackgroundFlipped Classroom: Though implementation of the flipped classroom varies from instructorto instructor, the model moves lecture content to be work done at home as preparation forclass while class time is used for problem solving. Typically, instructors accomplish the“flip” by using instructional technology to deliver lectures or learning modules out-of-classthrough lecture capture videos, online quizzes, educational videos (i.e. TED talks), and otheronline resources. Instructional difficulties may arise from this model: a failure to addressstudent misconceptions, poorly designed activities that require only recall
for unobtrusive research12 informed by conventionalcontent analysis13. Using this method, we examined each organization’s group name anddescription in the ASA database to identify keywords associated with working definitions ofinvolvement categories. As additional database entries were reviewed, these working definitionswere continuously revised and adapted to reflect the organizations contained within eachcategory; in some cases, new categories were developed or organizations were re-categorized toreflect emerging trends in the data. In some cases, organizations could not be categorized basedon the ASA database information alone; for these groups, the “About” section of theirorganization website was used for classification. In total, 432 of
. f3f/8-f3f/12,2002. Page 24.150.714. ABET. 2013. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2014-2015Accreditation Cycle. Available at. Accessed 1/2/2014.15. Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., Dias De Figueiredo, A., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., Schifellite, C.,Stevens, R., Svinicki, M., Trenor, J. M., and Wilson, D. 2011. Journal of Engineering Education. January. 100 (1).48-88.16. Meyers, K. L., Silliman, S. E., Gedded, N. L., and Ohland, M.W. (2010). A Comparison of EngineeringStudents’ Reflections on their First-Year Experiences. Journal of Engineering Education. April. 169-178.17
Centeredness.While enthusiasm is covered in devotion, breadth of coverage reflects in knowledge. We didnot explicitly include grading and examinations but believe that they (grading andexamination) may have impacted rating of Student Centeredness. We did not use studentself-rated learning, assignments, course difficulty and workload as that could vary based onthe courses taught by the same faculty.ProcessWe formed an award committee consisting of the head of the college, his deputy, and thehead of the Innovation Centre. The committee deliberated all the aspects of the award processand ran it by all the deans and department heads. Their feedback was taken into account tobaseline the system.The baseline system was announced to all 2879 eligible students over