pioneers in positioning design as a key contributor toinnovation. These and other creative companies are increasingly emphasizing the importance ofconnecting design to customers’ emotions and needs, and of constructing maps that show thepath to innovation. "Design Innovation" has been likewise identified as an important skill forstudents in science, technology, and engineering disciplines by national organizations like theNational Science Foundation and the National Academy of Engineering. Real-world problems are rarely defined along specific disciplinary lines and innovation oc-curs when those lines are crossed. Biological systems have always been a source of inspirationfor engineers, and many bio-inspired designs (sometimes referred to as
in Chemical Engineering from Northeastern University in 2011. In the fall of 2011, she took a position as an Assistant Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in the College of Engineering as a part of the First Year Engineering Faculty with a focus on chemical engineering. She teaches the first year courses where are Engineering Design and Engineering Problem Solving. She also teaches senior Chemical Engineering Process Controls. She runs a faculty led international summer program to Sao Paulo, Brazil which focuses on Alternative Energy Technologies and Brazilian Culture.Dr. Richard Whalen, Northeastern University Dr. Richard Whalen is a Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in Boston, MA and a core
Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. She received her B.S., MEng, and PhD degrees in chemical engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in undergraduate engineering education, and retention of engineering students. She leads a research group whose goal is to foster active interdisciplinary research which investigates learning and motivation and whose findings will inform the development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student success in engineering. Her fields
engineering student identity development and engineering student global preparedness. She completed her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University in 2014 and a certificate in Engineer- ing & Science Education in 2012. She completed her B.S in Biomedical Engineering from Michigan Technological University in 2003.Dr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college transitions and retention of underrepresented students in engineering and also research about engineering global preparedness and engineering innovation. She also has research expertise in STEM K-12 and in STEM assessment. She
reports), an underrepresented minority category, or within syllabus errata Category 2 - “Low design”– Disability used as a design constraint or requirement; tags include reference to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)3, assistive technology design projects for “people with disabilities” (sometimes shortened to “PwD”); few to no references to specific client needs, Category 3 - “High design” – Disability included as a facet of the design client (i.e., high design); tags include specific disabilities, meeting with the client, multiple references to client needs in paper Category 4 - “Perceptions and accommodations” – Disability as it relates to engineering student or faculty
and attribute, lifelong learning, seems to indicate that it is an outcome and attributeconsidered valuable for engineers and engineering education, and essentially worth the struggle.This attitude was evident in the literature when ABET first proposed lifelong learning as part ofCriterion 3, and historically, long before9,15-17. Engineering educators argue for the relevance oflifelong learning, some considering it the most important of the professional engineering skills 18due to our rapidly changing technological and global societies16,18. The necessity for engineers toadapt quickly and creatively to this swiftly moving ‘modern knowledge’ 21st century economy17requires the skills and behaviours attributed to lifelong learning. These skills
conference on Learning@ scaleconference, March, 2014, pp. 41-50.[5] M. K. Ardebili and A.M. Sadegh, A New Approach to Teaching Engineering Graphics UsingActive Learning and Product Realization, American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20-23, pp. 9.76.1-9.76.7, 2004.[6] G. Baronio, B. Motyl, P. Diego, “Technical Drawing Learning Tool‐Level 2: An interactiveself‐learning tool for teaching manufacturing dimensioning”, Computer Application inEngineering Education, vol. 24, no. 4, March, 2016.[7] V. Sriraman, J.D. Leon, “Teaching Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing in aManufacturing Program”, Journal of Industrial Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2-6, May-July1999.[8] S. A. Durham, W. M
Paper ID #30111Engineering graphics in a community-college setting: Challenges andopportunitiesDr. Hannah Dawes Budinoff, Pima Community College Hannah D. Budinoff is a researcher interested in additive manufacturing, geometric manufacturability analysis, design for manufacturing, and engineering education. She received her BS in mechanical engi- neering from the University of Arizona and recently completed her PhD in mechanical engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, where she was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Dr. Budinoff teaches CAD classes in her role as Instructional Faculty at Pima Community
) is a 5-day program offered byMissouri University of Science and Technology (Missouri S&T) to introduce high schoolstudents to various engineering disciplines. The Intro Camp occurs at three different timesduring the summer and typically attracts incoming high school juniors and seniors. The IntroCamp was established with the following goals: (1) increasing students’ knowledge of variousengineering disciplines, (2) enhancing students understanding on how math and science relate tothe field of engineering through hands-on activities, (3) introducing the educational and researchopportunities at Missouri S&T, and (4) preparing high school students for making a thought-outdecision on choosing career or disciplines they want to
that there are other approaches to this course. We describe our own “solution.” Page 12.391.2A Bit of HistoryThe computing course was introduced to the engineering curriculum sometime in the late 1950sand early 1960s. If you got your engineering degree before 1965, you probably took a Fortranprogramming class using something like an IBM 1620. You prepared your program on punchedcards and “loaded” the cards along with the operating system components onto the machine.Computing technology dramatically changed over time - from cards to terminals and magnetictapes and from 16 bit machines to 64 bit machines (mainframes). Even the programminglanguage
national security [and] economic competitiveness.”9Iowa State University’s College of Engineering is committed to the premise that tomorrow’sengineering leaders must not only be technologically savvy – they must also embrace andleverage globalization to advance engineering and economic vitality while addressing the criticalneeds of society. While there are many paths to achieve success in these areas, we have chosento create a program which offers a breadth of opportunities for today’s students.The impact of this approach has resulted in the number of engineering students at Iowa Statewith an international experience tripling within a five year period of time. With the continuedsupport and active involvement of our faculty, staff, cross-college
2006-1368: COMMUNITY BUILDING AND IDENTITY DEVELOPMENTTHROUGH GRADUATE COURSEWORK IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONHeidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University Heidi Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education (ENE) at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE). She is the chair of the ENE Graduate Committee and she is a member of the Teaching Academy at Purdue. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. from ABE in 1997. Her research interests include open-ended problem solving, evaluation of education technology, and first-year and graduate curriculum
degrees from The Citadel in1984, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1986, and The University of Texas at Austin in 1996.He served for eleven years in the United States Army Corps of Engineers. He is a member of ASEE,ASCE, and ACI. Page 8.400.9Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
Session 2661 Four Reasons for Including an Ethics Component in Engineering Classes Marilyn A. Dyrud Oregon Institute of TechnologyABET Criterion 3 requires that engineering programs pay some attention to ethics andprofessionalism. For already jam-packed curricula, however, simply adding a required ethicscourse might not be feasible.This paper examines several reasons encouraging instructors to consider an ethics across thecurriculum approach in lieu of a stand-alone course. These include acquainting students withprofessional expectations, fostering an awareness of ethics in the
offinancial and managerial accounting usually required in the business school curricula. Even thesingle combined course offered in some business schools seems too a large price to pay accordingto many engineering faculty. Since the students usually find the accounting material uninterestingand in their view, unimportant, they tend to side with the latter faculty group creating even moreimpetus for the technology driven argument to avoid the topic altogether.Of course, this is a narrow argument, which, if followed, graduates engineering students bereft ofany financial literacy and unable to understand the accounting scorecard in their eventual workorganizations. One possible solution is to identify the most critical learning objectives and deliverthem
Session 2615 The Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: The Gap Between the Blackboard and Business Marlee A. Walton Iowa State UniversityAbstract:Civil Engineering curricula have been criticized for not effectively preparing engineering studentsfor the workplace. Industry wants technically competent students who also can work as part ofteams, manage projects, communicate well and understand the economic, social and politicalcontext of their professional activities. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET), with
Session 1478 Ocean-Related Senior Design Projects for Mechanical Engineers at UMass Dartmouth1 Prof. Diane E. DiMassa Mechanical Engineering II-116, U Mass Dartmouth 285 Old Westport Rd., North Dartmouth, MA 02747 508-910-6606 ddimassa@umassd.eduAbstractThis paper discusses several ocean-related capstone design projects completed bymechanical engineering students at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. Someprojects are detailed analytical projects that involved complex simulations, others aresystems engineering projects
Session 1602 Identifying Specific, Measurable “Skills” Perceived as Requisite for Graduating Aerospace Engineers Kimble-Thom, M.A., Thom, J.M., Crossley, W.A. Purdue UniversityIntroductionIn the last 15 years engineering educators and industry practitioners have attempted to identifywhat skills a graduating engineer needs to acquire during his/her undergraduate education inorder to be successful at design activities. The efforts to identify these design skills are hamperedby both the lack of precision in the terms used to describe design skills and by the
many information technology executives who completed the survey indicated that theyroutinely overestimate by 150%, extending the project duration by a factor of 2.5, whenplanning project timelines and making commitments. By contrast, TSP teams generally reportsetting the most aggressive schedules that they believe can actually be met. Page 10.1124.8 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIn assessing the quality of products produced by TSP teams, it may be useful to
important/not important for passing the Fundamentals of Engineering Examination 2. Topic important/not important for passing the Professional Engineering Examination 3. Topic related/not related to their every day work 4. Topic learned/not learned through on job training 5. Topic learned/not learned through continuing education 6. Topic fundamental to learning related advanced topicsInput on these issues is sought from a selected group of practicing structural engineersand educators in Iowa. The paper summarizes results of this feedback.IntroductionEngineering marketplace is vastly different today than it was few decades ago. Due torapid advances in technology and globalization of engineering services there is highdemand for
engineers with less ability to solve practicalproblems. This has created an outcry from industry that engineers are not prepared for thepractical applications that define engineering in the “real world”.4Over the last several years, the concept of measuring outcomes has come to the forefront inengineering and has focused learning measurements toward more practical goals. TheAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) now requires engineering collegeprograms to develop class objectives and measures for assessing the level of achievement of thestated goals. These goals must include both technical and social measures of student growth anddevelopment and consequently require newer approaches to instruction. Few students becomeproficient
. Theengineering based labs were designed to enhance and stimulate middle school students’interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts. Lessonsare focused on increasing students’ awareness of engineering in daily tasks. Careeropportunities relating to the engineering lesson were presented. The importance ofeffective teamwork, critical thinking, problem solving, and sound technicalcommunication are emphasized. These engineering labs are available for future use bythe partner teacher and the GK-12 program.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 EducationVanderbilt-Meharry-Tennessee State Program is now in its fifth full year1. The majorfocus of this program is to partner graduate
© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2639Industrial Engineering. His research concerns operations research, AHP, economic analysis, and lean manufacturing.Prior joining to California State University, he taught at Amirkabir University of Technology over 10 years.TAREK SHRAIBATI is a full time lecturer of the Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Managementdepartment at California State University at Northridge with 17 years of full-time teaching experience in engineeringcourses. He received his M.S. degree in Materials Science from USC. Prior joining to California State University, heworked at Rocketdyne
achieved in the bread-and-butter sophomore-level Materials Science course required of all engineering majors. This two-credit course now has asone of its primary objectives that ‘The student will have an understanding of, atomic and crystalstructure and chemical bond types, and understand how these affect material properties and aspectsof nanotechnology.’ This is being achieved by supplementing the classroom lectures and text4 withguest lectures by researchers from UIUC as well as A&T’s CAMSS.Manufacturing Processes (MEEN 446)This junior-level course, required of all mechanical engineering majors, uses a textbook5 thatdevotes a chapter to small-size manufacturing technologies and discusses the two approaches ofmolecular engineering and
Integration of Electrical Engineering Core Labs with Major Design Experiences Glen E. Archer Leonard J. Bohmann Michigan Technological UniversityMotivation: Michigan Tech has taken bold steps to structure a design experience thatbegins the moment a student sets foot in the department. Michigan TechnologicalUniversity underwent a remarkable transformation as the conversion from quarters tosemesters unfolded over the 2000-2001 academic year. The Electrical and ComputerEngineering department took advantage of the opportunity to enhance the department’slaboratory experiences as well. The ECE department had followed a traditionalcurriculum model that
Session 1153 Impact of Vertically Integrated Team Design Projects on First Year Engineering Students Helen K. Qammar1, H. Michael Cheung1, Edward A. Evans1, Sandra Prettyman Spickard2, Francis S. Broadway3, Rex D. Ramsier4 Department of Chemical Engineering1/ Educational Foundations and Leadership2/ Department of Curricular and Instructional Studies3/ Departments of Physics, Chemistry, and Chemical Engineering4 The University of Akron Akron, Ohio
Session 3651 Including Service Learning In The Environmental Engineering Research Project David Pines College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture University of HartfordAbstractService learning provides a meaningful service to the community as well as a relevant learningexperience for the student. The service done by the student is linked to course outcomes andenhances the learning experience that occurs in the classroom. Service learning wasincorporated into the civil engineering curriculum at the
the laboratory experiments. It is expectedthat with this experience, the students will choose their concentration area before their junioryear, and will help coordinate future courses in the ECE Department. The laboratoryexperiments are performed in the facilities of the High-Tech Tools and Toys Laboratory, createdwith the support of NSF CenSSIS.II. EE Department BackgroundThe University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, the third largest campus of the state-owneduniversity system of Puerto Rico, homes the daily activities of about 765 faculty and almost15,000 students. According to the American Society for Engineering Education's (ASEE) 2000edition of Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges UPRM ranks 14 th in theU.S. in terms
,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition Montreal 2002.http://www.asee.org/conferences/caps/document2/2002-2039_Paper.pdf Page 8.625.8 Proceedings Of The 2003 American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education[6] Tom Morel, Rusl Flowers, Jerry Schumacher, Don Welch “Use Of Robots To TeachInformation Technology And Problem Solving At West Point,” Proceedings of the 2002American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Montreal 2002.http://www.asee.org
. degree in chemical engineering and biochemistry from Rice University in 1990 and her Ph.D.degree in chemical engineering from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1995. As a graduate student,Dr. Saterbak received two Excellence in Teaching Awards from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.KA-YIU SANDr. San is a professor in the Departments of Bioengineering and Chemical Engineering at Rice University. Dr. Sanreceived his B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Rice University in 1978 and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees inchemical engineering from the California Institute of Technology in 1981 and 1984, respectively. His researchinterests include genetic and metabolic engineering of microbial and plant cells, and modeling and