Paper ID #29480Drone Construction and Racing for PreCollege StudentsDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska Fairbanks.Dr. Catherine F
-style questions, which can be the case for relatively less mathematical subjects. Even in the first year concept-based questions are necessary.Implementing an innovation --- the case for PBL (Problem Based Learning):1) PBL involves students working in teams on case studies in which realistic industrial problems are solved, the aim being: § to integrate knowledge and skills (multidisciplinary) § to acquire knowledge through self-study (learning to learn) § to teach students to work in groups § to improve communication skills § to improve problem solving ability.2) Every student is part of a small team (of approx six), supervised by a tutor. § Important that the tutor does not impose their own knowledge and standards
construction of a walking beam conveyor, combinedwith a parts feeder driven by a Geneva mechanism. Both the walking beam conveyer and theGeneva mechanism are examples of machinery used in automation that pre-dates electroniccontrol systems. While they can be operated as strictly mechanical systems, their application canbe expanded by implementation of electronic control. An industrial grade programmable logiccontroller (provided by the ET program) is perhaps the most desirable type of controller to usedue to its relevance to industry. However, a hobbyist grade microcontroller such as Arduino [4]may be desirable in some circumstances. As the project continues, it is foreseen that thesemechanisms can be integrated into a larger system employing modern
curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Mr. Nathan Hyungsok Choe, University of Texas, Austin Nathan (Hyungsok) Choe is a doctoral student in STEM education at UT Austin. His research focuses on the development of engineering identity in graduate school and underrepresented group. Nathan holds master’s and bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering from Illinois Tech. He also worked as an engineer at LG electronics mobile communication company.Ms. Maya Denton, University of Texas, Austin Maya Denton is a STEM Education master’s student and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. She received her B.S. in Chemical
study the subject. Turkanet al. [3] launched an iOS marker-based app for third year undergraduates that recognizedtextbook and assignment examples and displayed pre-calculated deflections and loads. Whilestudents reported an improved learning experience, students were also overwhelmed and foundthe app difficult to use.Given the limited integration of AR in structural engineering courses and its potential benefit tostudents who struggle with visualizing complex structural phenomena, this study presentsSTRUCT-AR, as a continuation of previous work by the authors [13, 14] as part of an ongoingstudy on the formation of engineering intuition in structural engineering. STRUCT-AR is amarker-less AR application designed to address the limitations in
Paper ID #31483Scrum as a Change StrategyDr. Timothy A Wilson P.E., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Tim Wilson is chair of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Embry- Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. Pembridges’ research is primarily focused on the faculty instructional development and the use of evidence-based instruction in
, but also to learn more about research methodology. This is her first published paper and conference.Douglas Correa OspinaYanfen Li Yanfen Li is an Assistant Teaching Professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She received her PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. Her current research is in engineering education with a focus on curriculum development and retention of female and minority students in engineering.Karoline Evans © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comThe Roles of Friendship and a Project Manager in Improving Retention Amongst First-Year Engineering
activities which instill self-driven and just-in-time learning experiences[1]-[3] are incorporated to promote system-levelthinking and reinforce the technical, communication, and leadership skills of each student.Engineering project platforms[4] offer an effective approach to integrate the curriculum acrosscourses and academic level of the student. This paper provides the framework of an engineeringproject which integrates the hardware environment with the simulation environment. Each 1 Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering
. Retrieved from http://upcea.edu/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/Demographic-Shifts-in-Educational-Demand-and-the-Rise-of- Alternative-Credentials.pdf. [Accessed Jan 6, 2024].[3] C. Craig, “Open Badges and Microcredentials,” Technlogy in the Curriculum, OER Lab Ontario Tech University, J.M Stokes and S. Stokes (Eds.), 2021.[4] V. Devedžić and J. Jovanović, “Developing Open Badges: A Comprehensive Approach,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 63, pp. 603-620, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9388-3. [Accessed Jan 4, 2024].[5] F.M. Sullivan, “New and Alternative Assessments, Digital Badges, and Civics: An Overview of Emerging Themes and Promising Directions,” CIRCLE Working Paper #77, 2013. Retrieved
and design can fit together seamlessly, which opens theFALL 2017 13 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Teaching Ethics as Designdoor to integrating ethics education directly into design-based engineering courses, up to andincluding capstone courses. There are institutional and cultural challenges to be overcome to bringabout such an integration, but it is the long-term goal toward which we strive. A third possibility is that the negative results in the self-report data are an artifact of the surveyinstrument
ethical decision-making into the engineering curriculum, weeducators can better prepare our students to serve as “public citizens.” In particular, Isuggest that three perspectives can serve as a framework for moral reasoning in decisionsregarding design or technology: • a rule-based reasoning process, termed deontological; • an outcomes based process, termed consequentialist; and, • an aspirational frame, where ethical judgment springs from the kind of human being the decision maker seeks to become.These have been proposed for other professions,1 both to teach moral reasoning and forcareer-long application. They could serve engineers equally well.Ethical Values in EngineeringiThe engineering profession has done well in
applied project-based experiences among lower development, etc. In addition, lectures on entrepreneurshipdivision courses causes many students to lose interest and were integrated during Winter quarter to allow students toleave engineering during the first year, without understanding develop a business plan related to the quadcopter project.the importance of rigorous training in math and physical Lab sessions were designed for students to apply thesciences. Many programs implemented innovative first-year technical contents to their project and were co-instructed bycourses to enhance engineering curriculum and increase graduate teaching assistants and laboratory staff. Studentsstudent retention [1
through online channels, including socialmedia, school networks, and community organizations. No prior coding experience was required,which allowed for a diverse group of students. In total, the camp hosted 17 students in 2023 and11 students in 2024, reflecting a range of genders, backgrounds and skill levels.The camp spanned two weeks, with daily two-hour sessions conducted entirely online. Eachsession was designed to be highly interactive, incorporating live instruction, hands-on codingexercises, “concept surveys” (quizzes), collaborative learning opportunities, and "papercraft"activities. The curriculum was structured around the P5.js library, an open-source JavaScriptlibrary and free online editor that facilitates creative coding through
curriculum. The four initiatives include: 1. How to assist university administrators and faculty to understand the significant value of this new field in academia and practice 2. How to resource Engineering Leadership Education (ELE) programs, such as funds, facilities, and capable faculty and staff 3. How to effectively integrate within the curriculum, teach, and assess leadership development in engineering students from undergraduate to graduate to practicing engineers. 4. How to develop a framework/model that describes the diverse Engineering Leadership needs of companies across industriesAs members of the LEAD division, the authors sought to focus on strategic initiative numberfour. In an effort to begin
significant difference in the retention rates of FFFminority students who took ECE 100 in the fall or the spring. However, there was a significantdifference in the retention of FFF minority students who took ECE 100 and those who did nottake the course. An alarming number of students withdrew from the CEAS before they hadtaken even one engineering course. Minority focus groups with FFF taking ECE 100 in thespring and those freshmen who have not taken ECE 100 will be used to clarify their programneeds.IntroductionIt is well known that the retention of engineering students is a national problem. Manyapproaches are being implemented to increase retention. These approaches range from specialdesign courses1 and experiences2 to integrated curricula3 and
significant difference in the retention rates of FFFminority students who took ECE 100 in the fall or the spring. However, there was a significantdifference in the retention of FFF minority students who took ECE 100 and those who did nottake the course. An alarming number of students withdrew from the CEAS before they hadtaken even one engineering course. Minority focus groups with FFF taking ECE 100 in thespring and those freshmen who have not taken ECE 100 will be used to clarify their programneeds.IntroductionIt is well known that the retention of engineering students is a national problem. Manyapproaches are being implemented to increase retention. These approaches range from specialdesign courses1 and experiences2 to integrated curricula3 and
acceptance of programs of less than six weeks, stressing the characteristics ofgood program design. These were: • Unassailable academic integrity • Integration into the curriculum Page 13.795.3 • Affordable program design • Good pre-departure orientation and preparation • Faculty buy-in and participation • Interaction with the host community • Incorporation of local language • Opportunities for cultural enrichment, and a faculty leader trained to provide on-site interpretation and support • A safe and secure environment • Competent, experienced staff • Delivering what is promised (meeting expectations
by instructors to meet their preferredobjectives. Therefore, while they may be prerequisites to second-year courses, first-yearengineering programs are not necessarily integrated into an engineering curriculum. Further,since they are often designed with little consideration for best practices in introductory coursedesign, overall outcomes and content vary widely. This leads to the issue of course developers“reinventing the wheel,” considering successful models are not adequately disseminated. Theproblem is further exacerbated by a lack of definition for first year models. Despite a developerknowing what they want in a course, he or she may not be able to find a course with similaroutcomes with nothing more than "first year engineering" as a
, innovation, and project management. They integrated the topicof leadership by focusing on the success of collaboration and knowledge transfer from prior teamleads. Furthermore, the presentation described the process from project initiation to completionwithin a relatively large group setting (approximately 20 students per project) under industrymentorship similar to an actual industry experience. The two different presentation approachesfrom VT and UCI provided a more well-rounded perspective for the student audience in China ofhow American engineering students applied problem solving skills, established effectivecommunications, interacted with industry, and moreover, developed student leadership. All students felt that the keynote speakers
4.150.3terminal windows (figure 4), typed text, video clips, or animations can be integrated into the Figure 2. Sample screen shot showing the "virtual whiteboard" in a recorded lecture. Figure 3. A lecture screen incorporating graphics and text from a PowerPoint slide. Page 4.150.4Figure 4. A demonstation of a UNIX-based CAD software package using an X-window terminal.lecture with relative ease. Because of the dynamic lecture format that this technique encourages,students are more inclined to take notes as they watch and listen, just as in an actual classroom.IV. Examples of Computer-Recorded LecturesSamples of this lecture technique can be viewed on the
is thus to operationalize the conceptualoutcome in some way (e.g., to develop a test of competence in critical thinking).”3Professional Practice faculty recognized that students achieve a host of significant learningoutcomes through co-operative education work experiences, many of which are described byCates and Jones. “From the standpoint of academic faculty there are several outcomes of co-operative education that are critical. As an educational strategy, co-operative education provideslearning that is related to the students’ curriculum. From the standpoint of industry, it isimportant that students have the technical knowledge that their academic preparation provides,but it is equally important for them to develop workplace knowledge.” 4
Page 3.169.1balance calculations for complex chemical processes was reported in an article by Kessler andKessler3. In the 1960s, it was known that several large companies, including Chevron, duPont,EXXON, Monsanto, Shell, and Union Carbide were developing computer-aided process designprograms. By 1967, as reported by Evans, Steward, and Sprague4, six commercial computer-aided process design programs for steady-state operation, all written in FORTRAN, werereferenced in the literature. It was believed at that time that all large companies in the petroleumindustry and most large chemical companies were using computer-aided process designprograms.During the same period from the mid 1950s to the late 1960s, computers were also spurringrevolutions
others, curiosity, entrepreneurship, fairness, high expectations,honesty, integrity, intuition, judgment, optimism, persistence, positiveness, respect, self-esteem,sensitivity, thoughtfulness, thoroughness, and tolerance”. Those attitudes are built over a lifetimeand are a function of role models, mentors and experiences outside the curriculum. They are verydifficult to incorporate into a CEPC that is restricted to curricular issues. Still, it could be arguedthat this topic is embedded in several existing requirements in both the general criteria and theCEPC. By the time students have functioned on a multidisciplinary team, demonstrated anunderstanding of professional and ethical responsibility, recognized the need for life-long learning
intent of this paper is to demonstrate the usage of the BBB in a variety of upper divisioncourses, illustrating several applications. Some potential courses include measurements andinstrumentation, wireless communications, control systems, and advanced microprocessors. Labscovered with the BBB include digital and analog I/O operations, UART interface, TCP/IP interface,touch screen display, and student chosen end-of-semester lab projects. Programming is achievedusing C++ and Python. Several of these labs will be discussed in this paper, along with schematics,configurations, and results.IntroductionIn an Electrical/Computer Engineering Technology degree, there are many classes that usemicroprocessors/microcontrollers as part of their curriculum
application examples from both plant and Page 4.551.2 animal systems. It is expected that this introduction will be expanded, if needed in a specific curriculum, by requiring a following course in biological chemistry.5. Planning for the $Thermodynamics for Living Systems# course is based on the expectation that it will be an introductory three-credit course taught in the sophomore year. The level of treatment of the material will be geared for second-year engineering students. Adequate examples and sample problems will be presented to fully develop the basic concepts. More detailed application of these
obtain invaluable real-worldengineering experiences that cannot be realistically taught in a classroom (Ibeh, 1999).Although it is not universally true in China, Chinese engineering curriculum tends to put moreemphasis on basic skill development, such as math, engineering theories and principles.Students normally do not work on realistic engineering projects until they finish two or threeyears of engineering school. The reason for such a practice lies in an old Chinese philosophythat a solid foundation leads to infallible construction.However, today’s world has entered an era of information explosion and rapid technologicaladvances (Morgan, Reid & Wolf, 1998). Today’s knowledge may soon become obsolete. Inorder for modern engineers to be
AC 2010-1482: TEACHING ENGINEERING TO ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONMAJORSLaura Bottomley, North Carolina State UniversityJustin Osterstrom, Combs Elementary Scho Page 15.1174.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching Engineering to Elementary Education MajorsThe elementary education teacher preparation program at North Carolina State University is aSTEM-focused program that requires a course in engineering and technology called ChildrenDesign, Invent, Create. For the fall 2009 semester, the course was taught by a faculty member ofthe College of Engineering from an engineering perspective. Although only one set ofassessment data is available, presentation of
institutions. However, since Hispanics are less likely to earn engineeringor engineering technology degrees15, forestry robotics engineering design can reach out morebroadly with minority groups by integrating robotics with forest or agricultural applications.This presentation describes the design, construction, and evaluation of an autonomous forestryrobot development by a student team and associated engineering design enhancements of arobotics curriculum. The robot design took place as part of the robotics curriculum that wasdeveloped as well as offered by Electrical Engineering and Computer Science as well asMechanical and Industrial Engineering Departments at Texas A&M University-Kingsville(TAMUK), a minority serving institution, and was
the Annual ASEE Conference, 2011. 11. D. Shetty and S. Choi: Globalization and Product Design Curriculum in Engineering Programs, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, 2003. 12. D. Nieusma: Integrating Technical, Social and Aesthetic Analysis in Product Design Studio: A case Study and Model for a New Liberal Education for Engineers, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, 2008. 13. W. Loendorf, D. Richter, and D. Teachman: Results from an Interdisciplinary Service Learning Pilot Project Incorporating Universal Design Concepts for ADA Compliance, Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, 2010. 14. P. A. Manohar, C. Jones and J. Radermacher: Development and Implementation of a Junior-Year
Case-based Learning Methods with 3D Interactive Multimedia for Millennial Generation Engineering Students by Paul G. Ranky, PhD Full Tenured Professor, Registered and Chart. Professional Engineer, Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, NCE, and the NJIT IT Program, NJIT, Newark, NJ 07102 Email: ranky@njit.eduAbstractMillennial generation students are interested in an integrated, simultaneouslyanalytical, computational, interactive, as well as practical, real