rather than reflecting on the past 9 . There any many examples in the literatureof works using this method for centering the experiences of individuals with marginalized identi-ties 10,11,12 . In order to emphasize the need for this work, we have reviewed the literature to findexamples of lived experiences similar to ours to emphasize that these are not isolated incidencesof struggle. Doctoral education begins not with admission to a university, but instead application to pro-grams within that university according to their alignment with a student’s research interests. Oncematriculated into a graduate program, young academics bring diverse life experiences that mayconflict with the typical impression of who belongs. These feelings which have
veteran combat experience and employmentexpectations do not have a civilian corollary, as indicated in Table 1. These myths or stereotypesare sourced from known veteran stereotypes of veterans [8] and do not reflect the authors’perspectives.Table 1: Veteran and civilian-coded survey items Veteran Veteran-coded Civilian Civilian-coded Item Item 1 Veterans are more likely to suffer 13 Civilians are less likely to suffer from PTSD than civilians. from PTSD than veterans. 2 Veterans are more likely to be 14 Civilians are more likely to be educated than
another group of through breakout rooms. presentations until all teams have presented to every team. Self-reflection to a prompt (1 min.), Breakout rooms for each grouping paired discussion (2 min.), group 1-2-4-all and PollEv to help facilitate large [7] discussion (4 min.), report out to large group report out. group (5 min.). Each student provides peer feedback An online survey tool (e.g., Google
review. Researchers utilized a working definition of the term “workforce development” to refer to any program that was preparing students for the workforce. Additionally, to maintain a focused scope, only peer-reviewed journals and conference papers were included. However, in the future, we plan to examine all available sources of literature. Considering the shifts in the engineering workforce practices due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this literature search was limited to sources published post-2020. This timeframe was chosen to accurately reflect the current state and needs of the workforce, which has increasingly adopted hybrid and remote working modalities. Microsoft Teams (Version 1.6.00.35956) and Zotero (Version 6.0.30) were
bemulti-axis and must be completed in less than four hours including machine setup and cleanup.The designs created by the students are amazing – both in creativity and in challenge. A small setof the final projects are shown in Figure 8.Changing Curriculum Outcomes and Skills DevelopmentTo meet the changes brought on by incorporating the described technologies, the course outcomesfor MFGE 332 have evolved to suit. These are shown in Table 2. Notably, outcome 1 has beenchanged from “Generate programs for CNC machining using manual part programmingtechniques” to reflect the move away from manual programming to CAM programming. Inaddition, outcome 5 has been added to reflect the increased role that inspection plays in the courseto help students
, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.007.[27] M. Pilvankar. "How to deliver effective research posters." https://youtu.be/2L6trywEMjA (accessed Feb. 07, 2024).[28] A. N. Ford Versypt. "Conference Best Practices." https://youtu.be/2L6trywEMjA (accessed Feb. 07, 2024).[29] A. N. Ford Versypt, "Self-reflection assignments for evaluating non-technical skills and setting goals for professional development," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH, 2017.[30] A. N. Ford Versypt, "Self-evaluation and reflection for professional development of chemical engineering students," Chem Engr Ed, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 157-161, 2019.[31] C. S. Dweck and E. L. Leggett, "A Social-Cognitive Approach to
to be on the information seeking behaviors of professional engineers ratherthan academics (Leckie et al., 1996). Some of the observations of professional engineers’information seeking behaviors clearly reflects the needs of their particular workplace settings.For example, researchers found a strong preference for professional engineers to work in teamsbecause of the increased facilitation of verbal communication, the ability to develop networksbased on trusted information, and the opportunities for richer feedback and contextualization(Fidel & Green, 2004; Freund, 2015). Professional engineers also rely on text-based documentsas information sources depending on the task and their knowledge of available sources (Freund,2015). When asking
instructor's reflection on the overall EEE 4423 course experience.Student Exit Survey: The fundamental purpose of the exit survey was to record students’perspectives on lecture content, homework assignments, overall course experience, and thechallenges they encountered during the EEE 4423 course. The survey also aimed to assess theperceived difficulty of the workload and homework assignments. In the end, students self-assessed their current level of understanding of the 9 key concepts introduced in the course.Additionally, the survey aimed to identify any barriers that might have posed challenges tounderstanding these 9 key concepts of QIS.Student Exit Interview: Following this student exit survey, a 45-minute semi-structured interviewwas conducted
-generated codes. Recall is the percentage of human codes that themodel was able to generate correctly. The F1 score is the harmonic mean of the precision andrecall [1]. We also performed qualitative analysis for model-generated codes for ten testinstances for both thermodynamics datasets. We report the number of codes that are semanticallyrelevant to the student’s narrative but not an exact match under “misses but makes sense”),semantically irrelevant codes with “does not make sense,” and the number of codes missed bythe model with “code missed.”Researcher PositionalityOur strength as researchers improves as we acknowledge and reflect upon the backgrounds andexperiences of ourselves and others in our team [69]. As this project is a collaboration
15 , panel membersdeparted after having shared insightful reflections, recommendations for the future, andencouragements for next steps. Within the reflections shared, it was mentioned that several panelmembers appreciated the opportunity to increase their understanding of how the Federalgovernment works, thus demonstrating a desire for more active transparency when it comes toSTEM education policy for non-Federal stakeholders of STEM education. Among the panel’srecommendations provided, some that stood out were that Federal STEM efforts should 1. Ensure the inclusion of the multiple disciplines within STEM in future strategic plans and government programs. 2. Encourage the inclusion of STEM in reading and writing curricula. 3
the instructor making them aware of the iterations that took place during their design process. Reviewing case studies of strategic design thinking “can help students realize the power and utility of iterative design.”1 Reflection in various contexts can be very helpful as well32. 4. Risk-taking and iteration: Offering students with lessons about learning from failures, approaching and accepting them, can be very effective in allowing students to appreciate iteration and take more risks while designing. “Instruction and scaffolding for systematic design” was selected as an appropriate teachingstrategy to illustrate the role of iteration in spacecraft design with respect to cost and schedulingissues. In particular
that contains a thermistor, a few resistors, andan operational amplifier. In general, the bridge circuit is used to detect small changes in theresistance of any of the resistors, which is reflected as a change in the output voltage. Thestudents are asked to derive the expression of the output voltage, Vo, as a function of the inputvoltage and the Wheatstone bridge resistive network, which contains the thermistor. The studentsare encouraged to refine their expression into the fewest terms possible to make MATLABprogramming and downstream design much easier to handle. The students are then required towrite a MATLAB script to simulate the thermistor and the Wheatstone bridge circuit. They are touse the thermistor formula (Equation 1) and the Vo(T
sessions, PAL Leaders are required to attend weekly staffmeetings with the PAL Coordinator. The staff meetings provide a venue for PALs to share theirobservations and experiences from classes and tutoring sessions, learn new skills, and assessareas for improvement. Administrative tasks are also discussed, including program advertisingand human resource issues. In order for students to experience the benefits of PAL, they mustfirst attend the tutoring sessions. The program must rigorously publicize the positive, uniqueattributes of the sessions to ensure that session nonattendance reflects a student’s consciouschoice rather than an unknowing one. It is the responsibility of PAL leaders to advertise through
Page 22.1470.7their value to the teacher/classroom/students.Fellows’ Journals. All SLIDER Fellows were required to journal throughout their participationin the program. This started during the summer training program when they were asked toreflect about the effectiveness of the summer training and how prepared they felt to enter theclassrooms at the start of the school year. Throughout the fall semester, the fellows wereinstructed to post a weekly journal entry on our online collaborative platform (T-Square, basedon the sakai program) about their experiences at the school and their reflections about whatsuccesses they were having and the areas in which they hoped to improve. Fellows were alsoencouraged to read each others’ posts and to comment
the foundations course Digital Electronics ™ asimplemented in an urban high school. The lessons observed covered two project areas:programming a basic stamp robot (3 hours) and the creation and troubleshooting ofcircuits using the computer program Multisims and breadboards (4 hours).First, the videotapes were digitized and entered into Transana21(see www.transana.org), acomputer application for discourse analysis that integrates the video, transcript text andcodes. Classroom sessions were segmented into clips, and clips were coded to reflect thepoints of interest noted in our research questions, in a manner similar to Nathan et al.,200922.Coding FrameworkOur coding framework delineates four different dimensions: A. Instruction time codes
3 5 45.5% n/a n/a n/a 45.5%Dean'sOfficesTotal 32 86 95 22.8% 26.6% 31.3% 23.7% 15.6%Women (36/115) (35/148) (24/154)STEMFaculty1 Represents Teaching (as opposed to Research) Faculty2 [2] Table F-2, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/tables.cfm NSF, Women, Minorities, and Persons withDisabilities in Science and Engineering, S&E doctoral degrees awarded to women, by field: 2000–08. Values listedin Table 1 were adjusted to reflect RIT S & E disciplines and necessary weighting based on discipline faculty count3 Data listed is for a subset of
. Am. Ed. Res. Jour., 38: 915-945.8. Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C., 2005. Characteristics of professional development that effect changed in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices, J. of Res. in Sci. Teaching, 42: 668-690.9. Supovitz, J.A. & Turner, H.M., 2000. The effects of professional development on science teaching practices in the professions, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.10. Geddis, A.N.., 1993. Transforming subject-matter knowledge: the role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. Intnl. J. of Sci. Ed. 15: 673-683.11. Keys, C. & Bryan, L.A., 2001. Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform, J
, why it is important, and major mistakes that had been made in theprevious stage. The intent of these lectures was to bring all students back to the same startingplace for the next stage and get them to reflect on how their work differed from what anexperienced modeler might have done. The students in BME09 did not receive these lectures.However, the BME09 students did receive one short lecture between activities 2 and 3 to clearup their misconceptions about light and to provide a mathematical description for the light Page 22.236.5distribution on a surface coming from a single LED. A modified version of this lecture was
requirement is intended to provide students with an understanding of theperspectives (e.g. theoretical; historical; social; political; economic; cultural; religious;geographic or sense of place; environmental; or intellectual traditions and/ or ways of knowing)of non-Western peoples. Through the U.S. ethnic diversity course, students will acquire anunderstanding of the perspectives (e.g. theoretical; historical; social; political; economic;cultural; religious; geographic or sense of place; environmental; or intellectual traditions and/ orways of knowing) of U.S. ethnic minorities.Design: Thirteen of the 24 design hours in the CE program come from the Design4Practice(D4P) curriculum, which is reflective of the engineering program’s long standing
other nine civil engineeringschools. The purpose of this paper is to share ideas and information about the master’s program Page 15.1076.2that might be of value to engineering educators in other countries, especially U.S. educators whoare pondering ways to reflect the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK) in theirundergraduate and graduate programs.Leadership, as used in the title of this paper, is shorthand for what are usually referred to asleadership and management. Leading means influencing the process of deciding where anorganization should go or what it should do. In contrast, and in a complementary manner,managing concentrates on how
American 11.0% 12.5% White 14.8% 3.7% Hispanic Hispanic Hispanic 81.0% 82.5% 74.1% Figure 1: Demographics of DREAM mentees from spring 2009 The demographics of the participants are never pre-determined by the program, and as such theDREAM mentee demographics largely reflect the school demographics. At Austin High School(AHS), African Americans and Hispanics make up, on average, 96% of the participants in
computing capabilities expected during the first years on the job. Eachresponse was assigned a value (1 = not important, 2 = slightly important, 3= average importance,4 = important, 5 = very important) and the mean rating given by all respondents was calculatedfor each question. Responses with a mean value higher than 4.0 and with a standard deviationless the 1.0 indicate a high level of consensus among participants about the importance of thatparticular item, while responses with lower means and higher standard deviations reflect lowerlevels of consensus 14.Results were further analyzed by type of engineering industry, with computer science, electricalengineering, computer engineering, information technology and engineering computer
Minority (URM) women faculty have emerged as successful leaders in theengineering academia in a growing number of universities across the United States. Increasedexposure of this group raises the conversation in academia to a new level and createspartnerships based on scholarship with diversity as an added benefit. There are, however, stillunique challenges and opportunities. The representation of URM women faculty at the Top 50institutions (based on research expenditures) is not reflective of demographics due to acombination of selection/self selection processes and hidden biases in the academia (Nelson,2007). As they progress in their faculty careers, Underrepresented Minority Women (URM
professional engineering environment.This is critical, given the nature of the instrument, as we posit that high scores on the EPS Rubricwill suggest high performance in engineering professional skills in the workplace.Table 9. Questions to Examine Validity Evidence (adapted from Moskal & Leyden25) Content Construct Criterion • Do the scoring rubric’s • Are all of the • How do the scoring rubric’s criteria criteria address any important facets of reflect competencies that suggest extraneous content? the intended construct success on related or future • Do the scoring rubric’s evaluated through the performances
Inventory(IDI). While this tool is widely used and robust, the major disadvantage is its proprietarynature: the institution needs to pay a fee each time the instrument is administered. One otherdrawback in using this tool is that it may not give the full picture about the learningexperiences of our students while abroad.Given this review, we assert that assessment of study abroad programs in a comprehensiveway is necessary but has not been done to a sufficient degree. Assessment tools exist oncultural sensitivity (e.g., IDI), however, results on these alone do not reflect the growth inknowledge our engineering students need to have, and show to justify the expense directedinto these programs. To fill this void, we develop an assessment instrument
author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Page 22.208.2This paper has materials that will appear in: Ganesh, T. G. (in press). Children-produced drawings: aninterpretive and analytic tool for researchers. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels, (Eds.). The Sage Handbook ofVisual Research Methods. London, UK: Sage. The author thanks Sage for the use of these materials.Review of the LiteratureThe use of children-produced drawings in research is not new. Margaret Mead used subject-produced drawings as contemporary responses by the public to events that represented rapidtechnological change after