situation.Dropping the laboratory from the fall schedule was considered. This idea itself wasquickly dropped. The negative impact on student progress and learning wasunacceptable. Attempts to reschedule the lab during evening hours proved unworkable.The schedule conflicts, which resulted from a number of the students being employed,could not be resolved. The ultimate solution required that we venture outside traditionalEngineering Technology boundaries.The practice of employing student laboratory instructors is foreign to ET education atPitt-Johnstown. The college’s primary mission is undergraduate instruction and full timefaculty members teach virtually all classes and laboratories. Only a few graduate classesare offered, and they are outside Engineering
supported by various researchers such as [1],[4]–[8].This co-creation project was structured around the project-based learning framework known as thegold standard, which involves seven stages that start with a challenging problem or question and endwith generating a public product [9]. Through this structure, graduate students aim to create effectiveeducational models and promote interdisciplinary collaboration, while learning to adapt to changingsituations in a dynamic and diverse workforce.The study includes evaluations of the technical and humanistic knowledge gained by the students whoco-create content, focusing on effective communication and collaboration practices between studentsand experts from different fields. This study is noteworthy for
Paper ID #37800Developing and Evaluating a Virtual Training Process for Energy AuditEducationBehlul Kula, Michigan State University Behlul Kula is currently a Ph.D. student and graduate research assistant in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department at Michigan State University (MSU). Also, he is a team member of the MSU Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) as an energy & sustainability analyst. He completed his Bachelor’s Degree in Civil Engineering from Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Turkey in 2015. He then worked in Qatar as a site civil engineer at Dogus Construction company for nearly one year. After
possess [17].We are seeking to understand how a unique co-op based engineering program, designedspecifically for increased access, impacts the experiences of participating students. Additionally,we are using CCW and funds of knowledge to understand what assets students bring into theprogram and their co-op jobs, and how they gain from participation in the program itself. Ourprimary research question is: What assets do students in a co-op based engineering programbring to that program, and what assets do they gain from participation in the program?Background of the Bridge AcademyThe Bridge Academy presented within this WIP is a two-and-a-half-year (five semester) upperdivision engineering program, designed for off-campus students. It is housed in
Annual Conference, Austin, Texas USA, 2009.[8] S. Collard, I. Datig, and A. Magid, "Reference and Research Services in a Global Campus Environment," in Bridging Worlds: Emerging Models and Practices of U.S. Academic Libraries Around the Globe, R. Pun, S. Collard, and J. Parrott, Eds., ed Chicago: ACRL Publications, 2016.[9] B. Trott and I. D. Silver, "Outreach Activities for Librarian Liaisons," Reference & User Services Quarterly, vol. 54, pp. 8-14, Winter 2014.[10] M. R. Tennant, "Customizing for Clients: Developing a Library Liaison Program from Need to Plan," Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, vol. 89 number 1, pp. 8-20, 2001.[11] J. E. Pasek, "Organizing the liaison role," College &
Paper ID #17643How to Shape Attitudes toward STEM Careers: The Search for the most Im-pactful Extracurricular Clubs (RTP)Dr. Fethiye Ozis, Northern Arizona University Fethiye has been working in CECMEE at Northern Arizona University since 2014. She has received her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from University of Southern California in 2005. Her doctorate work focused on modeling of bio filters for air pollution control. After graduation, she has been involved in K-12 STEM institutions both as a teacher and administrator. Her research interests include biotechnology for environmental issues, engineering education
AC 2008-768: SAME COURSES, DIFFERENT OUTCOMES? VARIATIONS INCONFIDENCE, EXPERIENCE, AND PREPARATION IN ENGINEERING DESIGNAndrew Morozov, University of Washington ANDREW MOROZOV is a graduate student in Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Washington. Andrew is working on research projects within the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) and the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE).Deborah Kilgore, University of Washington DEBORAH KILGORE is a Research Scientist in the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) and the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE), University of Washington. Her areas of specific
Page 22.868.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Industry Based Projects and Preparing Engineers for the 21st Century WorkforceIntroductionAt the October 2005 National Science Foundation Advanced Technology Education (NSF-ATE)Annual Meeting, Dr. Renee S. Lerche, an executive at The Ford Motor Company and a nationalauthority on global leadership and workforce development, said that, “employers need workerswith deep experience with scientific inquiry, design and problem solving solutions.” Studentsmust be able to apply what they learn to real world problems that are relevant and meaningful. Inparticular, research has documented that contextual learning
often meet the curriculum content and practice goals better thansingle-subject lessons. Engineering, as a key component of STEM education, offers hands-on,designed-based, problem solving activities to drive student interest and confidence in STEMoverall. However, K-12 STEM teachers may not feel equipped to implement engineeringpractices and may even experience anxiety about trying them out in their classrooms without theadded support of professional development and professional learning communities.To address these concerns and support engineering integration, this research study examined theexperiences of 18 teachers in one professional development program dedicated to STEMintegration and engineering pedagogy for K-12 classrooms. This
obviation of failure, every new failure – no matter how seemingly benign – presents a further means towards a fuller understanding of how to achieve a fuller success.23End point failure, however, is not a desired outcome for an engineer. When such failures occur,analysis of the event is performed to understand heretofore-unknown risks or the impact ofunintended usage, or to examine the failure in light of new knowledge or research.24 Engineerspersistently engage in what Petroski calls a “thoughtful reappraisal of even centuries-oldfailure[s] to yield new lessons from old examples.”25 Designing and testing for limits to establishfactors of safety at final product stage is an engineering norm. In the field, failure is used as ameans to
]. Angelo and Cross’ 1993book discusses classroom assessment techniques [6]. Nilson’s 2012 book focuses on research-based resources for college instructors [7]. Walvoord published a practical guide to assessment in2010 [8]. The pre-post methodology is similar to that of one of the co-authors at the Air ForceInstitute of Technology [9] which presents a three-year study of a two-course graduate sequenceand employed a pre-test/post-test methodology with teaching techniques of Felder and Brent [10]to assess student learning using learner-center teaching techniques, one of which was Real-worldmini-sessions in industry, defense, and security. A statistically significant improvement wasobserved in student performance for some courses when the Pre
team proposal project was offered again in2013.There are multiple considerations for this type of project in terms of logistics and sustainability,especially for yearly participation of 220 students in this project. This paper will discuss thestrategies involved in adapting a community service learning project originally designed for 60students to a larger scale project for 220 students while maintaining the academic robustness ofthe proposal assignment and the good will of the partnering community organizations.1.0 IntroductionEngineering is a profession that holds high respect within the community. The design,communication, research, audience analysis, and business skills that engineers build and developthroughout their careers are
-PEER, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 4, 2015.[6] W. Roldan, J. Hui, and E. M. Gerber, “University makerspaces: Opportunities to support equitable participation for women in engineering,” Int J Eng Educ, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 751– 768, 2018.[7] V. Wilczynski, “Contributions of Academic Makerspaces to Design Education,” Des. Educ. Today Tech. Contexts Programs Best Pract., pp. 91–114, 2019.[8] C. R. Forest et al., “The Invention Studio: A University Maker Space and Culture.,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, p. n2, 2014.[9] V. Wilczynski, J. Zinter, and L. Wilen, “Teaching engineering design in an academic makerspace: Blending theory and practice to solve client-based problems,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[10
students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. Currently, she teaches within the first-year engineering program at Ohio State while maintaining an active engineering education research program.Dr. Elizabeth G. Creamer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Elizabeth G. Creamer is professor, Educational Research and Evaluation in the School of Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University where she teaches graduate level courses in mixed methods research. She is working on a manuscript for a new introductory textbook, Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research
. Sochacka, and S. E. Miller, "Empathy and engineering formation," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 11-33, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20301.[14] A. Goncher and A. Johri, "Contextual Constraining of Student Design Practices," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 252-278, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20079.[15] A. Johri, B. M. Olds, and K. O'Connor, "Situative Frameworks for Engineering Learning Research," in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 47-66
five-year period. Extending this study beyond graduation to look at careerchoices and graduate study will also be considered. We also propose to increase studentinvolvement in the research design and data analysis process, and continue involving students aspeer-facilitators. Finally, looking closely at variables that might affect student success such associoeconomic class, family support, high school preparation, race/ethnic background, and socialnetworks, and using this information to create a supportive, beneficial environment for allengineering students through all stages of their academic careers is a goal as we continue thisresearch
Paper ID #19310Integrated Teaching Model in Graduate Aerospace Classes: A Trial WithCompressible Flow AerodynamicsDr. Sidaard Gunasekaran, University of Dayton Sid is an Assistant Professor at the Mechanical and Aerospace Department at the University of Dayton. He got his MS and Ph.D. at the University of Dayton as well. During his doctoral studies, Sid developed a knack for teaching using modern pedagogical practices in mechanical and aerospace classes and engaged in diverse research in Low Reynolds number flows. Sid is an active participant in the Dayton/Cincinnati American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA
courses,experiential learning can promote lifelong learning, a common goal for many higher educationinstitutions.6 The research also found that professional skills are best cultivated and enhanced bypracticing them through real experiences.6 Davis et al. also stated that it is difficult for studentsto achieve leadership skills in a lecture format.11ReflectionExpanding on the experiential learning theories, reflection is an increasingly important elementthat must be discussed in student learning. Self-reflection is a way to bridge connectionsbetween elements of specific experiences and contributes to true learning and positive changes.4Similarly, Wong et al. stated that reflection integrates theory with practice and appreciation ofthe world.14
and facultyperspectives from the 2007-08 course projects. These surveys were designed to establish abaseline for the project and used selected questions from the UW-Madison campus’ NationalSurvey of Student Engagement, Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey(APPLES), and Educational Benchmarking, Inc (EBI). While these assessment data have notbeen significant in determining impact on the desired outcomes, it has identified those courses, inand outside of the initiative that are contributing to the goals of the EB2. For example, surveyresults indicate that students found a number of courses outside of specific EB2 funded projectsalso contributed to their development of the EB2 specific project course goals.At regular intervals
AC 2007-656: DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CASE STUDY ANDMULTIMEDIA COURSEWARE FOR THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLASSROOMGina Montgomery, Auburn University Gina Montgomery is a doctoral student at Auburn University studying the Management of Information Technology and Innovation. She received her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the Samuel Ginn College of Engineering at Auburn University and holds various industry certifications. Mrs. Montgomery's research interests include innovations in the classroom, data security concerns, and risk management. She expects to complete her graduate studies in 2010.Chetan Sankar, Auburn UniversityP.K. Raju, Auburn University
teaching entrepreneurship.According to a Cornell University study by Debra Streeter1 Lehigh’s entrepreneurshipmodel is classified as a magnet program centered in the business school and primarilyMBA-oriented. Lehigh has made a substantial commitment to our entrepreneurship-oriented graduate MBA program, including an entrepreneurial option and a Ventureseries certificate program.Recently Lehigh has invested heavily in several new programs that promote campus-wideteaching, research and outreach in technical entrepreneurship at the undergraduate level,including a year-long experiential capstone course for majors in Integrated Business andEngineering, Computer Science and Business, Bio Engineering, Design Arts and a catchall campus wide program in
? THE VALUE FOR STUDENTSBased on our experiences, and student surveys and reflections from the students participating inthe course, we found the students top learning experiences were the challenges of functioning ina team environment, the need to learn how to communicate in a technical setting effectively witha client, and the positive feeling they had because of their impact on the community. The factthat their project was part of a service learning course served more to motivate the students andto make them aware of their ability to solve a problem of value to their community, comparedwith the value of the specific methods of engineering analysis or design learned to solve thevarious problems. Of course the principles of the design process
electrical power generation, including the use of renewableenergy resources. An important aspect of any Introduction to Engineering course is the projector projects which are chosen for the students to work on. Since renewable energy is a relevantand multidisciplinary field, it provides a good topic for a first-year engineering design course,provided the experience is properly designed.This paper describes a successful renewable energy project that has been used for the past sevenyears in an Introduction to Engineering class at a large, public, research university. Details ofthis project and its evolution based on the curricular needs of the university and research-basedbest-practices will be discussed. Some of these research-based best practices
AC 2011-2642: USING ARDUINO AS A PLATFORM FOR PROGRAM-MING, DESIGN AND MEASUREMENT IN A FRESHMAN ENGINEER-ING COURSEGerald W. Recktenwald, Portland State University Gerald Recktenwald is an Associate Professor and the Chair of the Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department at Portland State University. His current research interests are in improving engineering education, and in the numerical simulation and measurement of heat transfer in electronic equipment, energy efficient buildings, and other industrial applications.David E. Hall, Louisiana Tech University Dr. David Hall is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at Louisiana Tech University
teacher data from state-wide publicinstruction databases. The goal will be to track students and teachers across multiple years,through multiple STEM outreach experiences and, for students, eventual matriculation tocolleges and universities (including NCSU).The new data-driven assessment tools will be used for MISO project research and will beavailable to any STEM outreach campus program. In this way, any STEM outreach projectaffiliated with NCSU, big or small, will have access to a valid analytic tool to evaluate theimpact of their project, as well as MISO research results. In order to support the campus-widecommunity of practice, projects will have the opportunity to work collaboratively during twice
, colleges and/or institutions to guide them insystem-wide development and measurement of policies, practices and procedures to ensure notonly sustainability, but also to positively impact student, faculty and staff learning for continuousimprovement purposes. In this paper, we focus on student learning by coursework program andpresent the results and analysis of a pilot study using a case study methodology. Included is adiscussion on the presented comprehensive evaluation tool’s usefulness for the continuousimprovement at programmatic and institutional levels, as well as for collecting and providingevidence for quality assurance and accreditation organizations, such as ABET.IntroductionFrom development, ecology, energy, to biology, sustainability
types of student behaviors in the classroom thatmay serve as indicators of what lifelong learning looks like after college. With access to suchinformation, engineering educational practices can be more explicitly designed to fosterdevelopment of the range of behavioral and affective learning outcomes necessary for a dispositiontoward lifelong learning.We are in the midst of a study investigating how instructor choices affect a range of studentoutcomes related to their development as lifelong learners. This study examines a variety ofundergraduate engineering courses at four different institutions throughout the U.S. We chose thetheoretical basis of self-regulated learning (SRL) 8 as a platform for the linkage between thebehavioral and affective
design specifications for their project, performed competitivebenchmarking and generated alternative system concepts. In order to evaluate the best systemconcept, the team used a decision analysis matrix. From these steps, each team emerged with aclear system design concept to pursue. At this point, each team performed a cost analysis,prepared a project plan. Each team prepared a 20-minute oral presentation of their project planand submitted a written report (Milestone 2). The next step was to develop a scale model or prototype to evaluate the system concept.Teams conducted design reviews to evaluate the safety, environmental impacts, reliability, lifecycle issues, maintainability, durability, manufacturability and cost of their design
University Indianapolis (IUPUI), collaborated to offer a short study abroadmultidisciplinary course in Mannheim, Germany titled, “GO GREEN - Green Organizations:Global Responsibility for Environmental and Economic Necessity.” This study abroad coursewas designed to teach engineering and technology students three important fundamental topics;sustainability, globalization, and cultures. The course examines sustainable development inbusiness and industry using best practices in Germany as examples. International companiesvisited are used as examples for analyzing and understanding the interconnectedness ofglobalization. Living in a different country for a short period of time is used for comparing andcontrasting differences and similarities in a
Broadening the Knowledge Base of Nuclear Engineering Students: The Development of a Course in Radiation Sources and Applications Nolan E. Hertel, Michael P. Shannon Neely Nuclear Research Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA/ Department of Physics, United States Military Academy, West Point, NYAbstract Nuclear engineering curricula have undergone significant revisions over the past tenyears, in response to both declining enrollments in the early 1990s and to broaden the visions ofnuclear engineering students beyond nuclear power applications. The keystone of traditionalnuclear engineering curricula was the need for competence in the design