higher rates than theirpeers. Students who are likely to persist in engineering reported supportive relationships withmentors, positive near peer role models, a strong sense of community, and an intention tocomplete their engineering major. Yet, accessing these support systems is often challenging forlow-income students, who are more likely to work long hours and spend more time off campusand less likely to have adequate opportunities to interact with others in their major and seethemselves in role models and as part of that community. The COVID-19 pandemic disruptedthe higher education plans and financial viability of UCSB engineering students, especially thosefrom low-income families. In addition to increased financial hardships, these
through videoconferencing, on their research results and lessons learned from the summer.Students received group instructions and feedback in our weekly teleconferences, but theyreceived individual coaching on slide design and all written work through in-person or onlineconferences. They also did peer editing. Thus, students were able to revise their communicationdeliverables and see how communication improves if one approaches it as a process. In addition,since students knew they would be making final presentations to a larger audience at the end ofthe summer as well as submitting reports to VaNTH, they were writing to real audiences – andthus engaging in the authentic “challenge-based” or “problem-based” instruction that VaNTHadvocates because
consisted of a set ofhands-on laboratory experiments on material testing while for spring 2016 a non-hands-onproject was assigned. For spring 2016 the students were required to simulate a material propertyor a basic manufacturing process using any finite element analysis software, or write a shortreview article on a topic closely related to the subject of materials and manufacturing. It was 3intended to add enrichment to the learning experience beyond the confines of the traditionalclassroom and positively impact a students’ academic performance. This would also lead todevelopment of better pedagogical practices by the engineering faculty, help the college to bettermeet the ABET objectives by
theuniversity adopt worklife policies that peer institutions have adopted. The resolution waspassed by both the Benefits Committee and the full Faculty and Staff Senate in spring of2012. Currently, a campus-wide committee, led by the project co-PI, with representativesfrom each of the colleges are working to draft policies in four areas: modified dutiespolicy for faculty dealing with life transitions, tenure-clock extension policy for facultywho have/adopt children, a tuition exchange program, and a common policy on tenureand promotion.The Grant Writing Program has at its goal to increase the success of women faculty insecuring federal funding. It has sponsored a variety of activities, from a statewide NSFDay, to webinars on NSF programs, to an NSF
reliability and validity of common assessment tools and treatment techniques used in the diagnosis and management of dysphagia in pediatric populations. She has published book chapters, a co-edited textbook, and peer-reviewed papers on these topics and she frequently presents both nationally and internationally on the topic of pediatric dysphagia. She maintains a small clinical practice at The University of Alabama Speech and Hearing Center and in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Druid City Hospital in Tuscaloosa, AL.Debra Moehle Mccallum Debra McCallum is a Senior Research Social Scientist and Director of the Institute for Social Science Research at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. She received her Ph.D. in Social
electrical engineering, computer science and mathematics byapplying evidence-based teaching strategies—student-centered problem-based teaching(SC-PBT), example-based teaching, and just-in-time teaching (JITT); (3) incorporating classroom andlaboratory activities that require active student engagement, conceptual understanding, criticalthinking, and problem-solving; and (4) Employing model students to lead SupplementaryInstruction (SI) courses with evidence-based peer-to-peer learning strategies. The studentassessment data indicated the effectiveness of the evidence-based instructional practices, the SIpeer-to-peer learning strategies, as well as existing engagement challenges. In addition, positivefeedback was obtained from the student survey data
; visualizing and assessingproblems and synthesizing decision strategies); (3) Self-directed/learning autonomy; (4) Changemanagement and innovation, and (5) Social connectivity (peer relationships). The paperconcludes with suggestions for next steps toward a practical teaching and learning resiliencemodel for educators.IntroductionGraduates must be prepared to enter the workforce with technical capabilities, but also withhigher level competencies. Writing on lean engineering education and the role of competencymastery, Flumerfelt et.al, refer to engineering problems learners face in the industry as “multi-disciplinary” requiring competencies like systems-thinking, innovation and adaptivecompetencies [1]. They emphasize the need for “the engineering
Langer lab as a postdoc. He then worked at the Dow Chemical Company Coating Materials as a research scien- tist. He was the Dow Certified Green Belt Project Leader and worked on binder platform development for different commercial products. Dr. Jiang edited the first book on Janus particles and has published more than 50 peer reviewed journal articles and book chapters. Dr. Jiang was awarded with the Racheff-Intel Award for Outstanding Graduate Research. The technology he participated in developing at Dow received the Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award and the R&D 100 Award. He recently received the ACS Younger Chemists Committee Leadership Development Award, the 3M non-tenured faculty award, ACS-PRF
topics were covered through lectures, mostly following the sequence in thetextbook10: Main Topics Overview of IoT Design Principles Architectural Layers Internet Principles Prototyping Embedded Devices Item Identification Prototyping Online Components Ethics related to IoT Student performance was assessed with quizzes, lab projects, and final exam.Considering students’ limited English writing skills
starting. Most clinicalengineering departments in hospitals limit the number of students taking an internship there toonly one at a time, mostly because of the size of the department, which prompts us to secure aplace in the student’s hospital choice as early as possible. Other types of industries may not havethis limitation, although it may be desired by the faculty to limit to only one the number ofstudents in this cooperative process at a given time. In this way, they will be sure that studentstruly interact with professionals from the company instead of with peers from school andconsequently obtain the maximum benefits from this experience. Another reason for theadvanced contact between faculty and the responsible industry contact is to have
Member of IEEE and is a member of ASME, SIAM, ASEE, and AGU. He is actively involved in CELT activities and regularly participates and presents at the Lilly Conference. He has been the recipient of several Faculty Learning Community awards. He is also very active in assessment activities and has presented more than thirty five papers at various assessment institutes. His posters in the areas of assessment, Bloom’s Taxonomy, and Socratic Inquisition have received widespread acclaim from several scholars in the area of cogni- tive science and educational methodologies. He has received the Assessment of Critical Thinking Award twice and is currently working towards incorporating writing assignments that enhance students
asserts the need for signs that communicate technical jargon [2]. The authors makea case that interpreters who have a knowledge of content, provide better instructioncompared to those who are not familiar with a subject. Additionally, the selection ofsigns in communicating technical jargon is important in effectively translating the idea.Finally, a study examining direct instruction (i.e. where the educator is signing) vs.mediated instruction (i.e. where an interpreter is present) showed no difference ineffectively conveying the information to the Deaf student [3]. However, one disturbingfact from this study is that Deaf students leave a course with less knowledge compared totheir hearing peers. Programs have been created to encourage Deaf
Hands-on research component for many participants Stanford Engineering Research Experience for Teachers Interactive Seminars on Professional Practices (SERET) Supporting Transfer to the Classroom Analyzing and Synthesizing Literature Education Transfer Plan with IISME Collaborating Peer coach to support teachers funded by IISME Synthesizing Data and Communicating Results Subject-specific
students in Lincoln felt more confident post-activities than Omahain general, possibly due in part to in-person interactions with these students. There was moredialogue between the Lincoln section and Omaha section due to the distance learning interactionpresent on the day of the dialogue, a factor which may have influenced the “confidence” answersto the post-survey questions. In addition, peer review sessions generated alternative solutionsthat a group may not have thought of initially. A previous study from quantum engineering sawa similar improvement in paper writing as a result of peer review activities, showing there areexamples of beneficial peer-review activities generating positive impacts in engineeringeducation[17] and more broadly in
reflection writing reports to a UTC Research of biogas experiment every 2 weeks discussion Dialogues production? board for peer conference. review Sabrina Colonizing Mars: 9 weeks NASA Mars Choice of Whole class Paper critiques White Paper to (Astronomy) How can we make Exploration aspect of discussion of ideas. from peers 3 NASA Mars a home for team member Mars
, Gabe has gained significant appreciation for the importance of clearly- defined, structured, and supported pathways for program participants. Gabe has a Bachelor’s degree from San Francisco State University in English; Creative Writing. He lives in the East Bay and enjoys exploring new rivers, lakes, and beaches in the area.Mr. David Gruber, Growth Sector American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Experiential Learning during COVID-19: A Systemic Approach for Increasing Diversity in Smart ManufacturingAbstractExperiential Learning is a key component in Engineering and Engineering TechnologyEducation. However, the current engineering an
ofobjectives, CATME peer evaluationdata from both years was used toevaluate whether students believetheir team members i) possessedrelated knowledge, skills, andabilities and ii) contributed todeliverables (objective 1). CATMEalso rated how efficiently the Fig. 2: SPOC subteam communication dynamicsubteams communicated relative to 2018-2019 results with the embedded ID team structure.End-of-semester reflections for both years and a survey in the fall of 2019 (Appendix B)provided more data on task allocation and subteam communication.Results and Discussion:Objective 1: CATME peer evaluation data reported that engineers scored higher than IDs (bothyears) and point differentials were slightly but not statistically less (two-sided t-test, α
challenging but foundationalcourses. In particular, we wanted to demonstrate the benefit of SI workshops in a majority first-generation, underrepresented minority, predominantly academically unprepared studentpopulation. The peer-led workshops are mandatory for FYrE@ECST students and designed topromote inquiry-based and collaborative learning environment and increase students’mathematics self-efficacy. Supplemental Instruction was assessed using self-efficacy surveys,physics and math grades, pre- and post-tests, and focus groups. FYrE@ECST students werecompared to concurrent (CG-2) and historical (CG-3) control groups. The math average GPA forFYrE@ECST students at the end of the first year was 2.9, compared to 2.2 and 2.45 for CG-2and CG-3
flipped instruction. Module 2: Online Engagement – Creating Videos Introduction to different types of videos. By the end of this module, faculty will have decided what type of video they want to create; selected and mastered technology to write or create videos for examples, record videos, post videos online; posted and received student feedback on one example video. Module 3: Engaging Students Actively in the Classroom Introduction to active learning including peer discussion, sharing and problem solving, case studies, etc. By the end of this module, faculty will have articulated active learning strategies that work in their discipline; tested out new
in a wind tunnel using a pitot/static probe. Here thestudents made use of the Bernoulli Equation that had been developed in class to calculatevelocity. The twist was that the report generated in Activity One was given to a differentteam to use, i.e., not the team that generated the report. The Activity Two studentsprovided a peer review of the Activity One report regarding ease of use and technicalcorrectness. The instructor then used this peer review to grade Activities One and Two. Page 14.1118.5The use of student generated reports, utilized by different students, is extremely valuablein emphasizing the importance of writing an industry report
and mentoring, as one of the leading elements that contribute to students’ success [1],figure 1. Figure 1: Elements of Students' Success [1]In practice, peer tutoring has been utilized to support students in large introductory classes, suchas math, chemistry, and biology, with little-to-no support in engineering classes. Tutoringservices that target lower level engineering courses have been limited to individual attempts orclub organizations, e.g., IEEE and HKN. Additionally, limited studies are evaluating generaltutoring services in higher education [2].In 2017, the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at California State University,Chico established a tutoring center to provide drop-in tutoring
. Her research has been published in journals such as Theory into Practice, Action in Teacher Education, and Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. She earned her Ph.D. in Reading/Writing/Literacy from the University of Pennsylvania. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Shifting Pre-Calculus from a Gatekeeper to a Gateway CourseAbstractThe national need to transform STEM education is paramount, as evidenced by the persistent gapin STEM degree attainment between whites and minorities, which continues to be a wide chasmin spite of greater numbers of minority students entering into STEM studies as compared to tenyears ago. This gap may be attributed in part to the systemic problem of
biomass in the systems. It isthought that more time should have been provided for the testing phase of the project. Withoutprior testing, more than two weeks are probably required to get the systems close to steady statewith reasonable COD removal. In addition, the students should have had an IPR during thisperiod so the instructor could assess the data collection protocol. In the future, the studentsshould be asked to conduct a mass balance on COD and/or nitrogen as part of this assignment.Students were asked to assess the overall project, their own performance, and the performance oftheir peers by completing a survey (Table 2). The survey was administered in-class after theproject was completed and was treated like an exam (no collaboration or
-scale projects that centered around each core competency required by the second tierwhich is the main project in the course. Page 12.1052.3In the first tier, each student group is given four weeks to work on a tier-one project in thelaboratory. Then, each group teaches the rest of the class the details of the core competency theyworked on. This allows peer-to-peer learning. In this process, each group gave a 25-minutemini-lecture to the class and demonstrated their prototype. The design challenges andprogramming details were covered in great depth. This approach generated lots of questions andinteraction between the presenting
your (professional development or personal growth), 1 through 7 with 7 as most effective.”All questions were to be answered on the same 7-point scale. An option to mark NA (notapplicable) was also provided. In addition, students were invited to write in personal perceptionsor clarifying or additive remarks. In total, 17 questions were asked, with 12 of those related toprofessional development activities, and 5 related to personal growth. Results are summarized inTable 1 (professional development) and Table 2 (personal growth).Results: Professional DevelopmentSEECS activities related to professional development have been chosen and tested over the yearsto address retention, employment potential and bolster enthusiasm for careers
is underway, with plans to expand to the College of Sciences.Outcomes will be measured using interviews, surveys, reflective writings, and peer teachingobservations. Educational Research This poster will highlight an IRB-approved qualitative study that is being conducted aspart of the grant project. The research is guided by the HSI servingness framework [7]. Theoverall purpose of the research is to understand the ways in which the university is serving itsSTEM students, using a mirror approach [13] to study and self-reflect on the institution, herebyfocusing on the organization as the main unit of analysis. Findings from this research willdirectly inform plans and actions to revise policies and
coding is aninstructional activity where the instructor thinks aloud as they write code in real-time in frontof the students [9], [10]. Live coding facilitates students' understanding of coding and allowsthem to learn debugging a good programming practice from the instructor [11]. Priorliterature has found that most students in introductory programming courses view live codingpositively and often prefer it over static instructional activities [12], [13]. However,depending on how it is conducted, live coding can become a passive activity for students [9].Previous research findings report that during passive live coding, students may disengage,feel disoriented, or struggle to keep up with the instructor [14], [15].To overcome the passive attention
. CEE 413 Peer Rating of Design Group MembersName______________________________ Group Name________________Please write the names of all your design group members, INCLUDING YOURSELF,and rate the degree to which each member fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completingthe design project. Remember to rate yourself. The possible ratings are: EXCELLENT (6): Consistently went above and beyond ― carried more than his/her fair share of the load and had to help group members. VERY GOOD (5): Consistently did what he/she was suppose to do, very well prepared and cooperative. SATISFACTORY(4):Usually
administrative policies, faculty interactions, curriculum andpedagogy, and peer relationships. Other factors included elements of the study environment,quality of effort on the part of both faculty and student, and integration of the student into theculture of the institution. The student outcomes are explained by Astin to encompass thoseaspects of student development that the university purposefully attempts to influence, thoughdefining the outputs of interest is “clearly the sine qua non of meaningful research on collegeimpact” (p. 224). Astin1 also explained the relationships between these three factors. The collegeenvironment was clearly affected by the kinds of students who enroll (shown in relationship A).The principal concern relating to
for Engineering Education, 2019 Development and Assessment of an Undergraduate Research CommunityAbstractLiterature suggests the benefits to undergraduate research include improving students’understanding of the research process, their resilience, and their ability to persist through failure.However, at primarily undergraduate institutions, there are a number of challenges in making theundergraduate research experience successful for both students and faculty mentors. First, there isa significant burden on faculty mentors who, along with designing a research project, are typicallyindividually advising students, training them in reading and writing about research, and critiquingposters and presentations. These are skills which could be