an online program provided that the curriculum has been developed or converted to meet the needs of the online medium. Transferring credits – Some schools still do not acknowledge online schools in the same light as on-campus schools, making it difficult to transfer credits to an on-site college.3. Security overviewThe success of Online Learning depends on how secure is the internet system, more precisely,how secure the web-server which providing the educational services is?A secure security system has three main concepts: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.Confidentiality ensures access of information to authorized parties only, whereas integrityensures transfer of unaltered data to the receiver. Availability ensures
Computer Science Department at Forman Christian College (A Chartered University) at Pakistan for eight years and was recognized for outstanding teaching with the year 2013 teaching award. Saira was also the recipient of the ”President of Pakistan Merit and Talent Scholarship” for her undergraduate studies.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Muhsin Menekse is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focus is on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science con- cepts by creating innovative
an engineering specialty” as the “basic professional degree for engineers.” 1985 NAE report:24 Offer broad engineering education, stronger non-technical education, exposure to realities of the work world, personal career management, and greater management skills. 1974-1995 ASCE Education Conferences: The 1995 conference recommended professional degrees (more formal education), integrated curriculum, faculty development, and practitioner involvement.Other Lessons LearnedThis paper highlights nine LLL as a result of contemplating the process used to develop andbegin the implementation of the civil engineering BOK. The LLL reflect insights provided by adecade of various Raise the Bar activities and the
active MESA students are engineering majors, and many of themare also heavily involved in campus student organizations. Additionally, the EngineeringDepartment has recently been awarded federal grant funds aimed at strengthening its programs.This includes a Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) grant fromthe US Department of Education, an Innovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, andInfrastructure ( IEECI) grant from NSF, and a Curriculum Improvement ImprovementsPartnership Award for the Integration of Research (CIPAIR) grant. The Cañada College NSF S- Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering
, “Systemsthinking is formally introduced in early education. Systems engineering is a part of everyengineer’s curriculum and systems engineering at the university level is grounded in the theoreticalfoundations that spans the hard sciences, engineering, mathematics, and human and socialsciences” [12]. Thus, to fully incorporate the teaching of system architecture to undergraduatesrequires the inclusion of systems thinking competencies, hands-on experience with variousdecision analysis techniques (informal and formal methods) and an introduction to an ArchitectureDevelopment Method/Model Based Systems Architecture synthesis tool [1]. It should be notedthat industrial engineering programs, due to their roots of creating/improving systems [13], areusually
, The Cooper Union, Drexel University, New Jersey Institute of Technology,Ohio State University, Polytechnic University, and University of South Carolina.For ten years, spanning two award periods, the Coalition has been developing andapplying educational innovations for both lower and upper division programs. Based onDrexel’s initial E4 integrated freshman design curriculum, the Coalition institutionsindividually and collectively have spearheaded a number of innovations in such areas asengineering design, concurrent engineering, and such emerging technology areas asbiotechnology and earth engineering systems. Page 8.1141.1
effective at planning, monitoring, and regulating their cognitive activities thanthe former. They tend also to participate in a task more often for reasons such as challenge,curiosity, or mastery; and, they express more positive attitudes towards professionaldevelopment.Introduction Previously1, we introduced an approach to integrate a hierarchical cognitive model into anundergraduate engineering curriculum, described teaching and learning strategies to support thatmodel, and presented preliminary assessment results for the implementation of those strategieson student development. Briefly, the hypothesis that drives this work is this: Mental growthconstitutes a progression through a hierarchy of cognition; the critical thinking and
. It discusses the importance of some social rituals for a living and the seeking for socialjustice. The goal is to form Engineers with good skills more creative, more critics and moreattempt to the quick transformations in every aspect of professional life integrated to the newconnected and global world. This experience has showed good results and has also brought upthe changes in the way of seeing the Engineer as an agent of Science and Technologydevelopment for the well fare of humanity.I. IntroductionIt is legitimate to say that globalization expresses a new wave of Capitalism expansion as aproducing way and a civilizing process in a wide level. The 180 Countries in the worldapproximately 100 of them receive together around only 1% of
, it has remained an implementation challenge for many mobile, tent-camping basedfield camps that have limited access to power.The Curriculum: Capstone and Mechanical DesignThe first design iteration was performed in the Systems Engineering senior capstone designsequence. The first semester of this sequence was a problem-definition process, which endedwith a budget a design specification and a preliminary design. The second semester involvedfinal design, construction and testing. The Systems Engineering capstone mixed seniors withtraining in electrical engineering, computer engineering, and mechanical engineering.The second design iteration was performed in the Mechanical Systems Engineering juniormechanical design course. This course was a
)References[1] P. Jennings, “New directions in renewable energy education”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp 435–439 (2009)[2] J. Swart and T. Sutherland, “Fusing theory and practical in a curriculum for engineering students-A case study”, IEEE AFRICON Conference, Article number #4401497 (2007)[3] H. Banchi and R. Bell, “The Many Levels of Inquiry”, Science and Children, Vol. 46, pp 26-29 (2008)[4] J. R.V. Flora and A. T. Cooper, “Incorporating Inquiry-Based Laboratory Experiment in Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Laboratory”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 131, pp 19-25 (2005)[5] K. Kephart, “The discourse of engagement: an approach to analyzing conceptual understanding in an inquiry
and techniques. Also presented isa course project in which a VB program was successfully used for a real-timetemperature control system. It is concluded that, by embedding VB programming to theControl and Instrumentation curriculum, we have created an effective and efficientteaching and learning approach and, as a result, students not only have gained thetechnical knowledge but also have significantly developed their skills for computerapplications.I. IntroductionOver the last two decades we have seen a strong growing trend of computer applications,especially PC applications, in the control and instrumentation industry. In response to theneeds of current industry and graduate job market, we have revamped our old ElectricalEngineering
?", Frontiers in Education, Kansas City, MI, Nov. 2000.4. Robinson, M., Fadali, M. S., Carr, J. & Maddux, C. "Engineering Principles for High School Students", Frontiers in Education, San Juan Puerto Rico, Nov. 1999.5. Ninnes, P. Representations of indigenous knowledge in secondary school science textbooks in Australia and Canada. International Journal of Science Education v. 22 no6 (June 2000) p. 603-176. Eijkelhof, H., Franssen, H. & Houtveen, T. The changing relationship between science and technology in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies v. 30 no6 (Nov./Dec. '98) p. 677-90.7. Wang, J. An empirical assessment of textbook readability in secondary education. Reading
. 2 (2003): pages 292-93.10. Splitt, Frank G. "The Industrial Needs of the Engineer in the 21st Century: An Update", ASEE New England Section 71st ASEE Annual Fall Conference. Boston, MA: Northeastern University, 1993.11. Al-Holou, Nizar, Nihat M. Bilgutay, Carlos Corleto, John T. Demel, Richard Felder, Karen Frair, Jeffrey Froyd, Mark Hoit, Jim Morgan, and David L. Wells. "First-Year Integrated Curricula Across Engineering Education Coalitions" Proceedings of the Frontiers of Education 28th Annual Conference. Session 1240, Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 1998.12. Cortese, Anthony. "Engineering Education for a Sustainable Future." Engineering Education
a few classes, andtherefore had experience in teaching and tutoring students in one-on-one and small groupsettings. Areas that I lacked experience in included overall course structure, preparing anddelivering lectures, and homework and exam writing.3.1.1 Developing Course StructureAs an integral part of the chemical engineering curriculum, the expected main topics of thiscourse are well defined. Once Dr. Eldridge and I had divided the topics between ourselves, ourmain concern was deciding what information and which concepts would be covered under eachtopic. There are several concepts throughout the course, particularly concerning column design,that could just as well be covered under several different main topics. Together, we decidedwhen
Iowa, an M.Ed in Curriculum and Instruction from Texas A& M University and a B.S in Elementary Education from the University of Houston. She is a former elementary science teacher. Over the past twelve years in Utah, Dr. Monhardt has worked with Navajo teachers and students and her research interests deal broadly with the topic of relevance in elementary science education. She is particularly interested in place a context for making science meaningful for all students, especially those who have been traditionally underrepresented in science. Page 14.1314.1© American Society for Engineering
author’sbackground in the subject. The author found that this approach did succeed in attracting a variety ofstudents who otherwise would learn little of engineering, and in engaging them in the subject and givingthem a basic quantitative understanding of some aspects of the subject. Of course, the approach was notwithout its difficulties, including the problem of integrating very diverse material. On the whole, theauthor found that the approach worked well and recommends it for further development.The rest of this paper is in five parts: (1) An account of how and why the course was developed and itseducational goals; (2) The design of the course, including the syllabus; (3) Observations on the types ofstudents who took the course; (4) The students
author’sbackground in the subject. The author found that this approach did succeed in attracting a variety ofstudents who otherwise would learn little of engineering, and in engaging them in the subject and givingthem a basic quantitative understanding of some aspects of the subject. Of course, the approach was notwithout its difficulties, including the problem of integrating very diverse material. On the whole, theauthor found that the approach worked well and recommends it for further development.The rest of this paper is in five parts: (1) An account of how and why the course was developed and itseducational goals; (2) The design of the course, including the syllabus; (3) Observations on the types ofstudents who took the course; (4) The students
, 2001. [4] E. J. Braude. Software Engineering: An Object-Oriented Perspective. Wiley, 2001. [5] T. Y. Chen and P.-L. Poon. Experience with Teaching Black-Box Testing in a Computer Science/Software Engineering Curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(1):42–50, February 2004. [6] A. Clements. Constructing a Computing Competition to Teach Teamwork. In Frontiers in Education, pages F1F–6, 2003. [7] R. Delisle. How To Use Problem Based Learning in the Classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997. [8] J. Dewey. Democracy in Education. MacMillian, 1963. [9] A. Fekete, T. Greening, and J. Kingston. Conveying Technical Content in a Curriculum Using Problem Based Learning. In Australasian Conference on
in either traditional electrical engineering or concentration incomputer engineering. The department was established in 1987 by the generous support oflocal industry. The Bachelor of Science in either of the concentrations offered by the departmentrequires completion of 127 credits over four years.Programs within the department place an important emphasis on the integration of designthroughout the curriculum starting with introduction to Electrical Engineering (EEP-101)in the freshman year. The design components are then continually strengthened in thesophomore and junior years. During the final (senior) year a sequence of two designcourses are offered. Two sixteen weeks courses, Design I (EEP-490) and Design II (EEP-491), are
aidedmanufacturing. However, students in MFGE 4376 were not able to see an immediate practicalneed for the course. Therefore, we decided to use robot systems (robot manipulator and its Page 9.1166.1sensor and actuator based accessories) to teach controls theory. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationOur Approach – The EquipmentThe key approach of this paper was to use multi-degree, robot manipulators as a vehicle fordemonstrating the practical aspects of automatic control theory. Robots were chosen for avariety of
curriculum emphasizes the integration of communityservice and enhances the learning experience of the students. In addition, SL providesstudents with opportunities to apply their knowledge to a real world environment. TheUniversity mission directs us to prepare our students to be global citizens by offeringcomprehensive, value-centered learning experience with emphasis on leadership, andsocial responsibility. To accomplish this mission, faculty are encouraged to incorporateservice learning as part of the curriculum. Freshman engineering students are introducedto SL as part of FYS. During fall of 2019, the freshman engineering class was presentedwith a problem of constructing the SFD to help achieve the UN-SDG of food security,nutrition, and
they are likely to encounter in advanced course work in a specificengineering discipline. Achievement of either of these goals would require appropriatecurriculum materials and learning activities. Some of the curriculum materials used in currentexisting introduction to engineering courses may require modification to better meet thetechnological literacy goal of a broad understanding of a wide range of technology.An additional consideration regarding introduction to engineering courses lies in acknowledgingthat not all students enrolled in an introduction to engineering course will persist to completionof an engineering major. Setting aside the issue of why these students leave engineering, it isreasonable to suggest that introduction to
learning scientists in twouniversities has been working on a collaborative grant project funded by the Department ofEducation for the purpose to enhance the student diversity in STEM fields. In this project, weaimed at (1) contextualizing the student learning experience in STEM fields, and (2)implementing an integrated STEM education approach to teach the skills and knowledge that arenecessary to be competent in engineering and technology careers in 21st century. The researchobjective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based instructionalstrategies and the integration of the maker culture on students’ problem solving and life-longlearning skills. Specifically, we introduce evidence based pedagogy together with
11Mr. Dearing is a faculty associate at Illinois State University and teaches Engineering and Technology at theUniversity’s laboratory high school. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees from Illinois State. He has served as Presidentfor the Technology Education Association of Illinois and served on the Board of Directors for the past 12 years. Heis active in professional research and publications, as well as continuing work towards professional development,state and national standards and curriculum projects.CHRISTA N. HESTEKINDr. Hestekin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her researchinterests are in the separation of biomolecules, specifically DNA, using microchannel electrophoresis forapplications in
favorspresent worth methods as much for their simplicity as for the foundation that PW provides thealternative methods.At an earlier ASEE conference, Hartman 6 spoke of an engineering economy curriculum that isgrowing stagnant. His suggestions to enhance the curriculum included teaching engineeringeconomy in the context of decision analysis and design processes, and also to integrate researchadvances. Nachtmann5 and others suggest that an increased emphasis be placed on case studies.But these are more, not less. While beneficial, such integrations will increase the challenge foreducators to identify and sufficiently cover appropriate topic areas that best serve our students.So, how should we proceed? We can begin by identifying the redundant, the
complement each other, whether research or curriculum activities where we can learn. Keep digging into that, so that we’re not waiting until there is an in- depth paper at the end of the project.This excerpt indicates team members’ desire for additional time dedicated to in-depth learningacross teams. The expertise of other teams in the network is recognized as an important resourcethat could strengthen their own approaches. This speaker specifically mentions the benefit ofsharing insights while the transformations were still actively in progress, as opposed to waitingto share polished final products. In these ways, the CoT serves as an incubator and supportivespace for the workshopping of changemaking efforts. This theme resonates with
alumni, The University of Tennessee College of Engineering is wellunderway in a major renovation / reconstruction of its Freshman Engineering program. Thiseffort is an integrated approach to the Freshman curriculum, with a 6-semester hour first-semester course emphasizing problem-solving, teamwork, design concepts, and computer tools(engineering graphics and computer programming), all based around the study of low-levelintroductory physics material. The second thrust is a second-semester 6-hour course integratingstatics and dynamics, while assuming and using mastery of the material from the first semester.Following the lead of educational theorists, the effort is trying to include as many different formsof learning opportunities as possible. The
soil tests are simulated withmultimedia interaction and visualization techniques, the student’s conceptual understanding ofsoil mechanics is enhanced. The methodology presented in this paper is based on presentingstudents with simulation of laboratory soil tests, which creates an individualized, interactive andguided learning environment. The main elements of this approach are: a means of assimilatingthe students' interactive learning knowledge and behavior (user model), representation of theinstructor’s guidance and assessment knowledge (tutor model), utilization of motivationaltechniques such as multimedia, animation (visual model) and simulated laboratory test model(simulation model). As an example, the presented paper provides the learning
Paper ID #27029Board 70: Development and Implementation of a Non-Intrusive Load Moni-toring AlgorithmDr. Robert J Kerestes, University of Pittsburgh Robert Kerestes, PhD, is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering. Robert was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He got his B.S. (2010), his M.S (2012). and his PhD (2014) from the University of Pittsburgh, all with a concen- tration in electric power systems. Robert’s academic focus is in education as it applies to engineering at the collegiate level. His areas of interest are in electric
courses, progressing to a final year project course. The projects willusually be combined with traditional teaching methods within the same course. They focus onthe application, and possibly the integration of previously acquired knowledge. Projects may becarried out by individuals or small groups. Project-organized curricula use projects as thestructuring principle of the entire curriculum, with subject oriented courses eliminated or reducedto a minimum and related to a certain project. Students work in small groups with a project teamof teachers who are advisers and consultants. Projects are undertaken throughout the length ofthe course and vary in duration from a few weeks up to a whole year. In present day engineering,a completely project