Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 435[10] A. T. Butt, E. W. T. Causton and M. A. Watkins, "Embedding Sustainability in the Engineering Curriculum: A Complimentary Approach to Performance Engineering and Sustainable Design," in International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, London, UK, 2022.[11] R. M. Rubio, D. Uribe, A. Moreno-Romero and S. Yáñez, "Embedding Sustainability Competences into Engineering Education. The Case of Informatics Engineering and Industrial Engineering Degree Programs at Spanish Universities," Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 5832, 2019.[12] D. Covill, D
ECSE Department Head from 2001 to 2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association (ECEDHA) from 2003 to 2008. He is a Life Fellow of the IEEE.Dr. Mohamed F. Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Mohamed Chouikha is a professor and chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Howard University. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Coloradoˆa C”Boulder. Dr. Chouikhaˆa C™s research inteDr. John C. Kelly Jr., North Carolina A&T State University Dr. John C. Kelly, Jr. is interim chair and associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina A and T State University. He received his
integrate a broad range oftechnologies and skills. Students are given the opportunity to crystallize the ideas learned earlierand to implement comprehensive systems across an organization. The Master’s Research Projectfocuses on the research and selection of an appropriate topic on one of the research orapplications in the field of wireless communication systems. Each project is to be evaluated by apanel consists of five judges (normally two from university and three from industry) and gradedby “H” for Honors, “S” for Satisfactory and “U” for Unsatisfactory. Each group is responsibleto submit a final project report and make a 50 minute formal presentation. Following is the listof MSWC courses: 1. WCM601 Analog and Digital Communications
of the American Society for Engineering Education" 1225 International Engineering Program, June 2005, http://www.uri.edu/iep/pdf/facts_figures/2001-2002/gender.pdf.26 Vader, D., Erikson, V. A., Eby, J. W. (2000); “Cross-Cultural Service-Learning for Responsible EngineeringGraduates,” Projects That Matter: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Engineering. Washington, D.C.:AAHE.27 Kelley, B. S., Fry, C. C., Sturgill, D. B., Thomas, J. B.(2004) “Faith-Based and Secular Experience onRebuilding Engineering and Computer Science Higher Education in Kurdistan of Iraq,” in
Space Flight Center’ s Leadership Alchemy Program whichuses storytelling for mid career employees to create ambassadors of positive change who canrespond to dynamic times and what’s happening in larger environments.Lori Silverman, in her popular leadership book Wake Me Up When the Data is Over, HowOrganizations use Storytelling to Drive Change explains that NASA “consciously designedstorytelling into their program through conversations, learning experiences, and tools to dealwith challenges that manifest in the workplace. Both storytelling and story listening skills werereinforced.”21In addition, the Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, and Fast Company magazine areamong the many publications to have featured stories on this trend
, 2018, doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.[2] S. K. Kapp, Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0.[3] J. Halpern, M. Arral, and J. Gesun, “Work-in-Progress: Inclusive Mentoring Strategies for Neurodivergent Undergraduate Researchers in STEM,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, 2022.[4] M. L. Arral, “10 Tips to Make Your Course More Accessible and Inclusive to Disabled Students,” in American Society for Engineering Education, 2022, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Apr. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.slayte.com[5] “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019 | NSF - National Science Foundation.” Accessed: Jan. 27
supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumbers 2346868 and 2144698. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. We would like to express gratitude to Team Y for participatingin this study and for their willingness to open their meetings to us and provide feedback on theinitial drafts of this paper. We would also like to thank Dr. Nicola Sochacka for her insightfulfeedback and discussions as we analyzed our initial data. Finally, we would like to thank themembers of the ENLITE research team who gave feedback to the drafts of this paper.References[1] M. Borrego and L. K. Newswander
look at the overlap between these two multidimensional fields, however, suggests a muchwider range of inquiry topics. Collisions between engineering culture and social scienceparadigms function as the focal point of this paper. Please see table 1 for a summary of fiveinterdisciplinary collisions that occurred between 2012 and 2024, illustrating aspects ofengineering education that transcend the narrow focal point of curricular design.Table 1: Situated learning catalyzed by disciplinary fissures Learning Disciplinary fissure(s) Lessons learned So what? catalyst Education Engineering about Eng Ed Define Leadership is a Leadership is a
Watson, University of the Pacific Mr. Micah Lande, Stanford University Dr. Estelle Eke, CSU-Sacramento Prof. Sanjida Khanam, ITT-Alabama Dr. Shazzad Aslam-Mir, Senior Consultant Dr. Abu Sadeque, Arena Pharmaceutical Inc. Dr. Kiran George, CSU-Fullerton Dr. Thomas Maccalla, NUCRI Dr. Arun Datta, NUCRI Dr. Brian Self, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Dr. Ralph Belcher, National University Dr. Abu S. Amanullah, Olympus Communications Dr
Directions for Community Colleges, vol. 1993, no. 82, pp. 21–31, 1993.including course descriptions, student grades, and course [4] B. S. Metzner, “Perceived quality of academic advising: The effect onevaluations is an intriguing area
/. [AccessedApril 5, 2024].[4] S. Lehmann, "Low carbon districts: mitigating the urban heat island with green roofinfrastructure," City, Culture and Society, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1-8. 2014. [Online]. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916614000046. [Accessed April 5,2024].[5] M. Premalatha, S. M. Tauseef, T. Abbasi, and S. A. Abbasi, "The promise and theperformance of the world's first two zero carbon eco-cities," Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews, vol. 25, p. 660-669, September 2013. [Online]. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032113003146. [Accessed March 13,2024].[6] A. Janik, A. Ryszko and M. Szafraniec, Smart and sustainable cities: in search ofcomprehensive theoretical
warrant solutions that provide meaningful benefit at all scales. Anotherprofessor thought their research and the competition were a “good fit because the challenge[s] ofthe competition are always related to energy and buildings.” Participating provided insight intosubjects that were of interest to national laboratories and created an opportunity for professors tobrainstorm solutions to emerging topics. Both personal values and research interests werepowerful motivators that guided the decision to engage with the national competition.Opportunities to collaborate with other professorsThe nature of the real-world problem-solving project encouraged collaboration with otherprofessors. The topic areas focused on energy and building sciences, but their
think aboutethical decision-making. To connect these important approaches from the Philosophy of Tech-nology to Engineering, we propose embracing a playful approach to engineering education,specifically the queer art of failure, to expand the strategies and tools available for engineeringeducators in conveying complicated practice of teaching ethics to engineering students.III. T EACHING E NGINEERING E THICS : T HE S TATE OF THE C RAFTPresently, the incentives that American engineering programs currently have to teach ethicsis to meet hard requirements, such as those set out by ABET Accreditation [3], which areaccreditation bodies within the educational system that judge engineering curricula across allinstitutions and verify that they are
Syndrome Research Question(s): Wernicke’s syndrome develops as a result of nutrient and vitamin deficiencies related to alcoholism. What prevents alcoholics from receiving adequate nutrition? How can biomedical innovations be used to prevent the progression of this syndrome? Topic: Acclimating to High School 17 Title: The STEM Innovation Academy’s Approach to the Senior Capstone Project: Promoting a Culture of Excellence Research Question(s): What logistical challenges do freshmen face when starting high
Paper ID #34922Creating a Peer Review of Teaching Process to Enhance InstructorFeedback in Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University Dr. Jennifer Herman is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University, where she teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in technical and research commu- nication. Dr. Hermanˆa C™s research interests includeDr. Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She
. Course StructureHumanitarian Design Projects is a two-credit engineering elective at the Harvard School ofEngineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) that challenges groups of engineering students todesign and implement multi-semester humanitarian engineering projects with partner communitiesaround the world. Undergraduate teaching assistants and student project managers are responsiblefor co-creating course assignments with the head instructor, which are then assigned to studentseach week and subsequently reviewed by the instructional staff. Each assignment must fit into asemester-long strategy that addresses the particular design prompt or need communicated by theproject partner(s). Each project spans multiple years, which means that each semester
mechanical drawings and software.7. Test results for your project.8. Analysis of your success measured against the performance specifications and need.Instructional Approach – Methods and ProceduresThe course consists of class discussions and individual/team requirements designed toreinforce the material throughout the quarter and your college tenure. Students should comeprepared to discuss the elements of the design process, including their assignments / project(s),in class and be prepared to contribute to team activities in / out of class to complete that / thoseassigned the project(s). Any exercises or other work must be done in a complete manner,which includes defining problems/processes, providing illustrations and including a
Practice 131, 19-25, 2005.4. Recktenwald, G., & Edwards, R. (2007, June), Using Simple Experiments To Teach Core Concepts InThe Thermal And Fluid Sciences Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu,Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/27375. Sundararajan, S., & Faidley, L. E., & Meyer, T. R. (2012, June), Developing Inquiry-based LaboratoryExercises for a Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference,San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/211906. “POGIL, Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning,” [pogil.org. Retrieved Jan. 2016.7. Douglas . E. P. et al. “Process-oriented Guided Inquiry Learning in Engineering,” Procedia - Socialand Behavioral Sciences 56 ( 2012 ) 253 – 257.8
various as solving ill-defined problems, systems thinking, technological challenges,interdisciplinary learning, and innovation. The context, which can affect the specific aspects of thephenomenon that are available for participants to experience, also differs from study to study.The nature of the phenomenon and the context(s) in which the phenomenon is experienced haveserious implications for a study. When the nature of the phenomenon is more concrete (such assolving a particular physics problem) and the context is limited (such as experiencing thisproblem-solving in the same middle school science class), the types of variation uncovered may belimited in scope but they will also be cohesive. In other words, the researchers can be
applied to the REU program is included inTable 1. In general, the percentage of applicants who were female and from underrepresentedgroups was similar to the typical representation of such students at the bachelor’s degree level inengineering overall 13. Page 26.1243.6Table 1. Demographic Information of Applicants to the Chemical Engineering REU Program Number of % CE/E/S AverageYear % Female % URM % Fr/So/Ju/Se Applicants Major Cumulative GPA2014 70 36 20* 91/7/2 3.44
as in Europe. At those sites, we will not collect identifiable information or registrar data.We plan to identify the students that are struggling and eventually to provide interventions thathelp to increase their prospects for success.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. DUE-1626287 (Purdue), DUE-1626185 (Cal Poly), and DUE-1626148 (UTEP). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Wewould like to thank all the students who participated in this study. Without their time spent inthoughtful response, this work would not be
variety. That variety is based on the fundamental difference in philosophy as to whetheryear 1 has common content for all branches of engineering or discipline specific programs begin inyear 1. For the former, many imaginative ways have been introduced to allow students to gain an Page 15.658.2understanding of the uniqueness of the disciplines.This summary considers eight options (with the school code in brackets for the school using thisoption): 1. Common year 1 with no engineering exposure through courses; basic math and sciences, 0% of responders 2. Common year 1 with required common engineering course(s) with no explicit
then enter "Did not use."Question 15, and its sub-questions intended to assess the validity of our hypothesis of whetherthe intervention helped with responsiveness. Figure 4 displays how this question was structured. Figure 4 Visual representation of the layout of the question(s) regarding responsiveness.In addition to above, the following questions were included in the survey to assess theresponsiveness objective of the intervention. • Question 16. Describe how you used one or more avatars to plan to alter how you responded to the expo audience in real time. • Question 17. Did you use the Mary Turner avatar to help you make communication decisions while preparing your Expo Video? • Question 18. Did the
recognized that one of the primary reasons students are unable to transfer theirknowledge into new problem-solving situations is because they perceive new information as theend goal, as opposed to a tool that can be used to solve other problems. As an example, theauthors mention how astronomers in the early 1600’s frequently dealt with tedious computationsinvolving big numbers. When the mathematical concept of logarithms was invented, theyrecognized the concept as a tool that could be used to make the problems they were solvingmuch more manageable. On the other hand, when students in the modern era are introduced tologarithms, they tend to think of them as a problem instead of a tool. They cannot appreciatethem the way the 17th century astronomers