different atmosphere is critical. No longer is this the normal, learn material and repeat that material; this is discovery of material that has not been seen before and the importance of conveying the findings to an audience that is not looking for regurgitated material but material that is fresh and new. The preparation for this activity has taken four years. During the student’s undergraduate years, communication activities have been an integral part of the engineering curriculum. As is shown in Table 1, the student has been provided with multiple opportunities to investigate and practice his/her communication skills within all of the required mechanical engineering courses and many of the elective courses. By the time the student takes the
and computer science. Theresponse from faculty and students has been overwhelmingly positive with, for example, amolecular biology student commenting that this is the best experience of her life and a facultymember sending an unsolicited e-mail report that his engineering student is outstanding andcompleting tasks so quickly that the faculty member is challenged to keep him occupied – a goodproblem to have! Most importantly, all twenty students who have participated in the program arecurrently or will be pursuing STEM degrees at UT Dallas.Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL)The integration of Peer-led Team Learning (PLTL)9 into the UT Dallas STEM learningframework has been supported, in part, by the Collaborative. The PLTL program began in theFall
his sabbatical to study entrepreneurship in Indiana and assist start-ups as Educator/Entrepreneur in Resi- dence at Indiana Venture Center. He has been Advisor/Director for several high tech firms and has been involved in national efforts to integrate entrepreneurship and engineering education. Since his retirement from full-time teaching, Mason has co-authored an updated edition of Forecasting and Management of Technology, teaches part-time, continues his research and writing on innovation and entrepreneurship, and works in an advisory capacity with several emerging firms. Mason received his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Pittsburgh and his B.A. in economics from Geneva College.Mr. Brian Charles Dougherty
effective at planning, monitoring, and regulating their cognitive activities thanthe former. They tend also to participate in a task more often for reasons such as challenge,curiosity, or mastery; and, they express more positive attitudes towards professionaldevelopment.Introduction Previously1, we introduced an approach to integrate a hierarchical cognitive model into anundergraduate engineering curriculum, described teaching and learning strategies to support thatmodel, and presented preliminary assessment results for the implementation of those strategieson student development. Briefly, the hypothesis that drives this work is this: Mental growthconstitutes a progression through a hierarchy of cognition; the critical thinking and
Computer Science Department at Forman Christian College (A Chartered University) at Pakistan for eight years and was recognized for outstanding teaching with the year 2013 teaching award. Saira was also the recipient of the ”President of Pakistan Merit and Talent Scholarship” for her undergraduate studies.Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Muhsin Menekse is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focus is on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science con- cepts by creating innovative
. It discusses the importance of some social rituals for a living and the seeking for socialjustice. The goal is to form Engineers with good skills more creative, more critics and moreattempt to the quick transformations in every aspect of professional life integrated to the newconnected and global world. This experience has showed good results and has also brought upthe changes in the way of seeing the Engineer as an agent of Science and Technologydevelopment for the well fare of humanity.I. IntroductionIt is legitimate to say that globalization expresses a new wave of Capitalism expansion as aproducing way and a civilizing process in a wide level. The 180 Countries in the worldapproximately 100 of them receive together around only 1% of
an engineering specialty” as the “basic professional degree for engineers.” 1985 NAE report:24 Offer broad engineering education, stronger non-technical education, exposure to realities of the work world, personal career management, and greater management skills. 1974-1995 ASCE Education Conferences: The 1995 conference recommended professional degrees (more formal education), integrated curriculum, faculty development, and practitioner involvement.Other Lessons LearnedThis paper highlights nine LLL as a result of contemplating the process used to develop andbegin the implementation of the civil engineering BOK. The LLL reflect insights provided by adecade of various Raise the Bar activities and the
an online program provided that the curriculum has been developed or converted to meet the needs of the online medium. Transferring credits – Some schools still do not acknowledge online schools in the same light as on-campus schools, making it difficult to transfer credits to an on-site college.3. Security overviewThe success of Online Learning depends on how secure is the internet system, more precisely,how secure the web-server which providing the educational services is?A secure security system has three main concepts: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.Confidentiality ensures access of information to authorized parties only, whereas integrityensures transfer of unaltered data to the receiver. Availability ensures
?", Frontiers in Education, Kansas City, MI, Nov. 2000.4. Robinson, M., Fadali, M. S., Carr, J. & Maddux, C. "Engineering Principles for High School Students", Frontiers in Education, San Juan Puerto Rico, Nov. 1999.5. Ninnes, P. Representations of indigenous knowledge in secondary school science textbooks in Australia and Canada. International Journal of Science Education v. 22 no6 (June 2000) p. 603-176. Eijkelhof, H., Franssen, H. & Houtveen, T. The changing relationship between science and technology in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies v. 30 no6 (Nov./Dec. '98) p. 677-90.7. Wang, J. An empirical assessment of textbook readability in secondary education. Reading
, it has remained an implementation challenge for many mobile, tent-camping basedfield camps that have limited access to power.The Curriculum: Capstone and Mechanical DesignThe first design iteration was performed in the Systems Engineering senior capstone designsequence. The first semester of this sequence was a problem-definition process, which endedwith a budget a design specification and a preliminary design. The second semester involvedfinal design, construction and testing. The Systems Engineering capstone mixed seniors withtraining in electrical engineering, computer engineering, and mechanical engineering.The second design iteration was performed in the Mechanical Systems Engineering juniormechanical design course. This course was a
)References[1] P. Jennings, “New directions in renewable energy education”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp 435–439 (2009)[2] J. Swart and T. Sutherland, “Fusing theory and practical in a curriculum for engineering students-A case study”, IEEE AFRICON Conference, Article number #4401497 (2007)[3] H. Banchi and R. Bell, “The Many Levels of Inquiry”, Science and Children, Vol. 46, pp 26-29 (2008)[4] J. R.V. Flora and A. T. Cooper, “Incorporating Inquiry-Based Laboratory Experiment in Undergraduate Environmental Engineering Laboratory”, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 131, pp 19-25 (2005)[5] K. Kephart, “The discourse of engagement: an approach to analyzing conceptual understanding in an inquiry
a few classes, andtherefore had experience in teaching and tutoring students in one-on-one and small groupsettings. Areas that I lacked experience in included overall course structure, preparing anddelivering lectures, and homework and exam writing.3.1.1 Developing Course StructureAs an integral part of the chemical engineering curriculum, the expected main topics of thiscourse are well defined. Once Dr. Eldridge and I had divided the topics between ourselves, ourmain concern was deciding what information and which concepts would be covered under eachtopic. There are several concepts throughout the course, particularly concerning column design,that could just as well be covered under several different main topics. Together, we decidedwhen
active MESA students are engineering majors, and many of themare also heavily involved in campus student organizations. Additionally, the EngineeringDepartment has recently been awarded federal grant funds aimed at strengthening its programs.This includes a Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program (MSEIP) grant fromthe US Department of Education, an Innovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, andInfrastructure ( IEECI) grant from NSF, and a Curriculum Improvement ImprovementsPartnership Award for the Integration of Research (CIPAIR) grant. The Cañada College NSF S- Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering
, “Systemsthinking is formally introduced in early education. Systems engineering is a part of everyengineer’s curriculum and systems engineering at the university level is grounded in the theoreticalfoundations that spans the hard sciences, engineering, mathematics, and human and socialsciences” [12]. Thus, to fully incorporate the teaching of system architecture to undergraduatesrequires the inclusion of systems thinking competencies, hands-on experience with variousdecision analysis techniques (informal and formal methods) and an introduction to an ArchitectureDevelopment Method/Model Based Systems Architecture synthesis tool [1]. It should be notedthat industrial engineering programs, due to their roots of creating/improving systems [13], areusually
, The Cooper Union, Drexel University, New Jersey Institute of Technology,Ohio State University, Polytechnic University, and University of South Carolina.For ten years, spanning two award periods, the Coalition has been developing andapplying educational innovations for both lower and upper division programs. Based onDrexel’s initial E4 integrated freshman design curriculum, the Coalition institutionsindividually and collectively have spearheaded a number of innovations in such areas asengineering design, concurrent engineering, and such emerging technology areas asbiotechnology and earth engineering systems. Page 8.1141.1
and techniques. Also presented isa course project in which a VB program was successfully used for a real-timetemperature control system. It is concluded that, by embedding VB programming to theControl and Instrumentation curriculum, we have created an effective and efficientteaching and learning approach and, as a result, students not only have gained thetechnical knowledge but also have significantly developed their skills for computerapplications.I. IntroductionOver the last two decades we have seen a strong growing trend of computer applications,especially PC applications, in the control and instrumentation industry. In response to theneeds of current industry and graduate job market, we have revamped our old ElectricalEngineering
Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators across the country. His current research focuses on student problem-solving pro- cesses and use of worked examples, change models and evidence-based teaching practices in engineering curricula, and the role of non-cognitive and affective factors in student academic outcomes and overall success.Dr
approach is a concept called “backward design” where “one starts with the end—thedesired results (goals or standards)—and then derives the curriculum from the evidence oflearning (performances) called for by the standards and the teaching needed to equip students toperform” The initial step in the process involves the identification of a set of “enduringunderstandings.” These are the core concepts, the large, robust ideas that are considered essentialto a discipline. With ProBASE, the project team focused considerable time and energy during theinitial stages of the project on an analysis of the Standards, to “boil” them down to the coreessentials for a solid pre-engineering curriculum. The results of this process will be presentedlater in the
Paper ID #27029Board 70: Development and Implementation of a Non-Intrusive Load Moni-toring AlgorithmDr. Robert J Kerestes, University of Pittsburgh Robert Kerestes, PhD, is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering. Robert was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He got his B.S. (2010), his M.S (2012). and his PhD (2014) from the University of Pittsburgh, all with a concen- tration in electric power systems. Robert’s academic focus is in education as it applies to engineering at the collegiate level. His areas of interest are in electric
they are likely to encounter in advanced course work in a specificengineering discipline. Achievement of either of these goals would require appropriatecurriculum materials and learning activities. Some of the curriculum materials used in currentexisting introduction to engineering courses may require modification to better meet thetechnological literacy goal of a broad understanding of a wide range of technology.An additional consideration regarding introduction to engineering courses lies in acknowledgingthat not all students enrolled in an introduction to engineering course will persist to completionof an engineering major. Setting aside the issue of why these students leave engineering, it isreasonable to suggest that introduction to
. 2 (2003): pages 292-93.10. Splitt, Frank G. "The Industrial Needs of the Engineer in the 21st Century: An Update", ASEE New England Section 71st ASEE Annual Fall Conference. Boston, MA: Northeastern University, 1993.11. Al-Holou, Nizar, Nihat M. Bilgutay, Carlos Corleto, John T. Demel, Richard Felder, Karen Frair, Jeffrey Froyd, Mark Hoit, Jim Morgan, and David L. Wells. "First-Year Integrated Curricula Across Engineering Education Coalitions" Proceedings of the Frontiers of Education 28th Annual Conference. Session 1240, Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, 1998.12. Cortese, Anthony. "Engineering Education for a Sustainable Future." Engineering Education
learning scientists in twouniversities has been working on a collaborative grant project funded by the Department ofEducation for the purpose to enhance the student diversity in STEM fields. In this project, weaimed at (1) contextualizing the student learning experience in STEM fields, and (2)implementing an integrated STEM education approach to teach the skills and knowledge that arenecessary to be competent in engineering and technology careers in 21st century. The researchobjective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of evidence-based instructionalstrategies and the integration of the maker culture on students’ problem solving and life-longlearning skills. Specifically, we introduce evidence based pedagogy together with
, 2001. [4] E. J. Braude. Software Engineering: An Object-Oriented Perspective. Wiley, 2001. [5] T. Y. Chen and P.-L. Poon. Experience with Teaching Black-Box Testing in a Computer Science/Software Engineering Curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(1):42–50, February 2004. [6] A. Clements. Constructing a Computing Competition to Teach Teamwork. In Frontiers in Education, pages F1F–6, 2003. [7] R. Delisle. How To Use Problem Based Learning in the Classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997. [8] J. Dewey. Democracy in Education. MacMillian, 1963. [9] A. Fekete, T. Greening, and J. Kingston. Conveying Technical Content in a Curriculum Using Problem Based Learning. In Australasian Conference on
11Mr. Dearing is a faculty associate at Illinois State University and teaches Engineering and Technology at theUniversity’s laboratory high school. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees from Illinois State. He has served as Presidentfor the Technology Education Association of Illinois and served on the Board of Directors for the past 12 years. Heis active in professional research and publications, as well as continuing work towards professional development,state and national standards and curriculum projects.CHRISTA N. HESTEKINDr. Hestekin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her researchinterests are in the separation of biomolecules, specifically DNA, using microchannel electrophoresis forapplications in
in either traditional electrical engineering or concentration incomputer engineering. The department was established in 1987 by the generous support oflocal industry. The Bachelor of Science in either of the concentrations offered by the departmentrequires completion of 127 credits over four years.Programs within the department place an important emphasis on the integration of designthroughout the curriculum starting with introduction to Electrical Engineering (EEP-101)in the freshman year. The design components are then continually strengthened in thesophomore and junior years. During the final (senior) year a sequence of two designcourses are offered. Two sixteen weeks courses, Design I (EEP-490) and Design II (EEP-491), are
aidedmanufacturing. However, students in MFGE 4376 were not able to see an immediate practicalneed for the course. Therefore, we decided to use robot systems (robot manipulator and its Page 9.1166.1sensor and actuator based accessories) to teach controls theory. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationOur Approach – The EquipmentThe key approach of this paper was to use multi-degree, robot manipulators as a vehicle fordemonstrating the practical aspects of automatic control theory. Robots were chosen for avariety of
Iowa, an M.Ed in Curriculum and Instruction from Texas A& M University and a B.S in Elementary Education from the University of Houston. She is a former elementary science teacher. Over the past twelve years in Utah, Dr. Monhardt has worked with Navajo teachers and students and her research interests deal broadly with the topic of relevance in elementary science education. She is particularly interested in place a context for making science meaningful for all students, especially those who have been traditionally underrepresented in science. Page 14.1314.1© American Society for Engineering
complement each other, whether research or curriculum activities where we can learn. Keep digging into that, so that we’re not waiting until there is an in- depth paper at the end of the project.This excerpt indicates team members’ desire for additional time dedicated to in-depth learningacross teams. The expertise of other teams in the network is recognized as an important resourcethat could strengthen their own approaches. This speaker specifically mentions the benefit ofsharing insights while the transformations were still actively in progress, as opposed to waitingto share polished final products. In these ways, the CoT serves as an incubator and supportivespace for the workshopping of changemaking efforts. This theme resonates with
engineering. Taking action as an ambassador might in turn impact her beliefs about how and whyindividuals decide to stay or leave the STEM pipeline in school. Actions might also impact herself-perceptions about her capacity to influence and lead others, thus strengthening herprofessional goals of achieving a leadership and mentorship position in engineering career. Thismight lead to further action possibilities of becoming a senior ambassador, and perhaps lookinginto engineering management as a future career goal. In this hypothetical case, all of these roleidentity components are in alignment. Moreover, different other roles, such as that ofundergraduate student (and the imagined role of future engineer) are integrated with the role ofthe
courses, progressing to a final year project course. The projects willusually be combined with traditional teaching methods within the same course. They focus onthe application, and possibly the integration of previously acquired knowledge. Projects may becarried out by individuals or small groups. Project-organized curricula use projects as thestructuring principle of the entire curriculum, with subject oriented courses eliminated or reducedto a minimum and related to a certain project. Students work in small groups with a project teamof teachers who are advisers and consultants. Projects are undertaken throughout the length ofthe course and vary in duration from a few weeks up to a whole year. In present day engineering,a completely project