., Guzdial, M. & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.4. Barak, M. (2009). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education, International Journal of Technology and Design Education (published online first).5. Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer.6. Zimmerman, B. J., & Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. In J. E. Davidson & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem-solving (pp. 233–262). New York: Cambridge University Press.7. Flavell, J.H. (1979
fun.Instructor PerspectiveI analyzed 10 pair programming projects from fall 2006, 8 projects from fall 2007, 4 projectsfrom fall 2008, and 5 projects from fall 2009. The programs were compared to individuallyproduced programs in the areas of design quality, number of defects, and code style consistency.In the area of design quality I looked for things like modularity and efficiency of the code. Ifound little difference between the individual and pair produced programs. This was especiallytrue for the “A” and “B” students. For the poorer students, there was a definite improvementwhen paired with a better student. In the few cases where poorer students were paired together,what was most significant was that they were more likely to complete the whole
principles”. 3 It was anticipated that some students could reachrigor-relevance domain B, application. Details on the course, new sustainability modules, andthe assessment of student attitudes and learning are provided below.First Year CourseThe content of the Introduction to Environmental Engineering course for first year students atCU has changed significantly over time. The course is one credit and meets for 50-minutes eachof the 15 weeks of the semester. All first year environmental engineering students are requiredto take the course. The course has had three different instructors, each with a different vision of Page 15.544.3what
) (b) Figure 2: Unwelded and welded tensile test samples of (a) 6061-T6 aluminum and (b) 1018 steel after tensile test Figure 3: 4143 steel tubes welded with TIG and MIG welds after tensile testTemperature effect on properties of materialsTemperature has a great influence on properties of materials1. In lectures on failure of materials, Page 15.87.5the Titanic tragedy has been used as one example to show Ductile-to-Brittle TransitionTemperature (DBTT) of metals with BCC (body-centered cubic) crystal structure. Some groupsare interested in the DBTT phenomena and test a variety of materials to
also observed when the students were testing their projects prior tothe competition.This project also highlights several problems and successes the students had with the project.Properly biasing the line sensors proved to be the most difficult part of the project. Readingdatasheets provided an additional challenge. There were several positive outcomes, includingthe use of lab notebooks to review topics from previous labs as well as trouble shootingexperiences.Every group successfully completed the “brawn” part the robot project and competed in achallenge (See Appendix B). The students expressed a positive experience on this project eventhough it required numerous hours of work outside of the allotted class time
needed13.Revising the Mission StatementMission statements should answer three important questions: (a) Who are you? (b) What do you Page 15.1280.3do? and (c) Who do you serve?14 The original mission statement for the program was developedconsidering these questions and other factors suggested by Strong15. The original missionstatement needed to be updated in order for the program to transition to engineering technologyand TAC ABET Accreditation. The Engineering Technology faculty at MU revised the existingmission statement for the program. The program advisory board provided advice and approvalin this process.Identifying Program Educational
Leadership Self-Perception Assessment. In itsoriginal form, it consisted of 30 statements (see Appendix A), but after a focus group study, itwas revised to contain 31 statements (one deleted and two added, see Appendix B). In addition,the students answer seven demographics questions. The instrument asks students to respond tothe statements on a 5-point Likert Scale in which they examine how they perceive themselves inthinking and behavior pertaining to the leadership/entrepreneurial skills that are introduced andpracticed in the leadership curriculum. For that reason, the statements are worded in first-personso that students respond in regards to their perceptions of themselves as leaders rather than theirunderstanding what leadership “is” or “is
. Kremer, Engineering Design: A Practical Guide, Togo Press, Pittsburgh, PA, (2004).39. Juvinall R.C., and K.M. Marshek, Fundamentals of Machine Component Design, Wiley, New York (1991)40. Tu, J.F., “Nuggets of Mechanical Engineering – Revisit of the Free-Body Diagram Analysis and Force Flow Concept,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education – ICEE 2007, Coimbra, Portugal September 3 – 7,( 2007).41. Novak, J. D. and Gowin, D. B. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, New York (1984).42. B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, David McKay Company, New York, (1956).43. Krupczak, J.J., “Using Insights from Non-engineers to Improve Introduction to
. ABET Criteria Project Components a. apply math, science & engineering product design; process design b. design & conduct experiments prototype evaluation c. design systems, components or product design, process design, processes production system design, enterprise design d. function in multi-disciplinary teams project operation e. identify, formulate & solve product design, production system engineering problems design, prototype fabrication f. understand professional
understands theconcept of engineering in terms of their conceptual ecologies. This, in turn, will illuminate onhow the concept may changes or resists change. 1. How do these high school students understand the concept engineering? a. How do they define it in their own words? b. How does this definition interact with their level of interest in becoming an engineer? 2. What conceptual ecology does the concept engineering exist in? a. What types of cognitive entities do students use to define it? b. How might this conceptual ecology interact with their learning about engineering?MethodsResearch SettingThis research was performed in a small, rural high school
determined byan alpha of 0.05 or less; (less than 5% chance of random selection providing results). The nature of the data collected for this evaluation lent itself to analysis by the useof a General Linear Model (GLM). The method of analysis for the data collected fromthis project was an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA The ANOVA, both factorial and one-way, used the General Linear Model (GLM).The GLM was selected because the data are arranged in categories. The method isessentially a form of regression, evaluating the distance from an “expected mean”,however the expected mean was not based upon the slope of a “y = mx+b” sort of line.Instead of determining the “expected value” of y from the x-position, the expected valueof y is
) _______ ME Tech Area B – 3 units _______ ME 159 – Mechanical Engineering Lab –(1) _______ ME 135 – Engineering Product Design-(3) _______ ME Tech Area A – 3 units ______ PLSI 304 – Political Science (CSUB) – (5 QTR ) _______ 6 units Technical Area A courses: select from ME 137,142, 144, 146, 162 or 164 3 units Technical Area B courses: ME 180, 190, 191T, ECE 121, 121L, 155 *Art – Recommended 100,101,102,110,or 147* Additional Requirement: Must pass the university writing exam or take IT 198W online course during the fifth semster.Figure 5. Example advising sheet
. The All-in-One Guitar-Playing Robot Video and Game. Online. URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEFxJFFA5OQ2. J.-D. Yoder, B. Jaeger, and J. K. Estell, “One-Minute Engineer, Nth Generation: Expansion to a Small Private University,” 2007 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, AC 2007-1599.3. J. Renaud, C. Squier, and S. C. Larsen, “Integration of a Communicating Science Module into an Advanced Chemistry Laboratory Course,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 83, no. 7 (July 2006), pp. 1029-1031.4. J. K. Estell, L. Laird, and J.-D. Yoder, “Engineering Personified: An Application of the One Minute Engineer,” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, AC 2008-171.5. J. K. Estell and J. K. Hurtig, “Using Rubrics for the
9 10 11 12Figure 2. Instructor Workbench Power Control Unit Block DiagramFigure 3 shows a labeled plastic bin parts cabinet used in five different electronics class Page 15.63.6experiments that is placed on each workbench in the lab.Figure 3. Part cabinet on the workbench5. ClassesThere are presently seven different classes and each class has a lab section. The components inthe plastic bins serve five classes per semester. The subjects include a) DC Circuits b) ACCircuits c) Solid State Electronics d) Digital Electronics, and e) Industrial Electronics. Using thecomponents in the part cabinet, 45 different lab assignments can be
engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 263-268.Dori, Y.D., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affectundergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? Journal of the LearningSciences, 14, 243-279.Fromm, E. (2003). The changing engineering educational paradigm. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 92, 113-121.Jensen, D., Self, B., Rhymer, D., Wood, J., & Bowe, M. (2002). A rocky journey towardeffective assessment of visualization modules for learning enhancement in engineeringmechanics. Educational Technology and Society, 5(3), 150-162.Linsenmeier, R.A., Kanter, D.E., Smith, H.D., Linsenmeier, K.A., & McKenna, A.F. (2008).Evaluation of a challenge-based human metabolism
the creation process by creating objects and scripts they may see as beneficial forthe off-shore students therefore allowing them to make meaningful contributions to the virtualstudio as well.Bibliography1. Eschenbrenner, B., Nah, F.F.H., Siau K., “3-D Virtual Worlds in Education: Applications, Benefits, Issues, andOpportunities.” The Journal of Database Management, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2008, pp. 91-110.2. Mansfield, R., 2008, How to do Everything with Second Life, New York, McGraw-Hill, 2008.3. Dickey, M.D., “Three-dimensional Virtual Worlds and Distance Learning: Two Case Studies of Active Worldsas a Medium for Distance Education.” The British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2005, pp.439-451.4. Ye, E., Liu, C., Polack-Wahl
, LCD and I/O ports. Write two assembly programs a) to display his/her name on LCD display, and b) to generate a square wave when a switch button is pressed. • Lab 3, Register Indirect Addressing Mode. Use register indirect addressing mode, write an assembly problem to move data and add the content. • Lab 4, Table Processing. Use table processing instructions to load data from program ROM space into data RAM space and add them. • Lab 5, Timer/Counter Programming. Write an assembly program to measure the frequency of a square wave by using a timer and a counter. Frequency is defined as the number of cycles in one second. If a timer is used to generate a one-second delay and meanwhile a counter is
., “Teamwork and Project Management”, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, 2007.[5] Williams, L. and R. Kessler, “Pair Programming Illuminated”, Addison-Wesley Longman, 2002.[6] Adams, S. G., “Building Successful Student Teams in the Engineering Classroom.Journal of STEM Education. July-December. Auburn, AL., 27-32, 2003.[7] Oakley, B. A., D. H. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R. M. Felder, “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in theClassroom: Results From a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents”, IEEE Transaction onEducation, Vol. 50, No. 3, 266-272, August 2007. Page 15.785.8
inserted between these two rings. Figures 5 and 6 show the case and the locationof the circuit board. A ¼” hole is drilled three inches from the top to allow for the sensorwiring. After sensor wiring is inserted, the hole sealed with silicone to prevent waterpenetration. The battery pack is attached to the side of the case with Velcro strips. An endcap is permanently attached to the bottom of the sensing unit. A threaded fitting isinstalled on the top of the sensing unit to allow for the replacement of batteries and sensor[7, 8].B. Main Station:1. Wireless Communication System: The receiver used is also made by Linxtechnologies and is the companion to the transmitter, the RXM-315-LR. An identical ¼wavelength antenna was used at this station. This
Arrangement (B) Renovated Workshop Arrangement Figure 1: Computer Classroom Arrangements – this classroom was changed from a traditional everyone facing forward (A) to a workshop arrangement with students sitting perpendicular to the front of the room (B).To improve the learning space for our students two rooms were renovated: 1.) a formerlyunderutilized room converted to a Multimodal Classroom/laboratory and 2.) a computerclassroom converted to workshop style arrangement. These two rooms are next to each other Page 15.470.5and adjacent to the Engineering Department office suite.GoalsThe key goals for both facilities
earned by each design team andoverall are shaded differently for scores below and above 70% and above 80%.This allows a quick determination of areas where students do not achieve an acceptablestandard on an outcome, and areas where students are excelling in achieving outcomes.Note, the format changed in Table 4 from 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 because of theprogram’s assessment of the assessment process and how the data should be displayed. Page 15.213.12 11Table 4 Assessment matrix: (a) 2007-2008; (b) 2008-2009(a) BS NU
AC 2010-1077: USING A MOUSETRAP-POWERED VEHICLE DESIGN ACTIVITYTO CONVEY ENGINEERING CONCEPTSJohn Fitzpatrick, Drexel University John Fitzpatrick received his Bachelors of Science in Physics Engineering from Washington and Lee University (Lexington, VA) in 2005. Matriculating to Drexel University for graduate studies, he received his Masters of Science in Mechanical Engineering in 2008, with an emphasis on soft-tissue biomechanics. John expects to complete his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering by the end of 2010, with a dissertation topic focusing on simulating cardiovascular mechanics.Adam Fontecchio, Drexel University Dr. Adam Fontecchio is an Associate Professor and Assistant Department
theprofession of manufacturing engineering; forums that [a] articulated technologies new to thegenerally-accepted field of ‘manufacturing’ and [b] broadened the focus in the discipline from‘production’ to ‘product realization’.[16,17,18] In parallel, a nascent movement to rename theuniversity field of study to include ‘product engineering’ remains localized.[13,14,15] Thelasting effect of these forums and parallel initiatives is yet to be determined.2010+: Where does all of this rich history leave us? What progress has been made formanufacturing engineering education over the past quarter-century? What lessons have beenlearned and insights developed for addressing the persistent problems of our educational genre
, 192 of 469 programs were cited as havingCriterion 2 weaknesses. After the due process period, the number was reduced to 92, but Page 15.203.2Criterion 2 shortcomings were still more common than shortcomings in any of the other eightEAC-ABET criterion. This has been a trend for several years.In a published report card on the status of institutional and program assessment, the developmentof PEOs was given a grade of B+, but assessment of PEOs was given a grade of D.3 Clearly,institutions are doing a better job of defining their PEOs than they are assessing them. The EAC-ABET Criterion 2 includes requirements for developing PEOs and an assessment
,” in proceedings of the 2009 Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education, June 5, 2009. (Schenectady, NY: Union College, 2009), p. 27.10. ABET Board of Directors, “Engineering Accreditation Criteria, 2009-2010 Criteria.” Available from http://www.abet.org.11. ABET, “The Vision for Change: A Summary Report of the ABET/NSF/Industry Workshops,” May 1995.12. Union College proposal to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, January 26, 2007.13. P. Catravas, D. McMullen, T. Olsen and Y. Chang, “Interdisciplinary Lightening: A Model for Networking in Advanced Undergraduate Courses,” American Society for Engineering Education's 2006 St. Lawrence Section Conference, November 17-18, 2006.14. R. B. Bucinell and Harold Fried
the data, output voltage vs. displacement and fit a straight line through them. Calculate the sensitivity of the measurement system (in mV/mm). Table 14.1. Procedure for Experiment 14. a) Block diagram: Displacement Measuring System b) Metalic Strain Gage Figure 14.1 Block diagram: Displacement Measuring System Figure 14.2. Quarter-Bridge Displacement Measuring System Set Up Figure 14.3. Typical results of the displacement measurement system
: a. Student’s reason for participating on this project. b. Student’s skills and talents that he/she brings to the project. c. Student’s academic standing. d. Impact on student’s career and life.The two teams are given below: Fall Semester Team Brian Kunkel, William Hurles, and Bryce Thelen Spring Semester TeamNabeel Aslam, Kevin McPhail, Ryan McPhee, Brent Rowland, and Eric TingwallThe author took on the role of faculty advisor for both teams.The DesignFollowing the traditional design process, the first step was to develop a conciseproblem statement. After significant discussion with ATDC, the followingstatement was developed: The goal of this project is
for interoperation with a variety of teaching and learning systems, according to standards. (b) Web Services: OCW content can now be transported across the network amongst those systems; by means of a service, oriented architecture developed using SOAP standards.Course Format Course format refers to the delivery method for the course content and how the students access it. Course formats can also include hybrid courses that utilize the classroom and online delivery. An OCW course
a 15 b Number of Students 10 10 8
learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.13. Williams, S. E. (1997). Teachers’ written comments and students’ responses: A socially constructed interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the conference on college composition and communication, Phoenix, Page 15.28.14 AZ.14. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.15