were doing to find out who was right." - NWStudent #3 (Senior level status during course) - “This class has taken an approach to materialpresentation that is unlike any previous class. The theory and materials are presented in the classperiods, and are driven home during project preparation. The projects have forced the studentsto indeed “think outside the box”. This course curriculum has undoubtedly tied many ideas andpreviously learned material together. As a student that learns through hands on experience, asmost students in this field are, I can say with conviction that due to the lab work associated withthis class, I now understand the practical application of differential equations. As a part timestudent, it is common for there to be
management systems, such as Moodle, have enabled courses to be effectively deliveredin an online format. The features that these systems have can also be effective in a face to faceclassroom, helping both the instructor and the student. This paper has shown several of thesefeatures used in a variety of face to face classes, including laboratory based, lecture based, and asenior capstone design course.References[1] Kyei-Blankson, L., Keengwe, J., Blankson, J. “Faculty Use and Integration of Technology in HigherEducation”, AACE Journal, v17 n3 p199-213 Jul 2009[2] White, C.P., Ramirez, R., Smith, Jessica G., Plonowski, L. “Simultaneous Delivery of a Face-to-Face Course toOn-Campus and Remote Off-Campus Students” TechTrends v. 54 no. 4 (July 2010) p
hasspecific objectives that will support these goals. They are: (1) develop and maintain an effectiveliaison between BRCC and LSU; (2) utilize scholars to develop a peer ambassador/mentorprogram facilitating transfer success; (3) establish and conduct a pre-transfer academiccounseling program; (4) expand existing seminars to orient and integrate BRCC and othertransfer students into LSU and (5) invite BRCC math, science and engineering faculty toparticipate in ongoing Faculty Development.Activities of the program to date have included outreach, professional development, advising,and developing an overall assessment tool. All scholars participated in outreach activities thatconsisted of Peer-to-Peer talks at BRCC each semester and Shadow Days at LSU
Sectional Conference 2METALLIC WAVEGUIDE EXPERIMENTSThe experiments mentioned so far would be relevant today if the curriculum and its objectivespermitted. B the 1980 s and be ond, engineering students needed to be prepared for theirprofessional lives by going beyond experimental studies that dealt only with improving studentunderstanding of the basic engineering science. At some universities basic electromagneticsexperiments were introduced in prerequisite physics courses, and such experiments still existtoday. To meet the demands of the engineering profession, the laboratory in engineeringelectromagnetics added basic transmission line experiments in the
,perceptions of social support, interpersonal experiences, and persistence. Specifically, pre-assessment and post-assessment data were gathered through the Self-Efficacy in ResearchMeasure (SERM), the Attitudes Toward Research Scale (ATRS), and the MultidimensionalScale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). The participant study afforded the project team theopportunity to determine the specific nature of advancements and iterate Alliance processes tomaximize impact for future cohorts, as the advancement of a refined Alliance model thatuniquely incorporates an integrated and collaborative structure to enhance socialization, doctoralcompletion, and success for STEM faculty is the overarching goal of this award.BackgroundThe AGEP Alliance Model for
basicdesign principles and tools necessary for PCB design, students also become better positioned toparticipate in various design competitions through student clubs and other organizations.The lab course developed and described in this paper provides students with an opportunity togain skills in the fundamental PCB design principles, which they can then use to build moreadvanced board circuitry as they progress through their curriculum. The course is offered as afull semester distance education offering and hence provides students with the flexibility tocomplete their weekly lab assignments without the need to physically come to campus eachweek. The paper provides a comparison of PCB design software and the justifications foradoption of the chosen
, why he wanted to be a BME major, and how he now believed he had amisconception of BME: They have a biochemistry degree at the school I'm at. I'm in biomedical engineering and I guess when I got into it I thought it was more like that laboratory track where you work under somebody helping them do their research or whatever. But I think now that I've seen about half of it, I can tell its hardcore engineering which I was not expecting it to be. (Derek)Derek now faced the conflict of having an ideal future possible career that was no longerconnected to his present tasks. He described the curriculum as being a major factor in his choiceand his feelings of being stuck in engineering: I really wanted
Technology 7/ Western Carolina University 8 AbstractThis is the fourth paper in the special panel session focusing on issues driving reform of faculty rewardsystems to advance professional engineering education for creative engineering practice and leadership oftechnological innovation to enhance U.S. competitiveness. This paper explores the conceptual beginningsof a template for improved faculty reward systems that better reflect the practice of engineering for full-time, tenure track professionally oriented faculty in schools of engineering and technology.1. Background and HistoryThe United States has built an excellent system of research-oriented graduate education that is second tonone for the
experience at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. She is currently pursuing Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. She is serving as a research assistant under an NSF-funded DR K-12 re- search project to promote integration of robotics in middle school science and math education. For her doctoral research, she conducts mechatronics and robotics research in the Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory at NYU.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in
Paper ID #42603Transition to the Civilian Workforce: Themes and Lessons from MilitaryService and CultureDr. Alyson G. Eggleston, Pennsylvania State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Her research and teaching background focuses on program assessment, STEM technical communication, industry-informed curricula, and educational outcomes veteran and active duty students.Dr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed
and lighter products using fiber- Page 15.655.3reinforced composite materials. Through the pedagogical integration of the course project withtheoretical concepts, the course learning objectives are attained. Following is a discussion usingan example of a case study project involving an automotive windshield wiper system. This topicis ideal because, consistent with the concept of Project-based Learning (PjBL) [2], it is a familiarmechanism for most students, although they may not have previously thought about it in depth.This provides a framework upon which new knowledge can be constructed. Because studentsmust work collaboratively in groups
Interim Department Head in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She is a former Program Director of the Engineering Education Program at the National Science Foundation and served as a founding faculty member of Smith College’s Picker Engineering Program from 2001- 2014. She is an ASEE Fellow and the 2012 recipient of the Sterling Olmsted Award from the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Which “Me” am I Today? The Many Disciplines and Skill Sets of Engineering EducatorsPick up any issue of the Chronicle of Higher Education and it is clear that American educationtoday, regardless of level or
of microfluidics was appropriate, given itsimportance in operation of biochips and LOCs which are an integral part of many BiomedicalMicrosystems. Nevertheless, a research article dealing with plastic microfluidic biochips forDNA analysis was added to supplement the lectures and to further illustrate the importance ofmicrofluidics in BioMEMS.Graduate and undergraduate students had different opinions of the breadth and depth of thecourse. Graduate students felt that the course did not cover the topics in enough depth. Most ofthem were enthusiastic about the assigned research articles and thought there should have beenmore. At the same time, undergraduate students felt overwhelmed by the amount of the materialcovered in the course. They felt
as coauthors. He was the first recipient of an NSF research initiation grant (now CAREER Award) at UALR. He has a strong grant funding record and in 2011, he received funding from NSF for curriculum development in the area of Photo-voltaic (PV) Solar Energy. The project involves developing exemplary course modules and innova- tive laboratory modules for adaptation at other schools for undergraduate/graduate teaching and research. Recently, he completed three projects for Arkansas Highway and Transportation department related to highway lighting using solar energy. He established a commercial PV system with solar panels on the rooftop of ETAS building for teaching and research with funding from Arkansas Energy
Paper ID #21103Case Study of a Blind Student Learning Engineering GraphicsDr. Steven C. Zemke, Whitworth University Steven Zemke, Ph.D., has been involved in engineering design and teamwork for 40 years as a professional engineer, university professor, and researcher. He is a Professor of Engineering and Physics at Whitworth University in Spokane, Wash., and teaches physics and engineering courses. His current research is in how students learn engineering with a focus on creating more effective pedagogies. Prior to teaching, Dr. Zemke was a professional product designer for 20 years with an emphasis on mechanical packaging
discussions among international engineeringdirectors, peer institutions expressed interest in a network of Global Engineering Fellows. Aninternational network of Fellows could establish a replicable program framework, standards, anddesirable outcomes at universities across the globe. Such a network could lead the way inleveraging globally minded engineering students throughout the world towards a commonpurpose, uniting students who are equipped with the capabilities to lead and inspire the world.An international network would oversee: • Standards for organization, such as an ethos, course curriculum, participant prerequisites, program requirements, assessment, and partner responsibilities. • Coordination of an annual project to promote
Session 1526 DSP Laboratory for Real-Time Systems Design and Implementation David J. Waldo Oklahoma Christian UniversityAbstractThis paper describes an NSF CCLI-A&I* project at Oklahoma Christian University (OC) todevelop a laboratory and three-course sequence in digital signal processing (DSP) that emphasizesthe design and implementation of real-time embedded DSP systems. Real-time DSP embeddedsystems are becoming more pervasive throughout the engineering design industry. DSP is a majortool used in electrical engineering
AC 2011-51: EVALUATION OF THE IMPACTS OF MATH COURSE PLACE-MENT IMPROVEMENT ACHIEVED THROUGH A SUMMER BRIDGEPROGRAMJohn R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee John R. Reisel is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee (UWM.) He serves as Associate Director of the Center for Alternative Fuels, and co-Director of the Energy Conversion Efficiency Lab. In addition to research into engineering education, his research efforts focus on combustion and energy utilization. Dr. Reisel was a 2005 recipient of the UWM Dis- tinguished Undergraduate Teaching Award, the 2000 UWM-College of Engineering and Applied Science Outstanding Teaching Award, and a 1998 recipient of
, MA from Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, and BA from Fordham University.Dr. Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh Scott Streiner is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department, teaches in the First-Year Engineering Program and works in the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. Scott has received funding through NSF to conduct research on the impact of game-based learning on the development of first-year students’ ethical reason- ing, as well as research on the development of culturally responsive ethics education in global contexts. He is an active member of the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurship Network (KEEN
(www.vanth.org) are concerned about how their innovative efforts to integratecommunication instruction into their classes can be promulgated throughout the curriculum.To investigate these problems and gather data to help us improve the teaching of writingthroughout the curriculum, our interdisciplinary committee--faculty from engineering, writing,and the learning sciences—collaborated to: (1) systematically gather information about the writing standards that engineering faculty want to support (2) discuss the standards with faculty in relation to preferred teaching methods (3) disseminate those standards through a websiteOur primary research question was to determine whether engineering faculty within and acrossdisciplines share
Hispanics, mainly of Mexican-American descent. As part of anambitious expansion to better serve an underrepresented community, UTB received state approvalfour years ago to start new programs in Chemistry, Computer Science, Engineering Technology,and Physics.Introductory courses in electronic engineering technology have been presented four or five times,upper division courses have been presented once or twice. Some elective courses have not beenpresented yet. Early on, we saw the advantage of using Mini-Lab prototyping trainer systems thatcome packaged in attaché cases. We call them suitcases. Each suitcase Mini-Lab comes completewith a solderless prototyping board, power supplies, a function generator, and LED indicators and
-socioeconomic students as an often understudied population. Justin has served as the ASEE Student Division Co-Program Chair and is a current Director of Special Projects for the Educational Research & Methods Division.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical
triangle approach includes in one integrated assessment model;the desired student outcomes (as captured by the Wiggins and McTighe framework), the studentlearning activities ( as designed by the Perkins’ approach to student learning activities) and thegeneration and analytic use of student performance or measurement data to assess studentlearning (which completes the Pelligrino assessment triangle). The assessment triangle approachas proposed by Pelligrino is illustrated for Principles for three enduring understandings: evaluatenew venture opportunities, exhibit presentation skills, and assess entrepreneurial competencies. Perkins identified seven types of learning experiences to incorporate into an overallintegrated and reinforced
).For the second project the students are asked to write a MATLAB program that will simulate theoperation of a turbomachine. The program requirements include the simple thermodynamiccalculations for an ideal or adiabatic turbomachine and the calculation of an actual efficiencybased on manufacturer’s operating data for the turbomachine. Additionally, the students areprovided with more advanced software that will enable them to explore design issues associatedwith the speed and diameter of the turbomachine and the selection of a turbomachine for aspecified flow system.Thermal environmental engineering design is the focus of the third project. Provided with in-house software, the students are asked to conduct a thermo-economic analysis for an
16,000 different line items under a'microcontroller' search.Selecting the ideal MCU and DT for a particular project could be a time-consuming and tedious Page 24.1012.2task for an undergraduate student or the course designer and faculty mentor3. This is aggravated bythe fact that students are usually only familiar with the MCU, DB and IDE they have used duringtheir undergraduate classroom and lab experience. The students are challenged not just by thedesign, but by the integration of these various types of technology.There are other challenges in the curriculum too. A student takes a digital circuits and systemscourse with its laboratory
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education 2. Access to faculty expertise and problem-solving services, provided free-of-charge within the scope of the projects. 3. University infrastructure and resources, including machine shop and computer facilities, are made accessible for the purpose of the student projects. 4. The sponsor industry is given the opportunity to explore the different capabilities and services offered by the Faculty of Engineering Science. 5. Student performance can be observed over an extended period. The feedback provided by the companies is incorporated in the curriculum in the hope of
disconnected students would participate at much lower rates than before 2020.This concern generally came true for many student chapters based on discussions amongst theAmbassadors in the last two-plus years [26]. Thus, starting with the Ambassadors’ ambition toincrease student engagement in the student chapters, a goal-setting workshop built uponentrepreneurial mindset’s 3 C’s (Curiosity, Connections, and Creating value) was proposed anddeveloped.The connection between the entrepreneurial mindset framework and the goal-setting objective ofthe workshop merits further elucidation. First, the workshop’s activities followed the 3 Cs, whichis analogous to and loosely based upon the Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset(ICE) workshops that has
Many first- and second-yearengineering students have little to no experience in a professional environment and have hadvery little opportunity to read, let alone write, items of a technical nature. Therefore, to providethem with some guidelines about technical report writing and a topic about which to write canleave the students overwhelmed and unsure where to begin.Studies of technical communication instruction in engineering schools has focused on whichdepartment teaches the technical communication class, whether the classes are required orelectives, and how technical communication in integrated across the curriculum. 5 There is littleinformation about specific methods of teaching technical communication and the effectiveness ofvarious
Programs. His duties entailed working with prospective freshmen and transfer engineering students. In 2018, he transitioned to the role of Assistant Research Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at the Clark School. His research interests transfer students who first enroll in community colleges, as well as developing broader and more nuanced engineering performance indicators.Ms. Shannon Hayes, University of Maryland, College Park Shannon Hayes currently serves as the Assistant Director of Transfer Student Advising & Admissions in the A. James Clark School of Engineering. Prior to working in the Clark School, Ms. Hayes served as an Academic Advisor in the College of Education at UMD, where she worked with
: Manufacturing Industry; TravelIndustry; Aerospace; Printing Industry; Food Industry; Textile Industry; HospitalsFilm Industry; Corrugating; Plastics Industry; Agriculture; Foundry; and Leisure.1PLCs can be programmed with graphical ladder logic and are unlike a general-purposecomputer in that they are environmentally hardened to survive on a manufacturing plantfloor.2 Couple this with the ease of interface to hydraulic, pneumatic, and electronicpower systems make PLCs an essential skill for Engineering Technologist.To achieve this level of familiarization, PLCs can be a dedicated process control courseor integrated into an existing course such as fluid power or industrial automation.Budget is often a concern and some programs are choosing to purchase