Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Approaches for Enhancing Non-technical Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Wuerffel, Valparaiso University; Jeffrey Dale Will, Valparaiso University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

the reflective markers and combinethe images to read the 3D positions of the markers at a 100 Hz frame rate. This information isrecorded and used to reconstruct the skeleton of the participant, or can be used as raw data inpoint-cloud form.Figure 9. Motion capture laboratory with cameras and motion-capture suit. Page 26.630.8Painting/DrawingPainting and drawing utilize several different media, such as charcoal, oil paint, andwatercolor. However, the typical drawing surface is two-dimensional in nature. Our goal in thiseffort was to allow students to “draw” and “paint” in three dimensions, using the capture volumeas a canvas. Additionally

Conference Session

Innovation in Engineering Leadership Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso; Richard T. Schoephoerster, University of Texas, El Paso; Jessica Townsend, Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

courses depends on minor.) • A focused area of study such as Pre-med, Pre-law, or preparation towards a Peace Corp assignment. Page 26.635.3 Figure 1: Track Options for the Bachelor of Science in Engineering LeadershipUTEP is uniquely poised to craft the first undergraduate program around this new discipline.With a motto of “Access and Excellence”, UTEP strives to attract a student demographic notwell represented in engineering today and arm them with the skills, mindset, and experience thatallows them to make a positive impact in the communities in which they live and work. UTEP’sstudent population is 80% hispanic and reflects

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Greg Rulifson, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Leaning, J. & Guha-Sapir, D. Natural Disasters, Armed Conflict, and Public Health. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1836–1842 (2013).2. Garriga, E. & Melé, D. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J. Bus. Ethics 53, 51–71 (2004).3. National Society of Professional Engineers. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. (2007).4. Herkert, J. R. in Social, ethical, and policy implications of engineering: selected readings 45–73 (IEEE Press, 2000).5. Hess, J. L. et al. Empathy and caring as conceptualized inside and outside of engineering: Extensive literature review and faculty focus group analyses. in

Conference Session

Technical Session: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Techniques for Teaching Assistants

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Algeo Wilson IV, Louisiana State University; Adrienne Steele, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University; Wei-Hsung Wang Ph.D., Louisiana State University; Linda Lee Ramsey, Independent evaluator

Tagged Divisions

Student

. Space for optional comments was also available andincluded feedback, such as “[The SI] is awesome, he made us think and explain things well. Hegave us real world applications to assist in our understanding;” “[The SI is] very organized andhelpful. You can tell he cares a lot about the students' understanding of the material;” “Withoutthe SI Leader I felt like this class would have been ten times harder;” and “I am not about tomake it to class most of the time, however, I have an A thanks to my SI Leader...” While the lastof these comments does not reflect the intention of the program, this general opinion was notedon several of the evaluations

Conference Session

Fundamental: K-12 Students and Engineering Design Practices (Part 2)

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amber L. M. Kendall, Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. Page 26.688.1311. Education, N. C. S. B. o. (2004). Science Standard Course of Study and Grade Level Competencies K-12. Raleigh, NC: Pubic Schools of North Carolina.12. Hynes, M. (2012). Middle-school teachers’ understanding and teaching of the engineering design process: a look at subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 345-360.13. Crismond, D., & Adams, R. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 739-797.14. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.15. Kuhn, D

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine Andrews Paulsen, Concord Evaluation Group; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Wolsky, WGBH Educational Foundation

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

 consider how we might provide resources and education to parents to help them support their children’s engineering­related interests.  Acknowledgement  Page 26.962.10 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation, Division of Engineering Education and Centers, Grant Number 1129342. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.    References  1​  Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2014). ​ Occupational outlook handbook, 2014 edition​ . Washington DC: U.S

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Capstone and Collaborative Projects

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago; Stephanie Tharp, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Studio. In 2002,the University of Illinois at Chicago was among some of the earliest to offer an interdisciplinaryproduct development program, engaging business, design and engineering. Corporate partnerssponsor a section of the course, and, with faculty, design project statements that are both ofstrategic interest and educationally appropriate for a senior design capstone course sequence.Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary product development courses are increasingly beingoffered at more institutions, with the motivation being that they better reflect real-world productdesign processes, and that considerations outside of a single discipline influence a successful endproduct [2, 3]. Interdisciplinary programs offer unique experiences for

Conference Session

Building Pathways that Promote Pursuit/Persistence in Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bette Grauer P.E., Kansas State University; Linda P. Thurston Ph.D., Kansas State University; Beth A. Montelone, Kansas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

military veterans in STEM fields. This reflects thelocations of Fort Leavenworth, Fort Riley, and McConnell Air Force Base in the state and highenrollments of military-associated individuals and veterans at all partner institutions.New programmatic offerings created as part of the project include a Math Boot Camp, STEMAlternative Spring Break, a Writing Lab, specific-by-major Transfer Advising Guides, a groupvisit to complement the Admissions Office’s Transfer Student Visit Day, and a summer researchexperience program, Research Immersion: Pathways to STEM (RIPS). Since the partnerinstitutions are two-year colleges, the emphasis of this project is on the transitions between highschool and community college and community college and four-year

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles E. Baukal Jr. P.E., John Zink Co. LLC; Lynna J. Ausburn PhD, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

findings relating to these questions in a framework ofimplications for further research and for instructional practice in continuing engineeringeducation.Learner PreferencesTwo aspects of learner preferences are considered next: learning strategy preference and verbal-visual preference.Learning Strategy PreferenceOne way to address individual differences in how students learn and to personalize learningoptions is through the concept of learning style. Learning style (also referred to as psychologicaltype6,8) refers to how students preferentially perceive (e.g., sensory vs. intuitive and verbally vs.visually), organize (e.g., inductive vs. deductive), process (e.g., actively vs. reflectively), andprogressively understand (e.g., sequentially vs

Conference Session

Using Technology and Research-based Instructional Practices in BME

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

Statistics and Statistical Education Broadening the Scope of Statistics and Statistical Education. Am Stat. 1988;42(2):93-99.9. Cross KP, Angelo T. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty. Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1988:1-168.10. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. J Eng Educ. 2005;94(1):87-101.11. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.12. Carberry A, Waters C, Krause S, Ankeny C. “Unmuddying” Course Content Using Muddiest Point Reflections. Front Educ. 2013;Oct 23-26:937-942.13. Ankeny C, Krause S. Flipped Biomedical Engineering

Conference Session

Assessing URM Programs Targeting the K-16 Continuum

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

the use of co-curricular support to improve the institutionalexperience of undergraduate engineering students. Page 26.1157.11AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Cynthia Hampton for contributing to the validity of this study. Additionally,this material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) GraduateResearch Fellowship Program (GRFP). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References1. C. Morrison and L. E. Williams, Minority Engineering Programs: A Case for Institutional Support, NACME Research Newsletter, 4(1

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies: Mechanical Engineering and Control

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Yao, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

. b) Modify the house parameters in the m.file to reflect the provided dimensions of the incubator. Save all the changes. After this file is run, the values of all the parameters will be in the MATLAB workspace and SIMULINK can use these values in the model built next. c) Build the incubator model in SIMULINK, using thermal parameters defined in the .m file. The subsystem should have two inputs: heat (power) flowing in “Qin” and the outside temperature “Tout”; one output: the air temperature in the incubator “Tincub”. Mask the model as a subsystem. d) Add the calculation of the bulb parameters Rf, Rb, Cf, Cb, and ReqBulb into the same

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Carrico, Virginia Tech; Matthew Arnold Boynton PE P.E., Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

team to use existing codebooks to analyzethese responses. Although the number of pilot responses limits our ability to fully test thesecodebooks on the responses, our preliminary review suggests meaningful overlap.Remaining pilot data is planned for collection and analysis in early 2015 along with any changesdeemed necessary. Deployment of the final survey to the larger participant population is plannedfor the spring of 2015.AcknowledgementsThis paper is based on research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-1232629. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography1

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jale F. Akyurtlu, Hampton University; Otsebele E Nare, Hampton University; Lumumba Harnett, University of Kansas

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

is still in contention whether to continue toinvolve art teachers in these programs or not.Several assessment tools were administered for the evaluation of the summer institutes and theteachers‟ circles, namely, Questionnaire for Evaluation of Teachers‟ Circles before the start ofthe Summer Institute, Pre- and Post- Surveys for the Evaluation of the Summer Institutes, andDaily Content and Inquiry reflections. The t-test results (Table 3) from pre/post surveys revealedthat the teachers showed significant changes after participating in the Summer Institute in the useof a logical approach to explain algebra, for example; - in demonstrating to students how to check work, - in analyzing students‟ mathematical thinking skills, - in

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wolter J. Fabrycky PE, Virginia Tech and AAII

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

reflects all needs and concerns. Included among these must be ecological Page 26.1452.8and human impacts. Arrow A represents the elicitation of customer needs, desired functionality,and requirements.Need, Functions, and Requirements (Block 2). The purpose of this block is to gather andspecify the behavior of the product or system in functional terms. A market study identifies aneed, an opportunity, or a deficiency. From the need comes a definition of the basicrequirements, often in functional terms. Requirements are the input for design and operationalcriteria, and criteria are the basis for the evaluation of candidate system and

Conference Session

Two-year College Division: Authors Address Transfer Matters-Part II

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brooke Charae Coley, University of Virginia; Carolyn A. Vallas, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

 transfers  to  the  University  of  Virginia’s  SEAS  has  increased  30%  over  the  last  few  years.    Despite  this  growth  in  applicants,  the  total  number  of  students  matriculating  into  the  program  has  remained  largely  unchanged.    These  numbers  reflect  transfer  applicants  and  enrollments  across  the  university  and  not  exclusively  engineering.     Page 26.1458.8

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

, engineering marketing, business development and proposal submittal. 6. Understanding of ethical and legal aspects of engineering. 7. Demonstration of management techniques, decision economics, engineering organization, and business accounting methods. 8. Understanding of value engineering and total quality management concepts.Eight CIVL 411 course goals are mapped to CEE Department outcomes and shown withaccompanying levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy as indicated in Table 7. The focus of the class isgenerally on lower levels of Bloom’s, even though this is a senior course. Higher levels ofBloom’s Taxonomy are used for course instruction and student assignments, even thoughassessment mapping has not been adjusted to reflect this more rigorous

Conference Session

Research & Evaluation on K-12 Teachers and Teaching.

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Birgit Fahrman, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Lena B. Gumaelius, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Per G. Norström, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

the teachers’ education is important for teaching structure andcontent. Bjurulf also mentions that classroom and group size affects the choice of content. Allteachers in the Bjurulf study performed design and make tasks, but it was found that the taskswere handled in very different ways and that reflection for a deeper understanding by thestudents was lacking in some cases.Blomdahl13 shows that teachers’ lack of knowledge about pupils’ preconceptions can causeproblems in planning and implementation classroom activities. Not knowing the pastexperiences of students has been found to be an uncertainty factor.Mattson14 discusses how teachers, student teachers, and pupils view technology. Her workshows that teachers need subject competence to give

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Tactical Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University; Richard J. Freuler, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

students and instructors. Relevant assessments must be developed, validated, and tested byeducators before they will gain broad acceptance and be used to leverage curricular changeneeded to transform undergraduate engineering education. Currently, we collect continuousfeedback from students in the form of peer reviews, weekly journal entries regarding a number ofthoughtful topics about the program, and reflection pieces at the end of each course.High quality assessment requires (1) clear learning targets, (2) clear purposes, (3) assessmentmethods that match the targets and purposes, (4) sampling for intended purposes, and (5)minimized bias and distortion [26]. The “assessment triangle” specifies that assessment evidencemust align with the intended

Conference Session

Focus on the Classroom: Novel Approaches to Course Delivery

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary J. Mullett, Springfield Technical Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

ratechanges may be detected by focusing an extremely high frequency beam of submillimeter waveenergy on the palm of a human hand – most of these techniques look at the parameter known asthe “reflection coefficient” of human skin to detect subtle changes in the heart beat of a humansubject.The health issues related to an aging population are very complex. For people over the age of 65,one of the most serious health care risks is falling. This is the leading cause of death for this agegroup! For those that survive a fall, many will suffer hip fractures. Even with successful surgery,about 40% of those hospitalized for a hip fracture cannot return to independent living, and,amazingly enough, about 20% will die within a year! Using sensors like radar and

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning Strategies I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth; Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas; Robert Feyen, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Theory-Based Approach to Reflective Planning and Instruction, Faculty of Education, University of Regina.    Appendix A: Student SurveyTOPIC: Course Name    Please rate the following questions based on the scale given below.    1 Strongly Disagree  2 Disagree  3 Neutral  4 Agree  5 Strongly Agree        1. The course was effective in helping me learn the 1   2   3   4   5  material presented.   Page 26.1533.142. The course was effective in helping me to understand 1   2   3   4   5  the material.  3. The course format

Conference Session

Visualization Within Engineering Design Graphics Education Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego; Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

multiple-choice and 13 sketching) 4 - Orthographic Projection (20 multiple-choice and 11 sketching) 5 – Inclined and Curved Surfaces (26 multiple-choice and 15 sketching) 6 - Flat Patterns (36 multiple-choice and 0 sketching) 7 - Rotation of Objects about 1 Axis (28 multiple-choice and 18 sketching) 8 - Rotation of Objects about 2 Axes (25 multiple-choice and 7 sketching) 9 - Object Reflections and Symmetry (24 multiple-choice and 17 sketching) 10 - Cutting Plane (26 multiple-choice and 0 sketching)During Lessons 3 and 4, a few mistakes were identified in the programmed sketching solutions,which led to incorrect grading of sketches. This led to a bit of student frustration, but by Lesson5 these mistakes

Conference Session

Promoting Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University; Terence Geyer, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

the distance education sections. This is mostlydue to the higher average exam grades across the board for the distance education students. Theoverall averages are 3.5 for the traditional classroom version and 3.8 for the distance educationblended format. The three tenths of a point differential for the distance education blended formatcan be explained by describing their typical students. They are on average older, taking only oneor two courses at a time, and working fulltime. A similar variance has also been noted in otherblended learning courses.Conclusions, Reflections, and the FutureUtilizing the blended learning model, course material can be successfully delivered remotely tostudents. The learning experience for the students can be

Conference Session

Survey and Assessment Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. According to Downing and Haladyna6, validity is the mostimportant consideration in test evaluation and refers to the appropriateness, meaningfulness, andusefulness of the specific inferences made from test scores. Haynes et al.7 go on to warn us thatdata from an invalid instrument can “over-represent, omit, or under-represent some facets of theconstruct and reflect variables outside the construct domain”.The use of unreliable and/or invalid instruments in engineering education could lead to theinaccurate measurement of student outcomes and perceptions, incorrect program and classassessments, as well as a general misrepresentation of the current state of engineering education.In this paper, we propose a structured methodology for the initial steps

Conference Session

Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph J. Biernacki, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

3. Since there are three “choices,” oneonly has three degrees of freedom before the vehicle is totally specified. Another way to helpstudents to see that 3 is the correct answer is to once again reflect on the reaction balancing Page 26.1661.6problem. There are four variables in the example problem (Example 1), but once one of thevariables has been specified, the entire problem is specified completely. Therefore, there is only   one “chooice” to be made. m This iss true despitee the fact thaat the one chhoice can be made an inffinitenumber ofo ways. Equating a deg

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

Learning,” Palo Alto, CA: Davies-black Publishing11. Dale, E. (1969), “Audiovisual Methods in Teaching,” (3rd ed.), New York: Dryden Press.12. Wankat, P.H. (1999), “Reflective Analysis of Student Learning in a Sophomore Engineering Course,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol.88, (no.2), 195 -203.13. Finelli, C., Klinger, A., & Budny, D.D. (2001), “Strategies for Improving the Classroom Environment,” Journalof Engineering Education, Vol 90, (no.4), pp. 491-497.14. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, A.D., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2005), “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 (no.1), pp. 87-101

Conference Session

Design as a Social Process: Teams and Organizations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida; Shari Ann Robinson, University of Florida Counseling and Wellness center

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Innovative Use of Technology I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhou Zhang, Stevens Institute of Technology; Mingshao Zhang, Stevens Institute of Technology; Yizhe Chang, Stevens Institute of Technology, School of Engineering and Science; Sven K. Esche, Stevens Institute of Technology, School of Engineering and Science; Constantin Chassapis, Stevens Institute of Technology, School of Engineering and Science

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Therefore, after segmentation, these features were extracted by the featureextractor. Then, these features were input into the classifier. Basically, the classifier can recognizethese 3 objects with very high accuracy (89.1% for the digital scale, 91.3% for the pump and98.4% for the Xplorer GLX. The relatively low accuracy of the recognition is attributable to theKinect’s inability to cope with reflective surfaces which reduces the scanning accuracy. (a) (b) Figure 9: Step motor (a) photograph of physical step motor; (b) model in GBVL Page

Conference Session

Dynamic Systems and Control

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diane L Peters, Kettering University; Richard Stanley, Kettering University; Craig J. Hoff, Kettering University; John Casci, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

there was not a true laboratory component in the course.The concerns identified by the students were often a reflection of their experiences during theirco-operative education rotations. Every student at Kettering University rotates between anacademic term and a co-operative education term, where students will work as engineeringinterns. The students do this rotation twice a year from the moment they enter the university.Because of this constant exposure to industry, students learn many of the ‘soft’ engineering skillsthat are difficult to teach in a classroom environment. However, this experience makes thestudents at Kettering ‘non-traditional’ students. They tend to filter their academic experiencesthrough their work experiences. The students

Conference Session

ECCD Innovative Teaching Applications

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas E McDermott P.E., University of Pittsburgh; Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

in general pleased with the performance on thesein-class active learning assignments. In an open-ended question about the benefits of flippedinstruction, the students identified the ability to re-watch videos (2 students), problem solvingduring class (2 students), flexibility (1 student), and reinforcement of concepts (1 student). In asecond open-ended question about drawbacks and suggestions relative to the flipped classroom,two students expressed dislike of the flipped classroom, and three provided suggestions about theuse of in-class time, including more worked example problems during class (2 students).Instructor Reflections Page