AC 2011-628: CLASSROOM TEACHER - ENRICHMENT TEACHER PAIRS:CO-TEACHING AS A MEANS TO IMPLEMENT ELEMENTARY ENGI-NEERING EDUCATIONPamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, and has been involved in both Project Lead the Way and Project FIRST robotics. She was a Hub Site Partner for Engineering is Elementary (EiE) through their National Dissemination through Regional Partners program. As a pre-service teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early
careers in STEM related subject Page 15.562.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Title: Exploring a Valid and Reliable Assessment of Engineering and Technology Education Learning in the Classroom.AbstractIt is common knowledge that No Child Left Behind (NCLB) created a system of accountability thatestablished a baseline for determining school success. To assess student performance, NCBL uses theresults of standardized assessments in traditional disciplines.Since engineering and technology education is not one of the traditional disciplines, only 12 states haveengineering and technology education
andhas regularly provided invaluable input. “The… AE Studio is unparalleled in the integration of form making and engineering de- sign within the academic studio setting. Each year the Studio provides students of both disciplines profound insights into the challenges of working with their soon to be profes- sional peers while designing a real world project. The hand-on experience further pre- pares the students for their divergent professional careers. I wish they taught like this everywhere.” Will Shepphird P.E., A.I.A., LEED AP BSCP Shepphird AssociatesJudson Taylor is a Senior Principal of one of the leading AE firms in the U.S. and has been aregular on the judging panel. "…. The
writing flexible programs (or “functions” or“scripts”). Many seem much more comfortable using software to solve what they tend to viewas separate, standalone problems. When they move from one problem to the next, many seem toview it as a time to start over from scratch. Of course, the students in the course are mechanicaland civil engineers, and not students who are preparing for a computer programming career.However, it seems for them to be efficient in their careers, they need to consider methods forautomating tasks when appropriate. It is hoped that the experience with this project will benefitsome students by prompting them to think about how to automate repetitive tasks
diverse population offaculty to obtain material from the library and found that women, early career faculty, andfaculty from non-research universities are more likely to buy material from the library. Thestudy indicates that the launch of a digital library did not make a significant change on networkbehavior. In their study, they identified a core of 5 to 6% faculty members out of the wholenetwork who were not only active participants in the activities of the network but also adoptedleadership roles. Opinion leaders are considered important in the theory as they influence othersin the social system in their attitude towards adopting an innovation.The theory of diffusion uses social learning theory of Bandura as a way to describe how peoplelearn
contemporary engineering challenges. By offering acomprehensive overview and in-depth insights into materials essential for both academic studyand future professional endeavors, the CEM course prepares students to meet the diversedemands they will face in their careers [3].The concept of ownership in learning encompasses crucial aspects, such as a profound sense ofconnection, active participation, and personal investment in the educational journey [4].Establishing this sense of ownership is useful for enhancing students’ learning potential andfostering success in various educational settings [5]. To truly internalize ownership, studentsmust grasp specific learning objectives and possess clear, well-defined targets, acting as guidingposts delineating
translate theacademic paper into a handout that would be appealing for the public and practitioners while alsotranslating my handouts into both english and spanish. My reflection also touches on how I’venoticed that the virtual notebook affords unique, individual contributions while also creating acollaborative product. Some additional themes in my reflection are about the class pace, the needto connect theory to practice, and the utility of this activity for my academic career.***This week I made the title of my reflection "Design IRL" because although I continue to learnabout how important being a peer reviewer is, what it takes to get a publication, and aiming forrejections to get published more, this week felt more grounded about how I can
the E4 Project, which examines the impact of two engineeringcurricula on students’ learning about engineering and science, as well as their interests in andattitudes towards careers in science and engineering. One of the two curricula is EiE, and is thefocus of the present study; the present study does not include data from the other curriculum. TheE4 Project is currently in its second of two data collection years, with data pertinent to thepresent study collected during and after the completion of the first year (2013 - 2014). E4 Project recruitment began by disseminating project flyers through state, district, andschool level channels within the Massachusetts, Maryland and North Carolina regions. Flyersexplained the basic E4 Project
Paper ID #15270Using a Real-Options Analysis Tutorial in Teaching Undergraduate StudentsDr. John A. White Jr., University of Arkansas John A. White, Distinguished Professor of Industrial Engineering and Chancellor Emeritus, received his BSIE degree from the University of Arkansas, his MSIE degree from Virginia Tech, and his PhD from The Ohio State University. He is the recipient of honorary doctorates from Katholieke Universitiet of Leuven in Belgium and George Washington University. Since beginning his teaching career as a tenure-track instructor at Virginia Tech in 1963, he has taught more than 4,000 engineering
; Taylor etal., 2001), inspiring students to take ownership and fostering creative tension (Marin et al.,1999), being an expert or authority (Goldschmidt, Hochman & Dafni, 2010), and modelingdesign acts to students (Cennamo, Brandt, Scott, Douglas, McGrath, Reimer & Vernon, 2001).Pembridge (2011) identified additional roles such as role model, career mentor, and professionalsocialization agent.1.2 Variations in design reviews across disciplinary cultures and over timeAnother issue to consider regarding design reviews is that the structure, content, and goals ofdesign reviews vary across disciplinary cultures and over the course of a single project. Designreviews may take place opportunistically at a student’s desk or at scheduled
hypotheses represent the very beginnings of a multi-year study in whichstudents’ and teachers’ responses to and reflections on design failures in the classroom areinvestigated as part of the aforementioned E4 Project.Study Context & Participants The E4 Project examines the impact of two engineering curricula on children’sengineering learning, science learning, interest in and attitudes towards careers in science and Page 24.980.10engineering. Also investigated within this larger study are teachers’ conceptions aboutengineering and science instruction, and their fidelity of implementation of assigned curricula. This larger study is in