, 37-59.14. Morrison, C., Griffin, K. & Marcotullio, P. (1995). Retentions of minority students in engineering: Institutional variability and success. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering (NACME) Research Letter, 5(2).15. Cejda, B.D., Rewey, K.L., & Kaylor, A.J. (1998). The effect of academic factors on transfer student Page 25.564.10 persistence and graduation: A community college to liberal arts college case study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22, 675-686.16. Cejda, B. D. (1997). An examination of transfer shock in academic disciplines. Community College Journal of
-Endangered “Positive“ Rights Pubic Harms of Aggregation Practitioner Problems (Problems of Execution: Distributive Justice, Whistle-blowing, consideration of long term-effects. Problems of Communication: Fraud, and Misrepresentation] Challenges of Contemporary Science and Technology to traditional ethical theories. To gauge the students’ understanding of nanotechnology and their perceptions about itsimpact on society, a survey is also conducted at the end of the course using a questionnaire (seeAppendix A). The results of the survey are exhibited in Appendix B. Page 25.965.8 IV. Conclusion Nanotechnology has
Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 1, No. 1, March 19962. Zhang, A. S., Heng, I., B, S., and Zia, F., 2011, Introduction of Mechatronics Technology into Cross- Department Product Design Curricula, NSF Grantees Session, ASEE Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada.3. Shetty, D., and Kolk, R. A., 1997, Mechatronics Systems Design, International Thomson Publishing. 1st Edition.4. Isermann, R., 2003, Mechatronics Systems Fundamentals,. Springer, 1st Edition.5. Dym, C., Little, P., Engineering Design, A project-based introduction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., San Francisco, CA, 20086. Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J. and Grote K. H. 2007. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London: Springer.7. Otto
AC 2012-4959: A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TEAM-EFFECTIVENESS IN TEAM-BASED PROJECTSMs. Patricia Kristine Sheridan, University of Toronto Patricia Kristine Sheridan is a Ph.D. candidate with the Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. She holds a B.A.Sc. and M.A.Sc. in mechanical engineering from the University of Toronto. She is a member of the teaching team and a course developer for the Praxis cornerstone design courses.Dr. Greg Evans, University of Toronto Greg Evans is a professor of chemical engineering and applied chemistry and the Director of the South- ern Ontario Centre for Atmospheric Aerosol Research at the University of Toronto. He is Co-leader of
(b) 8 Players Registrar Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Scheduler Red Receptionist Blue Registrar Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Scheduler (c) 11 Players Figure 5. Variable number of participants from 6 to 11 players enabled by modular tasksAnother key to the improved flexibility of number of participants is that the roles of Receptionistand Registrar can be either combined or separated as shown in (a) and (c) of Figure 5. When thetwo roles are combined, the game setting can accommodate even numbers of participants.Separating the two roles
% Title I? Enrichment Teachers in Teachers in school setting Minority teachers Pilot Pilot students* A Medium Rural No 10% 1** 1 1 B Medium Rural No 5% 1 3 2 C Small Rural No 15% 1** 1 1 D Medium Small city Yes 60% 1 2 3 E Large Suburban No
, Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, June 21, 2010.2) Educating the Engineer of 2020, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC: Page 25.95.14 National Academies Press, 2005.3) Panitz B., Senior Editor, Training Technology’s Maestros, American Society for Engineering Education, PRISM, November, 1997.4) Bode H. W., Report to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U. S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, 1967.5) Blanchard, B. S. and W. J. Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis, Fifth (30th Anniversary) Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2011.6) Fabrycky, W. J. and E. A. McCrae, Systems
AC 2012-4331: AN INVERTED TEACHING MODEL FOR A MECHAN-ICS OF MATERIALS COURSEDr. Jeffery S. Thomas, Missouri University of Science & Technology Jeffery Thomas is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Civil, Architectura,l and Environ- mental Engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Mo. He received a B.S. and M.S. in mechanical engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering mechanics from Missouri S&T. He is a licensed Professional Engineer. His technical interests are in mechanical characterization, construction, and the influence of force on biological systems. His artistic interests are in music.Dr. Timothy A. Philpot, Missouri University of Science & Technology
Hill Construction. 2. Kang, J., Smith, J., Kale, A., Jayaraman, N. (2008) “Empirical Application of Building Information Modeling to Commercial Construction”, Technical Report, Associate General Contractors in America. 3. Riley, D. (1994). “Modeling the space behavior of construction activities,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa. 4. Akinci, B., Fischer, M., and Kunz, J. (2002). “Automated generation of work spaces required by construction activities”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 306-315. 5. Guo, S.J., (2002). “Identification and
consolidated all project-based communications into an easily accessible and dedicated archive. In addition,students were required to log all team communications, specifically those that did notinvolve email. Furthermore, a Facebook page was established for the class in an attemptto enhance group interactions. The Facebook page was used for posting the localgeotechnical photographs of the second icebreaker activity.Assessment of project activities has been conducted using a) peer evaluation of studentwork, b) the Felder-Silverman Learning Styles Index,4 c) student surveys, d) focus groupvideo conferences between students and an external assessment consultant, and e) gradedanalysis of student work products.Assessment of ActivitiesStudent PerformanceThe
accreditation suggests that if anythingundergraduate programs that stress an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary approach arebecoming rarer. There evidently are powerful barriers in place against such degrees. Wespeculated that these barriers include the professionalization of engineering professors asspecialists, the assumptions that engineering professors make about the job market for graduatesof their program and assumptions that engineering professors make about when and whystudents enter the degree program in the first place.Bibliography[1] Newberry, B., and Farison, J. “A Look at the Past and Present of General Engineering and EngineeringScience Programs” Journal of Engineering Education , 217-226 (2003).[2] Profiles of Engineering and
Engagement – Institution specific dataDavis, S., Connolly, A. and Linfield, E. "Lecture Capture: making the most of face-to-face learning", EngineeringEducation, vol. 4 issue 2, 2009.Toppin, I. “Video lecture capture (VLC) system: A comparison of student versus faculty perceptions”, Educationand Information Technology, vol. 16, 2010.Von Konsky, B., Ivins, J., Gribble, S. “Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies:A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns”, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol 25issue 4, 2009 Page 25.507.12
screen, or cellphone, or etc. may generate a plenty of RF noise), put a 10 resistor in series with the 10µF capacitor between pins 1 and 8. 3. Turn the amplitude of the function generator to a minimum. 4. Now, you need to setup amplitude modulation at the transmitter. Use TAs help if you have any questions. To do so: a. Push the button MOD/ON. b. Push the button MOD/EXT. c. Pull out MOD/DEPTH knob and rotate it all the way clockwise. d. Connect the cable from the back of the function generator to audio plug from your PC. e. Start play a sample audio clip “Sleep away” by Robert Acri. f. Slowly increase the amplitude of the function
(asopposed to the problems assigned in the traditional course in which all students shouldarrive at the same solution). That these facets of the course were immediately obvious toobservers who were unaware of the course aims is very encouraging. Other observationsin their report for included: a) considerably higher attention paid by the students in the experimental course (no sleeping, considerably less cell phone checking), b) students in the traditional lecture were very passive (taking notes from the board) while students in the experimental course were actively engaged (working on problems, discussing their designs with other groups, presenting
their own personal answer. 1. If you thought this activity should be modified for the upcoming students, what modifications would you suggest to make this activity a better educational experience for those students? 2. Comments.Bibliography1. Chan, L.K.Y & Lau, H.Y.K. (2004). An Interactive Virtual Reality based e-Education System. Industrial &Manufacturing Systems Engineering: Conference Papers. Retrieved fromhttp://www.hku.hk/cc/ccsystem/hpc-fac-2006/ie/plychan_virtual_reality.pdf2. Dias, P., & Pimentel, A., Ferreira, C., van Huussen, F., Baggerman, J., van der Horst, P., Madeira , J., Bidarra, R.,& Santos, B. (2007). "Usability in virtual and augmented environments: a qualitative and quantitative study." SPIE
. 2 3 2 6 1 A` 1. ‘Pod’ equipped with dual monitors, a 1 4 resident computer and switcher for B plugging in laptops 1 2. Interactive wall surfaces E 3. Projection Screen 4. Table for layout drawings Page 25.1459.5 1 5. Space for printer and
/Cumulative gpa and other pertinent information.ID 1 2 3 4HS Hanna Porter CBTIS 189 CBTIS 189Country US US Mexico MexicoEntering HS Grad HS Grad HS Grad HS GradSP 2006 4.000/4.000FA 2006 3.700/3.769SP 2007 3.000/3.526 4.000/4.000S1 2007S2 2007SU 2007 Intro to Eng (A) No Grade Intro to Eng (B)Start Math Calculus I HS Alg Precalc HS ReadingFA 2007 BS
Michael Michael Preston. "Teaching and Learning with VideoAnnotations." Http://learningthroughdigitalmedia.net. 8 Mar. 2011. Web. 03 Apr. 2012.. [7] Michel R.G., Cavallari J.M., Znamenskaia E., Yang K.X., Sun T., Bent G.“Digital video clips for improved pedagogy and illustration of scientific research - Withillustrative video clips on atomic spectrometry” (1999) Spectrochimica Acta - Part B AtomicSpectroscopy, 54 (13), pp. 1903-1918.[8] Christopher Lopata, Kathleen A. Miller and Robert H. Mille, “Survey of Actual and PreferredUse of Cooperative Learning among Exemplar Teachers”, The Journal of Educational ResearchPublished by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. , Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 232-239, (Mar. - Apr., 2003),Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org
Michael Michael Preston. "Teaching and Learning with VideoAnnotations." Http://learningthroughdigitalmedia.net. 8 Mar. 2011. Web. 03 Apr. 2012.. [7] Michel R.G., Cavallari J.M., Znamenskaia E., Yang K.X., Sun T., Bent G.“Digital video clips for improved pedagogy and illustration of scientific research - Withillustrative video clips on atomic spectrometry” (1999) Spectrochimica Acta - Part B AtomicSpectroscopy, 54 (13), pp. 1903-1918.[8] Christopher Lopata, Kathleen A. Miller and Robert H. Mille, “Survey of Actual and PreferredUse of Cooperative Learning among Exemplar Teachers”, The Journal of Educational ResearchPublished by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. , Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 232-239, (Mar. - Apr., 2003),Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org
participantsbetween July 1st and August 30th, 2011.We specifically focused on a charter school system because of their a) STEM focus (some of thecampuses were categorized as STEM academies), b) Convenient location ., and (c) HarmonyPublic Schools offer variety of computer courses to their 9-12 grade students: Desktoppublishing, Web Mastering, Digital Graphics and Animation, Vide o Editing, Game Design, APComputer Science and such.This study examined the data collected for graduates of HPS’ class of 2011. Data were collectedfrom a charter school organization in which eight of their campuses gave graduates during 2010-2011 year. We conducted a survey to collect their graduation status, demographic information(gender, ethnicity, and lunch status related to
Performance” College of Technology Directed Projects. Paper 13.http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/techdirproj/13.Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., and Hayek, J., (2006). What Matters toStudent Success: A Review of the Literature. National Symposium on PostsecondaryStudent Success: Spearheading a Dialog on Student Success. National PostsecondaryEducation Cooperative. July 2006.Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Cruce, T, Shoup, R., Gonyea, R., (2006). Connecting the Dots: Multi-Faceted Analyses of the Relationships between Student Engagement Results from theNSSE, and the Institutional Practices and Conditions that Foster Student Success. FinalReport. – Lumina Foundation for Education, Grant #2518. August 2006.Kumar (2012). 8 Reasons Why Should You
AC 2012-4059: GETTING STUDENTS INVOLVED IN A CLASSROOMWITH AN IPHONE APPMr. Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University Smitesh Bakrania is an Assistant Professor in mechanical engineering at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan in 2008 and his B.S. from Union College in 2003. His research interests include combustion synthesis of nanoparticles and their applications. He has recently begun developing educational apps for smartphones. Page 25.669.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Getting Students Involved in a Classroom with an iPhone
students to take a portion of their design to the next level of hardwareconstruction and testing greatly improves student enthusiasm for engineering and gives themhands-on experience that is valuable to propulsion and power generation industries and researchfacilities.AcknowledgementsMr. Ed Reilly at the Bronze Smith, Prescott Valley, Arizona provided a facility tour andanswered numerous student questions on casting. Page 25.726.12Dr. Angela Beck, College of Arts and Sciences provided tremendous support for studentpresentations and written documents.Bibliography 1. Haven, B., Fabian, M., Berg, D., Herring, A., and Pinnola, M. (2012
course (A=4, B=3, C=2, D=1, E=Not Applicable)“I would like to thank our instructor for his creativity and for the innovative way in teaching thiscourse. I hope this way of teaching can be applied to other courses at the university.”“More such student oriented teaching processes are required”“I have benefited a lot from the course. The course has covered the knowledge gained from theCEM program and added a unique way for teaching and learning about a unique project (greenbuilding)”ConclusionsThe student team put in a lot of effort to contact the limited available local experts in sustainable,green construction. The students found that the difference the in the initial cost between thegreen building and the conventional
AC 2012-3195: EDUCATING ENGINEERING STUDENTS TO SUCCEEDIN A GLOBAL WORKPLACEDr. Vukica Jovanovic, Trine University Vukica Jovanovic, Ph.D., began her academic career in 2001 when she graduated with her dipl.ing.- M.S. degree at University of Novi Sad, majoring in industrial engineering and focusing on mechatronics, robotics, and automation. She lectured various courses at departments of Industrial Engineering, Me- chanical Engineering, and Mechatronics from 2001 until 2006. She was an active member of a Euro- pean organizing committee of the student robotic contest Eurobot and chief of the Eurobot organizing committee of the Serbian student national competition in robotics. In the summer of 2002, she had an
AC 2012-5031: A FINANCIAL STUDY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PRO-FESSION AND PARAPROFESSIONSKing To Hung, Brigham Young University King To Hung obtained a B.E.S. in civil engineering from Brigham Young University in 2009 and is currently a M.S. student in Civil Engineering at Brigham Young University. He has served as a Team Captain in a steel bridge competition and is interested in engineering management.Dr. Fernando Fonseca, Brigham Young University Page 25.43.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The authors appreciate the reviewers’ comments and suggestions; each was seriously
. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan and D. K Anthony, “A Survey of Capstone Page 25.106.10 Engineering Courses in North America,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, 1995, pp. 165- 17411. Newell, S, “Collaborative Learning in Engineering Design,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 19, no. 6, 1990, pp. 359-362.12. Gabriele, G. A., L. T. McCloskey, and J. A. Watson, “Guidelines for Forming and Building Student Design Teams,” Proceedings, Advances in Capstone Education Conference, Brigham Young University, 1994, pp. 121-125.13. Barrett, G.V., and C.L. Thornton, “Cognitive Style Differences Between
AC 2012-3271: A COLLEGE-INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP: THE MULTI-DISCIPLINARY MASTER’S OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERINGDr. James G. Ladesic P.E., Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach James Ladesic is the Associate Dean of Industry Relations and Outreach and Professor of Aerospace En- gineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He has been with Embry-Riddle for 38 years, serving in many different capacities as faculty member and engineer. He is the recipient of the 1993 University Research Achievement Award, the 2001 Outstanding Teacher Award, and the 2009 Outstanding Service Award at ERAU. A registered Professional Engineer in Florida and FAA structures designated engineering representative. He is a recognized
and Schuster (1997)[10] Coleman, L. Liz Coleman’s Call to Reinvent Liberal Education from TED: Ideas Worth Spreading (2009) http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/liz_coleman_s_call_to_reinvent_liberal_arts_education.html[11] Ohlund, M., Sheppard, S.D., Lichtensten, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D. and Layton, R.A. “persistence, Engagement and Migration in Engineering Programs”, Journal of Engineering Education 97(30, 259-278 (2008)[12] Crawford, Matthew B., Shop Class as Soulcraft, Penguin Books, New York (2009)[13] Hacker, A., & Dreifus, C. Higher Education? New York, New York: Holt/Times Books (2010). Page
AC 2012-5093: INNOVATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCES IN A TECHNI-CAL UNIVERSITY USING OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESProf. Edmundo Tovar, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid Edmundo Tovar, computer engineering educator, has a Ph.D. (1994) and a bachelor’s degree (1986) in computer engineering from the Universidad Politcnica de Madrid (UPM). He is Certified Software De- velopment Professional (CSDP) from the IEEE Computer Society. He is Associate Dean for Quality and Strategic Planning in the Computing School of the Universidad Politcnica de Madrid. From this last po- sition, he is in charge of the training for academic staff, the introduction of innovative solutions including new pedagogies, new approaches that improve student