Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 2461 - 2490 of 48894 in total
Conference Session
Best in 5 Minutes: Demonstrating Interactive Teaching Activities
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anthony Battistini, Angelo State University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
theirqualitative feedback.In order to gain data on the activity, the author developed a survey with short answer and Likertscale questions to be administered following the final exam in the course beginning with the Spring2021 semester. The author also gathered feedback from 13 students who had participated in theAMechanics Race activity in the course prior to the Spring 2020 semester (COVID-19 pandemic)using the same survey. The survey is given in Appendix B, Figure 14 and results are presented.Survey Questions- Short AnswerPlease write 1-2 sentences summarizing your opinion (positive/neutral/negative) of theAMechanics Race activity and provide any feedback for the professor. • Past Students (prior to Spring 2020)- 13 Responses o “Enjoyable
Conference Session
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Engineering Technology: Part II
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Irwin, Michigan Technological University; Nasser Alaraje, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
distinction between its program objectives and program outcomes,(b) demonstrates the relationship of Criterion 2 [a] – [k] to each objective, and (c)demonstrates the assessment measure and metrics associated with each objective. OnJanuary 3, 2008 it was communicated to ABET that a response to this finding would beprovided at a later date.Finally, in response to the findings, the MET Program Spring 2008 Assessment Reportwas submitted to ABET prior to the 2008 Summer Meeting. This report included arevised version of the previously submitted attachments, along with assessment resultsand analysis in a tabular format. Following the 2008 Summer Meeting the final responseon August 15, 2008 from ABET was that the MET Program be reaccredited.I believe that it
Conference Session
Materials Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Megan Frary, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Materials
wouldalso be helpful to administer the survey to a similar group of students who did not receive theintervention. Based on the lack of literature about the growth mindset in engineering curricula,this area of study has much potential.Appendix A: MINDSET SURVEYAttitudes about difficult classes and learning1. What have you heard about the difficulty of MSE 308? a. It’s really hard b. It’s kind of hard c. It’s not too hard d. It’s not hard at all2. What have you heard about the time commitment involved with MSE 308? a. It takes a ton of time b. It takes a lot of time c. It takes a moderate amount of time d. It is not too time intensive3. What else have you heard about MSE 308? (short answer)4. What are you expectations for your
Conference Session
PBL and Flipped Classrooms in Civil Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aliye Karabulut-Ilgu, Iowa State University; Suhan Yao, Iowa State University; Peter Tarmo Savolainen, Iowa State University; Charles T. Jahren P.E., Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
; Exposition. Indianapolis, IN.6. Clark, R. M., Norman, B. A., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2014). Preliminary experiences with “flipping” a facility layout / material handling course. In Y. Guan & H. Liao (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2014 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference. Montreal, Canada.7. Clemens, B. M., Nivargi, C., Jan, A., Lu, Y., Schneider, E., & Manning, J. (2013). Adventures with a flipped classroom and a materials science and engineering MOOC: “Fools go where angels fear to tread.” In Proceedings of Materials Research Society Symposium (Vol. 1583). Boston, MA.8. Ghadiri, K., Qayoumi, M. H., Junn, E., & Hsu, P. (2014). Developing and implementing effective
Conference Session
Engineering Economics Teaching Tools
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University; Matthew T. Stimpson, North Carolina State University; E. Downey Brill, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
this first flipped iteration were similar to final grades fromthe previous three lecture-format offerings (see Table 4). However, when examining thenumber of students earning a D or F grade, more students from the flipped classroom earnedlower than a C in the course when compared to the average of the three previous courseofferings (p < 0.001( χ2 = 39.53, df = 16). Table 4: Final Course Grades, Fall 2009 to Fall 2012 Percentage of Students Receiving Grade A B C D F Other Fall 2012 12 23 23 24 16 2 Spring 2011
Conference Session
Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 3
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maher Shehadi, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
. The thermocouples were arrangedat two different elevations (0.9 m and 1.8 m from ceiling) as shown in Figure1(a) andFigure 1(c). Figure 1(c) is a generic 3D model for the room showing the surrounding rooms,window and door locations, and the twelve thermocouples. The room was conditioned using theexisting building HVAC system and the temperature was controlled by a thermostat located onthe left side wall of the room. The hallway on the west side of the room was kept at highertemperature than the room temperature. The thermocouples were labelled for better analysis as Figure 1. Office used for experimental data collection (a) actual office with hanging thermocouples, (b) actual office with included equipment and furniture, (c
Conference Session
New Directions for ET
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University; Shelly Tan, Purdue University; Liza Ann Russell, Purdue University; Mary E. Johnson Ph.D., Purdue University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
and F. Pearson, "Women's Perceptions of the Climate in Engineering Technology Programs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, pp. 309-314, 2013.[11] J. D. Burns, R. J. Budreau, G. L. Harding, W. M. Pace, M. E. Prygoski and J. A. Piller, "A Redesigned Engagement and Recruitment Strategy for Engineering Technology Programs at a Regional Campus," in ASEE IL-IN Section Conference, West Lafayette, 2018.[12] R. L. Mott, G. P. Neff, M. J. Stratton and D. C. Summers, "Future directions for mechanical, manufacturing, and industrial engineering technology programs," Journal of Engineering Technology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 8-15, 2002.[13] S. Zakani, B. Frank, R. Turner and J. Kaupp, "Framework for the Transferability Between
Conference Session
Trends in Mechanics Education
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Don Evans; Gary Gray; Francesco Costanzo; Phillip Cornwell; Brian Self
A. Stevens, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1983, pp. 15–33. Page 8.1202.8 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2003, American Society for Engineering Education[11] , “Toward an epistemology of physics,” in Cognition and Instruction, L. Resnick, ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1993, pp. 105–208.[12] B. E YLON AND M. L INN, “Learning and instruction: An examination of four research per- spectives in science education,” Review of Educational Research, 58, 1988, pp. 251–301.[13] R. H
Conference Session
Design Across Disciplines
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Taskin Padir, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
2 ECE 2 MEGrade Distribution: The number of students receiving A grades in their project work was foundto be 79%. The percentage of B grades was 14% and the number of C grades was 7%. This gradedistribution appears to indicate grade inflation. The large number of A’s relative to the number ofB and C’s is related to the number of projects that were judged to be worth 1 unit (9 credit hours)per student. In this review, it was determined that 29% of the projects completed weremarginally worth 1 unit or did not worth 1 unit at all. However, It must be emphasized that an Agrade should reflect one unit of excellent work by the student, a B grade should reflect one unitof
Conference Session
Mechanical and Architectural Engineering Laboratories
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nancy K Lape, Harvey Mudd College; David L Harris, Harvey Mudd College; Matthew Joseph Keeter, Harvey Mudd College; Madeleine S Ong, Harvey Mudd College; Zachary Dodds, Harvey Mudd College
Tagged Divisions
Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies
  12            Other   4            Undecided   4      2)  My  printed  circuit  board  in  Lab  1  worked:              a)  on  the  first  try   22            b)  with  minor  repairs  in  the  lab  session   12            c)  only  after  help  outside  lab  from  the  teaching  staff   3
Conference Session
Teaching Team Skills Through Design
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Mary Cook; Jim Lyons; Kenneth Gentili
areincluded in this paper as a reference for completeness.The method has been tested and improved by multiple instructors in Introduction to EngineeringDesign1 classes and Physical Science classes. Both classes are structured around developingquality teams to understand concepts or developing innovative products.Included in this paper is detailed team performance criteria that help teams identify their teamcharacteristics (see Appendix A: TIDEE Team Assessment Criteria), a handout that is given tothe students prior to the meeting (see Appendix B: TIDEE Team Meeting Handout), and detailedimplementation instructions complete with agenda for running the meeting. The package isdeveloped as a turnkey process that can be effectively used by a novice.The
Collection
2011 North Midwest Section
Authors
Katherine Acton
Learning S r c ral Anal i in A B ilding ha Teache Katherine Acton University of Minnesota DuluthAbstractThe Swenson Civil Engineering Building, opened in 2010, was constructed with the goalof providing a space in which, and from which, Civil Engineering students can learn.Multiple exposed structural systems allow students the opportunity to visualize the wayin which the building is designed to carry load. The building is LEED certified. A largehigh-bay lab is open to view, so that class work and research is visible to students as theypass through the halls of the building.The high bay lab features two 15-ton gantry cranes. The gantry cranes have beenanalyzed in the
Conference Session
Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Camille Velarde, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Estike Kokovay Gutierrez
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
, where each question has answers lettered (i.e., A, B, C, D)and the quiz taker reads their results based on these (i.e., “If you answered mostly As, you…). Inaddition to careful wording, we saw this format as a means to mitigate the sense of being ranked.We wanted to invite members of the organization to comfortably place themselves on thetrajectory toward becoming community engaged, not reject it as out of reach. Thus, to also offeropportunities to learn and grow, we linked the categories (e.g., mostly Bs) to descriptions andideas; for example: “Your program is characterized as for the community. The role of the community is consultant. There may be an advisory board that the organization selected or identified out of
Conference Session
Diversity Research - Session I
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Jacklin Stonewall, Iowa State University; Michael Dorneich, Iowa State University; Cassandra Dorius; Jane Rongerude PhD, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Diversity Research
,” Review of educational Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249-276, 1998. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [12] A. M. Langan, C. P. Wheater, E. M. Shaw, B. J. Haines,This material is based upon work supported by a Miller Grant W. R. Cullen, J. C. Boyle, D. Penney, J. A. Oldekop, C. Ashcroft, and L. Lockey, “Peer Assessment of Oralfrom Iowa State University. Presentations: Effects of Student Gender, University
Conference Session
MVCC Technical Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jakob C Bruhl, U.S. Military Academy; Joseph P Hanus, U.S. Military Academy; Paul M Moody P.E., U.S. Military Academy; James Ledlie Klosky P.E., U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Military and Veterans Constituent Committee
Engineering program. The course scopefocuses on issues related to the professional practice of civil engineering, and is intended toaugment and enrich the student’s civil engineering core courses. Topics include professionalregistration and practice, engineering ethics, contemporary issues, and fundamental concepts ofbusiness, management, and public policy. The course objectives are: 3  a. Apply the ASCE Code of Ethics to the solution of an ethical problem confronting a practicing engineer, b. Explain the elements of project management in the military, public service, and private sectors, c. Describe the business and public policy issues for public and private practice, d
Conference Session
Multimedia and Distance Learning in ET
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sorraya Khiewnavawongsa, Purdue University; Ron Leong, Purdue University; Edie Schmidt, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
oninefficiency of the old, and ultimately, critically evaluate the value of evidence (Boom 1956;Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. 1973). The result of this paper will be based on a 40 minutes lecture, which goal is to helpstudents learn the concept and application of Material Requirement Planning (MRP) in the mosteffective manner. Learning, for the purpose of a mere 40 minutes lecture, will therefore besuperficially defined as the ability to understand, the ability to recall, and the ability to apply theknowledge meaningfully (Sekaran, 2003). 2.2. Demographic Survey At analyzing the hypotheses, we wanted to know how experienced our students are withthe technology (Breeze). To analyze the students, a demographic and
Conference Session
ChE: Innovations in the Classroom
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Bullard, North Carolina State University; Richard Felder, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
given to students following the information literacypresentation. Typically they are given 2–3 weeks to complete it. By linking informationcompetencies to assignments related to class material, we move beyond decoupled instructionthat is quickly forgotten to “just-in-time” need-based instruction.Library Assignment1. Select a chemical substance from Table B.1 in your text that begins with the same letter as your first name or the nearest possible letter (for example Andy Aniline). Find and report the information listed below for this substance in references other than the course text or CD, and properly cite the references. Organize your report neatly and show all units. (a) Specific gravity, molecular weight, normal melting and boiling
Conference Session
Nuclear and Radiological Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ye Li, Univ of Illinois; Rizwan Uddin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Xuefeng Zhu; Imran Haddish
Tagged Divisions
Nuclear and Radiological
. Student clickson the shielding blocks placed on the table, which moves them next to a scale, allowing the student tomeasure their thickness. Next, clicking on the block moves it to the space between the radiation sourceand the detector. Counts can then be measured by setting the time interval and clicking on the counterbutton. Process is repeated for different number of shielding blocks; thus gathering data for differentthicknesses. Entire process can then be repeated for blocks made of different material. Figure 4 showsthe thickness measurement step. Figure 5 shows the lead shielding blocks, next to labels A, B, C, …, foruse in the shielding experiment. Figure 6 shows two of the shielding blocks placed in between theradiation source (on the left
Collection
2001 Annual Conference
Authors
Oral LaFleur; Matthew Govindsanny; Joshua Hill; Daniel Jones
at Eastern Cape Technikon in South Africa, 4. Solus, a company that developed the solar refrigerator, League City, Texas, and 5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas. Page 6.596.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2001, American Society for Engineering EducationDuring the REEP summer academy, faculty members from across the United States volunteeredto provide hands-on instructional workshops and tours to local industries. All students
Conference Session
Curriculum in Electrical Power Engineering Technology
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Edwards, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Gerald Recktenwald, Portland State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
volumetric flow rate will be as you predicted in #1?Questions (Post-exercise) 1. Was your prediction for the volumetric flow rate correct? 2. What factors in this exercise do you think influence the actual volumetric flow rate? 3. If two fans are placed in series with each other will the flow rate: a. Increase by a factor of 2 b. Decrease by a factor of 2 c. Stay the same 4. If two fans are placed in series with each other will the total differential pressure across the fans: a. Increase by a factor of 2 b. Decrease by a factor of 2 c. Stay the same 5. If two fans are placed in parallel with each other will the flow rate: a. Increase by a factor of 2 b. Decrease
Conference Session
Teaching Materials Sci&Eng to Non-Majors
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Mark Palmer
was unstable as were surfaces. Weintroduced surface energy so that the students knew a) that the underbonded atoms added energy Page 7.218.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Engineering Educationto the crystal and b) they were familiar enough with the concept to understand nucleationphenomenon and coarsening.Polymers were included as another material. By introducing the students to organic chemistry wewere able to lead them through the formation of long chain molecules by polymerization andfrom this they
Collection
2003 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference
Authors
Charles McIntyre; Prajesh Kondaskar; Gary Smith
Note Pad (write notes and brief documents) 8 “To Do” List (track tasks by date, category, & priority) 9 Graffiti Writing (Palm hand writing system by stylus) 7 Download Programs and Games (from Internet) 12 Wireless Transmission (Beaming Data - IR Port) 9 Hot Sync ( Synchronize between Palm and Computer) 7 Table 2. Learning Strategies vs. Student Use Learning Strategies Student Use A. Trial and Error (only) 1 B. Reference Manual
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 2: Assessing the Entrepreneurial Mindset, Curiosity, and Workplace Preparedness
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meagan Eleanor Ita, Arvinas; Amanda Marie Singer, The Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)
use of the direct and indirect assessments in parallel to fullycharacterize student curiosity as it relates to an EM. Future work will focus on adapting theexisting codebook to better align with the 5DCS constructs in the context of a first-yearengineering classroom and to differentiate between overt covert social curiosity, sub-constructsdistinguished by Kashdan et al., [25] in the Revised Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale (5DCR).References[1] D. Pusca and D. Northwood, “Curiosity, creativity and engineering education,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 152–158, 2018. [2] T. B. Kashdan, P. Rose, and F. D. Fincham, “Curiosity and exploration: facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth
Conference Session
Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Stefan Christov, Quinnipiac University; James Walker, Michigan Technological University; Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Divisions
Software Engineering Division
A: Ability to determine the scope of a software project by taking into account various constraints. B: Ability to develop a software project plan. C: Ability to enact a software project plan. D: Ability to estimate various software project parameters. E: Ability to measure and control software products and processes. F: Ability to manage software project risk. G: Ability to lead a diverse team of software developers.Figure 1: Self-assessed contribution of course
Conference Session
Institutionalizing Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victoria Matthew, VentureWell; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; Raina Michelle Khatri, Western Michigan University; Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Robby Sanders, Tennessee Technological University; Bonnie J. Bachman, Missouri University of Science & Technology; Renee Cole, University of Iowa; John Lovitt, Wichita State University and Missouri University of Science & Technology; Melissa Geist, Tennessee Technological University; Charles Henderson, Western Michigan University ; Debra May Friedrichsen; Phil Weilerstein, VentureWell
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Paper ID #19060Institutionalizing Campus Innovation and Entrepreneurship Programmingby Optimizing a Faculty Grantmaking Process: A Case StudyVictoria Matthew, VentureWell Victoria Matthew is Senior Program Officer for Faculty Development at VentureWell, where she plays a lead role in the Pathways to Innovation Program, Epicenter’s faculty development and engagement strategy. She designs in-person and online convenings, engages experts, and curates content that fosters the Pathways faculty goals of integrating entrepreneurship and innovation into undergraduate engineering. Prior to joining VentureWell, Victoria worked for
Collection
ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
Authors
Byul Hur, Texas A&M University
Paper ID #35123Self-publish textbook for Embedded System Education using an MSP432microcontrollerDr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2017, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011 to 2016 at the University Florida previously
Conference Session
Design and the Capstone Experience
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
R. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Michael S. Thompson, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
thequestions and maps specific design representations to the rows and columns. Each of therepresentations is briefly discussed and some of the failed attempts in earlier versions of thecanvas are disclosed along with the reasons they did not work in the authors’ capstone courses. A B C D E Design Are we Why should Does our (still) able Choices we build it How What system to build it System
Conference Session
Enhancing Recruitment and Retention in Engineering
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College; Glenn Ellis, Smith College; Diana Fiumefreddo, Smith College
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
, although notaltogether satisfactorily. The post-assessment responses showed significant improvement overthe pre-assessment responses, but, again, this was not deemed entirely satisfactory for the cohort.Open-ended pre- and post-assessment questions were administered to the teachers. The responsesto these questions were independently evaluated by McGinnis-Cavanaugh and Ellis using thescoring rubric shown in Appendix B. On average, response scores went up 83% and 60% (seeAppendices B and C) on questions 1 and 2, respectively, showing significant improvement inboth the understanding of both basic mechanics concepts and educational theory with regard tostudent engagement. The assessment questions were as follows: 1. A gymnast stands on a
Conference Session
Impact of COVID-19 on Design Education 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Melissa Mae White, University of Florida; Megan Stowers, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Paper ID #33644Building a Sense of Community in a Multidisciplinary, Split-level OnlineProject-based Innovation Design CourseDr. Melissa Mae White, University of Florida Dr. Melissa Mae White develops and instructs course curriculum in Engineering Innovation and Engi- neering Entrepreneurship to the students in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. She works with faculty and students to build an ecosystem focusing on creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship across campus and in the community. She received her Bachelor of Science degree in Biomedical Engineering with a minor in
Conference Session
Aerospace Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elizabeth Scott Fleming, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amy Pritchett, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
Paper ID #16431Creating and Validating a Model to Support Aerospace Engineering Stu-dents’ Coordination of Knowledge about a DesignMs. Elizabeth Scott Fleming, Georgia Institute of Technology Elizabeth ”Scottie-Beth” Fleming is an Aerospace Engineering PhD candidate and NSF GRFP Fellow in the Cognitive Engineering Center (CEC) at Georgia Tech. She graduated from Georgia Tech with a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering. Her research within the CEC examines interdisciplinary teams within the engineering design process, training approaches for aircraft pilots, and human interaction with technology.Dr. Amy Pritchett, Georgia