provided to engineering education.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Tufts University and the many centers and departments fortheir past and continuing support in helping establish these projects. This includes: Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service Tufts Institute for Global Leadership School of Engineering School of Arts and Sciences Frederic BergerBibliography1. Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations During the 2005-2006 Accreditation Cycle, November 2004.2. Matson, D., Freeman, S., Sharpe, G., Swan, C., "International Citizenship and Global
10mA 3.3 VoltsReferences[1] J. M.Rabaey, M. J. Ammer, J. L. da Silva Jr., D. Patel, and S. Roundy, “Picoradio supports ad hoc ultra-lowpower wireless networking”, IEEE Computer, pp. 42–48, July 2000.[2] Roundy, S., Steingart, D., Fréchette, L., Wright, P. K., Rabaey, J., “Power Sources for Wireless Networks”, Proc.1st European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks (EWSN '04), Berlin, Germany, Jan.19-21, 2004.[3 Stordeur, M., Stark, I., “Low Power Thermoelectric Generator – self-sufficient energy supply for micro systems,”16th Int. Conf. on Therm, 1997, pp. 575-7][4] E.M. Yeatman, “Advances in Power Sources for Wireless Sensor Nodes,” Proc. Int.Workshop Wearable andImplantable Body Sensor Networks, Imperial College, 2004
engineering relate to domestic life inthe 18th and early 19th centuries (Kohlstedt35, 1999). In fact, the study of botany was framedfor and by women in the late 18th century, who used their knowledge in gardening, herbalmedicine and food preparation. Women living in rural areas, through organizations such asthe Women’s Institute in Ontario, shared knowledge about science relating to the home –such as farm work, health, food and hygiene issues. This would give birth to schools such asthe MacDonald Institute at the University of Guelph (McPhedran40, 2003).Engineering was a men’s club until the late 1800’s, at which time very few women took upthe discipline. In 1893, only three women had ever received an engineering degree in theUnited States (Lebold
courses described herein serves tointegrate the student’s theoretical studies with practical experiences in an environment that isboth supportive and professional as well as well designed to prepare students for the next phaseof their career.Bibliography1. King, Paul H., and Fries, Richard C., Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 20032. Enderle, J., Gassert, J., Blanchard, S., King, P., Beasley, D., Hale, P. Jr., Aldridge, D., “The ABCs of preparing for ABET,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, v22.4, 122-132 (2003)3. Enderle, J.D., Ropella, K.M., Kelso, D.M., and Hallowell, B., “Ensuring that biomedical engineers are ready for the real world,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
generally measure theCT level of their engineers. This SECtCS modeler created in Phase 2 can be utilized to identifyunproductive student measures or variables specific to that college. This group-specificquestionnaire and model should be utilized for existing students where the organizations find ithard to measure but require innovation in order to retain a competitive advantage.Implementation of other phases of the methodology is not recommended without furtherdirection from the researchers.REFERENCESBarber, Luke and Weinstein, Matt. Work Like Your Dog: Fifty Ways to Work Less, Play More, and Earn More.(New York: Villard 1999)Bassman, Emily S., Abuse in the Workplace, Management Remedies and Bottom Line Impact. (Westport: Quorum Books
group ofexperts located in different geographical areas whose opinions are important for decisionanalysis. Through the Delphi technique different responses and views are obtained on theunderlying problem resulting in the generation of new ideas, unique suggestions, and eventuallygains consensus on the findings among a panel of experts. A conventional Delphi method startswith an open-ended questionnaire and the participants are asked to answer the question(s). Asecond questionnaire composed of collated information and calculated statistics obtained fromthe first round questionnaire is sent out asking respondents to revise their opinions about theproblem under study. This process continues until the consensus is gained among respondents orthe
2006-2658: AN APPROACH TO TEACHING COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERINGTO A DIVERSE STUDENT POPULATIONJitendra Tate, Texas State University-San Marcos Dr. Jitendra S. Tate is an Assistant Professor in Manufacturing Engineering at Texas State University-San Marcos. He teaches courses in Materials Engineering, Plastics and Composites Manufacturing, Engineering Design Graphics, and Computer Aided Engineering. His research interests include low cost manufacturing of composites, mechanical characterization of composites under static and dynamic loading, fatigue life prediction modeling, finite element analysis, CADD, and statistical analysis. He is a member of several professional societies
• Provide academic • At the beginning of • Faculty participation/ and develop solutions support and counsel- the school year presentation and to enhance the ing. acquaint students interview workshops existing method(s). • Provide scholarships, with departmental, for UG & G minority• Provide leadership to fellowships (offer in college and univer- programs in other coordinate UG & G Dec/Jan), and grants. sity guidelines. relevant states. of all departments • Tuition waivers. • Acquaint students • Computer orientation and Colleges within • Improve stipends and with funding sources workshops, library IHE
understanding is an area that should beparticularly enhanced by use of the spreadsheets.Table 1. Summary of student characteristics and measures of achievement.Section # of % Prior GPA DCI Pre- DCI Post- Total students graduate test* test* Course students Score*Comparison 15 60 3.04±0.61 -- 68±17 (9) 66±23Experimental (F’04) 19 26 3.43±0.49 35±10 (19) 64±13 (16) 77±10Experimental (S’05) 24 38 3.47±0.52 30±11(11) 64±10(6) 79±9
learning. However, in this course, the students require carefulguidance throughout a research effort that is looking outside of applied technology and more atthe base technology available. The use of mobile robotics is also found to be very valuable notonly in providing a meaningful multidisciplinary engineering environment, but also inmotivating students to learn.Bibliography[1] N. Tsoulfanidis. “The Benefits of the Undergraduate Research Experience,” Proceedings of the 1997 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI, June 1997.[2] D. Ahlgren, I. Verner, D. Pack, and S. Richards. “Effective Practices in Robotics Education,” Proceedings of the2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt
. Recentassessments comparing U. S. student performance in multi-national groups reveals serious faultsin this foundation.Society’s leaders and pundits consistently emphasize the role engineering and science educatorsserve in building technical literacy4-6. Methods, techniques and strategies abound for engagingstudents in the quest for technical knowledge and understanding7-8. The authors have engaged in Page 11.1406.3a variety of activities to try and bridge the technological literacy gap, including working with K-12 pre-service teachers9-11.While outreach programs serve an important role informing students of available programs andfields of study, a detailed
project, there are obstacles that must be identified and overcome. Forthis project, major obstacles identified are: change within radiology, change outside radiology(scheduling, registration, corporate culture, physicians), and system thinking.Project Objective(s): Objectives for this project are to: 1. Identify and reduce the impact of the radiology process constraints limiting the ability of the MR and CT areas to maintain their referral base. 2. Provide a project roadmap to maximize the number of procedures available on a daily basis in the MR and CT areas, resulting in increased revenue. 3. Provide a project roadmap to increase patient and physician customer satisfaction 4. Create standardized
and graded to ensure active studentinvolvement. The final tutorial includes creation and generation of an off-line robotics program,which can be sent to a working robot in another location. All students work independently ontheir assignments, but frequently assist one another to overcome problems they encounter.Approximately midway through the ten-week quarter the students are split into teams of three tofive persons for assignment to a company project. Based on individual preferences or companyrestrictions (e.g.; US citizenship) the project is designated and arrangements made for a plantvisit. Typically, a 1-2 hour meeting with the company includes an explanation of their business, ageneral description of the operation(s) to be simulated
through free space. Propagation coefficient, reflection coefficient, voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) and their use in analysis of RF systems and devices. Introduction to Antennas, as the interface device between transmitters, receivers and free space. Table II RF Experiments Signal analysis using spectrum analyzer Network analysis using of network analyzers S parameter characterization of RF networks Characterization of various RF components, including filters, mixers and couplesThe
AVERAGE Arch 602 (control) Studio S 04 NA 3.83 3.67 4.33 4.33 3.83 3.50 3.50 4.33 4.17 4.50 3.67 4.33 4.17 3.83 4.00
100 N VA 0 J N I W S Installed Gen. Capacity K E N Consumption
fundamental chemical engineering concepts. Assessment shows both thetechnical and affective objectives of the seminar were accomplished. This seminar should beportable to other institutions, or with some modification, could be used in outreach activities withhigh school students. We plan to use this seminar again in the coming academic year.Bibliography1. Vigeant, M., J. Baish, R. Kozick, S. Petrescu, R. Zaccone, and R Ziemian. Introducing First-Year Students toEngineering, Economics, and Social Responsibility: Ada Compliance as a First Project. In American Society forEngineering Education. 2004. Salt Lake City, UT.2. Vigeant, M., S. Velegol, J. Baish, R. Kozick, R. Zaccone, and R Ziemian. Restructuring Exploring EngineeringAt Bucknell University. In
) in theearly 1990’s to about Tk. 200 billion (3.33 billion US dollars) in 2003. Figure 1 shows a steadyincrease of the country’s construction output which is presently over 8 per cent of its GDP1.Most of the construction works are in the public sector. Funding for a high percentage ofconstruction projects come from multilateral development agencies (MDA) like the World Bankor Asian Development Bank.The rapid growth in the construction sector demands an adequate number of professionals with abroad understanding of the principles of construction science as well as leadership skills in Page 11.473.2motivating teams and integrating a wide range of
was supported through the National Science Foundation through theCAREER program (NSF9984896); the Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvementprogram (NSF0088279), and the Department Level Planning Grants for Engineering Education(NSF0230695). LASER CULT case studies are available on-line3, as are portfolios of studentwork8. The author acknowledges generous equipment donations from Melles Griot andThorlabs.Bibliography1 Committee on Optical Science and Engineering, Harnessing light: Optical science and engineering in the 21st century. (National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 1998).2 S. B. Feichtner and E. A. Davis, "Why some groups fail: a survey of students' experiences with learning groups," J. Organ. Behav. Teaching Soc
a new skill. Using role play enhanced the students’ interest in the course andafforded opportunities of how to apply training concepts in the corporate environment. Thestudents obviously enjoyed the use of role play as an instructional method, developed thenecessary skill set to design effective training programs, and highly recommended this course toother engineering graduate students. With the necessary planning and preparation, the use ofrole play in a graduate engineering course can be successfully implemented to provide a moreproductive student-centered approach to teaching and learning.Bibliography1. Andrianoff, S. K., and Levine, D. B. (2002). Role playing in an object-oriented world. SIGCSE Bulletin.2. Brady, K. M., Forton, M. B
2006-1657: THE ROLE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN INTERNATIONALDEVELOPMENTRosalyn Hobson, Virginia Commonwealth University Rosalyn S. Hobson is an Associate Professor at Virginia Commonwealth University. She received her B.S. ('91), M.S. ('95), and Ph.D. ('98) degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research includes the use artificial neural networks for signal processing and controls problems, science and technology in international development and engineering education. She joined VCU in the fall semester of 1996. Page 11.1326.1© American Society for
Commerce and Economic Opportunity, http://www.commerce.state.il.us/dceo/Bureaus/Facts_Figures/Factsheets/ 2. Illinois Board of Higher Education Data Bank, http://www.ibhe.state.il.us/Data%20Bank/default.htm 3. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/race.htm 4. S. T. Hill. (2002). National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1991-2002, NSF 02-329, Arlington. 5. L.J. Bottomley, S. Rajala and R. Porter. (1999) Engineering outreach teams: K-12 outreach at North Carolina State University. Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference, v 3, pp. 13a7-14 - 13a7-17 6. M. Mooney
] Smith, K. and Waller, A., “New Paradigms for Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 1997 Frontiers inEducation Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1997.[7] Clark, M.C. et al., “The evolution of Curricular Change Models Within the Foundation Coalition,” Journal ofEngineering Education, January 2004.[8] Duerden, S. and Green, M., “Enhancing Freshman Engineering Education: Integrating Freshman EnglishComposition with Engineering, Math, Physics, and Chemistry,” found on the internet athttp://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/3a6/3a62/3a62.htm Page 11.459.8 Appendix I
course: Re-examining the curriculum. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 66(1):5-10. 3. Forsha, Harry I. (1995). Show me: The complete guide to storyboarding and problem solving. Wisconsin: ASQC Press. 4. Fraioli, J. O. (2000). Storyboarding 101: A crash course in professional storyboarding. California: Michael Wiese Productions. 5. Hanks, K., Belliston, L. (1992). Draw! A visual approach to thinking, learning and communicating. California: Crisp Publications. 6. Hanks, K., Belliston, L. (1990). Rapid Viz. California: Crisp Publications. 7. Katz, S. D. (1991). Film directing shot by shot. California: Michael Wiese Productions. 8. Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic thinking for architects and
, Evgenia, ”Multiple-queue Backfilling Scheduling with Priorities and Reservations for Parallel Systems” Department of Computer Science, College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795, USA5. Srinivasan, S., Kettimuthu, R., Subramani, V., and Sadayappan, P., “Characterization of backfilling strategies for parallel job scheduling”. IEEE International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, pages 514– 519, August 2002.6. Bode, Brett, Halstead, David M., Kendall, Ricky and Lei, Zhou “The Portable Batch Scheduler and the Maui Scheduler on Linux Clusters”. In Annual Technical Conference, USENIX, June 1999.7. Alagusundaram, Kavitha “A Comparison of Common Processor Scheduling Algorithms for Distributed- Memory
, T.R. Smith and D. Cadogan, “Development of UV-Curable Inflatable Wings for Low-Density Flight Applications,” AIAA Paper 2004-1503, AIAA GossamerSpacecraft Forum, Palm Springs, CA, April 2004.7. Usui, M., J.D. Jacob and S.W. Smith, S. Scarborough and D. Cadogan, “Second GenerationInflatable/Rigidizable Wings for Low-Density Flight,” AIAA-2005-1883, AIAA Gossamer Spacecraft Forum,Austin, TX, April 2005.8. Simpson, A., et.al., “Flying on Air: UAV Flight Testing with Inflatable Wing Technology,” AIAA 2004-6570, AIAA Unmanned Unlimited Conference, Chicago, IL, September 2004.9. Simpson, A., Jacob, J.D., and Smith, S., “Morphing of Inflatable Wings.” AIAA 2005-2110, AIAA SDMAdaptive Structures Conference, Austin, TX, April, 2005.10
course exam)? Page 11.693.3 • Describe the types of activities or projects that you use with students. • Describe the ways in which you and your students use technology to teach/learn Algebra II. • If you have taught Algebra II for several years, what changes have you made in Algebra II? Why? • In what way(s) do you think using technology in the classroom enhances (or not) the teaching and learning of algebra II concepts? • Describe the characteristics of different students to whom you teach Algebra II (what courses have they taken and what do they take after Algebra II
accreditation criteria document states requirements for accreditation.Example program names are shown below: • Aeronautical Engineering Technology • Computer Engineering Technology • Construction Engineering Technology • Drafting/Design Engineering Technology (Mechanical) • Electrical/Electronic(s) Engineering Technology • Environmental Engineering Technology • Industrial Engineering Technology • Information Engineering Technology • Manufacturing Engineering Technology • Surveying/Geomatics Engineering Technology • Telecommunications Engineering TechnologyNAITThe National Association of Industrial Technology [3] was
been introduced. Page 11.252.2Course Descriptions and BackgroundThe NU course is a required four-credit sophomore course for Industrial Engineering majors,with a few engineering students taking IE as a minor. The course covers core IE topics, aboutone topic per week, using selected chapters from Turner, et al.’s text5 along with supplementalmaterial. The class meets three times weekly: one class is generally an introductory lecture withproblem-solving, the second includes more problem solving or further exploration of the topic,and the third is a laboratory or hands-on classroom activity. The students complete homeworkproblems and an
ideas that are helpful whenthinking about how to redesign the college.IntroductionImpending changes are presenting engineering schools across the country and around the globewith new challenges. Our task force at the UW-Madison COE has been engaged in efforts toassist the college in meeting these challenges. Some of these challenges are specific to the UW-Madison College of Engineering. Many of them, however, are universal. Our hope is that indiscussing the path(s) that we are following, we can broaden the conversation beyond a singlecampus. We do not want to mislead anyone: we do not claim to have the answers, and wecertainly have many unanswered questions, however, we believe that a national dialogue isrequired if engineering education is to