the dots between classroom learning and real worldapplications. We assessed this program informally during tests, projects, and an industry visitduring the first semester, and then formally via an online evaluation in the second semester of theprogram. This manuscript presents the outcome of the teaching mentorship experiment. Ourapproach could provide a pathway for new engineering faculty to become effective teachers andsuccessful mentors.I. Introduction and BackgroundThe 2lst century has seen a significant shift from bricks to clicks, from simultaneous to non-simultaneous engineering and communication cultures. 1-2 Traditional classrooms, in the walls ofbricks, have transformed with integration of software and design tools, digital
and other assessments. They also indicate some of the techniques their peers use insupervised (e.g. tests, quizzes, exams etc.) and un-supervised (e.g. homework, projects, labreports, online environment etc.) assessments. The survey also reveals whether students are morelikely to cheat in the major required courses or non-major elective courses etc. Some of thetechniques that deter students from cheating are also discussed.Literature Review:Academic misconduct has long been a problem on college campuses in the United States.Studies across the nation have consistently shown that a majority of undergraduate studentsacross various disciplines engage in some form of academic misconduct during their collegecareer [1, 2, 3, and 4].Various
approximately 100 papers and has been awarded over $3 million of research grants.Dr. Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Richard H. Crawford is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He is also Director of the Design Projects program in Mechanical Engineering. He received his BSME from Louisiana State University in 1982, and his MSME in 1985 and Ph.D. in 1989, both from Purdue University. He teaches mechanical engineering design and geometry modeling for design. Dr. Crawford’s research interests span topics in computer- aided mechanical design and design theory and methodology. Dr. Crawford is co-founder of the
communication interaction scenario,selected from the CareerWISE content, is presented here: Monique wants to talk with her advisor, Dr. Hernandez, about taking the lead on an upcoming project in their lab. She is not sure how supportive Dr. Hernandez will be since she is already committed to a number of other projects, so she is trying to proceed cautiously and deliberately to convince him that she is capable of handling the extra work. In order to broach the topic with him, she uses the following plan to devise her approach…This particular communication interaction scenario pertains to multiple themes. Monique iscarefully planning the best strategy for negotiating with her advisor to secure a lead role on
retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering. Page 23.429.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Development of an Interview Protocol to Understand Engineering as a Career Choice for Appalachian YouthAbstractAs part of a grant funded by the National Science Foundation, we are conducting a three-phase,sequential mixed method project to research the factors influencing the choices Appalachianyouth make about pursuing or not pursuing engineering degrees
: (i) technicalcompetence; (ii) managerial & leadership abilities; (iii) business communication skills; (iv)ethical & professional matters; and (v) social awareness.Training is a crucial component and process in the development of these qualities of aprofessional engineer. It is a period for a candidate to acquire practical knowledge, skills, andattitudes which can be learnt only in an industrial or commercial environment, and arecomplementary to those he has already acquired in college through formal education. Thetraining is aimed at developing the technical and managerial abilities of the candidate so as tobetter prepare him to undertake engineering projects as a professional engineer in his later careerwith due consideration of
also designated severalsubgroups ideal for various scenarios in the engineering academic environment at any institution;a few consistent with Mercer engineering students analyzed are outlined in Table 2. Table 2. Professional competencies for students3 TTI Description Effectively collaborate in a Applying critical and Persist through and learn team setting creative thinking to from failure ambiguous problems Mercer Equivalent Group projects/assignments Design phase of senior Student’s overall (PDR, CDR) design, R&D projects
stems from every aspect of the project, from pre-project planning with varied stakeholders to building with minimum environmental andcommunity disturbance. The ASCE report “Engineering the Future of Civil Engineering”(www.asce.org/raisethebar) has highlighted the significant and rapid changes confronting theprofession, while recent events have demonstrated our vulnerability to human- made hazards anddisasters. The risks and challenges to public health, safety, and welfare will continue to escalate Page 8.235.1in complexity, and the civil engineering profession must respond proactively. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for
actively pursues research in engineering education and assists other faculty in their scholarly projects. She also is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of American Society of Engineering Education and guest co-editor for a special issue of the International Journal of Engineering Education on applications of engineering education research.Matthew Holsapple, University of Michigan Matthew A. Holsapple is a doctoral candidate at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan. His research interests include the impact of educational experiences on student moral development and personal and social responsibility, professional
AC 2010-1534: ARE WE REALLY “CROSSING THE BOUNDARY”? ASSESSING ANOVEL INTEGRATED MATH/SCIENCE COURSECynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Cynthia J. Finelli, Ph.D., is Director of the Center for Research and Learning North and associate research scientist in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. In addition, she actively pursues research in engineering education and assists other faculty in their scholarly projects. She also is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of American Society of Engineering Education and guest co-editor for a special issue of the International Journal of Engineering Education on applications of engineering education
AC 2010-1622: THE EFFECT OF PANOPTO ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCEAND SATISFACTION OF TRADITIONAL-DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTSChung-Suk Cho, University of North Carolina, Charlotte DR. CHUNG-SUK CHO is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Engineering Technology. His teaching and research focus on project scope definition, pre-project planning, sustainable construction, project administration, construction safety, construction simulation, and project management. He has prior teaching experience at North Carolina A&T State University in construction management and working experience with Fluor Corporation as a project manager.Stephen Kuyath, University of
fundamental engineering and life sciences and 3) to train a workforce to sustain agrowing bioengineering industry in the United States and participate in the economicdevelopment of the State of South Carolina. To assist in accomplishing these goals, theDepartment of Bioengineering participates in a university-wide program known as CreativeInquiry3. This program, unique to Clemson University, was developed to allow small teams ofstudents to study problems stemming from curiosity, a professor’s challenge, or simply the needsof the world around them. With more than 250 projects currently active, programs are availableto every undergraduate student at all levels, and new projects are welcomed and encouraged. Afaculty advisor, who leads the group and
thinking in pursuing innovative designsolutions. Teams are first asked to list as many methods as they can to generate creative ideasfor design solutions. Next they are given the listing of Cognitive Domain learning skills andasked to analyze the skills under the creativity cluster. They are then challenged to apply each ofthe creative thinking skills to generate one or more ideas for the problem of fastening two piecesof paper together. Table 2 gives a result from this task. Next, students are asked to select adifficult area of their design project calling for creativity and to apply each of the creativethinking skills to generate a design alternative. Finally, they are asked to discuss how they mightsystematically add creativity to their design
Scholars since my freshman year. Within the program I worked on my teamwork skills by participating in many volunteering and engineering events with fellow members. I also help plan events and projects for the program as a member of both the social and mentorship committees. As the Ohio State University Pistol Club Vice President I have gained valuable experience as a leader; teaching members how to properly and safely handle a pistol. Besides being involved with these activities I enjoy volunteering for my high school Science Olympiad team. I help coach and run events for the team when they attend invitationals in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. I enjoy going back to help the students learn more about science and
, model calibration, and modelvalidation as well as failure prevention in the context of a diverse set of real world case studies.The emphasis of this course is to teach students in a modular fashion7 the essential concepts ofcomputational tools describing phenomena at different length scales, to perform simulations atdifferent scales, and to bridge all this information together to determine process-structure-properties-performance relations of materials. On successful completion of the assignedcollaborative projects, all students are required to update their learning contributions on theICME CI portal Wiki8, facilitating easy assessment of student achievements. Moreover, using theexample case studies, PowerPoint lectures, computational tools and
the college level, he collaborates on projects exploring teaching methodologies and assessment strategies in undergraduate courses in the sciences, engineering, and computer science. Dr. Kimmel has received numerous awards in recognition of his service, including: ASEE 1985 Vincent Bendix Minori- ties in Engineering Award, and ASEE CENTENNIAL MEDALION for ”Significant Lasting Impact on Engineering Education,” 1993. The NJIT Foundation Overseers Public and Institute Service Award, 1981 (First Recipient) and in 2005; Allan R. Cullimore Distinguished Service Award (NJIT) for 1991. Presi- dential Award for outstanding contributions to Science Education by the New Jersey Science Supervisors’ Association. Center for Pre
the problem. Based on existing research, we expect threekey factors to influence ideation flexibility: 1) problem framing (the way a problem and itsconstraints are “set”); 2) the use of ideation tools; and 3) ideation teaming (interactions withothers during ideation). Our research investigates the impacts of these key factors on engineeringideation flexibility and correlates them with students’ cognitive styles. Our aim is to createguidelines and methods that will help engineers increase that flexibility by learning how todeliberately engage in ideation using different approaches. The project uses experimental studieswith pre-engineering and engineering students, at various stages in their educational programs,testing each factor’s impact on
—Preparing Outstanding Women for Engineering Roles, it was also intended to be a recruitmenttool to increase female enrollment in the PSET. POWER is weeklong residential camp thatserves as an introduction to engineering for high school age females. The week includes hands-on activities, opportunities to meet with professional female engineers, and interaction withfemale college engineering students who serve as camp counselors.Each year the camp consists of one visit to an engineering company, a professional roundtable, ateam-based project following the engineering design process, an overview of differentengineering disciplines with hands-on interaction, and a lunch with engineering faculty. Inaddition camp participants attend a college information
and theevolution, range, and appropriate application of contemporary structural systems.”[8] Theintegrated architectural solutions realm (comprehensive design) implies a closer engagementbetween technology and the design studio through the new integrative design criterion that reads,“Ability to produce an architectural solution that demonstrates the ability to make designdecisions about a single project while demonstrating broad integration and consideration ofenvironmental stewardship, technical documentation, accessibility, site conditions, life safety,environmental systems, structural systems, and building envelope systems and assemblies.”[8]Since NAAB does not mandate a specific pedagogy or number of credit hours, the structuralsystems
’ cognitive styles. Our aim is to createguidelines and methods that will help engineers increase that flexibility by learning how todeliberately engage in ideation using different approaches. The project uses experimental studieswith pre-engineering and engineering students, at various stages in their educational programs,testing each factor’s impact on their approaches to solving design problems.In this paper, we focus on the development of a sustainable foundation for our investigations ofthe factors impacting ideation flexibility. We present our basis and vision for this foundation, andillustrate some of our preliminary findings through case studies.What is ideation flexibility and why is it important in engineering?Concept generation, or ideation
-orbit sensor characterization but has also managed technical teams as a technical team lead and a deputy Integrated Project Team lead within the SEIT (Systems Engineering Integration and Test) organi- zation. Boyd has presented his work at both academic and industry conferences. Furthermore, to address his passion for leadership development and community building, he kickstarted a chapter of Connect1NG; a professionally recognized yet non-traditional development program focused on engaging and assimilat- ing new employees to the workplace through leadership development activities and networking. He is currently one of two Western Region liaisons for the program. Boyd was also selected to be a part of the company’s
Underground Space Utilization [evaluation of an underground quarry for other uses] 3 Being an Expert Witness [Labor Day holiday precluded usual format] 4 2 Offshore Structure Design/Build [risks in launching an offshore platform] 5 3 Geotechnical Value Engineering On a Design/Build Project 6 4 Changed Conditions?? [evaluating a contractor’s claim] 7 5 Cryptosporidium Chronicles [industry response to proposed regulations] 8 The Hyatt Collapse [literature review and discussion; fall break precluded usual format] 9 6 Building a Tunnel…to Leak [riverbank filtration using a rock tunnel/pumping
” -pu ex d pe an ns cta e m io ti on s “d ta t c pe ex Figure 1. Triangular Perspectives of the “Stakeholder” PopulationsIn summary, the current research project seeks to answer those questions by presenting amethodological approach to define an expert
to transform the system of architectural education, we must adopt new modes ofthinking and managing resources (NSC, 2003). To arrive at a new era in architecturaleducation, we need to establish cultural values and incorporate them in university curricula.The need for reform is not limited to architecture. Reform in other disciplines is important toarchitecture because architectural projects do not take place in a vacuum. Students majoringin other disciplines such as management, the natural sciences, and engineering should alsodevelop artistic and humanistic qualities to complement their technological competencies.Major projects almost always require the combined efforts of business managers, scientists,and engineers for their successful
Page 10.260.1principles taught in class (i.e., as phase equilibria, solubility, fugacity, etc). Such an open-ended “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”approach is common in engineering education and has been used in thermodynamics courses5because it resembles problem solving situations encountered in industry6.The open-ended problem presented in this paper was given as a final project to a graduateprocess thermodynamics class. However, portions of it could be suitable in an undergraduatethermodynamics, modeling3 or design class7 if presented in a less open-ended manner, or ascontinuing
different implications for the allocation ofpublic and private resources, a matter of concern in a world still characterized by scarcity inmeeting the basic needs of many. There may be widely held values concerning the environmentand sustainability that are separate from health and safety concerns. The twenty-first-centuryengineer must be aware of and competent to address these sorts of ethical and social issues—andthis imposes new demands on educational programs for engineers.11,12 As ABET recognizes incriterion 3(f), students must understand their “professional and ethical responsibility” [emphasisadded] and, in criterion 3(c), students must be able to design a project to meet “desired needswithin realistic constraints such as economic
help students see that “real world”work experiences are not neatly bound by the schedule of the syllabus, and that learning is notconfined to the lecture hall or lab. What we did with this approach, in the parlance of operationsmanagement, was to create a “pull” system in which students were responsible to a certaindegree for pulling the materials they needed from the online case environment and from thetextbook. We wanted the students to experience the excitement, uncertainty, and dissonance ofhaving dynamic and long-term projects that require them to think “outside of the box,” and to seetheir actions as having consequences beyond simply handing a project into a teacher. We wantedour students to see that the decisions that they make (design
instruction and practice in identifying which phase of problemsolving they were in, so they could develop meta-cognitive skills to better control their problemsolving activity.2. Description of the CourseIn Fall 2004 the course was taught as one of eight sections of GES 131 Foundations ofEngineering I at the University of Alabama. GES 131 is a two credit course that meets threetimes per week, twice for 50 minutes, and once for 110 minutes. The 110 minute section isuseful for extended exercises, student presentations, or special projects. Two sections of GES131 were set apart for first semester freshmen who had the appropriate math placement scores(Calculus ready or one semester before Calculus). One section received the experimentalproblem solving
actively engaged. Studenttopics ranged from the drying of grain to high pressure washers.The thermal systems course was organized around four major design projects; three smaller oneswhich focused on an individual component of the thermal design process (i.e. process design,optimization, and cost analysis) and a larger cumulative design incorporating at least two of thethree design components. Initially it was hoped that the student topics could be integrated astopics for these design projects. Unfortunately, formulating a suitable problem with sufficient Page 10.268.1background information proved to be too time consuming once the semester had
tutoring. A recent National Academy of Science analysis of student assessments, forexample, emphasizes that the challenge of continuously gathering and evaluatingcomplex information about students probably cannot be achieved without newinformation technology. The report notes that “New capabilities enabled by technologyinclude directly assessing problem-solving skills, making visible sequences of actionstaken by learners in solving problems, and modeling and simulating complex reasoningtasks.”3New communication tools allow students to collaborate on complex projects and ask forhelp from teachers and experts from around the world. Learning systems can be designedto adapt to differences in student interests, backgrounds, learning styles and