included tailoring the curricula to attract a more diverse group of students,integrating the curricula to present a unified rather than compartmentalized view of engineeringscience and practice, and broadening the curricula to include an emphasis on the additionalprofessional skills needed to practice engineering.4-5 One area in which these changes have beenimplemented is in the introduction of entry-level engineering courses. A wide variety of modelsexist, ranging from a one-credit, voluntary introduction to engineering course at the University ofFlorida6 to fully integrated first-year curricula such as the 12-credit IFYCSEM program at theRose-Hulman Institute of Technology.6First-Year Engineering Projects CourseCU’s College of Engineering and
Community was recently expanded toinclude second-year students to accommodate student requests. Not only does the livingcommunity offer a way for students to develop friendships, it also creates an environment wellsuited for academic work. Our paper includes an overview of our ABE living community, whichincludes both engineering and technology students. We developed this arrangement to strengthenstudents’ existing learning communities through additional interaction with ABE peers in aliving community, to encourage interaction and collaboration between our two undergraduatestudent majors, and to increase interaction of these students with the ABE faculty. In addition,we present the results of our assessment, which includes a year-end survey, student
Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in technology and how
a registered professional engineer. He is one of the founding faculty in the School of Engineering Education having courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering and Curriculum and Instruction. He was the first engineer to receive the U.S. Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning and a co-recipient of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education. He is a fellow of NSPE and ASEE and elected to the ASEE Hall of Fame. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reflections from Graduates on the Impact of Engineers Without Borders USA
engineering courses also has a positive effect on students’ spatial ability[17]. Beyond academia, spatial ability has also been linked to success in professional STEMfields [18].Spatial skills are malleable meaning that they can be taught and enhanced through targetedinterventions [19]. Such interventions that can be integrated into academic coursework includeactivities in engineering design, technological literacy, scientific inquiry, and mathematicalthinking [20]. The format of spatial interventions ranges from the implementation of entirecourses [21], [22] to physical manipulatives intended to teach specific concepts. Furthermore,once learned, spatial skills can be maintained over time [19].In order to effectively measure gains in spatial ability
State University, Long Beach (CSULB). He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Penn State University, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Oklahoma State University. Prior to joining CSULB, he was the head of the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs at Penn State. Dr. Sathianathan has been actively involved in engineering education initiatives since 1994. He led several NSF funded initiative to enhance engineering education, especially focused on retention. He is the co-founder of the Engineering Entrepreneurship Program and the Center for Engineering Design and Entrepreneurship at Penn State. He has received the Boeing Outstanding Educator Award and Boe- ing Welliver
all ABET-accredited undergraduatebiomedical engineering (BME) programs. At the University of Virginia, this experience isimplemented in the form of a team-based, year-long Capstone design course. Student teamswork on a diverse set of real-world BME problems and are advised by different cohorts ofresearch faculty, clinicians, and/or industrial advisors. Our study addresses whether or not teamand advisor demographics and formulation impact project outcomes in terms of success metrics,defined here as grant applications, conference proceedings, peer-reviewed publications, patentfilings, national or university-level awards, and technology licensing. Our analysis spans fiveconsecutive years of the Capstone design course, in order to determine which
Workforce Development and Life Long Learning division of the Univer- sity of the District of Columbia, Community College.Dr. Annie R Pearce, Virginia TechDr. Christine Marie Fiori P.E., Virginia TechDr. Tanyel Bulbul, Virginia Tech Dr. Bulbul is an Assistant Professor of Building Construction and Adjunct Professor of Civil and En- vironmental Engineering at the Virginia Tech. She has expertise in investigating information and com- munication technologies together with the development of formalized, model-based analysis approaches to deal with the complexities of the built environment. Her research areas include Building Information Modeling (BIM); product and process modeling in AEC/FM; ontology based approaches for design
.[21] Gollwitzer, P.M., 1990. Action phases and mind-sets. Handbook of motivation and cognition:Foundations of social behavior, 2(53-92), p.2.[22] Haynie, J.M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E. and Earley, P.C., 2010. A situated metacognitivemodel of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of business venturing, 25(2), pp.217-229.Biographical Information:Yuva Manikanta Tamineni completed his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering fromAmrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, India. He has 3 years industrial experience in 3Dmodeling, testing and inspection of actuator assemblies, gearbox design and structural analysis ofparts. He is currently a Masters’ student and a Graduate research Assistant in the Department ofMechanical Engineering at
] Santiago, L. & Hensel, R., “Engineering attrition and university retention,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012, pp. 25-538.[4] Moor, S., “Engaging Spaces For First Year Engineering: A Tale Of Two Classrooms,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010, pp. 15-47.[5] Concannon, J. & Barrow, L., “A cross-sectional study of engineering students’ self-efficacy by gender, ethnicity, year, and transfer status” Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 2009, pp 163-172.[6] Hutchison, M., Follman, D., Sumpter, M., & Bodner, G., “Factors influencing the self‐efficacy beliefs of first‐year engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 2006, pp. 39-447.[7
, the one year persistence rate wasconsistently less than 90%. Since selective enrollment started (2009) the one year persistencerate is well above 90% and the two year persistence rate is well over 80%. There is a significantdrop in persistence in the third year for the 2009 cohort. The cause of this drop has not beendetermined. A the time of writing, data were not available to determine whether students leavingcivil engineering switched to another STEM (science technology engineering math) program,switched to a non-STEM program or left the university. There is a large drop in the persistenceof transfer students in the third year which is associated with graduation (33% of studentsgraduated). Students in the 2009 cohort did not benefit
UASPP: Three Years of Helping Middle School Teachers Devise Their Own Hands-on Engineering and Science Activities Shannon G. Davis1, Bryan W. Hill1, Carol S. Gattis2, Bradley M. Dearing3, Christa N. Hestekin4 and Edgar C. Clausen4 College of Engineering1/Honors College2/ Ralph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering4 University of Arkansas Technology Department3, Illinois State University High SchoolAbstractThe University of Arkansas Science Partnership Program (UASPP) was developed in 2006 tofocus on the professional growth of 6th, 7th and 8th grade science teachers through summerinstitutes and follow-up
Education, 2025 Supporting Engineering Graduate Students to Create Inclusive Learning Environments: A Professional Development Program at a Hispanic-Serving Institution Keywords: Graduate, undergraduate, engineering IntroductionIncreasing diversity and equity remains a national goal for STEM (science, technology,engineering, and mathematics) education in the United States [1], as men and white individualscontinue to receive a disproportionate share of STEM bachelor's degrees and are overrepresentedin the national STEM workforce [2]. Creating cultures of inclusion at institutions and withinSTEM departments and classrooms is vital for the success of
Engineering Education, 2023 CAREER OUTCOMES OF NEW YORK CITY LOUIS STOKES ALLIANCE FOR MINORITY PARTICIPATION GRADUATE STUDENT ACTIVITIES COORDINATORS 1998 TO PRESENTAbstractThe NSF supported New York City Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (NYCLSAMP) at the City University of New York (CUNY) has, since its inception in November 1992,been at the forefront of a concentrated effort to substantially increase the number ofunderrepresented minority students (African-Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans and NativePacific Islanders), who pursue and graduate with Baccalaureate Degrees in Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Since inception in November 1992 (through 2018), over18,000 baccalaureate degrees have been
forces students to utilize all the skills learned inthe corresponding unit, in the context of a practical application of the material covered whenapplicable.Overall, the integration of fourth year mathematics CCSS, historical components, writingassignments, classroom debates, vocabulary activities, technology lessons, and engaging hands-on projects along with a variety of refresher topics essential to engineering and scienceprofessions provides a holistic learning environment for students. These components coincidewith research that shows the method of curriculum implementation is just as important, if notmore important, than the base content [7]; hence, a STEM curriculum is made that includesintroductory and cumulative projects as well as cross
researcher in STEM at Ca˜nada College. Her research interests include understanding how students become involved, stayed involved, and complete their major in engineering and STEM majors in general, particularly for students in underrepresented populations.Mr. Nick Patrick Rentsch, Canada College Nick Rentsch is an adjunct professor of physics, engineering, and computer science at Ca˜nada College, Skyline College, and San Francisco State University. He received his M.S. degree from San Francisco State University in embedded electrical engineering and computer systems. His educational research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and the development of novel instructional equipment and curricula for enhancing
AC 2010-1770: BUILDING A COLLABORATIVE K12 PARTNERSHIPHeath Tims, Louisiana Tech UniversityJim Nelson, Louisiana Tech UniversityGalen Turner, Louisiana Tech UniversityMissy Wooley, Ruston High SchoolMarvin Nelson, Benton High School Page 15.247.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Building a collaborative K12 partnershipAbstractTechSTEP, Cyber Discovery, and NASA-Threads are partnerships between K12 schools andLouisiana Tech University that lead to an improvement of high school student achievement inmathematics and science. These partnerships result in better prepared students entering science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM
, mitigate the growingenergy crisis, and reduce the impact of carbon emissions on the environment. An importantcomponent of this ERC is the precollege outreach activities at three university campuses in thesoutheast and southwest. The lead university is North Carolina State University (NCSU) and thetwo partner institutions are Arizona State University (ASU) and Florida State University (FSU).The importance of enhancing science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)education in middle and high schools continues to be noted. Key issues guiding theprogramming for the FREEDM Systems Center include: ≠ the aging of the power industry workforce (we need students to consider power engineering as a career since the need is increasing).1
primarily on conducting interdisciplinary design feasibility assessments across the engineering, market- ing, finance and manufacturing domains. Prior to this, he held positions in New Product Development at Ford Motor Company and Onsrud Cutter. He currently serves as lead instructor for the Baylor En- gineering Capstone Design program and teaches additional courses in the areas of Engineering Design, Technology Entrepreneurship, and Professional Development. Mr. Donndelinger has published three book chapters in addition to 30 articles in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings and has been awarded two United States patents. Mr. Donndelinger earned an M.S. in Industrial Engineering and a B.S. in Mechanical
. Raghavan serves as a Professor and Associate Dean of Research and Graduate Studies at Embry Rid- dle Aeronautical University. Her research interests are in the areas of Mechanics of aerospace structures and materials. She joined UCF in Fall 2008 after completing her doctoral studies at Purdue University, Indiana, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics in the area of Structures & Materials. She obtained her M.S., Aeronautical Engineering in Structures at ISAE-SUPAERO, Toulouse, France where she also worked with Messier Bugatti in Velizy, Paris (S-92 wheels and brakes testing). Prior to this, she com- pleted her B.Eng in Mechanical Engineering at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. She has 7 years of
college engineering technology programs [29]. Perhapsthe most ambitious, mature, and successful effort at contextualized math instruction forengineering can be found in the Wright State Engineering Mathematics model, which introducescore calculus concepts in the context of engineering applications in an introductory course taughtby engineering faculty before the students complete their formal mathematics courses [30] [31].This approach has been extended to an earlier preparatory course focused on algebra conceptsthat has also shown promising results in terms of degree attainment by students who wereinitially underprepared [32] and has been adapted by several other engineering colleges [33][34], including versions focused on precalculus-level
aCharrette construction design method to develop a multiple stakeholders-focused course. Duringthe next months we will analyze the overall dropout numbers since the workshop course wasimplemented and the 10 previous years, including the feedback of last-year students whoparticipated in the workshop their first semester.Background/FrameworkFor several years, there has been a lot of research focused on how to increase and maintain thenumber of graduates from higher education studies in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM). One of the main reasons for this is because graduates of this field help acountry to stay competitive, improve the global economy through greater innovation andtechnology, create jobs and improve [10], [12], [13
in the Wertheim College of Engineering and a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. Her research answers national calls for construction and civil engineering professionals to develop new competencies to navigate the changes of evolving work- force demographics, technology, and organizational structures. As director of the Simmons Research Lab, she researches competency development via education and training; interactions between humans and technology; and conceptualization of leadership in engineering. Supported by more than $7.5M in federal funding and with results disseminated across more than 100 refereed publications, her research aims
-year community college (Clark College in WA), a public polytechnic institution(Oregon Institute of Technology in OR), a branch campus of a public R1 institution (WashingtonState University Vancouver in WA), and an independently governed Catholic institution (theUniversity of Portland in OR). We included courses from three engineering disciplines (civil,electrical, and mechanical) with one general engineering curriculum. All courses are 2nd yearengineering labs, except MECH 309, which is offered in the 3rd year. CE 376 is offered in the2nd year.Table 1 provides information regarding the major of the courses being analyzed, along with thename of the course, the institution, the term and year in which it was offered, and the number of
groups: international and domestic undergraduate students in focus in the United States’ higher education institutions. In addition, Mr. Halkiyo is interested in broadening the participation of engineering education in Ethiopian universities to increase the diversity, inclusivity, equity, and quality of Engineering Education. He studies how different student groups such as women and men, rich and poor, students from rural and urban, and technologically literate and less literate can have quality and equitable learning experiences and thrive in their performances. In doing so, he focuses on engineering education policies and practices in teaching and learning processes, assessments, laboratories, and practical internships. Mr
engineering problems but also how to lead others in the organizations. In sum,the potential to advance knowledge from this research is evident in the applicability ofengineering leadership development for both men and women engineering students.References[1] Block, K., Gonzalez, A. M., Schmader, T., & Baron, A. S. (2018). Early gender differencesin core values predict anticipated family versus career orientation. Psychological Science, 29(9),1540-1547.[2] Hill, C., Miller, K., Benson, K., & Handley, G. (2016). Barriers and Bias: The Status ofWomen in Leadership. American Association of University Women.[3] Skervin, A. E. (2015). Success factors for women of color information technology leaders incorporate America (Doctoral dissertation
). Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers 2019. Washington, DC.Bielefeldt, A. R., Polmear, M., Knight, D., Swan, C., & Canney, N. (2018). Intersections between Engineering Ethics and Diversity Issues in Engineering Education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(2), 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000360Celedón-Pattichis, S., Borden, L. L., Pape, S. J., Clements, D. H., Peters, S. A., Males, J. R., Chapman, O., & Leonard, J. (2018). Asset-Based Approaches to Equitable Mathematics Education Research and Practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0373Eisner, E. W
, equitable access (i.e., technology, education, healthcare,food, and housing security), energy and resource stewardship, engineering ethics and policy,empathy for humanity, allyship, and social justice. The inaugural cohort in this first-of-its-kindpartner program drew applicants with a wide array of experiences and backgrounds, and generatedone of the most diverse groups of students under the engineering or honors divisions here at UA,supporting a majority of scholars from and allies of conventionally underrepresented ormarginalized groups in STEM. Here, the EPIC program framework and design will be detailed,including the student learning objectives for each stage, general curriculum flow and seminarrequirements, courses complementary to the vision
Paper ID #37309Building Effective Mentoring Relationships: Advancement ofMentoring Practice Program for Engineering FacultyAdvisors and Doctoral Student AdviseesHa Pho Ha Pho currently works as the program director of the Public Health Informatics and Technology (PHIT) Workforce Development program, at University of Massachusetts Lowell (UMass Lowell). This is a $3million federal funded program to create and train undergraduate and graduate students in PHIT. Previously, Ha helped design, develop and implement the DifferenceMaker program, a campus-wide student entrepreneurship initiative at UMass Lowell for eight
Southeastern Public Research One Institution. It introduces theGrand Challenges and a corresponding scholars program defined by the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) that link society and engineering to improve and maintain quality of life forthe twenty-first century. This course was developed to enhance student development in theessential engineering mindset and interdisciplinary system thinking to address the prescribedglobal engineering grand challenges. It interweaves engineering with the social and politicalsciences, encouraging students to explore the interactions between society and technology,including the influences of human behavior, culture, economics, ethics, and policy on thedevelopment and implementation of technologies.The course