, specifically how this programprovides a rich experience and help students to overcome knowledge gaps. We also exhibit howthis initiative fosters a comprehensive interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary context, diversity,and distinctive student engagement practices.IntroductionHigher education, especially engineering institutions are facing unprecedented challenges due tofast and rapidly changing societies and the growing gap between industry needs and curriculum[1]. To better equip the students, it is inevitable for engineering institutions to innovate andimprove their curricula and provide them with the necessary trainings that help in their career[2]. Among many changes, the focus is on adding new courses and introducing co and extra-curricular
innovation, and assessing engineering students’ agency to address climate change. Currently, MiguelAndres is working on a framework to support and conduct undergraduate research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Introducing a coffee break to improve exam performance and reducing student stress in construction majors Raúl Toscano1, Vanessa Guerra2, Miguel Andrés Guerra3*1 Undergraduate student, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador.2 Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, School of Architecture, Department of Urban
of time reading traditionaltextbook content. This leads to many students skimming or skipping the reading, hindering theirlearning [1], [2]. And this is despite students themselves reporting knowing that it’s important toread, and that reading will improve their grades [3]. Many students find engineering courses(including introductory engineering courses) challenging, and failure rates can be high. Forexample, one institution found average failure rates (students receiving a grade of D or E in thecourse, or withdrawing) of 23% for their introductory circuit analysis course [4]. Onlinetextbooks, tutorials and courses developed by academic institutions [4], [5], [6], [7] andcompanies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] often have integrated interactive
focus on understanding and improving the learning that occurs in experiential, out-of-class activities for engineering students. Cassie previously received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and her M.S. and Ph.D. de- grees in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Supporting the Development of Professional Competencies and Engineering Identity at ScaleWork in Progress PaperIntroductionExperiential learning opportunities have long been known to be important in higher education [1]as they have been linked to more successful recruitment and retention efforts and better
academia.IntroductionAttempts to understand research culture are not new, and there are examples of scholarsmapping, analyzing, and critiquing research culture in the sciences. Some examples are studiesranging from ethical concerns in psychology research [1], critiques of the underlyingphilosophical assumptions of scientific research [2]–[4], developing a framework for scientificresearch in the life sciences [5], to social and political critiques of funding practices in the STEMresearch enterprise [6]–[8]. Following these trends, scholars have explored the nature ofengineering and the cultural underpinnings that guide the field in both practice and training offuture engineers [9]–[13]. These works are often concerned with developing a deeperunderstanding of the
curriculum (one that is contextual to their uniqueroles and identities of people in their learning/working environment), individuals either: (1)change their environment, (2) change themselves, or (3) perform no or minimal action.Particularly, majority women (White American) tended to perform the first two strategies morecompared to women of color (Black American, Latinx, Native American) who took no or minimalaction regarding their surrounding hidden curriculum. More recent unpublished research has alsofound similar findings among self-identified men and LGBTQIA+ individuals. The findingsuggests that for situational hidden curriculum, the actions, and decisions one may take to facepower is contextual and vary by different gender/racial/ethnic
, connections, and creating value (3C’s) [1]. In the 2022-23 academic year, a team of laboratory and design course instructors at a large public universityin the Midwestern United States began to explore this overlap and surveyed students enrolled inthe laboratory courses about various aspects of the framework. This work-in-progress paperillustrates the overlap between the framework and undergraduate laboratory courses and presentsthe initial student survey results. The initial analysis shows similar results to previous surveys atother institutions implementing the framework.Entrepreneurial Mindset and Laboratory CoursesLaboratories are key learning spaces in undergraduate STEM programs. They bridge the gapbetween theory and practice whilst engaging
transferability of aneurodivergent codebook developed from social media content on TikTok. Neurodiversitystudies and acknowledgement of neurodivergence within diversity conversations are starting toemerge within engineering education research [1]–[5]. For example, a spike of publicationsmentioning “neurodivergent” or “neurodiversity” in the ASEE Peer depository occurred in 2020,which marks the early COVID-19 quarantine timeframe (e.g., [6]–[9]). This quarantine wassignificant for the neurodiverse community as many undiagnosed adults discovered throughsocial media (specifically TikTok) that they are, and always were, neurodivergent [10]–[14].While neurodivergent experiences are being included, fundamental understanding of what itmeans to be neurodivergent
resistant capitals. An 18-item survey was designed to connect engineeringstudents’ cultural assets to the ways they navigate their present-day lives as college students andforesee their future lives as engineers. The study recruited a sample of undergraduate studentsregistered in engineering majors at three institutions of higher education including a publicHispanic Serving Institution (Angelo State University), a Tier-2 research institution (JamesMadison University), and a Tier-1 research institution (University of Colorado Boulder). Thesurvey findings corroborate results found in other studies. Although our study is limited by asample size of just seventy-five students from three different engineering schools, the findingsshow two key results
Mathematical Preparation and Engineering PersistenceAbstractThis work-in-progress research paper is at the early stages seeking to further understand the linksbetween incoming engineering students’ mathematical preparation and their actual degreeattainment in engineering. The importance of mathematical achievement and preparation toengineering persistence has long been studied. This investigation seeks to further enhance thisresearch-base. A sample of 450 incoming engineering majors were divided into three differentengineering tracks by their university based upon their level of mathematics preparation:Engineering Track 1 (Calculus-ready), Engineering Track 2 (Calculus-ready with Precalculusreview), and Engineering Track 3 (College Algebra-ready
highlighting, etc.), stress, and interruption [3]. Theobjective of this article is to provide a survey of literature that shows current efforts that haveaddressed the need to showcase the importance of the technical interview process in academicTECHNICAL INTERVIEW INTEGRATIONsettings, and highlight the need to further alleviate the awareness deficiency of its overallimportance to CS and related majors who aspire to have careers in tech.2. Literature ReviewTo better understand the current efforts involving interview preparation in academia, notableactivities seen in literature are categorized into four descriptions below (Table 1). The followingsubsections provide example case studies and initiatives that fall into one of these categories,respectively
, are both described in Table 1. Table 1. Initial Themes Relating to Student Awareness of Macroethics in Aerospace Engineering Theme Definition Example Excerpt Sees Both Sides Students feel that there are valid “I believe it is a poor reflection on the (Acceptance) arguments on “either side” of community but is also important to ethical dilemmas within the field. understand that military spending has been fundamental to finding new advances that help the world outside of
developed a complete embedded system that enables usersto control the motion of the four joints - base, shoulder, elbow, and wrist, as well as the gripperof the robotic arm by simply turning the corresponding knobs on a custom-designed control box.They modified the 3D CAD model of the base, shown in Figure 1, to enclose all the electronicsand allow multiple ports and connectors to be conveniently accessed for battery charging,software update, and diagnosis. Figure 1. Base of the Robotic Arm (a) 3D CAD Model; (b) Base with HardwareThree MG996 servo motors were used for the base, shoulder, and elbow joints while two SG50micro-servos were used for the wrist and gripper. The PCA8695 PWM servo control board wasadopted to drive the motors and
, 2023Sustainability designation, introductory course, and a new textbook in anengineering curriculumSustainability is an important topic. If human societies don’t live sustainably, by definition, wewill experience drastic reductions in our population and/or standard of living and may cease toexist. Knowledge about sustainability has become a foundational component of a generaluniversity education and of being an informed citizen. Sustainability, as a subject of study, isincreasingly popular with students and is an increasingly relevant skill domain in the job market[1]. Given that undergraduate engineering curricula are typically very full of technical content,how is it possible to incorporate sustainability principles into an undergraduate
interests are on studentsˆa C™ problem-solving disposition and instructional strate- gies to advance their ways of thinking. Dr. Lim is particularly interested in impulsive disposition, stu- dentsˆa C™ propensity to act out the first thing thatLisa Garbrecht, University of Texas, AustinPhilip B. Yasskin ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction Mathematics has historically been taught in ways that are a barrier to minority studentspursuing advanced STEM courses in high school and college [1] while current teaching methodsare heavily reliant on spoken and written language, which can be particularly problematic forbilingual students [2]. Consequently, too few underserved students such as
alsopresented.Introduction of Problem and NeedThe benefits of project-based learning have been well established, especially in providingstudents opportunities to develop their independence, responsibility, and social skills [1]. This, inaddition to the push of the Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) toinvolve students from multiple disciplines in solving complex engineering problems [2], haveresulted in the implementation of interdisciplinary team-based projects throughout engineeringcurricula.However, team-based project teaching can experience several instructional challenges,particularly when working with a large number of students and projects. Interdisciplinary teamformation can also impose difficulties as students vary in technical skills
on their impressionof the self-revised assignments to evaluate the efficacy of these assignments in three areas: 1. Student academic performance on exams compared to previous cohorts 2. Student perception of the homework and learning experience 3. Instructor perception of the assignment style’s benefits to students and ease of gradingOutcomes proved neutral to slightly positive in each area. Student grades remained similar toprevious cohorts, but struggling students demonstrated increased time spent engaging with thematerial during the revision process. Students reported neutral to positive perceptions of themethod, and instructors generally favored the approach for its reduction in time spent grading.Overall, we recommend other
. The purpose of soliciting feedback from theseinstructors was to learn how to best design a flipped course so that future instructors caneffectively use the materials for a flipped course with little additional work on their part.IntroductionIn 2013 a flipped classroom was described as “a new pedagogical method, which employsasynchronous video lectures and practice problems as homework, and active, group-basedproblem-solving activities in the classroom” [1]. A summary of flipping classes in engineeringand the type of activities used in class is provided in Ref. 2. Ten years after these papers, we donot think it is appropriate to call the pedagogical method “new” anymore, but the number ofpapers discussing the flipping of Dynamics is limited
research.IntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and engineering educators envision a bettertomorrow by preparing undergraduate STEM students to define and build a sustainable, secure,healthy and enjoyable future [1-3]. The NAE fourteen grand challenges encompass the greatestchallenges and opportunities that engineers face and will continue to face in the 21st Century.This work describes the design, implementation and assessment of a summer undergraduateresearch experience curriculum that was established in 2022 to strengthen an existingengineering Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) in a southeastern Research-One LandGrant institution. The goal of this 10-week summer Research Experience for Undergraduates(REU) program was to provide hands-on
is the hidden curriculumsurrounding P&T. ‘Hidden curriculum’ refers to unwritten norms, practices, and expectationsrooted in traditional routes to academic advancement. Much attention has been paid in theliterature to the effectiveness of various types of mentoring in helping faculty navigate P&T [1] -[3]. We add to this literature by focusing on the role of pre-tenure peer reviews as mentoringopportunities. These reviews are often conducted in the third year and could serve as a mentoringmoment to help faculty gain a deeper understanding of P&T standards, expectations, and wherethey stand in their progress toward tenure. To learn more about the effectiveness of these reviewsin helping faculty prepare for P&T, we conducted
to contribute significantly to the increase of askilled workforce [1]. According to a previous estimate, about 315,000 civil engineeringpositions must be added by 2030 to meet the need for future civil engineering projects [1].Although the work of civil engineers is increasingly recognized by American society, where theyhave helped improve the sustainability of infrastructure and the quality of the environment [1],the supply of civil engineers is constrained by the steadily decreasing number of studentsenrolled in civil engineering programs. Statistics reveal that while full-time engineeringenrollments nearly doubled between 2010 and 2020, the number of undergraduate studentsstudying civil engineering declined by 3,145 [2], [3]. Although
support for the GTAs to make the connections between what they want to teach (content),how to teach it (pedagogy), and what technological tools can be used to teach it (technology).Future studies will explore possibilities of implementing this and its impact on the GTAs’ TPACKdomains. 1Introduction Graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) are graduate students who assist professors inteaching courses through performing teaching practices such as presenting information, explainingcertain concepts to students, communicating with students and assessing students’ learningoutcomes [1]. Nevertheless, for GTAs to implement effective teaching practices
. Collaboration 1 paired a100-level engineering Information Literacy class in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering witha 300-level Educational Foundation class. Collaboration 2 combined a 300-levelElectromechanical Systems class in Mechanical Engineering with a 400-level EducationalTechnology class. Collaboration 3 paired a 300-level Fluid Mechanics class in MechanicalEngineering Technology with a 400-level Elementary Science Methods class. Collaborations 1and 3 interacted with fourth or fifth graders by developing and delivering lessons to theelementary students. Students in collaboration 2 worked with fifth graders in an after-schooltechnology club. While each collaboration had its unique elements, all collaborations includedthe engineering design
alsoincluded.IntroductionA learning environment that engages students cognitively, affectively, and behaviorally is anessential component of the larger engagement that include elements such as sense of belonging,and institutional support [1]. Cognitive engagement supports deeper understanding of thelearning materials, affective engagement encourages students to be vested in their learning, andbehavioral engagement fosters an environment of on-task behavior conducive to learning. Therelationship between engagement and various markers of academic success and learning hasbeen empirically studied extensively and found to be positively correlated [1] - [6]. Activelearning has been reported as an effective pedagogy for cognitive engagement [7], [8]. Studentmotivation is
with hands-on design. To the extent thatundergraduate engineering experiments are essential to prepare these future engineers to excel in theirprofession [1-2]. Whetton [3] states that instructional design requires the thoughtful choice of readingmaterials, assignments, activities and most of all learning objectives. In the context of experimentation,Sivaloganathan et al. [4] adds that the choice between experiments is critical for an often tightly packedcurricula. For more than two decades, the engineering community has struggled with finding an appropriatebalance between classical pedagogy and practical experiences for developing engineers [5]. Kolb’s work[6] is often cited regarding experiential learning as the start of discussions
been developed to improve engineering design skills of firstyear students like design thinking exercises, the Engineering Design Canvas, and strategies forcommunicating ideas. The evidence-based practice described in this study consists of in-classexercises for each of these tools which include 1) an IDEO design thinking worksheet at thebeginning of the project, 2) the Engineering Design Canvas at the middle of the project, and 3)the Heitmeier Catechism design communication strategies at the end of the project.This study was conducted at New York University in the first-year multidisciplinary introductoryengineering course General Engineering 1004 Introduction to Engineering and Design. Eachsemester, half of the 700 first-year students enroll
Fast-Forward Engineering Program is a summer bridge and scholarship programat Louisiana Tech University funded by the National Science Foundation that allows risingsophomore engineering students to continue their curriculum ahead of schedule [1]. Eligibility isbased on unmet financial need and on-track degree progression to achieve a 4-year graduation.The program allows students to get more interaction with the faculty as well as increasedinteraction with their peers. The program also allows students to take part in local industry visitsso that students may see first-hand various engineering workplace settings. Due to COVID-19,the industry visits were virtual for the Summers of 2020 and 2021. Students participated in Zoomlectures from industry
students. This work is important because undergraduate research is wellestablished as an effective tool to support students in moving to graduate programs, in particular forunderrepresented students [1]–[3]. Underrepresented students have reported that mindset and mentoringare important factors in succeeding in STEM fields [4], [5].In 2019 our team developed a faculty development workshop focused on undergraduate researchexperiences in engineering and computer science. Our goal was to help faculty members to think aboutmentoring undergraduate students as an opportunity to help shape student mindsets. We believe thatfocusing on the research experience as a growth-oriented student experience leads to much richeroutcomes than focusing purely on
in undergraduate students.Implications: Implications of this study relate to (1) the need to provide students withprofessional skills, such as project management and teamwork, in addition to research skills tohelp them cultivate self-regulated abilities and (2) methods for facilitating undergraduateresearch.Keywords: undergraduate research, self-regulated learning, project management, scrum,mentoring1. IntroductionUndergraduate research is often described as the exploration of a specific research topic by anundergraduate student - on their own or in collaboration with faculty members or other students -to make an original contribution to the discipline. It is a recent concept in the academiccommunity, with roots in the nineteenth and
was in the late 1700s thatresearch was harnessed to address specific needs of society. Countries, and later industrieswould gather groups of scientific individuals to solve challenges related to particular topics. Theindustrial age brought many advances revolutionizing how things were made. World wars alsocontributed to the need for targeted research. It was in the 1950s that the relationship betweenresearch and development (R & D) was recognized [1], connecting research to the developmentof new products and new forms of old products. This connection became the foundation for R &D at the university. Since WWII, innovative research activity has been the single, most importantcomponent of long-term economic growth [2]. Research programs