Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Pedagogy of Lab-Oriented Courses

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University; Gregory J Kowalski, Northeastern University; Andrew F. Carbonar, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

bycapstone teams during the 1990’s. A second team will be working during the Spring 2015 termin order to further develop new experiments to renovate the lab. The authors recognize that thenumber of interviews is extremely limited. This was due to the difficulty in contacting studentswho had already graduated. Nevertheless, some insights were gained into the thought process ofthese students.The students were asked to describe their best lab experience as a mechanical engineeringstudent, and what made it the best. In both cases, the students preferred hands on interaction withreal tools, sensors, and equipment. One student enjoyed a lab in mechanical testing because itwas “hands-on, exciting, and mildly dangerous”. The other student enjoyed a

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: The Transition from High School to College

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert W. Whalin, Jackson State University; Qing J Pang, Jackson State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, 2001.[7] Maria A. Reyes, Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Mary Ann McCartney, “Freshman Introductory EngineeringSeminar Course: Couples with Bridge Program Equals Academic Success and Retention”, Frontiers in EducationConference, 1998.[8] Donna S. Reese, Robert Green, and Martha Smith, “A Pre-Engineering class to Help Transition Students Into anEngineering Major”, ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Blacksburg, Virginia, April 2010.[9] Donna S. Reese, “Assessing the Effect on Retention of an Engineering Living/Learning Community”, ASEESoutheast Section Conference, Charleston, South Carolina, April 2011. Page 26.1440.16

Conference Session

Idea Generation and Creativity in Design

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K. Scott Marshall II, The University of Texas at Austin; Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin; Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Government is authorized to reproduce anddistribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. Theviews and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted asnecessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of theUnited States Air Force Academy or the US government.5. References [1]. Gordon, W.J.J., 1961, Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity, New York: Harper and Brothers. [2]. Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., and Nataraju, B. S., 2005, “A Behavioural Model for Representing Biological and Artificial Systems for Inspiring Novel Designs,” Proceedings of the International

Conference Session

Research & Evaluation on K-12 Teachers and Teaching.

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Nadelson, Utah State University; Anne Seifert, Idaho National Laboratory; J. Kade Hendricks, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Paper ID #13590Are We Preparing the Next Generation? K-12 Teacher Knowledge and En-gagement in Teaching Core STEM PracticesDr. Louis Nadelson, Utah State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor and director for the Center for the School of the Future in the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education at Utah State University. He has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western Washington University, and a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher professional

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melodie A. Selby PE, Walla Walla University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

survey of ethics-related instruction in U.S. engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 459-464. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00474.x6. Pfatteicher, S. K.A. (2001). Teaching vs. preaching: EC2000 and the engineering ethics dilemma. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 137–142. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00581.x7. Davis, M., & Feinerman, A. (2012). Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics. Science & Engineering Ethics, 18, 351-367. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9250-28. Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2008) Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 327-338. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00982.x9. Chang, P., & Wang, D. (2011

Conference Session

Additive Manufacturing Practices

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas; Aditya Akundi, University of Texas; Juan Alejandro Saavedra, University of Texas; Eric D. Smith, University of Texas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

(3D) printingmarket is estimated to be around 2.99 Billion USD by the year 2018 according to a globalstrategic business report 6 complied by Global Industry Analysts Inc., a source of WorldwideStrategy and Market Intelligence.As a flipside to Subtractive Manufacturing process where a solid block of material is used tomanufacture products, Additive Manufacturing (AM) is an advanced manufacturing technologyprocess used since 1980’s where parts are built by selectively adding materials as layers alongwith reducing waste. It is an automated technique for direct conversion of 3D Computer AidedDesign (CAD) (digital) data into physical objects using different layer-based additiveapproaches. Manufacturers have been using these technologies to reduce

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Tactical Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Pines, New Mexico State University; Patricia A. Sullivan, New Mexico State University; Luke Nogales, New Mexico State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

networks.References 1. Brennan, J., Ryan, S., Ranga, M., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., & Kamphuis, B. (2014). Study on Innovation in Higher Education: Final Report. LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55819/. 2. Bulovic, V. & Murray, F.E. (2014). The MIT Innovation Initiative: Sustaining and Extending a 3. Legacy of Innovation. Retrieved from http://innovation.mit.edu/. 4. Dhillon, B.S. (2006). Creativity for Engineers. Singapore: World Scientific Printers. 5. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. “The Future of Open Innovation.” R&D Management, 40(3), p. 213-221. Retrieved from http://corporateinnovation.berkeley.edu/ open-innovation-research/articles

Conference Session

First Year Programs Division Poster Session: The Best Place to Really Talk about First-Year Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, increasing the datasets tomore than one semester may increase the accuracy of the models.References[1] J. Gardner and A. Koch, “The First-Year Experience Thirty Years Later: It is Time for an Evidence-Based, Intentional Plan,” Purdue SoLar Flare Practitioners' Conference, West Lafayette, IN, 2012.[2] ACT, National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates, 2012. Available at http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/retain_2012.pdf[3] K. Green, “Campus computing, 2009,” The 19th national survey of computing and information technology in US higher education, 2009.[4] S. Huang and N. Fang, “Predicting student academic performance in an engineering dynamics course: A comparison of four types of

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Scott Rebentisch, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Stephen Townsend, Project Management Institute; Edivandro Carlos Conforto, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

Management Conferences in Brazil and U.S.A., and guest Professor in Executive MBAs and trainings in Brazil and Europe. He holds a Ph.D and a Master degree from University of S˜ao Paulo, EESC, EI2. Page 26.356.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Collaboration Across Linked Disciplines: Skills and Roles for Integrating Systems Engineering and Program ManagementAbstractIn new product development programs, systems engineers and program managers must oftenwork together closely to define the product, the program structure and objectives, and allocateand define the focus

Conference Session

Best Paper Presentations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University; Kaitlin Engle Mallouk, Rowan University; Krishan Kumar Bhatia, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

university freshman engineering clinic,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 1997, Milwaukee, WI.4. R. P. Hesketh, K. Jahan and A. J. Marchese, “Multidisciplinary experimental experiences in the freshman engineering clinic design at Rowan university,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 1997, Milwaukee, WI.5. A. J. Marchese, R. P. Hesketh and K. Jahan, “Design in the Rowan university freshman engineering clinic,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 1997, Milwaukee, WI.6. S. Farrell, J. Kadlowec, A. Marchese, J. Schmazel and S. Mandayam. “Hands-on Experiments: Engineering and the Human Body,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental & Research-to-Practice: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design (Part 2)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mandy Biggers, Penn State University; Leigh Ann Haefner, Penn State University; Jonathan Bell, Penn State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

, beliefs, and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 381–414.11. Biggers, M., & Haefner, L. A. (2015, April). Integrating Elementary Science and Engineering Curriculum. Presentation at National Association of Research of Science Teaching Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.12. Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199–218.
13. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
14. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and

Conference Session

Assessing Literacies in Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bryan A. Jones, Mississippi State University; Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

improve student learning.a See http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/projects.html.b JavaDoc is included in Oracle’s Java implementation and used to document its API, resulting in wide adoption inthe Java community. See, for example, https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/overview-summary.html.Much of the instruction in the microprocessors course requires students to integrate material frommultiple sources. For example, the function shown in Figure 1(a) also depends on understandingof a timer provided in the textbook used in the course, and specific reference to the definition ofbits in timer 2’s control register which is provided in the microcontroller’s datasheet. Cognativeload theory predicts that when these elements are spatially or

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Guannan Liu, Purdue University - West Lafayette; DeLean Tolbert Smith, Purdue University - West Lafayette; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Anirudh Roshan Sriram, Purdue University - West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University - West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1151019. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. We would also like to acknowledge the contributions of the MEDLEEresearch group.REFERENCES1. Bursic KM, Atman CJ. Information gathering: A critical step for quality in the design process. QualityManagement Journal. 1997;4(4).2. Ennis Jr CW, Gyeszly SW. Protocol analysis of the engineering systems design process. Research in EngineeringDesign. 1991;3(1):15-22.3. Atman CJ, Adams RS, Cardella ME. Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expertpractitioners. Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas, El Paso; Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso; Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas, El Paso; Hugo Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso; Randy Hazael Anaya, University of Texas, El Paso; Hector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas, El Paso; Herminia Hemmitt, University of Texas, El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Which room(s) on campus should we upgrade first?All participants were given free range to elaborate on these questions or make other commentsand suggestions they felt was essential to the conversation. Rather than concentrating on newcutting-edge technologies and modernistic concepts, participants overwhelming felt fixingsimple issues in currently existing classrooms would make a huge difference in their teachingand learning and was a crucial first step in the classroom of the future design moving forward.ResultsThere were a total of 51 participants, including instructors and students, that provided feedbackeither in person or via one of the online methods. All comments and suggestions were sorted andgrouped to a matching category, which

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Pre-college Programs for Women

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawna Fletcher, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division, Women in Engineering

Identity Formation, Research in Science Education, vol. 43, issue 5, p.1979-2007 (October, 2013).17. Schultz, L.A., Barriers for Wilmot High School Female Students not Enrolling in the Mechanical Design Technology Program at Gateway Technical College, Thesis, University of Wisconsin, http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2011/2011schultzl.pdf (2011).18. Tully, D., Jacobs, B., Effects of Single-Gender Mathematics Classrooms on Self-Perception of Mathematical Ability and Post-Secondary Engineering Paths: An Australian Case Study, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35:4, 455-467 (2010).19. Wee, S.; Cordova-Wentling, R.M.; Korte, R.F.; Larson, S.M.; Loui, M.C., Why Many Smart Women Leave Engineering: A

Conference Session

Classroom Practice III: Student-Centered Instruction

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Sanchez, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Peter Bermel, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

reasoning in science. In: Carruthers P, Stich S, Siegal M, eds. The Cognitive Basis of Science. Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002:133-153.12. Nersessian NJ. Model-based reasoning in conceptual change. In: Magnani L, Nersessian NJ, Thagard P, eds. Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press; 1999:5-22.13. Lesh R, Doerr HM. Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In: Lesh R, Doerr HM, eds. Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003:3-33.14. Kozma R, Russell J. Modelling students

Conference Session

Innovations in Advanced Fabrication Technologies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Radharamanan, Mercer University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

module to the main controller. After, the transmitter was connected to the Naza using aservo cable. The S-Bus receiver in the transmitter was connected to the X2 channel of theNaza.At the end, the GPS module was plugged into the GPS port on the PMU. Figure 6 showsall electronic parts connected and fitted in the bottom box. Figure 6: Electronic parts connected and fitted in the bottom boxConfiguration1. Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) CalibrationElectronic speed controllers are responsible for spinning the motors at the speed requested by theautopilot. Figure 7 shows a Turnigy-Electronic Speed Controller used. Most ESCs need to becalibrated so that they know the minimum and maximum PWM (Pulse Width Modulation)values that the

Conference Session

Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Washington State University; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Kirk A Reinkens, Washington State University; Stephanie Anne Pitts, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

-14.15. Glynn S, Brickman P, Armstrong N, Taasoobshirazi G. Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validationwith science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2011; 48(10): 1159-76.16. Lackey L, Jack W, Grady HM, Davis MT. Efficiency of using a single, non-technical variable to predict tehsuccess of academic success in freshman engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education. 2003; 92(1): 41-8.17. Bryan R, Glynn S, Kittleson J. Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high schoolstudents learning science. Science Education. 2011; 95(6): 1049-65.18. Zygomatic. Free online word cloud generator and tag cloud creator. Worldclouds.com; 2016. AppendixEngineering Motivation

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Experiential Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Liang Li Wu, University of California - Irvine; Robert M. Cassidy, University of California - Irvine; J Michael McCarthy, University of California - Irvine; John C. LaRue, University of California - Irvine; Gregory N. Washington, University of California - Irvine

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Education, Savannah, GA. https://engineering.purdue.edu/MIDFIELD/Papers/paper08.pdf6. Meadows, L.A., Fowler, R., and Hildinger, E. S. (2012). Empowering students with choice in the first year. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, Texas. Retrieved from: https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/4128/download7. Meyers K. L., Silliman, S. E., Gedde N.L. and Ohland, M. W. (2010). A comparison of engineering students’ reflections on their first-year experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 169-178

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4A: Retention Programs and Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

W. Jackeline Torres, Rice University; Ann Saterbak, Rice University; Margaret E. Beier, Rice University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

learning components.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported in part by a grant to Rice University from the Howard Hughes MedicalInstitute through the Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education ProgramReferences[1] X. Chen and M. Soldner, “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001.,” National Center for Education Statistics, 2013.[2] T.A. Lacey and B. Wright, B, “Occupational employment projections to 2018,” Monthly Labor Review, vol. 132, no. 11, pp. 82 – 123, 2009.[3] National Science Foundation [NSF], “What is the S&E retention rate in U.S. 4-year institutions?” [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/data/college-10.html [Jan

Conference Session

Emerging Computing and Information Technologies II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahmoud K. Quweider, University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley; Fitratullah Khan, University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

showcased in the course website.IV. Pre-Lesson Quiz a. You just downloaded the popular Angry Birds game. As you play the game (on your phone, or in the lab, or on your computer), try to figure out how the game is implemented. What are the variables you change as you push the bird up or down, left or right?V. Test Your Mettle Quiz a. You shoot a dart at a speed of 10 m/s with an angle of 50. What is the time for impact. b. What is the maximum height and what is the maximum range for the dart in question a. c. You shoot a dart at a speed of 10 m/s with an angle of 45. What is the time for impact. d. What is the maximum height and what is the maximum range for the dart in question c. e

Conference Session

Make It!

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso; Pedro Arturo Espinoza, University of Texas, El Paso; Hector Erick Lugo Nevarez, University of Texas, El Paso; Hugo Gomez, University of Texas, El Paso; Randy Hazael Anaya, University of Texas, El Paso; Herminia Hemmitt, University of Texas, El Paso; Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas, El Paso; Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso; Alfonso Pruneda, University of Texas, El Paso; Sara Soto, Academic Technologies ; Erik Lopez, Academic Technologies; Gil Paquian Jr., UTEP Academic Technologies

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers,and tinkerers. McGraw Hill Professional, 2013.4 Fab Foundation. What is a Fab Lab? Web. 28 Dec. 2015 .5 Bloom, Benjamin S. Hasting, Thomas. Madaus, George. Handbook of formative and summativeevaluation of student learning. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1971.6 Harris, Pamela. Johnson, Ralph. Non-traditional Teaching & Learning Strategies. Montana StateUniversity. Web. 6 Jan. 2016. .7 Wookieepedia. Jedi. Web. 28 Dec. 2015. .8 Etsy. Redefining Entrepreneurship: Etsy Sellers Economic Impact. Web.https://blog.etsy.com/news/files/2013/11/Etsy_Redefining-Entrepreneurship_November-2013.pdf9 Bloom, Benjamin S. Hasting, Thomas. Madaus, George. Handbook of formative

Conference Session

Classroom Practice II: Technology - and Game-Based Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Camilo Vieira, Purdue University; Anindya Roy, Johns Hopkins University; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Michael L. Falk, Johns Hopkins University; Michael J. Reese Jr., Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Oklahoma City, OK. October 23-26. (2013)6 Rogalski, J., & Samurc¸ay, R. 1990. Acquisition of programming knowledge and skills. In J.M. Hoc, T.R.G. Green, R. Samurc¸ay, & D.J. Gillmore (Eds.), Psychology of programming (pp. 157–174). London: Academic Press7 du Boulay, B. 1989. Some difficulties of learning to program. In E. Soloway & J.C. Spohrer (Eds.), (pp. 283–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.8 Sweller, J., Ayres, P., and Kalyuga, S. 2011. Cognitive Load Theory, Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, doi: 10.1007/978-1- 4419-8126-4_5, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC9 Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y. B., Resnick, M., & Rusk, N

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Classroom and Online Innovations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kip D. Coonley, Duke University; Justin Miles, Duke University; Kim Manturuk, Duke University; Martin A. Brooke, Duke University; Christopher Woodard, Duke University; Chris Lorch, Center for Instructional Technology; Genevieve M Lipp, Duke University

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

than halfthe lab with another student. The students also relied heavily on the TA; only 1 person said s/hedid not get TA assistance for the NI myDAQ lab.TroubleshootingJust as was observed in class, the most common way that students approached troubleshootingwas to visually compare their circuit to the diagram. Of the students reporting, 7 completedtroubleshooting visually; 2 people used the multimeter; no one used the oscilloscope; and onestudent wrote that s/he “tried everything” (Table 1). A key objective of these labs is for studentsto encounter problems building the circuit and have to invoke circuit debugging techniques. Allstudents except one indicated confusion about how to proceed at some point during the lab. Thisis evidence that the

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom Chen, Colorado State University; Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University; Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University; Ali Pezeshki, Colorado State University; Melissa D. Reese, Colorado State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

), both with Pearson Prentice Hall. Prof. Notaros served as General Chair of FEM2012, Colorado, USA, and as Guest Editor of the Special Issue on Finite Elements for Microwave Engineering, in Electromagnetics, 2014. He was the recipient of the 1999 Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE) Marconi Premium, 2005 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) MTT-S Microwave Prize, 2005 UMass Dartmouth Scholar of the Year Award, 2012 Colorado State University System Board of Governors Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award, 2012 IEEE Region 5 Outstanding Engineering Educator Award, 2014 Carnegie Founda- tion for the Advancement of Teaching Colorado Professor of the Year Award, 2015 American Society for

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danda B. Rawat, Georgia Southern University; Chandra Bajracharya, Georgia Southern University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

the implications and interconnectionsbetween key terms and concepts linked to a topic. In this paper, we have present results based onthe “thought bubbles” approach for ‘Cybersecurity (for Networked Systems)’ course and‘Program Design for Engineers’ course. However, the proposed approach can be implemented inany other courses in a straightforward manner.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported in part by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant CNS1405670. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation. The authorswould like to thank the students who participated in the feedback process for different coursesand

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Salzman, Boise State University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Teacher Professional Development in Engineering: Lessons Learned from Engineering is Elementary. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22, 2008 - June 24, 2008 (2008). 7. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M. & Rogers, C. Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97, 369–387 (2008). 8. National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. (The National Academies Press, 2009). 9. Melchior, A., Burack, C., Gutbezahl, J., Hoover, M. & Marcus, J. FIRST Longitudinal Study: Summary of Preliminary Findings – Year 2. (The Center for

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Home, Parents, and Other Out-of-School Issues Related to K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamecia R. Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jean M. Trusedell, EPICS; William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

students learned, students alsoreported that they learned many others specific things. Terms explicitly used included“patience,” “time management,” “responsibility,” “leadership,” “accountability,” and“discipline.” Some of these responses are included in the table below with a student response toprovide an example in their words. Response Student quote Creativity “Sometimes you have to think outside of the box to come up with the best solution” Brainstorming “It’s better to brainstorm ideas in a group because other[s] offer a new perspective in functionality and creative aspects that you

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason Bazylak, University of Toronto; Ruth A Childs, University of Toronto; Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

, 139(1), 49-68.[9] J. Mills et al., “Introduction: Why we need Gender Inclusive Engineering Education,” in Gender InclusiveEngineering Education, New York, Routledge, 2010.[10] J. Archer and S. Freedman, “Gender-Stereotypic perceptions of academic disciplines,” Br. J. educ. Psychol, 59,306-313, 1989.[11] J. Calnan and L. Valiquette for Engineers Canada. (2010, March, 31). Paying heed to the canaries in the coalmine: Strategies to attract and retain more women in the engineering profession through green light leadership[Online]. https://www.engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/w_Canaries_in_the_Coal_Mine.pdf[12] I.H. Settles et al, “Derogation, Discrimination, and (Dis)Satisfaction With Jobs in Science: A GenderedAnalysis,” Psychology of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Raymond Markovetz, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh; Golnaz Arastoopour Irgens, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Zachari Lucius Swiecki; David Williamson Shaffer, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

wassupported by a University of Pittsburgh Innovation in Education grant as well as an NSFResearch Initiation Grant in Engineering Education (RIGEE EEC#1340426), for which theauthors are also grateful.References1. Baregheh A, Rowley J, Sambrook S. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Manag Decis. 2009;47(8):1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578.2. Arastoopour G, Collier W, Chesler NC, Linderoth J, Shaffer DW. Measuring the complexity of simulated engineering design problems. Am Soc Eng Educ. 2015.3. Markovetz, MR, Clark, RM, Zwiecki, Z, Arastoopour, G, Chesler, NC, Shaffer, DW, Bodnar CA. Influence of End Customer Exposure on Product Design within an Epistemic Game Environment. Adv Eng Educ. 2016