survey results to explore the impact of factors such as learning goals,study habits and skills, and learning readiness on student outcomes. Survey participantsresponded to questions from the Maryland Physics Expectations Survey (MPEX), and a mixtureof quantitative and qualitative research methods was applied for data collection. Conclusionsdraw on data analyses using an alternative taxonomy model in the cognitive domain. This study'sfindings reinforce our view that metacognition (knowledge of cognition) and knowledgeconstruction play an important role in learning. These findings also deepen our understanding ofwhy some engineering students struggle in physics classes and shed light on how to assiststudents in these courses.I
Paper ID #37348A Review of Promising Practices in STEM Bridge Programs Serving HighSchool and College Native American Indigenous CommunitiesDr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, The University of Texas, San Antonio Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD., is the Microsoft President’s Endowed Professor of Engineering Education in the Klesse College of Engineering and Integrated Design/ College of Education and Human Development at the University of Texas at San Antonio. She leads a comprehensive research agenda related to integrated STEM learning, challenge-based learning for students, engineering faculty professional development and culturally
autoethnographic, ethnographic, and qualitative interview projects on a wide- range of topics, has taught research methods at the introductory, advanced, and graduate levels, and has trained research assistants in diverse forms of data collection and analysis.Robert L. Nagel © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student competency, autonomy, and relatedness in a practice-oriented engineering program: An application of self-determination theoryAbstractFor engineering students, how might three basic needs—competency, autonomy, andrelatedness—promote intrinsic motivation among students? In this
practices. Human capital analyses are problematic in explaining women’s location in the workforce and perpetuate the deficit model of gender inequality. (p. 156-157)Taken together, these three sets of critics point out major methodological flaws in using pipelineas a metaphor for structuring research studies: • Most studies do not articulate what counts as a “successful” scientific or engineering career. Must a person remain in the same profession for her entire working life for her to be considered “in” the pool? Or might there be more “kinds” of scientific-related careers that should “count” than that of bench scientist or design engineer?18 • Assuming that “gender effects” on career choices can be studied
2019. Paper ID# 25474.[4] S. Rivera-Jiménez, D. Alford, and L. Virguez. “Fostering a Chemical Engineering Mind-set: Chemical Process Design Professional Development Workshops for Early Undergraduate Students.” Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. June 2019. Paper ID# 26147.[5] L.J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, J. McGourty, “The ABET ‘Professional Skills’- Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp. 41-55, January 2005.[6] J. Yoritomo, N. Turnipseed, S.L. Cooper, C.M. Elliott, J.R. Gallagher, J.S. Popovics, P. Prior, and J.L. Zilles, “Examining engineering instructions at a large research university through the lens
Franklin & Marshall College in physics and women and gender studies.Christine Mathilda CummingsLauren Elizabeth DennisDr. Hannah Nolte, Pennsylvania State University Hannah Nolte has recently completed her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University specializing in human factors and ergonomics. Her research investigates the applicability of mindfulness interventions as a stress-management technique for engineering design to improve design outcomes and student well-being. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Physics and Psychological Science from Gustavus Adolphus College and earned her master’s degree in Industrial Engineering at Penn State by researching the impact of practica style
, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group.Dr. Cassandra McCall, Utah State University Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and Co-Director of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Transition
past many years. In the recent years, she has been conducting research on exploring gender bias in IT and its impact on retention and recruitment in the field. She has been a longtime supporter of National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) and its mission, having spearheaded the establishment of an Academic Affiliation between NCWIT and VSU and most recently, USFSM. At the local and national level, she has collaborated with several organizations in their efforts to develop methods and strategies for increasing diversity in STEM. Dr. Javidi has been the recipient of a number of NSF, NASA, Google and Microsoft grants. She has also been a long time member of ACM and IEEE among a number other
PEER Guide focused on navigating the ASEEconference is designed to reinforce identity and recognition, enhance the flow of information,offer credentials, and influence individuals with decision-making power.Overall, the responses have signaled positive experiences and increased engagement with EERwhile participating in the RIEF VCoP. The VCoP has been an external support structure formentees to learn about common EER practices within a community of other engineeringeducation researchers while developing relational resources.The virtual format allowed for flexibility and accessibility, but it was a challenge for usscheduling a time when all or most participants could join the sessions. One major factor thatmay have negatively influenced
Paper ID #40998A Perspectives-Making Approach to Biomedical Engineering Design: Entrepreneurship,Bio-Inspired Design, and ArtsDr. Adel Alhalawani, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Adel Alhalawani’s teaching interests include engineering design, biomechanics, statics and mechanics of materials, biomaterials and design of manufacturing. His research has focused on bio-glass based adhesives for orthopedic applications and dental-based adhesives.Sophia KoopDr. Thomas Omwando, Simpson University Dr. Thomas Omwando holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. He is an Assistant
-driven, where actual student data and actual university curricula areutilized. Five thousand seventy-three student records from the University of New Mexico (UNM)are used for this purpose. Results demonstrate the restructuring impact on an engineering cur-riculum, particularly the computer engineering program at UNM. The effect is an improvementin the graduation rates of the students attending the revised engineering programs. These resultsare validated using a Markov Decision Processes (MDP) model. Furthermore, the findings of thispaper showcase the practical benefits of our approach and offer valuable insight for future ad-vancements in curriculum restructuring methodologies.keywords: curricular complexity, Markov decision processes
Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michi- gan. She earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Her current research focuses on idea development and ideation tools, divergent thinking, and engineering curricular practices and culture. Her research interests include front-end design practices, sociotechnical knowledge and skills in engineering, and queer student experiences in engineering. Their work is motivated by their passion for and experiences with inclusive teaching and holistic mentorship of students, seeking to reimagine what an engineer looks like, does, and who they are, especially
within each metric. For the performance-based grading system used in SEED,students are provided with criteria and targets ahead of time. Teams receive a grade based onhow closely their system performance matches the best performing team in each specific designcriteria.Study MethodsTo assess the impact of SEED Lab on students’ skills relevant to engineering practice, a casestudy activity was developed as an open-ended prompt to elicit students’ concepts of the designand development process. The case study activity presents a hypothetical capstone design projectand asks students to describe their general approach to completing the project, rather than for aspecific solution. The case study activity was chosen as a way to elicit students
Callihan Linnes is the Marta E. Gross Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Director of the College of Engineering Honors Program at Purdue University. Her work advances pa- per microfluidics, molecular biosensors, and human-centered instrumentation design for translation into point-of-care diagnostics for global health and health disparities research. She teaches undergraduate design courses for first year engineering honors and capstone design, graduate level instrumentation mea- surement and point-of-care diagnostics, and human-centered design workshops to practitioners around the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A systematic review of pedagogical
Engineering. Page 11.1454.6 6 MethodologyThis study utilized a quantitative and qualitative design to advance our understanding of theexperiences that female students go through in deciding to pursue and in completing anEngineering degree. Two major data collection methods were used. First, for the quantitativedesign, a survey was developed, and was used to obtain insightful information to determine thefactors that have hindered and assisted graduating female engineering students at a university inthe Midwest in deciding
they could design mightplay a role in helping the university achieve the SDGs, even Goals that may initially appear notto pertain to them. To do that would require some research and imagination on their parts. Although some students resisted working with the SDGs, the course evaluations suggestthat integrating them into the course themes and assignments generally increased students’perception of the course’s value and contribution to engineering education and practice. Inresponse to a question that asked students to identify aspects of the course that most helped theirlearning, students frequently commended the strength of the curriculum and the course’s focuson “real-world” challenges and applications for engineering knowledge
sustainability.Shanae Lekeisha Edwards, University of Texas at Dallas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Application of Concept Maps to Measure Effectiveness of Engineering Design Learning Intervention for School TeachersAuthor 1, PhD StudentAuthor 2, PhD StudentAuthor 3, Postdoctoral AssociateAuthor 4, ProfessorUniversity Affiliation1 MOTIVATION: MEASURE STUDENT LEARNING Evaluating changes in learning and understanding is essential to educational research andinterventions [1,2]. It serves as a critical parameter to gauge the effectiveness and impact ofeducational programs [3]. This assessment is not just a valuable tool; it is often the most effectivemeans available to measure and
are also expected to participate in seminars to practice oral communication skills.Seminar attendance was noted as a mandatory activity for 41% of the schools. These seminarsinclude presentations given by visiting faculty, which allows students to learn differentpresentation techniques that faculty use to convey information about their own research. Havingformal presentations amongst peers can help students learn what methods of presenting work anddo not work to advance their oral communication skills. Once again, the 2002 study did notexamine such requirements, and thus, we cannot adequately compare the progression of thisspecific curriculum.Exam Requirements Written and/or oral examinations are a key requirement for all of the schools
sustainability. Prior to joining the JMU Engineering faculty in 2012, Dr. Barrella was at Georgia Tech completing her Ph.D. research as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). She also completed a teaching certificate and was actively involved with the Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech. Her academic interests focus on two primary areas of sustainable transportation: (1) community-based design and planning and (2) strategic planning and policy development. Dr. Barrella is also interested in investigating how to best integrate these research interests into classroom and project experiences for her students
Enterprise for STEM Learningpartnership between JHU and Baltimore City Schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Impact of Student Driven Engineering Design ProjectsAbstractAs part of a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded Math and Science Partnership (MSP)between an urban, east coast, city school district and a private research university, city youthfrom three high-minority, high-poverty neighborhoods were taught the engineering designprocess both in-school and afterschool. Those in the afterschool program had STEM experts asmentors as well as a paid facilitator. They engaged in engineering projects from NPASS2 byEducation Development Center, Inc. and from Engineering Adventure by the
students. Nathan has bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Applied Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters degree in Civil Engineering from Stanford Uni- versity and a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Page 24.1089.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Social Responsibility Attitudes of First Year Engineering Students and the Impact of CoursesAbstractThe goal of this research was to characterize the social responsibility (SR) attitudes of first yearengineering students, determine if these
Effects Grades: Sizeness and the Exploration of the Multiple‐Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development through Hierarchal Linear Models Page 26.280.2Introduction In a recent study, an effect entitled sectionality was probed to determine the effect ofdifferent course sections at various schools had on students’ grades.[1] A caveat of that studybrought up numerous times in lectures and via private correspondence – one left out of theoriginal paper – was the effect of class size (or sizeness) for the same introductory courses.While anecdotally, faculty from all over the country had discussed with the researchers in thepast few years that
following fiveimportant characteristics of a Capstone Design course: 1. Challenging design project done by students within teams. 2. Focuses on knowledge gained throughout the curriculum. 3. Encourages solving problems that represent real-life engineering. 4. Earns an understanding of the professional aspects and engineering culture. 5. Learns and practices project proposing, planning, and control.Besides team-based projects, including a wider range of technical skills such as presentations,report writing, requirements analysis, and programming increases student the learning outcomes[4]. These technical skills serve to increase marketability for engineering graduates. Ideallyintroduction to the technical skills begins at the
semester, the program was opened to all faculty at the EEdepartment (total of 25 faculty). No faculty opted out, which allowed more course options forstudents to choose from.4-Pedagogy Training of Student Observers: Volunteering students were enrolled in a learningmodule on teaching and learning best practices on the Canvas learning management system,covering topics such as backward design and assessment, observation practices, and givingconstructive feedback. All handouts and training materials were provided within that Canvasmodule. The students were required to attend a one-hour training session on how to observe andevaluate teaching effectiveness and how to provide constructive feedback to faculty members.The training session was offered
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring early-career professionals’ conceptions of “stretch assignments”: A qualitative study of recent graduates from engineering and non-engineering fields1.0 IntroductionEarly-career engineers often enter workplaces that have not been designed with equity in mind.Beliefs about techno-meritocracies reign, blurring experiences of negative stereotypes, bias, anddiscrimination. Many new engineers learn largely opaque organizational practices and unwrittenrules of advancement as they go—with some having more informational advantage than others.One such practice is a developmental, or “stretch”, assignment. We define stretch assignments asinformally allocated work
transformative learning among our studentsbased on this model. One of these interventions was the opportunity to participate in a programcalled Communities of Practice (CoPs) for credit in our courses. In the first set of resultspublished, we found a statistically-significant correlation between participation in CoPs andprogress along the transformative learning process as defined by Mezirow. Based on support inthe literature for the CoPs to not only support transformative learning but also to potentiallyincrease engagement and sense of efficacy particularly among underrepresented students, wefocused the next stage in our research on investigating the impact of Communities of Practicefor our underrepresented student populations, specifically
innovation, feeling, and impressions - Favor form over function - Emphasis on physical prototypes - Exhaustive search of possibilitiesQuotes: - “They try for form follows function but without understanding function they sometimes wander astray.”Table 9. Student perceptions of possible improvements to architectural design approachKey ideas that architecture students can learn from engineers: - Recognize practical limitations - Be more open to advice (e.g. from engineers) - Put more emphasis on function - Conduct a more orderly, objective, and efficient search for solutions - Make decisions after research not before - Select a solution and stick with it – move forward - Respect deadlinesQuotes: - “Moderate their emphasis
and Lead Faculty of the Engineering Management and Homeland Security and Safety Engineering© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 programs. He leads six full time and fifty-two adjunct faculty members, offering three undergraduate and six graduate programs, with a student population of three hundred. Dr. Viswanathan is an educator, researcher and administrator with more than twenty-five years of industrial and academic experience encompassing engineering and environmental consulting, research and development, and technology development. His career experience includes teaching at the University level, conducting fundamental research, and developing continuing
undergraduate students in field-specific hands-on research by utilizing small internalgrants designed for undergraduate research. This study also aims to focus on how engaging inhands-on research impacted the students’ learning experiences, their professional developmentand even their academic results and achievements. In teaching focused universities, theopportunities for undergraduate students to get involved in externally funded research arelimited. However, a small grant from the universities can support involvement of bothundergraduate and faculty in research activities. In the last five years, the authors havesupervised more than 10 undergraduate students in the areas of architecture and manufacturing.It has been observed that engaging students
Engineeringand Technology (ABET) and to foster, as well, the globalization of engineering education bypointing out the remarkable achievement in the remote experimentation field.BackgroundThe current ABET engineering criteria (2012 – 2013) has emphasized the role of laboratorypractices in engineering education, stating that all engineering programs must demonstratethat:. Page 25.326.4 Their graduates have ability to: 1) design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. 2) use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. Their graduates must provide a bridge between