framework has involved the role of theresearcher, including both teacher librarians [12] and qualitative researchers [13], and stories ofpreservice teachers [14], adult learners [15], and women returning to education [16].This study responds to the lack of research on engineering leavers [17] as well as the gap in thedocumentation of women’s stories globally [4], by analyzing and re-telling the story of a womanwho tried engineering and left, but who nonetheless reflects heroism. She reported experiencingan apotheosis, or period of catharsis, which she took the time to share with us during her last dayin Dublin, before her flight home.The analysis reported in this paper applies and further tests a multi-part methodologicalframework for analyzing
framework to better understand empathyamong engineering educators. The framework is made up of three mutually dependentdimensions: skills, orientation, and being. The skills dimension includes empathic skills that canbe learned such as perspective taking, mode switching, and affective sharing. The orientationdimension concerns one’s proclivity for being empathetic and includes aspects such as anepistemological openness and reflective values awareness. The being dimension aligns withone’s values and morals as engineers and citizens and how these morals and values define andguide our actions and behaviors. Interviews were conducted with three assistant professors andone professor and these interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using in
impact of a user’s prior knowledge and the reflections of first-year engineeringstudents on differing results were also assessed.The results of this study indicate that designing a product display or interface is still centeredaround a population stereotype, but the population takes many forms depending on the productor interface. When an open-ended prompt is provided, such as, “draw in how you consider the[gear selections] should be positioned for [an auto transmission] Neutral (N), Drive (D), Low(L), and Reverse (R),” the multitude of responses becomes overwhelming to designers. Theinfluence of cultural shifts, since the original study, was evident within our responses as well.Multiple responses highlighted how modernization of technology may
,Sacramento’s (Sacramento State) with the Hornet Leadership Scholars’ Curriculum. TheHornet Leadership Program (HLP), launched in 2018, addresses some of our potential gapsin engineering leadership education. The program includes instruction on principles ofleadership, seminars by industry leaders, leadership practice and reflection, discussions,one-on-one mentoring, leadership development in student organizations, and communityactivities. The program also reinforces the educational process by creating opportunities forparticipants to be coach/mentors for less experienced students as they progress in theprogram. The HLP allows students to enhance their engineering leadership training throughdirect application of leadership principles. As we grow the
, changing racial and ethnic demographics, national security, andglobalization have all fueled the push to increase and diversify the science and engineeringworkforce [6]. Further, expanding racial (and gender) representation of engineering faculty hasbecome a top priority in many engineering colleges and departments across the country. Despitethe best intentions, many organizations have failed to reflect societal demographics within theirfaculty ranks. Techniques and strategies exist to recruit candidates from traditionallyunderrepresented groups, yet the full participation of these groups has not been achieved [6].It is clear that the engineering programs within higher education must improve their teachingapproaches to address issues of diversity
disparate contexts and perspectives.2. improve the ability to apply engineering design concepts to solve problems in the real world.3. improve the ability to make reflective judgment through independent and critical thinking4. improve the ability to make and act on the moral or ethical judgment in the engineering design process5. improve the ability to function effectively on a team.6. improve the ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiencesThis course is designed to achieve the learning outcomes listed above by assigning studentsdesign activities and projects. Table 1 shows the detailed descriptions of the teaching methodsused for each learning outcome. Table 1. Teaching methods for each learning outcome
contentknowledge in a way that reflects deep understanding of the field, and 4) experts are able to easilyand accurately retrieve important aspects of their knowledge with little cognitive effort(Bransford, 1999). It has long been understood, however, that experts within the same disciplinemay differ in the manner and effectiveness with which they are able to apply their expertise tosolve a problem (Hatano, 1990; Wineburg, 1998).Based on studies in the field of learning sciences, researchers have developed the concept ofadaptive expertise (alternatively referred to as “adaptiveness”) to characterize the differences inthe way that experts utilize their content domain expertise (Hatano, 1990; Wineburg, 1998). Forexample, one classical work in this area
Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests include graduate education, curriculum development, faculty development, global engineering education, and education policy.Ms. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include faculty development and data-informed reflective practice. Ms. Soledad has degrees in Electrical Engineering (BS, ME) from the Ateneo de Davao University (ADDU) in Davao City, Philippines, where she continues to be a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering Department. She also served as Department Chair and was a
have produced, piloted, and internally distributed 64 curriculum modules and/or labs.The purpose of this paper is to provide preliminary results of an investigation of the relationshipof learning setting and instructional use of experimental centric learning, especially for students ofcolor. Learning settings studied include: 1) traditional classrooms, 2) lab settings and 3)homework. Variations by instructional use included: 1) instructor demonstration, 2) cooperativeand 3) independent student use. Student outcomes reflect gains in: 1) pre-requisites to learning; 2)immediate short-term learning; 3) long-term and transferable outcomes and 4) selected ABETcharacteristics (importance and preparedness). Findings indicate that both setting and
the engineering ISD report—a key characteristic, ashighlighted by Vijai K. Bahtia, is that genres reflect disciplinary cultures and focus on“conventionalized communicative events embedded within disciplinary or professionalpractices” (23) [5]. Thus, while engineering faculty saw the project/course oriented to aspecific purpose or [business] product—the ISD report translation in condensed form—Spanish language faculty saw the use of translation as a framework for advancingspecific literacies across disciplines through the use of Spanish. We recognized abroader series of “communicative events” attached to the specific course register.Twenty-four students enrolled in the Spanish course, and twenty-three students wereassigned final grades
development model where they wereimmersed in tasks in which the facilitator supported an inquiry-based learning environment. The professional development model consisted of two full days of inquiry experience anda half-day at the end of implementation dedicated to reflection of practice. The first day ofprofessional development focused mainly on Algebra concepts and was given prior toimplementing any of the Math Out of the Box lessons. After teachers implemented the tenlessons relating to Algebra, they returned for the second day of professional development dealingprimarily with data concepts. Teachers were also given the opportunity to reflect on the Algebralessons and discuss issues relating to implementation with their peers. Topics such as
Learning and Challenges Faced during a Summer Undergraduate Research ExperienceAbstractUndergraduate research experiences offer many benefits to our students and serve as a primarymechanism to recruit students to graduate school and expose them to the practice of research,which also enables students to learn problem solving in the context of discovery and innovation.This paper employs a mixed-methods approach and a Community of Practice (CoP) theoreticalframework to investigate how participation in summer undergraduate research promotes situatedlearning. The mixed-methods approach, incorporating pre- and post- survey instruments as wellas weekly self-reflective journal entries were utilized to study undergraduate researchers
trying to figure out a way to structure exercises to access story as a methodologyand explorative form for a graduate engineering and design methods class. To do this I reflect back onwhat I already know, what I am learning from graduate student co-creators, and how my participantobservation as instructor for the class will impact the developmental stages of their projects.We know that collaborative design thinking is a social activity [1]. Members work together in teamsin the workplace and increasingly in engineering schools in project-based design courses. While thesecourses give an experience of working in teams, the elements of how insights help individuals createnew approaches, sustain engagement and inspiration well into a project and
framework to ensure that hazards are not only identified, but are also eliminated atthe design stage. The Australasian engineering profession has begun to address this humancomponent through the introduction of the most recent National Generic Competency Standards6in 1999, which incorporate competency standards for design. However Toft7 had already foundthat engineering educators have reported that they do not have skills and knowledge in the areaof designing for human use, and would need to first learn themselves about ergonomic principlesof design.Research MethodologyAction Research (AR) is a cyclic process of problem definition, enacting a potential solution,observing the impact of that action, and finally reflecting on the outcome, and then
ideas about experience as thesource for learning and development.3 We believe the best way to achieve the course objectivesis through experiential learning, whereby students learn from working on real problems. * The course is listed for five credit hours in the College of Business Administration & Economics to reflect thecourse's time demands. The College of Engineering allows only three credit hours of projects courses to count Page 2.405.2toward masters degree requirements. Hence, engineering students are allowed to take the course for between threeand five credit hours, with anything more than three hours of credit not
students’responses revealed sudden engagement with the mathematical concepts as students discovered a Page 14.1382.8relationship to their interests and passions. Some students reported really struggling with some ofthe concepts and repeatedly seeking additional outside help or conducting online research.In her discussion of symmetry, one student chose the capital letter H to illustrate symmetry,rotation, and glide reflections. As she concluded her answer, her enthusiasm became evident: Overall, the letter H in Helvetica has tons of different kinds of symmetry. A nice re-design I see for this where it would still be very
from a multi-year project that is initiatingtechnology supported experimental centric approaches to learning in electrical and computerengineering courses at 13 historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). One of the personalinstrumentation tools supporting experimental student-centered learning at these institutions is theAnalog Discovery Boards (ADBs). The content or setting of use reflects introductory, circuits, andsupporting electrical and computer engineering courses. The students consisted of undergraduatesenrolled in engineering courses across the 13 member institutions. The authors provide an overviewof learning theories that support experiential learning, followed by brief overviews of selectedvalidated instructional modules
paradigm is not easy (Finelli, Daly, &Richardson, 2014). In order to train teachers for this new scenario, many institutions offeropportunities for teacher development through specialized courses. However, there is verylittle evidence of the effectiveness of these courses.In this scenario, active learning methodologies appear as a way to improve conceptualunderstanding and thinking skills of science and technology students for flexible use in thecurrent context. Although there is a clear evidence of the benefits of active learning,professors still use traditional teaching methods.Helping teachers moving towards a new conception of teaching and learning needs a way ofprofessional development that creates opportunities to reflect and rethink
Security.” He is a recent recipient of the NSF CAREER award (2012), as well as the ISU award for Early Achievement in Teaching (2012) and the ECpE department’s Warren B. Boast undergraduate teaching award (2009, 2011, 2016).Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching
multiple approaches to inquiry to research this particular wicked problem of ourtime. Our course incorporated documentary film, fiction, arts based inquiry, research, andmultiple modes of reflection to frame the design of creative solutions to complex problems.Engaging students in practices of attending to experience introduced them to artistic/creativereflective practices, design thinking, and aesthetic inquiry. Examining how artists interweaveart, science, technology, and math in imaginative artworks that blur boundaries between art,design, and STEM disciplines developed "thinking dispositions that are valued both within andbeyond the arts," (p. x, Hetland, Winner, Veenema, & Sheridan, 2013). In this paper we discuss how an art
capstone design project reports. However,the difference here is to have a structure to provide multiple formative feedbacks from theinstructor, the peers, and the student writing fellow (trained by the writing center) to helpstudents reflect on their weaknesses in writing through multiple interactions and assessment overa period of a semester. Furthermore, this vigorous writing-to-learn process is repeated in twosubsequent courses to ensure students proficiency in the process. In this format, the benefits ofusing writing-to-learn methodology have been expressed in many ways in the literature, such asimproved student writing, increased student learning and engagement, student-facultyinteraction, collaborative learning, and critical thinking to name
premotor cortex (known to be involved in themanagement of uncertainty, control of behavior, and self-reflection in decision making). Thenumber of solutions generated was also significant (p=0.032). Freshmen generated 5.6 solutionson average during the brainstorming activity while seniors developed 4.1. In many ways, thisinitial work serves as a proof of concept in using neuroimaging to study the processes involvedin engineering design. Through a better understanding of these processes, we can begin toexplore specific elements of the engineering curriculum that may contribute to student ability tomanage complexity inherent in engineering design problems. We hope this interdisciplinarystudy integrating engineering education and neuroscience
return to their institutions(workshops), have time to practice these skills (practice writing time), and discuss how things aregoing (writing clusters). Figure 1. Dissertation Institute Main ActivitiesWorkshop Sessions: Multiple 1 or 2-hour sessions lead by experts in dissertation topics toprovide the participants with ideas, concepts, techniques and reflections about the writing habitsand process, time management, communication with advisors, and overall topics germane to thecompletion of their dissertation.Practice Writing Sessions: Significant amount of structured writing time distributed along theweek to provide students with the opportunity to apply the workshop’s lessons, practice theirwriting, and advance in
explanations [9]. However, thefield of engineering has not yet established a clear idea of what “disciplinary engagement”means.Engineering at its core is about creating solutions to problems using mathematics, science, andcreativity through a design process. The engineering curriculum reflects this by containingdifferent types of courses that teach the mathematical models of natural phenomena (i.e.engineering science courses, or technical core courses), laboratory and experimental techniquesand processes (i.e. lab courses), and fundamentals of engineering design (i.e. design courses).These courses all ask students to engage disciplinarily in different ways, all in support of theoverall practice of engineering to create new solutions. Prior research
Rubrics for Anything 8 No speaker: Make-up Session & Open Forum 9 Final summer deliverables due uploaded to Blackboard beginning of Presentation of Projects (2 sessions) fall semester beginning of Assessments/Reflections for faculty projects implemented in Fall 2019 due spring semester beginning of Assessments/Reflections for faculty projects implemented in Spring 2020 due summer termThe aforementioned required written deliverables included: Intermediate Deliverables o Draft of New/Revised Student Learning Outcomes o Brief Summary of Project Plans and Progress to Date o Preliminary Assessment Plan to evaluate
Introduction module, students first learned about the National Academy of EngineeringGrand Challenges for Engineering. As part of discussion groups, they were asked to prioritize thechallenges and identify those that most interested them. Most students were previously unawareof these challenges. In reflecting what was learned in this module, one student stated: I learned the responsibility of engineering. With all the rewarding aspects of engineering comes responsibility. The grand challenges emphasized the responsibility engineers have to society. If engineers have the tools to create, they should use them to create good. This is important to acknowledge so that engineering can remain ethical and just.Students were then
interventions and b) standing on a set of sustainability-thinkingskills. Data on these two outcomes of interest are gathered through the use of end ofsemester surveys as well as written reflection activities included in student projects.Student survey results are analyzed with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis foropen-ended items. Written reflections are scored with institute-developed rubrics tied toeach system-thinking skill, depending on the nature of a given reflection prompt.Initial results from thematic analysis of open-ended student survey items suggest thatafter experiencing the sustainability intervention, students exhibit an initial understandingof the three key components of sustainability: social, economic, and
students worked with clientsfrom the local community to design a solution to meet their rehabilitation needs. In addition tothe projects, student assignments included reflection prompts, four hours of community service,and several empathy “immersion” experiences (i.e., wearing a blindfold while trying to completebasic tasks). Seven students opted to participate in the study, all in their 4th or 5th year in eitherbiomedical or mechanical engineering. Students completed pre- and post-course surveys aimedto measure changes in self-reported levels of empathy. One student participated in a personalinterview, aimed at understanding the different ways in which the course activities influenced hisdevelopment of empathy. All seven students who participated
. Second, they work regularly with the course instructor as a member ofthe instructional team to better understand the content that they will deliver in class. Third, theyfacilitate active learning in classes of near peers, and reflect on their learning and practice inwriting. LAs have become widely used in science courses at many universities and there isresearch evidence that the programs effectively enhance the success of the students in LA-facilitated courses and of the LAs themselves [6], [7]. To date, the implementation and researchabout engineering LA programs is sparse.At a large public university, we identified specific logistical barriers and educational goals in theCollege of Engineering and adapted the LA Program developed in the
SystemVerilog of their implementation; and abrief reflection on the difficulties experienced during the lab and how they would approach the labdifferently if they were to repeat the design and implementation.Implementation DetailsWe use a Digilent Nexys4 development board as the target platform and SystemVerilog and XilinxVivado to implement the design and configure the board. Students are introduced to the designtools and the development platform through the first lab (see Table 2) and utilize them in all of theother labs. In general, any HDL and target platform should work. The only elements needed, asidefrom the pulse sensor, are four 7-segment displays, two buttons, and a slide switch, which areavailable on almost any contemporary development board