Paper ID #25003Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. inLearning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning,and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Race, Veteran, and Engineering Identities among Black Male Student VeteransAbstractUsing interviews with seven Black Student Veterans in Engineering (BSVEs) at threepredominantly White institutions (PWIs), we explore how the identities of Black, Male, Veteran,and Engineering student are enacted during their undergraduate engineering experience. Weapproach this study informed by
using Neural Networks. It can be understood that thetrained neural network model takes irradiance as input and outputs the recommended topological configuration. Anexample use case is given in the bottom. Students will use the program for selecting the appropriate topology fordifferent irradiance conditions. All the exercises and learning modules are used in our DSP class. Portions of the training moduleshave also been used in our REU site program (Fig. 14) to train undergraduate students in sensors andmachine learning. We also plan use of our modules in an upcoming international research experiencesprogram at the University of Cyprus. Fig. 14. REU students and faculty at the SenSIP solar site. Students have been introduced through a module
teaching and learning”, 2000, pp.171-200.[28] E. Wenger, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge university press; Sep 1999.[29] A. Amin, “Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity”, Environment and planning A, 34(6):959-80, Jun 2002.[30] GA. Fine and LJ. Van den Scott, “Wispy communities: Transient gatherings and imagined micro-communities”, American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10):1319-35, Oct 2011.[31] SB. Merriam, Qualitative Research: a Guide to Design and Implementation, 2009.[32] N. Valanides, “Analysis of interview data using the constant comparative analysis method” In Using analytical frameworks for classroom research, Routledge, pp. 77-89.[33] C. Gilligan, “Strengthening
design of the VR teachingmodule to be more immersive and visualized. The current VR module is a semi self-paced tutorial.Concurrent research (Phase III) is being conducted to investigate how well students understand thequeuing theory concept using this updated VR teaching module versus traditional classroomlecture. Data is currently being collected using a different set of students with the same conceptualquiz but taught the topic in a traditional classroom manner (control group). Afterwards, we plan toprovide a comparative analysis of both approaches, control group versus experimental group anddisseminate the results.. The sections discussed below only reflects how well the students performusing the VR training module (experimental group
purpose of this second coding system was todevelop a simpler and more viable option to assess the sole construct of what engineers do. Itallows the participants conceptions of engineers to be coded into the following categories: Designer: Designing or improving objects or processes, usually portrayed by drawing plans or performing specific parts of the engineering design process, an implied client or public use is intended Technician: Computer or electronic technician portrayed by a person fixing something electronic Design/Create single: Hobbies, crafts, and designs for personal use or making one object for a specific person Tradesman: Carpenters, plumbers, welders, etc. where a person is fixing
engineering problems by comparing results from both application of models/physical principles and measurement data. 5. Students will apply basic teaming principles (such as the Tuckman’s Model) and team effectiveness practices while working with their teams. 6. Students will write a technical report and give an oral/multimedia presentation following [course name] technical communication guidelines which include formatting, explaining and justifying aspects of the project. 7. Students will construct detailed project plans using basic project management techniques (such as scheduling and budgeting) and methods (such as Gantt charts). 8. Students will self-evaluate their prototype design decisions and reflect on the
] "Grundfos SQFlex 60 SQF-3 Centrifugal Submersible Solar Pump," Northern Arizona Wind & Sun, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.solar-electric.com/grundfos-sqflex-60-sqf-3- solar-pump.html. [Accessed 18 April 2018].[25] M. Nasir, S. Iqbal and H. Khan, "Optimal Planning and Design of Low-Voltage Low-Power Solar DC Microgrids," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017.[26] Digi-Key Electronics, "Electronic Components," Digi-Key Electronics, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.digikey.com/products/en. [Accessed 16 April 2018].[27] J. P. O'Connor, Off Grid Solar: A handbook for Photovoltaics with Lead-Acid or Lithium- Ion batteries, CreateSpace, 2016.[28] K. Ardani, E. O'Shaughnessy, R. Fu, C. McClurg, J. Huneycutt, and R
processshortcomings, increase software quality, and aid in development planning [11], [19]. Studentconfidence can be increased by comparing their metrics to those published in the literature.Furthermore, the instructor gains insight from collecting metrics on the students’ softwareprocess. The instructor can observe the improvement in individual and class abilities, as well asacquire indicators of the relative complexity of homework and design assignments. Manysoftware measures in IEEE Std. 982.1 are obtained very naturally during the developmentprocess described in the previous section [3]. Throughout the design activities and the inspectionprocess, students are asked to record: Defects -- identified by author, design task, defect type, and severity
material that may have been prepared in previousyears, another investment of time and energy. These “energy bumps” become less severe as thesemester progresses and especially in subsequent years, but the additional upfront effort coulddiscourage some young faculty from implementing the new model. These concerns are partially,though not completely, alleviated by the new course structure proposed in the previousparagraph.Some tips for ease of implementation: 1. Plan ahead. The number one tip is to strategize and prepare in advance as much as possible. From choosing the software one feels more comfortable with to design the exams with, to having handouts prepared in advance (during previous semester or over the summer), to having
schoolopportunities), there are also plans to further improve the video content by adding interviewswith alumni on what companies are seeking in resumes, interviews, etc. and their own stories ofwhat made their employment searches successful. The goal is to add a level of credibility to thelessons by having the students hear messages from professionals in industry who graduated fromValparaiso University engineering programs, and to keep the ESSP content current byhighlighting hiring practices and networking software used in practice.9.0 SummaryThe College of Engineering at X University has developed the ESSP to help students develop thenecessary skills to find excellent jobs in their desired fields of study. The program consists ofstand-alone Blackboard
. Tinkering SE 4 0.87 0.89 Design SE 4 0.90 0.94† Abbreviations: SE = self-efficacy; OE = outcome expectationsChoice Self-Efficacy and Student Major ChangesStudents’ self-reported majors at admission (Figure 1, left column), six weeks into the Fallsemester (Figure 1, center column), and the major they are most likely to pursue (Figure 1, rightcolumn) were analyzed to visualize trends in student majors. Over 71% of all students indicatedtheir major was and would be the same at each of the three time points (n = 219), but there arestill many students who indicate a change in major or a planned change in major (n = 89
consisting of creative self-efficacy questions. II. Lesson Introduction | The lesson/module began with a class discussion on the engineering design process, which focused on conceptualization and creativity, which was developed from a lesson plan inspired by Starkey et al. [19]. Embedded in the slide deck presentation that was assembled to introduce students to the entire process is a YouTube Video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuaaXMp35NI) (7:41) “developed by the researchers that introduces students to the importance of creativity in engineering design through a series of engineering examples and creativity exercises like an alternative use test [35]” [19], quoted
requests. We will explore suppressing the Techstreet direct requestoption for our patrons, or consider a standard reply that they should use the ILL request system ifthe item will not be used for a course. More frequent analysis of ILL requests and continuedoutreach to patrons about this format type and the potential utility of standards documents in thedesign process will allow subject librarians to identify standards that should be added to thecollection, either in the Techstreet aggregator system, or other multi-user licenses. We have alsoinitiated annual evaluation of the subscribed items in our Techstreet license to remove thosewithout long-term utility.We plan to investigate local cataloging practices that might increase the discoverability
economicexpansion. This escalating use of transportation infrastructure; coupled with financial constraints,has forced transportation agencies to shift more attention on the preservation and maintenance ofexisting infrastructure (i.e., pavements) rather than the construction of new highways [1]. Forexample, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) invested $91 billion in 2013for the purpose of pavement maintenance to restore the road network to a satisfactory,operational condition [2]. The main objective of any federal, state or municipal transportationagencies is to develop an efficient system of planning for the maintenance, rehabilitation, andconstruction of roadway networks; within the confines of allocated funding. Most
people skills.” ● “Having skills from a wide range of disciplines help engineers have multiple ways of approaching problems and this helps in solving problems in an efficient way.” ● “The biggest takeaways from this course are that engineering is not at all linear, and that every object you use has real world impacts.” ● “I realized how important the human aspect of the engineering process is. You are never doing something that will affect just you.” ● “Engineering isn’t just designing, it has many more parts to it. It actually consists most of communication, planning and teamwork.”A final aspect of assessment of the course relates to the student evaluations conducted at the endof each module. Total number of students who
approach and the other sectionnot receiving the pedagogy. Formative and summative assessment results of the impactedclasses (two+ in each discipline) should demonstrate the “enhanced student learning andmotivation” with course grades compared to control group or previous course administrations.Additionally, course evaluations, and measurements of cognition, engagement, and motivationwill be determined using the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaires (MSLQ) [24]amended with specifically designed additional items or measures to capture the project'sintervention.During the planning phase for the project, the following criteria were developed for selectingcourses in each discipline for the pilot test implementation of ECP in Spring 2020: 1
reinforce progress, and scaffolded learning with increasing challenges. Further itemssuch as a point system and leaderboards are planned in future work. Gamification has frequentlybeen found to improve learning and engagement [11].)Prior controlled, randomized experiments have shown a 1.21σ improvement in learning onwriting nodal analysis equations and identifying elements in series and parallel in a laboratory-based experiment and a corresponding improvement of 0.91σ in student motivation [3, 4]. Aclassroom-based assessment in Fall 2014 using random assignment to compare this system tocomplete nodal and mesh analysis exercises to using the commercial WileyPLUS system found a0.41σ improvement in that homework score (p < 0.008) [7]. It was also
experience in the Invention Studio” • “Really liked the workshop assignments and felt like they offered good exposure to the machines available in the Invention Studio Felt like a good intro to the maker space for someone who was not an ME major”Scheduling • “I think this class should have blocked out the times for the Invention Studio workshops. Even if we didn't get credit for them, I think this would be very helpful in making sure that there aren't any conflicts and that students can attend each workshop to learn how to use the Invention Studio tools.” • “If class time was a little longer, there would be more time for groups to plan their next iteration. This was the biggest problem in my group, since
those who were scheduled to travel but were unable to do so. If requested by thepartner, planned on-campus meetings were shifted to a videoconference format (as were allremaining faculty interviews).B. Tenured/tenure-track faculty demographics in College of Engineering and Applied ScienceDespite multiple programmatic efforts over more than a decade, the demographics of thecollege’s faculty has remained stubbornly unrepresentative of its diversifying student body andthe diversifying pool of individuals who are earning the doctoral degrees in engineering andapplied science typically required for tenure-track faculty positions in the CEAS.1. Gender of facultyAcross all CEAS T/TT ranks, the percentage of women faculty has increased by only 5
inengineering [9]. To incorporate these benefits into this lab, students were placed into large teamsto complete the manufacturing of the Mr. Potato Heads and into smaller teams to complete agroup lab report. While not all students plan to study ISE, all engineers can benefit from theexperience of studying a problem and implementing changes to improve the solution whilemeeting given constraints.ConclusionIn the honors track for the first-year engineering program at The Ohio State University,laboratories are utilized for students to both introduce them to engineering topics from variousmajors as well as develop their technical writing skills. This Quality & Productivity lab wasdesigned to introduce first-year students to introductory ISE topics
considered it. Theproportion of female and male students who had not received encouragement from a facultymember, yet intended to attend graduate school was 26.1% and 20.5%, respectively. Whereas,38.9% and 55.9% of female and male students, respectively, who had been encouraged by one ormore faculty were planning to attend graduate school. These observations indicate a statisticallysignificant increase among male students when encouragement is received (99% confidence), buta statistically significant increase among female students can only be observed with 84%confidence. Figure 4. Graduate school intentions of LCOE students with GPA of 3.0 or above displayed by gender and whether or not faculty encouragement to attend graduate school has been
of sense of belonging. Considering that the essay question was open-ended, it is ofsignificance when students mention one of the interventions in their response. Since the interventionsthemselves are short (both the norms and mindset activities take less than an hour), the researchers weresurprised to see that so many students reflected positively on those activities. What the essay is not measuring,however, is the change in student sense of belonging over the course of the quarter. The researchers plan toconduct future research to investigate this further.Conclusion, Limitations & ChallengesThe norms and mindset interventions designed as part of this research study are of high quality and are easyto embed into an existing course. The
positive impact of socialization for ELC students occurred inInterview C. Both described how socializing can be tiring and straining for busy students,especially those who identify as introverts and need time to recover from extensive interactionwith others. This instance co-occurred with Feedback, as the student suggested havingpurposeful social time planned, such as study groups, in lieu of social time for the sake ofsocializing, such as going to a theme park. These disconfirming examples show that relationshipsare still a chief positive impact of the ELC, when tailored to the unique needs and personalitiesof engineering students [8].Theme II: Resources for Transition This theme is made up of Resources, Mentoring, and Transition to Adulthood
don’t know 11. working as a member of a large team (> 5 people) 12. working as a member of a small team (5 or fewer people) 13. working as a member of a multidisciplinary team (both engineering and non-engineering backgrounds) 14. being a leader on a team so that the job gets done while still respecting the roles of others 15. contributing to team goal setting and working with others to achieve those goals 16. evaluating team effectiveness and planning for improvements 17. identifying your own personal areas of strengths & weaknesses 18. identifying the means to develop your strengths and eliminate your weaknesses 19. working to develop broader knowledge 20. applying critical inquiry and analysis to engineering problems and doing the
forsolving technical issues later or collaborating with peers. The power of the hypotheseis.is site isthat it retains the annotations, allowing one to toggle between having it on and off during siteaccess. It leaves clues about how many annotations are there as well, noting hot spots in the webdocument. In the future, the instructor plans to invite students are to submit at least fiveannotations from any computer networking technology websites, including sample screen clipsof their annotations as part of their portfolios.Learning both within the Network Switches & Routers classroom and beyond it can bestrengthened tremendously by using specific reading strategies. It can be done by showingstudents how technology professionals in the area read
Paper ID #30117Mentoring Among African American Women in the Engineering AcademyJocelyn LaChelle Jackson, University of Michigan Jocelyn Jackson is a doctoral student in engineering education research at the University of Michigan and national chair of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE). Her major work includes research in entrepreneurship, organizational leadership and behavior, and strategic planning for NSBE.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State
even received national mediaattention [10]. However, the focus on plagiarism hides a host of underlying issues. In our course,we encountered gray areas where the enforcement of plagiarism rules and student learning maynot be in alignment. We also discovered that plagiarism cases were mostly among students withno prior experience, suggesting that plagiarizing could be as much a last-ditch attempt to salvagea lost situation, rather than a devious plan to break rules. This is not to suggest that we should scale back efforts to detect plagiarism or reportindividuals who commit it. However, we should also be understanding of what the underlyingissues might be. Previous research has suggested [5], [8], and we have experienced in teachingthis
virtualenvironment of a factory with a series of workstations. They were able to interact with theenvironment using the controllers on each hand (Figure 13). Inside the VR simulation, there was a large factory room with a row of workstations, asshown in Figure 14. A user wearing a VR headset was able to see the virtual environment andother users in the virtual environment. Figure 15 shows what a user saw as the other three userswere working. Every user was shown in the simulation with body and hand tracking, meaning thata user could see where the other users were and what the other users were doing with their hands.While inside the simulation every user was represented with a male virtual character in a blackbody suit, in the future we are planning
Paul andElder model of critical thinking specifically, the University of Louisville adopted it specificallyas the core of their Quality Enhancement Plan for undergraduate education, e.g. [10] As far aswe have determined, the present work is the first to apply the Paul & Elder approach to theteaching of critical reading and writing to engineering graduate students.The Course 1/Course 2 sequence was originally implemented in the University of South CarolinaCollege of Engineering and Computing (CEC) as part of the graduate curriculum in BiomedicalEngineering, which was established in 2008. Since that time, the courses have evolved into theircurrent form and have been taken by students in all CEC PhD-granting programs. The CT modelis, of