Industrial Technology (BSIT) and BS in Aviation. BSIT has twoconcentrations: Electronics and Computer Technology (ECT) and Manufacturing Systems. Thestudents are not distributed equally between the two concentrations; 25% of BSIT majors areManufacturing Systems students and 75% are Electronics and Computer Technology (BSIT-ECT) majors. This inequity is not surprising considering the location of the university in SiliconValley, CA. The university, as a whole, has large enrollments in electronics and computer-related fields including computer engineering, computer science, MIS, and the BSIT-ECT.There are several other demographic factors that serve to make the delivery of instructionchallenging for the department. Approximately 70% of ECT students
support the staffing needs of the nanotechnology industry. A new Computer ChipCommercialization Center (Quad-C) on SUNY Polytechnic Institute (SUNY Poly) campus inUtica, is part of the sprouting industry and alone is expected to create approximately 1500 directjobs.The intent of this paper is twofold. On one side it explains the rationale for recent changes to therequirements for the Nanotechnology minor while on the other side it explores the opportunitiesfor the expansion of the nanotechnology education that arise through the integration of SUNYITand CNSE into a single academic entity, SUNY Poly.The College of Engineering through its Engineering Technology Department in Utica hasengaged in a curriculum rejuvenation consisting of the creation of
Paper ID #13454Welcome to the Maker Movement: Parallel Education Pathways of AdultMakersMs. Chrissy Hobson Foster, Arizona State University Chrissy Foster is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College of Arizona State University. Her dissertation study explores the approaches to technical innovation within Native American communities.Mr. Aubrey Wigner, Arizona State University Aubrey Wigner is a PhD student in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology at Arizona State University. He has an undergraduate degree in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering and a Masters in
AC 2009-141: INTERACTIVE INSTRUCTION, REMEDIATION, AND RESEARCHINMarilyn Reba, Clemson University Page 14.781.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Interactive Instruction, Remediation, and Research in Freshman Calculus via Pen-Technology and Web-based SoftwareAbstract Too many students in Freshman Calculus are unprepared for the pace at which new conceptsare introduced, are unable to implement prerequisite Algebra skills, and are unwilling to seekanswers to their questions in front of their classmates. We report on how the Department ofMathematical Sciences at Clemson University, through a
Engineering from the University of Technol- ogy, Jamaica. Her research interests are exploring students’ disciplinary identity through engagement with knowledge, curriculum design, assessment and evaluation and teaching for conceptual understanding.Dr. Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Dr. Sneha Patel Davison, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Sneha is an instructor
educationenvironment.I. IntroductionLab work is a very important component of electrical engineering and electricalengineering technology education. For the student to have a good rewarding educationalexperience in the lab, this experience must not only be properly designed and integrated Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.217.1 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationwith the lecture. A proper assessment must be planned and fairly executed. Part of thefrustration, on the side of the student, with the lab experience is what is usually referredto by
word processors, spreadsheets, equation solvers and drawing packages.2. Scanning the TopicThe incorporation of Internet resources in engineering, math and science education has become apopular item of discussion at recent conferences and in educational journals and transactions.Specific topics of discussion include an introduction to the capabilities of various Internet andWeb delivery mechanisms ([1]---[6]), the application of these technologies to specific courses Page 2.487.1([7]---[13]), and software subsystems created specifically for on-line coursework presentationand student evaluation ([14]---[16]). Innovation in this area is happening
science and engineering technology. Undergraduate students in engineeringtypically receive good training in how to solve well defined problems. However, they usuallyreceive very little training in the creative activity that is involved in the development of newtechnology; often, students read only their textbooks in engineering courses.One way to get students to think creatively about developing new technology is to incorporate arequirement for a research proposal into the course. However, a survey of the literature ineducation has revealed that little has been reported about using research proposals in coursestaken by undergraduates. In fact, only two such instances have been found. In an undergraduatecourse for chemistry majors entitled
Session 3425 Excellence in Product Design Jon C. Dixon Adjunct Faculty Programs in Engineering and Technology Management University of St. Thomas St. Paul, MinnesotaAbstractIndustry strives mightily to provide excellent products. No manufacturer is likely toproduce excellent designs without understanding what is meant in some way by“excellence”. However, it is extremely infrequent to find solid definitions of “designexcellence”.The University of St. Thomas (St. Paul, MN) has established a
ArchitecturalAccreditation Board and the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, the “Designand Development” course influences several of our specific assessment strategies. TheOutcomes Assessment Committee for the school, founded in 1994, listed in its July 2000 report5the following methods to be utilized for assessment: Bi-Annual meetings with the School’s Professional Advisory Committee Survey of professionals who served on Capstone course juries Survey of employers of recent graduates Alumni Surveys Internal program review and self-study Exit Interviews of graduating students Portfolios of cumulative student work Survey of student attitudes and satisfactionInternal formal assessment at the
goals: Goal 1 - Develop students who understand and apply the core scientific, mathematical, and engineering principles that form the basis of chemical engineering. Goal 2 - Develop students who work individually and in diverse teams and effectively utilize advanced technology to solve complex problems. Goal 3 - Develop students who gain a perspective on the role of engineering in a global society including the importance of ethics, professional responsibility, diversity and culture, lifelong learning, safety, sustainability and the environment. Goal 4 - Develop students who communicate their ideas effectively in various formats to both technical and non-technical audiences.Fall 2010
Best Practices of Honor Societies Steve E. Watkins1 and Nancy M. Ostin2 1 Missouri University of Science and Technology Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Rolla, Missouri 65409 USA 2 IEEE-Eta Kappa Nu (IEEE-HKN) 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 USA E-mail: steve.e.watkins@ieee.org and n.ostin@ieee.org Abstract service learning initiatives, and general engagement for Academic honor societies are widely
Building Relationships BetweenAcademics and Industry2019 Engineering Technology Leaders Institute (ETLI)October 2019 © TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reservedAbout TRCGroundbreaker. Game changer. Pioneer. Since the 1960s TRC has set the bar for clients whorequire more than just engineering, combining science with the latest technology to deviseinnovative solutions that stand the test of time.Today we are a global consulting firm for the oil and gas, power, environmental and infrastructuremarkets. TRC’s 5,000 professionals work with a broad range of commercial, industrial andgovernment clients and the communities they serve. We deliver breakthrough solutions thataddress local needs – so our clients can better
Speaker Topic/Title Dr. Carl Haas, Dept. of Civil “Teaching future engineeringSeminar April 12, 1999 Engineering educators.” Dr. Gloria Rogers, Rose- "Outcomes assessment - whatSeminar March 25, 1999 Hulman Institute of is it good for?" Technology Graduate engineering
that reflect university and college missions and skill sets desired byprospective employers. Qualitative and quantitative assessment tools are used to identifyareas of improvement for continuous enhancement of program effectiveness.Introduction Systems engineering approach is used to address the need for highly qualifiedworkforce to address the technological needs of our society. The goals and objectives ofthe department are developed through a top-down approach to reflect the needs of thesociety and are consistent with the mission of the University and the College. The goal ofthe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Tennessee State University isto offer a high quality, broad-based program in electrical engineering
program that lasts for sevenweeks, six days per week. [1]2) Machinist Training Institute (MTI) constitutes the second level of Focus:HOPE’s three-tieredtechnology training program. The MTI, a yearlong, full-time program, teaches precisionmetalworking, machining, and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) throughclassroom instruction and hands-on experience. Candidates learn to set up, operate, and maintainconventional lathers, mills, grinders, and Computer Numerical Control (CNC) equipment.[1]3) The Center for Advanced Technologies (CAT) is a national demonstration of the content,resources, and methodology needed to educate advanced manufacturing engineer-technologist atworld-class levels. The pinnacle of Focus:HOPE’s three-tiered
theseassignments become enjoyable course work and learning projects they are attached to in apersonal way. This project is one of my teaching strategy tools to respect a variety oflearning styles, to connect chemistry into our daily lives, and to engage students learningwith their own talents and insights.Introduction and ObjectivesOne of the seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education by Chickieringand Gamon’s is to respect diverse talents and ways of learning1. I have used theVARK(Visual, Aural, Read/Write, Kinesthetic) learning styles survey by Bonwell andFleming2 to recognize different leaning styles among my students and observedkinesthetic style as predominant learning style among engineering technology students asreported earlier3
Paper ID #19862Matched Assessment Data Set for Experiment-Centric Pedagogy Implemen-tation in 13 HBCU ECE ProgramsProf. Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) where he teaches courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photon- ics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. He learned problem solving from
of glutaraldehyde cross-linked whey protein-basedmicrocapsules containing theophylline”, J. Control Rel. 61, 123-136, 1999.16 Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 19th ed., Mack Publishers, 1995.17 Kompella, U.B. and K. Koushik, “Preparation of drug delivery systems using supercritical fluid technology”,Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems, 18(2), 173-199, 2001.Biographical InformationStephanie Farrell is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. She received her B.S. in1986 from the University of Pennsylvania, her MS in 1992 from Stevens Institute of Technology, and her Ph.D. in1996 from New Jersey Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Rowan in September, 1998, she was a facultymember
Session 12-5 Active Vehicle Water Level Monitoring System Matthew Moreno, Amador Salazar, Rafael Gijon, Sangita Prajapati, Farrokh Attarzadeh, Mayuri Mahajan, Aditya Gupta, Prafulla Kesari Engineering Technology Department University of Houston AbstractThis paper describes the results of a senior project completed in December 2007 andshows details of the subsystems along with future enhancements of the Active VehicleWater Level Monitoring System or “Puddle Jumper.” The project is currently beingreviewed by the office of Intellectual Property
components such as flip-flops, memory and ALU circuitswith ease. But more importantly, since the hardware and software were based on the sametechnology and interfaced together, it enabled the instructor to utilize these new componentswith less effort and time consumption from students compared with teaching a differentsoftware and hardware based on different technologies. Page 10.811.9 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©, American Society for Engineering Education”Bibliography[1] Paton, B., Introduction to NI ELVIS Courseware, National
communities.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Scientists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University Press of America, 2005), Engineering and Sustain- able Community Development (Morgan &Claypool, 2010, and Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities (Springer, 2013).Dr. Marybeth Lima
experienced In the fall of 2016 a study was conducted to evaluate howthrough the study of the humanities, the environment through engineers at various experience levels – first-year, seniors,the study of the natural sciences, and the mechanisms of the and practicing professionals – use this tool to performeconomy through the study of business. Engineering students constraint analysis. [9] For this research, a subset of 15 designrequire a broad-based education, grounded not only in STEM attributes (shown as shaded attributes within Table I) was(science, technology, engineering, and math) related topics, used, so as to not overwhelm the first-year students servingbut also in the liberal arts and in
, Bob "An Integrated Freshman Engineering Curricula", Proceedings, 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe Mission Palms Hotel, Tempe, Arizona, November 4-7, 19983. P. Imbrie, C. Malavé, and K. Watson., "From Pedagogy to Reality: The Experience of Texas A&M University with the Foundation Coalition Curricula," Proceedings of the 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1997.ANN KENIMERAnn Kenimer is an Associate Professor of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at Texas A&M University and amember of the NSF Foundation Coalition project. She teaches courses in engineering problem solving, engineeringdesign, environmental engineering technology, and nonpoint source pollution control
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Ms. Catherine D. McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Courtney June Faber, Clemson University Courtney Faber is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and a National Science
are surveyed at the end of the course to assess how thecourse objectives are met. In addition, specific course outcomes developed using theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Criteria 2000 program outcomes(a through k) were assessed. Based on one year of data, it appears that students would like moreexamples using the discipline specific software (PSpice, ANSYS). However, results indicate thatstudents did not see the need to learn software from disciplines other than their own. Whenintroducing software, we plan to provide more emphasis to how the software would be useful forall engineering disciplines. In addition, the results are mixed for the desire to have assignmentsusing MS Word and Excel. Some students thought more
interested in research around recruiting and retaining underrepresented minorities and women in STEM. Prior to Purdue, she spent time in industry holding technical and operations-based roles and has experience with informal STEM community and outreach projects. She holds a BS degree in Industrial Technology and a MS degree in Engineering Management.Jake Davis, Purdue University Jake Davis is an undergraduate student studying Accounting and Management in the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University. He is also a research assistant in the Social Policy and Higher Education Research in Engineering (SPHERE) laboratory
IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE.Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Dr. Jeffrey E. Froyd is a TEES Research Professor in the Office of Engineering Academic and Student Affairs at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science
makes DSTR highly desirable for applied research, especially in engineering. DSTR has been designed using aeducation and Science, Technology, Engineering and system of systems approach thus making it applicable to aMathematics (STEM) outreach activities. wide range of engineering disciplines including electronics, mechanics, embedded software, control and communications. Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin
profession as a faculty teaching in atechnology program, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)stipulate that one must have some industrial experience, among other expectations. Thevalue of this lies in the fact that it helps in bringing aspects of the real world to theclassroom. This helps the students to appreciate how the theories and principles learnt inthe classroom relate to practices in industry. Page 7.555.1Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education.This project was sponsored by the Minority Office and