what to do about it.” (Stake, 2010, p. 123) 31References• Lee, W. C., & Matusovich, H. M. (2016). A model of co-curricular support for undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 406–430. http://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20123• Lee, W. C., Godwin, A., & Nave, A. L. H. (2018). Development of the engineering student integration instrument: Rethinking measures of integration. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(1). http://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20184• Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91. http
99% of the students find the workshop very or somewhat valuable, with the section on“recruitment and messaging” being the most highly rated. Over 93% of the participants reported beingsomewhat or very motivated to engage in specific bias-reducing activities in their organization. Futureanalyses will include tracking demographic data from student organization membership and leadershiplists, as well as climate survey results. I. IntroductionIt is clear that the field of Engineering not only lacks the diversity of the U.S. workforce, but also is lessdiverse than other fields in STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine)fields [1], [2]. At the undergraduate level