Paper ID #19678Creation of an Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Innovation LabDr. Shiny Abraham, Seattle University Shiny Abraham is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University. She received the B.E. degree in Telecommunication Engineering from Visveswaraiah Technological Uni- versity (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA in 2012. Her research interests span the areas of Wireless Communication, Internet of Things (IoT), Optimization using Game Theory, and Engineering Education Research. She is a member of the IEEE and ASEE, a technical pro- gram
3 years 3 yearsNotes. Unique features of ACEEES at the master level is that students need to undertake a research projectoutside of their major field of research with a different academic advisor.* the number of peer review published papers required to qualify for graduation depends upon the department.When the energy course began in 2016, approximately 50 students were expected to join it but inactually over 100 students applied and were admitted. The program popularity was unexpected.It is expected that the number of students will reach 200 in several years depending upon thenumber of doctoral students and the reception of industry to the master graduates in 2018 anddoctoral students in 2019.Until academic year 2017, both
Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies (April 2006-September 2013). Dr. Karimi is a Fellow of ASEE, a Fellow of ASME, senior member of AIAA, and holds membership in ASHRAE, and Sigma Xi. He has served as the ASEE Campus Representative at UTSA, ASEE-GSW Section Campus Representative, and served as the Chair of ASEE Zone III (2005-07). He chaired the ASEE-GSW section during the 1996-97 academic year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Examination of the Proposed Changes to ABET-EAC-CriteriaAbstractA proposal has been under consideration for several years to make major changes to requirementsof ABET-Engineering Accreditation Commission’s (EAC) Criterion 3-Student Outcomes
potentialcourse restructuring.References[1] KEEN Engineering Unleased, Retrieved from http://engineeringunleashed.com/keen/[2] KEEN Framework, Retrieved from http://engineeringunleashed.com/keen/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/KEEN-Frameworks-2016.pdf[3] K. Thoroughman, A. Hruschka, and P. Widder, “Engineering virtue studio keen modules to fosterentrepreneurial mindset in an integrative first-second year online course”, Proceedings of the 121st ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, June 15-18, 2014, Indianapolis, Indiana.[4] K. Reid, D. M. Ferguson, “Enhancing the entrepreneurial mindset of freshman engineers”, Proceedings of the118th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29, 2011, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.[5] S. Condoor, M. McQuilling
objectives, curricular mapping, and identification of relevant process skills and learningactivities. For goal 2, existing materials are being reviewed and refined, and new materials are indevelopment. For goal 3, POSSE materials have been revised, and POGIL practices have beenincorporated into several POSSE sessions so that instructors experience a POGIL classroomenvironment and better understand the benefits and limitations of POGIL [33].Ongoing EffortThe OpenFE project is currently winding down while the OpenPath project is still ongoing withan expected end date of August 2019. The community of HFOSS educators continues to expand.A longitudinal study of the impact of POSSE is underway with a combination of questionnaireand structured interview
Paper ID #19777Wai-Tat Fu is an associate professor of Computer Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(UIUC). His research focuses on applying theories of cognitive science and human-computer interactiontechniques to education. Wai-Tat Fu is the Associate Editor of the ACM Transactions on Intelligent In-teractive Systems (TiiS) and the Topics in Cognitive Science journal. He is m the program chair of ACMIUI (Intelligent User Interfaces) 2017, and the general chair of ACM IUI 2019. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017A scalable online platform for evaluating and training visuospatial skills of engineering students University of Illinois at Urbana
has been instrumental in informing our curricular design and the founder ofESJP has joined us as a professor of praxis within the new General Engineering department.Program StructureThe General Engineering major was officially added to the the university catalog in Spring 2017.However, as students do not begin taking major-specific courses until after they complete thecommon engineering core, our first course will be offered in Fall 2017. We anticipate that ourprogram will be ABET accredited under the Engineering (general) category after we conferdegrees upon our first graduates in 2019.Our GE curriculum is divided into four components: university liberal arts requirements, anengineering core, GE major courses, and a concentration. This
and Outcomes for Connectivity Series Evaluation Plan Objective Short-Term Intermediate Long-Term Evaluation Outcomes Outcomes Outcomes Data Source (s) / Each AY AY 2017 AY 2019 Cycle Strengthen Continual Assess Inform NSF Connectivity faculty core review of Connectivity ADVANCE Series competenci Series Series impact on national Evaluations es and build satisfaction participating community with (individual faculty
Paper ID #17689Ethics and ArtifactsDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a full professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology, where she has taught for nearly four decades. She has been a member of ASEE for 32 years and is active in the Engineering Ethics Division, as past chair, and the Engineering Technology Division, as communi- cations editor the the Journal of Engineering Technology. She is an ASEE fellow (2008), winner of the James McGraw Award (2010), winner of the Berger Award (2013), and serves as the communications editor of the Journal of
: Mechanical/HVAC, Electrical/Lighting, and Structures, as well as investigate the possibility of future track options. The timeline for the electrical/lighting track option was deferred to 2019. The program should be built around tenured/tenure track faculty, with Professors of Practice used to meet the needs for relevant faculty design experience. The program should begin offering graduate degree(s) within 2-3 years after starting.As a result, the following next steps were approved for the program’s implementation: Create a formal Industry Advisory Panel (IAP) with a sub-group in each of the three track option areas: Mechanical/HVAC, Electrical/Lighting, and Structures. Develop a detailed plan for the
Engineering students.Second, the Penn State College of Engineering strives to meet the national benchmark fordiversity in Engineering set by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) byawarding baccalaureate Engineering degrees to at least 130 African American and Hispanicstudents annually. In 2013, Penn State awarded 74 baccalaureate Engineering degrees to raciallyunderrepresented students. Therefore, our long-term goal is to achieve a net gain of at least 56Engineering degrees to racially underrepresented undergraduates. If we can improve our junior-year retention for University Park racially underrepresented Engineering students from 43% to63% (net gain of 86 students, from Table 1: 429 x .63) and our junior-year retention forAbington