, and the CommonGood. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press, 1998.[8] L.D. Gonzales, “Subverting and Minding Boundaries: The Intellectual Work of Women,”The Journal of Higher Education, pp. 1-25, 2018.[9] M. Horton, The long haul: An autobiography. New York, NY: Doubleday, 1990.[10] B.J. Thayer-Bacon, “An exploration of Myles Horton's democratic praxis: Highlander FolkSchool,” Educational Foundations, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 5-23, 2004.[11] A. Schutz and M. Miller, People power: The community organizing tradition of SaulAlinsky. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2015. [12] B. Robinson and M. G. Hanna,“Lessons for Academics for Grassroots CommunityOrganizing: A Case Study—The Industrial Areas Foundation,” Journal of Community Practice,vol
Paper ID #24975Integrating Inclusive Pedagogy and Experiential Learning to Support Stu-dent Empowerment, Activism, and Institutional Change: A Case Study withTransgender STEM StudentsKristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts. Her training is in nineteenth-century literature, but for the past 8 years she has taught engineering ethics, first-year en- gineering courses, and humanities for engineers. She has also worked with students and
Paper ID #24889Targeted harassment of engineering education researchers: How to connectwith community and support your colleagues under attackDr. Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Alice L. Pawley is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate fac- ulty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and the Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. Prof. Pawley’s goal through her work at Purdue is to help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering
the questions on thereverse side.(10 minutes) Discuss the thoughts you jotted down regarding CRQG in small groups (3-4). We’ll askyou to report back to the larger group in about 10 minutes. Note these questions appear in theHandout. 1) To what extent are you already engaging with these questions in your own research? 2) Which questions do you find most challenging to address adequately? a. Where will you seek help if you need it (to address those challenging questions)? b. What areas are less familiar/less part of your research practices/hygiene? 3) Which areas would you like to focus on refining/improving upon moving forward? a. What steps will you take to do this? 4) What
Inclusivity and Collaboration,” Proceedings of the Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference, 2018.[2] D. Matsumoto and H. C. Hwang, “Assessing cross-cultural competence: A review of available tests,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 849-873, 2013.[3] I. Halloun and D. Hestenes, “Common sense concepts about motion,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1056–1065, 1985.[4] R. Streveler, S. Brown, G. L. Herman, and D. Montfort, “Conceptual change and misconceptions in engineering education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 83-102
Paper ID #24893Design and Implementation of an Engineering for Social Justice CurriculumDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities and also leads outreach