quality learning outcomes [5], so it would beand instruments for program evaluation, as well as beneficial to students for tutoring to involve and encouragecritical thoughts on peer tutoring assessment. deep learning strategies. To measure deep versus surface learning approaches, we used a modified “Revised Two-Index Terms – Assessment, best practices, survey, tutoring. Factor Study Process Questionnaire” adapted from Biggs, Kember, and Leung [6], which we have shortened and BACKGROUND supplemented with questions
be quantified. Surveys to be Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 36(5): p. 413-423. 6. Caldwell, J.E., Clickers in the large classroom: Current research andgiven to all students at the beginning (pre) and end (post) of best-practice tips. CBE-Life sciences education, 2007. 6(1): p. 9-20.the course are under IRB review for implementation in F17. 7. Klingbeil, N.W. and A. Bourne. A national model for engineeringThe pre-survey includes questions from Intrinsic Motivation mathematics education: Longitudinal impact at Wright StateInventory [11] and GRIT-S [12] questionnaires that have University. in
., “Early predictors of career development: A 10-year follow-up study”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 1, 2007, 61-77.[7] Budny, D., Paul, C. A., & Newborg, B. B., “Impact of peer mentoring on freshmen engineering students”, Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11, 5/6, 2010, 9. AUTHOR INFORMATIONBilly Baker Community Director, Elon University,Bbaker20@elon.eduDeanna Calder Graduate Apprentice, Baylor University,Deanna_Calder@baylor.eduMegan Harper Graduate Apprentice, Baylor University,Megan_Harper@baylor.eduZack Jackson Graduate Apprentice, Baylor University,Zack_Jackson@baylor.eduEmily Sandvall Associate Director for UndergraduatePrograms – Engineering and Computer Science