, assignment, or examquestion that applies the course knowledge in a nontraditional way that is relevant to students'interests. For example, the students may be asked to provide an example of where they haveneeded to summarize information for decision making. Later, their answers to the summarizationquestion are used to investigate mathematical means of compression often applied to sound,video, or general file systems.Notable difficulties in personalizing course content then include how to extract relevant andinteresting applications from 30 to 60 students, and how to manage the time required to mapthese applications into the course. We will address time management first, under the section“Course Structure”, the method of seeking applications second
Future STEM Leaders: An Innovative Career Readiness Program for STEM Graduate StudentsAbstractFuture STEM Leaders: An Innovative Career Readiness Program for STEM Graduate Studentsprepares future leaders of the STEM workforce through a cross-departmental initiative todevelop student transferable skills, activate mentor networks, and instill confidence in theirability to attain their career goals. The program encourages traditionally underrepresentedstudents in STEM (including but not limited to women, minorities, and persons with disabilities)to participate and draws from a unique and broad set of partners at the university, includingfaculty in the College of Engineering & Applied Sciences, the central Career Center’s careerdevelopment and
potentialsolutions to these barriers, and to receive and review the evaluator’s formative and summativeassessment of the education plan and deliverables. In April 2023, the external evaluator willtravel to USU to meet in person with the project team (PI and graduate student). During this visitto USU, the project evaluator will also present an invited talk on project outcome evaluation tothe USU engineering education department faculty and students, as well as other interestedfaculty and graduate students in the college of engineering. In addition, the project team (PI andgraduate student) and the project evaluator will meet with the USU Veterans Resource OfficeDirector, another key collaborator in education plan work, to discuss feedback on the progressof
, constructing one’s sense of self throughconstant development and self-reflection [5]. It includes the traits and characteristics, socialrelations, roles, and social group memberships that define who a person is within a particularsetting. Engineering identity, especially for students, reflects their acceptance of and recognitionas part of the engineering field, influencing their decision to enter and persist in the field [6].When students possess a strong engineering identity, they tend to perceive themselves as futureengineers, fostering their commitment to their pursuit of an engineering career [7]. This identitycontinues to impact their learning, serving as a guiding force throughout their studies [8]. Morelock synthesized the disperse
opportunities that are created independent of facultyactivities (e.g., courses for GTAs). This case of an integrated teaching development experiencebrings teaching development for graduate students into the same kinds of department-basedmentoring experiences that are used for their research. In this case, GTAs worked closely with afaculty member on a discipline-based education research project. We recognize that GTAs atsome institutions may be benefitting from mentoring from faculty about their teaching. In thiscase, however, we explored a formal structure in which both GTAs and faculty were learningabout teaching and about discipline-based education research. Exploring how the graduatestudents pushed the faculty to learn more is an area for future
theirschool, including AP courses, dual enrollment, and well-informed teachers and counselors. Thisdifference will be explored further in future work, as well as the experiences of students whotransferred to Virginia Tech from community colleges.Next StepsBased on the findings from Phase 1, we used snowball sampling to identify participants forPhase 2. We are currently conducting interviews with individuals that students identified asinfluential in their choice of major. In addition, in each community the high school principal,guidance counselors, teachers, personnel from other local education institutions (e.g., Governor’sschools, career and technical schools, community colleges), the director of education, andrelevant members of town government
Paper ID #32502Assessing Emphasized Engineering Practices and Their Alignment withEngineers’ Personal ValuesDr. Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a research fellow and lecturer focusing on engineering education at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.A. in sociology and psychology from Case Western Reserve University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Higher Education from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include cultural beliefs about what engineers do and who they are, students’ career thinking and trajectories, and ways to effectively facilitate more diverse, inclusive, and
Session at the ASEE 2014 Annual Conference, anddescribes a recently funded project (October 2013) under the Research Initiation Grant inEngineering Education (RIGEE) program. It is hypothesized that there is disconnect betweenthe principles outlined in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the actual classroomenvironment, thus creating a barrier to intrinsic motivation needed for student learning. Theproposed work is an empirical investigation to explore this disconnect in the context ofundergraduate engineering education. The primary tasks will be to (i) assess the Facultyknowledge of SDT; (ii) develop a measurement framework to assess the classroom environmentas it relates to SDT; and (iii) determine the association among Faculty knowledge of SDT
Society of Engineering Educa- tion with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning. She was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland).Dr. Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education Rocio Chavela is Director of Education and Career Development at the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, a B.S. and a M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Universidad de las Americas, Puebla in Mexico. Rocio’s current efforts focus on engineering faculty and graduate student development, with particular
Paper ID #33847CAREER: Learning from Students’ Identity Trajectories to ActualizeLatent DiversityDr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clem- son University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and
Experience program and an annual Research & Development Showcase featuring astudent research poster competition. The Nanotechnology Fellows Program targets freshmen and sophomores to influencestudents early in their academic careers, establish program longevity, and enable scaffolded andmodule-based learning. Program recruitment starts about one year in advance of the summerprogram. The program instructors give talks to incoming students and their parents describingthe program’s features and benefits. The talks take place during the university orientation weekand are repeated at the beginning of the academic year in the SEAS “Meet the Faculty” seminarsattended by all SEAS freshmen. The program leaders also hold informational office hours
school, lack of encouragement andreticence about asking faculty for letters of reference or research opportunities. Women studentswho applied to graduate school were more likely to be motivated by intrinsic factors (e.g., loveof learning, interest in their field) than male students, who were more motivated by furtheringtheir careers. The authors noted that personal outreach and encouragement to apply to graduateschool were more important influences on women’s decision making than men.Once they transition into graduate education, women contend with experiences of sexism, genderstereotyping, delegitimization, and isolation [9]. To mitigate these challenges, women often haveto depend on their own resilience and capacity to cope with these
Engineering at NC A&T State University. As a faculty member, he played a significant role in the implementation of a PhD in Industrial & Systems Engineering. Dr. Ram served as the PI for a cross-disciplinary Research Experience for Undergraduates site sponsored by NSF. He is currently the PI for an NSF project on Innovation in Graduate Education. Dr. Ram is an evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021AbstractThe Graduate Research Identity Development program (GRID) is an initiative in the College ofEngineering at North Carolina A&T State University, sponsored by the National Science
were marked by a blend of learning,collaboration, and growth. Our experiences offer an illustration of this dynamic interplaybetween individual skill development and collaborative research endeavors. We relay insight intothe interconnectedness of personal growth and collaborative research endeavors, highlighting thetransformative potential inherent in graduate student involvement within research teams,depicted below:Deana"I first joined the research team during my first semester of graduate school, where I wouldpartake in meetings with Rebecca and a faculty member from the anthropology department, aswell as my mentor from engineering/technology. Rebecca and I started having our own meetingswhere she would teach me how to use different
Page 25.681.16lecture materials that can be used to further enhance student experience. The students ultimatelyprepare and present a business plan for judging using Power Point.Expected Outcomes: The goal of this elective unit is to have students integrate solving technicalproblems within the confines of the business world, by having students explore means formaking solar energy an economic renewable. Engineering students undergo a major designexperience in their last few months before graduation. At that point in their academic career it istoo late to pursue course work that will prepare them for competing in the entrepreneurial arena.This elective unit is intended to expose students, early in their academic careers, to theexcitement of
- Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and facultyDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Stressors for Doctoral Students Questionnaire in Engineering: Year 2 of an RFE project on understanding graduate engineering
opportunities for graduate school. As a result of these findings,we increased our outreach opportunities to allow students to discuss and explore the benefitsof graduate school to build the interest and self-efficacy of our target population. Further, weasked faculty members that work with the students to reach out to students individually andencourage them to apply. Using this approach, after identifying 79 eligible students, 38applications were received, 84% from our list of eligible students, and 63% from populationsunderrepresented in engineering.Problem One of NSF’s strategic objectives is fostering the growth of a more capable and diverseresearch workforce [1]. According to the recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering,and Medicine
Paper ID #12518Supporting Students’ Plans for STEM Careers: How Prepared are HighSchool Educators in Appalachia to Help?Dr. Cheryl Carrico, Virginia Tech Cheryl Carrico is a Postdoctoral Research faculty member for Virginia Tech. Her current research fo- cus relates to STEM career pathways (K-12 through early career) and conceptual understanding of core engineering principles. Prior to her current role, Dr. Carrico spent over 25 years in the aerospace in- dustry conducting and leading R&D, design engineering, and project management for composite aircraft components. Dr. Carrico received her B.S. in chemical engineering
over graduate school. Thepaper provides an in-depth discussion on the findings of the REU program evaluation and itsimpact on undergraduate students with respect to their future plans and career choice. The analysisis also done by gender, ethnicity, academic level (sophomore, junior, senior), and type of homeinstitution (e.g., large research universities, rural and small schools) to explore if there was anysignificant difference in mean research competency scores based on these attributes. 1. IntroductionToday’s manufacturing operations are more complex and globally scalable compared to those inthe last century (Lee et al., 2016). This complexity in manufacturing operations is due to a shift inmanufacturing from craftsmanship model in the
experiences and lessons learned in the design and development of aprofessional development course designed for first year graduate students in an interdisciplinarycomputational science program, under an NSF S-STEM grant funded project titled "AcademicSupport, Career Training, and Professional Development to Improve Interdisciplinary GraduateEducation for the Next Generation of Computational Scientists and Engineers". Herein wediscuss the development and implementation of this two-semester course sequence (1 credit eachsemester). The course modules included (a) Understanding the academic challenges, goals andtimelines in the interdisciplinary computational science program, (b) Individual DevelopmentPlanning, (c) Career Exploration, (d) Communication
. Simmons’ research is supported by awards from NSF, including a CAREER award. She oversees the Simmons Research Lab (www.denisersimmons.com), which is home to a dynamic, interdisciplinary mix of undergraduate and graduate students and a post-doctoral researcher from various colleges and de- partments at Virginia Tech who work together to explore engineering and construction human centered issues with an emphasis on understanding difference and disparity.Dr. Ashley Shew, Virginia Tech c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Exploring Professional Identity Development in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students Who Experience DisabilitiesAbstractRecent calls throughout the
Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Applying Research on Reducing Student Resistance to Active Learning Through Faculty Development: Project UpdateAbstract This paper provides an update on our research study about active learning in highereducation science, technology, engineering
faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a Na- tional Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and
Paper ID #43367Board 423: What Drives You? Exploring the Motivations and Goals of Low-IncomeEngineering Transfer Students for Pursuing EngineeringAnna-Lena Dicke, University of California, Irvine Dr. Dicke is an Associate Project Scientist within the School of Education at the University of California, Irvine. In her research, she aims to understand how students’ motivation and interest in the STEM fields can be fostered to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the
didactic training and real world applications, and exposedthem to people working in a STEM field. Over a period of four years, STEP participants had theopportunity to tour several STEM industries in the metropolitan area.The 3+8 undergraduate research component of STEP provided participants with an 11-weekresearch experience. The 3-week session introduced students to research through partnering witha faculty member at the 2-year institution; this was followed by an 8-week research experienceguided by research faculty members at 4-year institutions. In both components, students worked20-25 hours per week. Students participating in the 3+8 program gained experience in collectingdata, monitoring their progress, solving problems and troubleshooting
faculty mentoring, as both can work togetherto provide a more complete mentoring experience. For example, students who may not want todiscuss certain personal issues with a faculty member may be more open with their peer mentor.Finally, research mentoring is provided though a three-hour workshop certifying the students as“Ready For Research,” and requiring the students to volunteer for and present a poster at theUniversity of Cincinnati’s Undergraduate Research Conference held each year in April. FSSPScholars who participate in a faculty-led research project are encouraged to present their work atthe conference, and others are guided to present a poster reflecting their freshman-year FSSPexperience at the conference.Pathway to Graduate School
Paper ID #42641Board 230: Contextualized Scaffolding for Engineering Faculty to Facilitatethe Adoption of EBIPsDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is aprofessor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER that initiated his work studying engineering student and practitioners understanding and use of engineering concepts.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor – Engineering Education
to their track, including asubstantial required final project. In the evening, students complete homework, attend tutoringsessions, and participate in activities designed to ease their transition to college, all facilitated bythe same upperclassmen tutors. During the weekends, students enjoy free time, complete theirhomework, prepare for exams, and attend field trips designed to increase their familiarity withHouston.Post-Summer Student SupportStarting in the summer and continuing through freshman year (and until graduation, if thestudent desires), RESP students meet individually with one of two program staff members, whoprovide an “intrusive” or “proactive” model of advising. Participants choose one staff member astheir primary advisor and
aculture focused on wellness should encourage this kind of learning rather than shame it.Diminishing the power of shame could contribute to an environment that participants commonlydescribed as cultivating wellness, like Jane outlined, “something where students feel as if theycan be vulnerable with everyone.” Vulnerability and Communication between members of thecommunity is characterized by open dialogue without judgement or fear of retribution. One wayto have these productive and positive interactions is by actively being vulnerable with everyone,even (or especially) when one person holds more power than the other, such as faculty and staffdo with students. For example, Jason imagined a situation where their students are comfortablewith
in college based on their perceptionsof payoff (e.g., salary, preferred location). There is robust evidence that Associate’s degrees andvocational certificates yield extra earnings compared with high school graduation [24]. Still,there is need to study how students form perceptions of the less tangible benefits and costs ofhigher education, like ability to become an active member of the community, or establish alifelong career pathway. Though Human capital theory is this study’s core theory of action, theresearchers recognize that students’ interest in entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship in theirrural communities leads us to consider the intertwining of human and social capital, as inBourdieu’s concept of habitus. According to Bourdieu