Paper ID #28257Understanding the ’us all’ in Engineering 4 Us All through theExperiences of High School TeachersDr. Bruk T Berhane, University of Maryland College Park Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Mary- land in 2003. He then completed a master’s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a Ph.D. in the Minority and Urban Education Unit of the Col- lege of Education at the University of Maryland. Bruk worked at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, where he focused on nanotechnology
as a Teaching Professor in BME and the Director of the Office of Multicultural Affairs at WPI. Dr. Butler fosters a student community at WPI that respects and celebrates diversity in all its dimensions, including but not limited the many intersectional identities of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, and physical ability.Mrs. Ryan Meadows, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Ryan Meadows holds a B.S. in Mathematics and Business from Fitchburg State University and an M.A. in Teaching from Sacred Heart University. She is currently the Associate Director of Pre-collegiate Outreach Programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Meadows works with K-12 S STEM outreach programs
., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education 94(1): 121–130. 5. National Research Council, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, “Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning”, http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9596&page=R1. 6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2002). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Com- mission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National Research Council. Washington: National Academy Press. 7. Lyon, G. H., Jafri, J., & St. Louis, K. (2012). Beyond the pipeline: STEM pathways for
institutions ofhigher education throughout the U.S. have experienced additional demands necessitated by themove to online platforms for all teaching and administrative work, as well as strains placed onresearch agendas as laboratories have been closed, fieldwork has been limited, and in-personcontact has been curtailed. At the time of this writing, many universities have remainedshuttered, relying on remote instruction and administration; others have adopted hybrid models.Of those that attempted to fully open for in-person instruction in fall of 2020, many had to asquickly shut down again and send students home, as outbreaks have followed openings [41, 42,43, 44].The economic impacts of the pandemic on the U.S. are many and range in severity. The fall
Participation (IBP), the S-STEM Interdisciplinary Biochemistry Master Program (NC State University), and the HBCU-UP Im- plementation Project (Fayetteville State University). She is an active member of ASEE.Dr. Tonya Lynette Smith-Jackson, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Tonya Smith-Jackson, PhD, CPE: Tonya Smith-Jackson is Senior Vice Provost for Academic Affairs at N.C. A&T State University. Her teaching-learning research focuses on inclusive pedagogies and methods to measure inclusion to support academic success. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Introducing Diverse Undergraduates to Computational ResearchThis paper
from http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/drupal/system/files/FF_Women_STEM.pdfDeCastro-Ambrosetti, D., & Cho, G. (2002). Technology— panacea or obstacle in the education of diverse student populations. Multicultural Education 10: 25–30.Finkel, L. (2017). Walking the path together from high school to STEM majors and careers: Utilizing community engagement and a focus on teaching to increase opportunities for URM students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9656-yFraleigh-Lohrfink, K. J., Whittington, D., & Feinberg, A. P. (2013). Increase in science research commitment in a didactic and laboratory-based program targeted to gifted minority high-school
. 6I. In the first‐year introductory course, Introduction to Chemical and Biological Engineering, the students perform multiple assignments: ‐ An implicit bias activity in the laboratory sections ‐ An interactive theatre sketch of a dysfunctional team interaction is performed, with trained facilitators guiding the activity [7] ‐ Regular surveys to assess these various activities ‐ Teamwork with intentional coverage by instructors and professors on things like team norms or dealing with conflict.II. In the first‐year computing course, Introduction to MATLAB for Chemical and Biological Engineers, the students perform multiple
Nariman Farvardin Professor of Engineering at the Clark School on Jan- uary 5, 2009, having come to the school in 1995 as an assistant professor and served as chair of the school’s Department of Aerospace Engineering from 2006 to 2009. As dean, Pines has led the devel- opment of the Clark School’s current strategic plan and achieved notable successes in key areas such as improving teaching in fundamental undergraduate courses and raising student retention; achieving suc- cess in national and international student competitions; giving new emphasis to sustainability engineering and service learning; promoting STEM education among high school students; increasing the impact of research programs; and expanding
an “authentic immersion” into engineering where they would be using realengineering tools in real engineering contexts to solve real engineering problems. It also helpedto sell the class as a unicorn – there are no other courses like it in the entire college that combinemathematics with engineering problem-solving in a hands-on lab based format where studentsalso learn programming/MATLAB. This messaging intends to convince students that it is not aremedial class, rather a challenging class that illustrates why math is needed in engineering andwill help give them an advantage in future courses. As the instructors were teaching the coursethey never referred to it as a remedial course, or that the students were “behind” in any way onthe math
engineering programs create with the community.Dr. Amalia Kokkinaki, University of San Francisco Dr. Kokkinaki is an Assistant Professor at the University of San Francisco, teaching in the Departments of Environmental Science and Engineering. Her research focuses in the areas of groundwater transport and remediation, environmental modeling and statistical methods for environmental monitoring and char- acterization. She teaches Environmental Chemistry, Environmental Data Analysis and environmental engineering courses.Jes Parker, University of California, BerkeleyHana M B¨ottger, University of San Francisco Hana B¨ottger’s interests lie at the intersection of structural materials engineering and architecture, and she created
aerodynamics, structures, propulsion, flightmechanics and controls, astronautics, and systems engineering. The department hasnine laboratories, including a Subsonic Wind Tunnel, a Supersonic Wind Tunnel andan Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Laboratory.Chemical and Materials EngineeringThis program offers a degree in chemical engineering, which includes work related tothe design, construction and operation of plants for fuels, plastics, fibers, foods andpharmaceuticals. Because of their strong background in chemistry and materialsprocessing, many chemical engineers also work for industry as environmentalengineers.Civil Engineering(Available Program Options: General, Environmental, or Geospatial)This program teaches students how to design, build
Paper ID #28478A New Change Model for Recruitment and Retention of UnderrepresentedGroups in STEMDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Elementary Education, is also the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place at NC State University. She has been working in the field of engineering education for over 20 years. She is dedicated to conveying the joint messages that engineering is a set of fields that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE
perceived values. There were four salient categories of counterspaces each fostering avariety of values for these students. The findings of this study contribute to the current researcharound counterspaces applying an added context to Black engineering students. Counterspacesare a necessary entity to for Black engineering students to feel supported and connected to theirinstitutions. Ong suggests counterspaces can be physical, conceptual or ideological settings andthat by having counterspaces in close proximity to the power structures of STEM, engineeringprograms can “set the tone for what kinds of social behaviors are encouraged and tolerated inclassrooms, laboratories and other social space” [9]. This work sheds light upon thinking aboutthe
whether the child indicated the engineer was themselves. Two of thesecodes (i.e., gender unclear and whether the child indicated the engineer was themselves) werenew for this study. Next, we looked at the profession of the engineer doing work. This constructincluded codes of a designer, technician, tradesman, mechanic, builder, driver, craftsman, factoryworker, or an object/engine (if the child drew an object rather than a person). Lastly, weexamined the activities that the engineer was involved in, which includes images ofbuilding/fixing, designing, drawings/blueprints, products of mechanical engineering, products ofcivil engineering, trains, laboratory work, engineering design process, SEEK class activities andusing tools.In addition to these
education research and to gain the understandingthat voices of marginalised and minority groups such as women, LGTBIQ and indigenous people are essential tothe development of the modern economy. The research method used in the narrative analysis in this paper ispeer-reviewed in [3] and [4] research.Results and DiscussionThe finding of this study shows a necessary implication that is sometimes overlooked regarding pedagogiesdifferences in academic transition. What is the dynamic relationship between educators and learners in highereducation settings? If we accept that the classroom, lecture theatre and the laboratory are workplaces for thecommunity of practice for a lifelong learning irrespective of the engineering disciplines in practice. This