Conference Session

Research in Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Kerice Doten-Snitker, University of Washington; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities and Pro- fessor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical commu- nication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among others.Dr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the Director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM

Conference Session

Revealing the Invisible: Engineering Course Activities that Address Privilege, -Isms, and Power Relations (Interactive Session)

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education, International, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Minorities in Engineering

prison: Vintage, 2012.[25] P. C. Gorski. (n.d., February 04). Circles of my multicultural self. Available: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/activities/circlesofself.html[26] J.A. Mejia, I. Villanueva, and R. A. Revelo, Using literacy to identify hidden factors that compromise equitable and effective engineering education, In Proceedings of the 2018 American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New York, 2018.[27] K. Boykin. (2007, September 05). Have the folks at intel lost their minds? Available: http://thenewblackmagazine.com/view.aspx?index=939[28] G. Ladson-Billings and W. F. Tate, "Toward a critical race theory of education," Teachers College Record, vol. 97, pp. 47-68, 1995.[29] E

Conference Session

Evidence-based Practices in Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Megan Huffstickler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joseph C. Tise, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sven G. Bilén, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

innovations within newteaching materials and the support provided by the Leonhard Center helped to facilitate andcatalyze the faculty. Led by the course chair and director of the design program, a proposal wassubmitted to develop a series of modules with the following goals in mind: • Strengthen relationship between the experience of a first-year engineering student and the vision of the college of engineering for graduating students • To provide a framework for students for the world-class engineer early in their education • Provide experience and vocabulary needed to make the World-Class Engineer an important part of engineering students’ identity • World-class Engineer attributes will be reinforced through

Conference Session

Faculty Development Work-in-Progress Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Kamal Abdulla Ahmed, University of Washington; David Schipf, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Paper ID #21812Work in Progress: Promoting Group Work for Learning: Student Charac-terizations of Exemplary Project Group MembersDr. Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington Dr. Jim Borgford-Parnell is Director and Instructional Consultant of the Office for the Advancement of Engineering Teaching & Learning at the University of Washington. He taught design, education-research methods, and adult and higher education theory and pedagogy courses for over 35 years. He has been involved in instructional development for 20 years, and currently does both research and instructional development in engineering education

Conference Session

Faculty Development Medley

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Om Prakash Jain, Independent Consultant

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

and will have to beextended for that. Despite these limitations, we believe that the model can help other facultyeducators in their efforts to develop symbiotic relationship between development of facultymembers and building of institutions.Acknowledgements We thank all the college authorities for allowing us to conduct the programs at theircolleges and all the participants for their whole-hearted support for the programs.References1. Minter, R.L., The Paradox of Faculty Development. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 2009. 2(4): p. 65-70.2. Aspiring_Minds, National employability report of engineers 2016, Aspiring Minds.3. Chakrabarty, R. Only 7 per cent engineering graduates employable: What's wrong with

Conference Session

Faculty Development Work-in-Progress Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M. Sherick, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

Paper ID #23704Work in Progress: Coaching as a Midcareer Faculty Development ApproachDr. Heidi M. Sherick, University of Michigan Dr. Heidi Sherick has worked in higher education for over 25 years. Currently, Heidi is the Faculty Devel- opment and Leadership Specialist in the College of Engineering and the Medical School at the University of Michigan. Her primary role is to design and initiate a suite of professional leadership development ac- tivities and coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring strategies for faculty. She provides one-on-one coaching for faculty in new executive leadership roles and for Associate level

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lessons Learned Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington; Jim L. Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Faculty Development Constituency Committee

generalhuman subjects concerns, of course.ConclusionWe believe the success of our SGID method can be attributed to its alignment with our context.In our experience, engineering faculty like interpreting data for themselves but are very busywith substantial research obligations, so they appreciate that our reports both offer acomprehensive transcription of student feedback but with grouping and ordering to facilitateskimming and prioritization of concerns. They also tend to be quantitatively minded, so theyappreciate the inclusion of summary statistics with visual representations. With only about tenweeks in a quarter, our analyzing feedback in less than a business day enables clients to close theloop promptly and maximize the impact of course