Paper ID #24893Design and Implementation of an Engineering for Social Justice CurriculumDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design and Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities and also leads outreach
Paper ID #24975Integrating Inclusive Pedagogy and Experiential Learning to Support Stu-dent Empowerment, Activism, and Institutional Change: A Case Study withTransgender STEM StudentsKristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts. Her training is in nineteenth-century literature, but for the past 8 years she has taught engineering ethics, first-year en- gineering courses, and humanities for engineers. She has also worked with students and
Paper ID #24809Measuring the Conceptualization of Oppression and PrivilegeRachel M Johnson, University of Minnesota Rachel Johnson is a PhD student in Biomedical Engineering at University of Minnesota. Her research interests are cardiac tissue engineering and biopreservation. She earned her BS at Oregon State University in Bzioengineering.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering
) Introduction to the Guide with Scenarios that Illustrate Successes or ChallengesParticipants will be prompted to open their Critical Research Questioning Guides.A note on the guide: we at CERSE created this list of questions, that is meant to hold usaccountable to research with integrity. An Institutional Review Board serves the purpose ofprotecting research participants and centering research ethics. Our aim is to go a step further, andexamine how our research is achieving social justice aims (or not). Often we will ask ourselves these 3sorts of questions informally, but in this workshop, we are inviting you to help flesh out a guide formaking
, Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an OccupationalColor Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.[4] E. J. Woodhouse, “Curbing overconsumption: Challenge for ethically responsible engineering,”IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, v ol. 20, no. 3, pp. 23-30, 2001.[5] M. Chua, “Unstable equilibrium: The privilege of being oblivious,” ASEE Prism, S eptember2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee-prism.org/unstable-equilibrium-sep/http://www.asee-prism.org/unstable-equilibrium-sep/. [Accessed December 3 2018].[6] joint submission at ASEE conference, omitted for blind review since these professionalcommunities overlap.[7] J. B. Bennett, Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism