Asee peer logo

Advice For New Engineering Faculty: Insights Gained From Faculty Development Programs

Download Paper |


2007 Annual Conference & Exposition


Honolulu, Hawaii

Publication Date

June 24, 2007

Start Date

June 24, 2007

End Date

June 27, 2007



Conference Session

Faculty Development: Creating successful NEEs

Tagged Division

New Engineering Educators

Page Count


Page Numbers

12.188.1 - 12.188.11



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Kam Jugdev Athabasca University

visit author page

Dr. Kam Jugdev is an Associate Professor of Project Management and Strategy in the MBA program at Athabasca University in Alberta and an Adjunct Professor at the Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Alberta. Her specific areas of interest and research include project management as a source of competitive advantage, project lessons learned, project management maturity models, project success/failure, project management education, and distance education. Dr. Jugdev actively contributes to the advancement of academic and professional communities of management practice.

visit author page

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Advice for New Engineering Faculty: Insights Gained from Faculty Development Programs


It is not easy being a new engineering faculty member (either as a newly minted PhD or as a new faculty member to the university) and harder still to find one’s bearings when faced with a demanding course load, the stress of demonstrating solid output from a new research agenda, and multiple service commitments. It is even more challenging to get established when the department (or university) lacks a formal faculty development program for newcomers, yet new faculty are expected to “hit the ground running.” As daunting as this may feel, and much as new faculty want to “hit the ground running and just run away,” there are some tricks of the trade that I culled from the literature and my own experiences that I share in this paper. These guidelines may help new engineering faculty in terms of job satisfaction and in addressing key sources of stress.

In this paper, I draw from the higher education faculty development literature and outline the merits of a faculty development program and how crucial these topics are for new engineering faculty members. I examine faculty development topics in the broader context of teaching, research, service, and personal growth and development. Key sources of stress for new faculty members relate to finding time for research, effective teaching practices, the lack of collegial relationships, inadequate feedback/recognition, unrealistic expectations, insufficient resources, the lack of mentors, and little work-life balance. In the paper, I address the following topics:

a) An orientation helps new engineering faculty become familiar with policies, support services, regulations, colleagues in the department, and faculty development resources (e.g., teaching models, resources, and workshops). b) New faculty requires different mentors for different needs such as teaching practices and possibly a senior research mentor. c) An academic dossier encompassing a teaching, research, and service is very important for tenure and promotion purposes. d) The dean has an essential role in ensuring that new faculty members are socialized into the department and have a reduced teaching and service load (at first) so that they can develop solid and successful research agendas. The dean also assists new faculty members develop reasonable annual work plans.

In the efforts to gain their bearings in new positions, new engineering faculty members feel daunted in achieving a work-life balance and inevitably, the scale tips in favor of work.

As I address each topic, I examine the importance of the topic and suggest some guidelines for consideration. I also recommend some useful academic resources for new faculty. In sharing some of my tricks of the trade, I hope that new faculty will not have to personally learn all their lessons the hard way, because at times, it is easier and less painful to learn from the experiences of others.


Jugdev, K. (2007, June), Advice For New Engineering Faculty: Insights Gained From Faculty Development Programs Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--1536

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015