June 22, 2008
June 22, 2008
June 25, 2008
New Engineering Educators
13.163.1 - 13.163.5
Advising Student Organizations: The Challenges (and rewards?) for New Engineering Faculty
Introduction It is not uncommon that a new engineering faculty member, amid a myriad of rationalizations, is often assigned the advising role for a student organization. This was true for both of the authors, as we were assigned this role even before all the boxes were unpacked. Some of these rationalizations include: you’re close to the students’ age, it will be good for your service profile, we need to relieve senior professor so-and-so of this duty, or you have so much in common with the organization. Unfortunately, most of the time the simple truth is that no one else on the faculty wants to do it and you are at the bottom of the food chain. In this paper some of the challenges associated with advising student organizations are examined and, based on 30+ years of student group advising, approaches to address these challenges are discussed. Some of these challenges include establishing a strong officer group, soliciting resources, and interacting with alumni. The rewards associated with this activity are also reviewed, including better student relations and research program student recruitment. We believe that student organizations provide students with extraordinary learning experiences associated with teaming, communication, networking, and leadership. Good, strong conscientious advising of these groups can make a significant contribution to the well being of an academic department and its educational mission.
This paper continues with a brief background on the nature of engineering student organizations and the stated roles of the faculty advisor. Previous literature on advising student organizations is reviewed. The nuts and bolts of good advising are then provided. This is followed by presenting a number of the challenges faced in advising student organizations and approaches to these challenges are suggested. The paper concludes by assessing the value of student organizations to the students, advisors, and program.
Background Engineering student organizations fall into one of four categories. First, there are the student sections of professional organizations, such as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE), American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICHE), and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The purpose of these students sections are to introduce engineering students to a discipline specific engineering profession. This includes professional practice, ethics, and general information about the discipline. Second, are the honor societies, examples which include Tau Beta Pi (overall engineering), Pi Tau Sigma (mechanical engineering), Chi Epsilon (civil engineering) and Eta Kappa Nu (electrical engineering). Third, there are the diversity organizations such as the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and American Indian Science & Engineering Society (AISES). Finally there are the organizations that focus on build projects that include concrete canoe, steel bridge, formula SAE, SAE Baja and challenge X competition teams. Many of the aforementioned organizations can fall into this final category, making advising two-fold: focusing on the tenets of the organization as well as an involved design and build. All of
Somerton, C., & Genik, L. (2008, June), Advising Student Organizations: The Challenges (And Rewards?) For New Engineering Faculty Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3235
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015