Asee peer logo

An Analysis Of Successful Minority Students Enrolled In Technology Degree Programs

Download Paper |

Conference

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Factors Affecting Minority Engineering Students

Tagged Division

Minorities in Engineering

Page Count

4

Page Numbers

13.171.1 - 13.171.4

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/4252

Download Count

16

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Pedro Leite Kansas State University-Salina

visit author page

Pedro Leite is an Associate Professor of Computer Systems Technology at Kansas State University at Salina. His research interests include the scholarship of teaching and learning, cross-curricular collaboration, and diversity and multicultural issues in teaching and learning.

visit author page

biography

Jung Oh Kansas State University-Salina

visit author page

Jung Oh is an Associate Professor of Chemistry at Kansas State University at Salina. She earned her Ph.D. from UCLA and was an ASEE postdoctoral fellow at Naval Air Warfare Center. She was 2004 Wakonse Teaching fellow and 2006 Peer Review of Teaching fellow at K-State. Her interests in scholarship of teaching include cross-curricular innovation.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

An Analysis of Successful Minority Students Enrolled in Technology Degree Programs

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of successful minority students enrolled in engineering technology and technology management programs at a large regional university. The study employs qualitative and quantitative design approaches with the intention of describing behavior patterns and experiences of these successful students.

Introduction

The explosion of information technology has brought the concern of workforce preparation and skills shortage in the United States. Most notably is the shortage of females in fields such as engineering, engineering technology, and computer science. Some believe that this gender gap is so serious “that the United States risks losing its economic and intellectual preeminence” (1).

During the past decade, investigators have advanced various accounts for the critical decline in females’ interest in engineering and computer science fields. These studies reported on attitudes toward computers and technology (2,3,4), differences in learning styles (5), perceptions of technology (6), and recruitment and retention (7).

Nevertheless, the number of female enrolled in Physical Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Math (PSTEM) is not encouraging. In 1999-2000, for example, women accounted for 0.9% (males 1.6%) of undergraduates with a declared major in Physical Sciences and 0.7% (males 0.9%) in Math. The largest disparity were reported in Computer/Information Science with 5.6% (males 12.6%) and Engineering with 1.6% (males 10.8%) (1).

Kondrick (8) conducted an extensive review of literature in which she examined the under- representation of women in PSTEM. The author stated that “female graduates predominate in fields like psychology, education, biological sciences, and liberal and fine arts …” but accounts for the minority in the PSTEM areas (8).

In order to better understand these variances in career fields, some authors have suggested a qualitative exploration of gender gap issues in computer science (4). Others have hinted towards a qualitative approach due to the fact that students’ desires “can be predicted by their self- recognition of the usefulness of computers and their perception of the usefulness of computers” (5) . These points are also supported by Kennedy and Parks (9); the authors stated that “Science is impersonal. Women are personal. Science is objective and women are subjective. Science requires logical, analytical investigation. Women’s methods are viewed as intuitive and holistic. Science is deemed rational, whereas females are seen as emotional beings.”

Leite, P., & Oh, J. (2008, June), An Analysis Of Successful Minority Students Enrolled In Technology Degree Programs Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/4252

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015