Virtual On line
June 22, 2020
June 22, 2020
June 26, 2021
Integral to student development, the exploration of ethical principles is deeply connected to both ABET student outcomes and professionalism. Case studies can serve as an impactful tool to support cognitive and personal growth prior to student graduation. While engineering technology ethical case studies exist, most have a discipline-specific focus. In contrast, the Prism case study can prompt a rare discussion of the right to express positions regarding sexual identity in an engineering context. This case study is designed to illustrate how professional and ethical standards relate to real life situations. In 2013, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Prism published a letter to the editor from Wayne Helmer, professor of mechanical engineering in Arkansas, offering the “truth about the homosexual /lesbian/ bisexual/ transgender lifestyle” and questioning whether diversity should be celebrated. The published material and subsequent responses offer students a context-based debate about the clash between statements of policy, opinion, intolerance, and bigotry. Using primary documents as a research base, students will be led through a case study analysis of the publications, responses, and debate that surrounded Dr. Helmer’s statements. The ASEE Statement on Diversity will be incorporated as a lens through which students can evaluate the decision of Norman Fortenberry, executive director of ASEE, to publish the letter.
The sequence of events offers students the opportunity to explore the case with a chronological approach. To begin, the case study will explore the initial published pieces in ASEE Prism related to diversity. Then Helmer’s letter to the editor will be considered and analyzed within the constructs of personal opinion, tolerance, and civility. Next, students will review the documents associated with the Prism discussion related to Dr Helmer’s submission that consumed almost six months of debate. Finally, public commentary associated with the letter will be explored.
The decision to publish an opinion piece in ASEE Prism characterizing LGBT engineers in negative ways offers engineering technology students the opportunity to explore the concepts of free expression and civility within the engineering domain. Prompts for writing exercises or discussion promote an exploration of ethical themes. With an emphasis on the decision to publish in contrast to an analysis of the arguments, students can view the complex facets of ethical constructs and professional identity.
Components of the case study include an instructor’s guide, recommended materials for students, and a student packet. The student handout includes a synopsis of the ASEE Prism articles and discussion prompts. An annotated bibliography offers additional resources for students and faculty.
Christe, B. L. (2020, June), An Ethics Case Study for Engineering Technology Students Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--34118
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015