Asee peer logo

An Initial Analysis Of Freshman To Sophomore Retention In A New First Year Engineering Program

Download Paper |

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Austin, Texas

Publication Date

June 14, 2009

Start Date

June 14, 2009

End Date

June 17, 2009

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Exploring Retention

Tagged Division

First-Year Programs

Page Count

17

Page Numbers

14.196.1 - 14.196.17

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/4771

Download Count

55

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Richard Cassady University of Arkansas

author page

Sean Mulvenon University of Arkansas

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Initial Analysis of Freshman-to-Sophomore Retention in a New First-Year Engineering Program

Abstract

During the 2007-2008 academic year, the University of Arkansas (UofA) implemented the Freshman Engineering Program (FEP),a new first-year experience program for engineering students. The FEP was originally proposed to the UofA engineering faculty as an effort to improve the retention of new engineering students from their freshman to their sophomore years. As a result, the activities of the Academic and Student Services Sub-Programs executed by the faculty and staff of the FEP are all intended to improve students’ likelihood of academic success and/or to increase students’ desire to pursue an engineering degree. Since improving freshman- to-sophomore retention was a primary goal of the FEP, a significant amount of data has been collected on each of the 343 students enrolled in the first FEP cohort. This data includes demographic information, ACT (or similar) scores, high school GPA, Advances Placement (or similar) scores, scholarship data, fall 2007 class schedule and grades, spring 2008 enrollment data, spring 2008 class schedule and grades, fall 2008 enrollment data, and information related to the process used by students in selecting their engineering major for the sophomore year. Our primary objective in constructing this data set is to facilitate the completion of an exploratory data analysis to examine the interrelationships among the variables in hopes of identifying more effective methods for predicting student success in engineering. The long-term goal is to use the information and models obtained from this analysis to identify intervention programs that will promote increased retention rates for these students. In this paper, we present what we view to be the most interesting results of our initial analysis of this data. These results will range from tabulated counts from selected categories of the data to statistical models of relationships between these categories. We also present a brief synopsis of the activities associated with the executing of the Academic and Student Services Sub-Programs of the FEP.

Review of the Literature

A plethora of research has been generated regarding the prediction of success in college (Young and Korbin11; Burton and Ramist4; Ting8; Pennock-Roman7; Wilson10; Bamforth et al.1). However, a growing concern among researchers is the ability to retain students in the quantitative fields like math, science, and engineering. Retention of students is defined as either graduation or concurrent enrolment in a specific academic field. Without retention of students in math- and science-based fields, national and local economies suffer due to the increased demand for such research and development professionals (NARSET Report6). Retaining students is a growing concern in many university departments, especially in the field of engineering. According to the National Access and Retention in Science, Engineering and Technology (NARSET) Report6, two factors determine the success of economic development in a country: 1) the amount and quality of human resources available, and 2) the extent of the research and development capacity. Without a retention and attraction program in place, the supply of graduates from the fields of science, engineering, and technology is unlikely to significantly grow. Identification and targeting of factors which influence retention is critical to the future growth of university engineering programs. Through the identification of prediction factors,

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015