June 16, 2002
June 16, 2002
June 19, 2002
7.180.1 - 7.180.13
An Inquiry into Computers in Design Education
Murali Paranandi Assistant Professor Department of Architecture and Interior Design Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 e-mail: email@example.com
Introduction We are living in an increasingly computerized world. It’s often been said that computers have triggered a second industrial revolution, to characterize their impact on our lives. Driven by the notion that computer literacy is mandatory for success, computer has now become a standard tool in architectural offices across the US and around the world. Academic institutions in US are actively integrating computers into the curricula and some are even requiring their students to purchase computers. This affects all schools of architecture. Educational theorists, recognizing that computers are here to stay, caution more computerizing may not necessarily result in more learning [AHERN, 2001]. While computers’ potential for enhancing innovative exploration in the design studio is widely reported in literature, many design educators see a pressing need to establish a critical appreciation of the ways in which computer affects the student learning, teaching practices, and studio culture [BALFOUR, 2001].
Consequences for design education Dorsey & McMilan  note that computers lack the fluidity and flexibility necessary for recording and exploring ideas during conceptual stages of design 1. Similarly, Yessios  from a heuristic 2 and Turk  from a phenomenological perspective argue that while computers replaced the drawing boards for design representation, they do not yet solve conceptual design and most of the hard design problems. The notion that computer does not adequately support design without restricting the artist’s creative process has been echoed elsewhere in design research literature [for example: HANNA & BARBER, 2001: P 261]. Greg Lynn, an avid proponent of computers in architectural design,
1 They do note that computer revolutionized drafting by enabling rapid entry and modification of design, visualization by allowing designers to walkthrough their designs with photorealistic imagery, and engineering by improving the analysis and construction of buildings. However, they consider these tasks to occur near the conclusion of a larger design process once the major artistic and design challenges are solved. 2 Yessios observes that the internal representation and operational behavior of available CAD software has not really been geared for architectural problem solving.
Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
Paranandi, M. (2002, June), An Inquiry Into Computers In Design Education Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. https://peer.asee.org/10760
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015