June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
Women in Engineering
26.203.1 - 26.203.16
An Iterative Process to Assess and Optimize Diversity ProgrammingMany engineering colleges are dedicated to creating an inclusive and diverse student population.These colleges offer a variety of recruitment and retention programs, including variations onmulticultural and/or women in engineering programs. Many assessments from these types ofprograms are of the “short and sweet” variety, namely, pre- and post-assessments to captureinformation on the immediate impact of an event or program on the mindset of students as itrelates to their consideration of engineering as a career option or the likelihood of staying inengineering.At a large western university, a unified diversity program called XXXXXXXX has hostednumerous programs that are similar in nature to their collegiate counterparts. A difference frommany is that XXXXXXX approaches the assessment of its diversity and inclusion programsmuch like a research problem using the iterative, engineering design loop. In this context, the“problems” include the overarching objectives or goals such as increasing the number andrepresentation of diverse students in the college, creating an inclusive climate, and increasing thelikelihood of diverse students graduating from engineering. Reviewing the literature for bestpractices and research results are the pieces of collected information used to develop programsand initiatives that are offered to students as a means to meet our stated objectives.These initiatives include: Recruitment events and proactive admissions practices Scholarship awards Community-building events, student society activities and other professional development resources Academic support initiatives that include drop-in tutoring and calculus workgroups Next-tier and pre-engineering with unique entry criteria and curricular plansEach year these initiatives are evaluated from several perspectives. Usage numbers with detaileddemographics illustrate if the desired audiences have been reached. If not, new strategies areincluded in the next offering to address the previous shortfalls. Performance indicators aretracked over time, and higher level analyses are used to understand the impact, if any, of highschool background, standardized test scores, and placement exams. Costs are tracked todetermine areas to reduce or eliminate, or if extra expenditures are warranted. These analyseshelp XXXXXXXX to implement changes, including eliminating ineffective programs andpractices.
Louie, B., & Parker, A. S., & Myers, B. A. (2015, June), An Iterative Process to Assess and Optimize Diversity Programming Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23542
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015