Asee peer logo

An Outcomes Driven Approach For Assessment:A Continuous Improvement Process

Download Paper |


2010 Annual Conference & Exposition


Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010



Conference Session

Assessment & Continuous Improvement in ECET: Part II

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology

Page Count


Page Numbers

15.172.1 - 15.172.18



Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Youakim Al Kalaani Georgia Southern University

author page

Shonda Bernadin GSU

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

An Outcomes-Driven Approach for Assessment: A Continuous Improvement Process


Continuous improvement is an important issue in education because it defines the framework for assessment and evaluation, which is required by accrediting agencies. Consequently, an accredited ET program that accomplishes its mission and successfully achieves its program objectives and outcomes must have multiple levels of continuous improvement whose results are used to constantly update and evaluate the program for sustained improvement and continued success. A plan must exist that details program-level continuous improvement, as well as course-level continuous improvement.

In this paper, we describe an ABET-driven assessment plan that was originally developed to address some weaknesses and concerns identified by program evaluators during a previous accreditation visit. However, faculty of the Electrical Engineering Technology (EET) seized this opportunity to embark on a major program revision making use of its newly organized Industrial Advisory Board (IAB). As a result, a five-step process that consists of 1) program assessment planning, 2) data collection, 3) data analysis, 4) program review, and 5) program improvement actions was developed. During this process, the program objectives and outcomes are evaluated and revised to maintain currency and technical relevance. Using the results from step 5, a curriculum mapping worksheet (CMW) is modified and used to revise the course-level assessment and evaluation plan. The CMW is a matrix mapping each course in the EET curriculum to appropriate program outcomes and identifies assessment tools used to measure the success of each outcome. Moreover, the CMW provides a mechanism for correlating program- level outcomes with course-level outcomes using effective assessment tools to measure student performance. Based on the results of the assessment tools, continuous improvement actions at the course level and program level are identified and used to revise the program assessment and evaluation plan which may also provide useful information to other institutions seeking ABET accreditation.

Objectives and Outcomes

The program educational objectives have been defined according to the ABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs1, as “broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the program is preparing graduates to achieve during the first few years following graduation”. The following objectives were approved by the IAB and EET faculty:

Within a short period after gaining employment, EET graduates should:

1. be able to apply knowledge of electrical devices and systems. 2. be able to use modern tools including computer systems and software. 3. be able to integrate theoretical and practical knowledge in the completion of assigned tasks.

Al Kalaani, Y., & Bernadin, S. (2010, June), An Outcomes Driven Approach For Assessment:A Continuous Improvement Process Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16356

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015