June 22, 2003
June 22, 2003
June 25, 2003
8.223.1 - 8.223.14
Analysis of Competitions for Mechatronic Design Using Autonomous Mobile Robots
Jason Flint, Shawn Cheney, Blake Hale, C. Richard G. Helps Information Technology, Brigham Young University, Provo Utah.
Abstract There are many miniature robot-building competitions used in teaching mechatronics. Brigham Young University has historically used an autonomous miniature mobile robot competition as the basis for an upper-level mechatronics course. A new competition design was sought that satisfies specific criteria. The department-specified criteria include incorporating a balanced approach to teaching mechatronics fundamentals, providing inherent flexibility in difficulty level, scalability for varying student enrollment and future development, and increased student appeal. We evaluated 100 internet-sourced mechatronic mobile robot competitions using the defined criteria.
Analyses using these criteria allowed the identification of underlying principles employed in the exploration and teaching of mechatronics. We identified desirable educational and mechatronic outcomes for inclusion in the course. We then designed a new competition that meets all of the defined criteria. The new competition allows flexibility in development time requirements (ranging from one semester to multiple semesters) and provides options for many levels of difficulty. It was tailored to the new competition requirements by matching specific criteria to features and principles found in other competitions. The criteria, mechatronics teaching principles, and competition details are presented and discussed.
Mechatronics Development at Brigham Young University
Teaching mechatronics offers some specific challenges. A student with a background in computing, electronics or mechanics is unlikely to be proficient in all three areas, yet mechatronics requires the successful integration of these three disciplines. The EET (Electronics Engineering Technology) department at Brigham Young University traditionally taught mechatronic principles to upper-level students. This course was designed for students with backgrounds in computing, electronics and/or mechanics. As part of the course requirements, each team of students was required to create and program an autonomous robot that would compete in a task-oriented competition at the end of the semester. The evolution of the EET department into the current Information Technology department offered the opportunity to design a new mechatronics course to meet new needs. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
Helps, C. R. (2003, June), Analysis Of Competitions For Mechatronic Design Using Autonomous Mobile Robots Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--11654
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015