Asee peer logo

Analysis Of The Ge Faculty For The Future Program At Bucknell University: Learning From The Past And Improving For The Future

Download Paper |

Conference

2003 Annual Conference

Location

Nashville, Tennessee

Publication Date

June 22, 2003

Start Date

June 22, 2003

End Date

June 25, 2003

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

ASEE Multimedia Session

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

8.224.1 - 8.224.9

DOI

10.18260/1-2--11911

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/11911

Download Count

395

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Candice Stefanou

author page

Karen Marosi

author page

Margot Vigeant

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2793

Analysis of the GE Faculty for the Future Program at Bucknell University: Learning from the Past and Improving for the Future

Margot A.S. Vigeant, Karen T. Marosi, and Candice R. Stefanou

Department of Chemical Engineering, Bucknell University/College of Engineering, Bucknell University/ Department of Education, Bucknell University

Abstract

Despite years of encouragement from the GE Faculty for the Future (GE-FFF) program, there has been no increase in the number of female students from our university going on to graduate school and academic careers. GE-FFF was a summer research program designed to pair students with professor-mentors with whom they would conduct research and learn about academic careers. While there was success in filling the program with interested students, it did not appear successful at encouraging women and minority students to go on to academic professions. In this work, we present the results of two surveys on why people do (or do not) go on to academic careers and the work currently ongoing at Bucknell to address the findings.

The first survey queried graduates who may or may not have participated in GE-FFF, to discover if the training they had received was important to their decision about which career to pursue. The conclusion of this survey was that there seemed to be positive impressions of the GE-FFF program, but that direct conclusions about students’ failure to pursue academic careers were not possible due to the limited size of the data set. Also, given the large number of choices available to someone starting their career, it seems somewhat unreasonable to ask graduates to state why, exactly, they decided against one career in particular. Therefore a second survey was conducted, and given to people currently employed as professors. In this survey, respondents were asked about life events and preferences which had lead them to their current work. Based on the conclusions of this survey, programming was started or improved at Bucknell to give students access to mentors, information on graduate school, and access to female faculty in an informal setting, all of which were flagged as important factors by respondents from academia.

Introduction

Bucknell University is a small Liberal Arts University, consisting of a College of Arts and Sciences as well as a College of Engineering. The university has an excellent gender balance (average of 50% for the past 10 years), which is not uncommon in Liberal Arts Universities.

Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Education

Stefanou, C., & Marosi, K., & Vigeant, M. (2003, June), Analysis Of The Ge Faculty For The Future Program At Bucknell University: Learning From The Past And Improving For The Future Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--11911

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2003 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015