Virtual
April 17, 2021
April 17, 2021
April 17, 2021
16
10.18260/1-2--38292
https://peer.asee.org/38292
685
Professor Richard Wilson currently teaches for the Computer Science and Philosophy departments at Towson University in Towson Maryland. He is a specialist in Practical and Applied Ethics and has taught courses in many areas of Practical ethics including Medical Ethics, BioEthics, Business Ethics, Media Ethics, Environmental Ethics, and well as Engineering Ethics and Computer Science Ethics. Most recently he designed the curriculum for 2 Universities Engineering Ethics and Computer Science Ethics Classes. His current interests include Technological Ethics and Information Communication Technology (ICT) Ethics. Professor Wilson’s background in Practical Ethics has led to his developing multiple cases studies in the field of Anticipatory Ethics.
Aristotle “Our discussion will be adequate if it has as much clearness as the subject-matter admits of, for precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions, any more than in all the products of the crafts.”
Abstract: In applied ethics, engaging students through the use of cases helps teach students about ethical issues arising in the fields they are studying. It can also help develop in students a sensitivity to social and historical issues related to the cases under discussion. Students are required to take ethics courses as a part of the preparation for students to enter the professional world and to deal with ethical issues arising in that world. The study of real world cases can help accomplish these tasks. A method is needed for Engineering and Information Computer Technology Ethics (ICTE) that is committed to remaining true to the technical principles of Engineering and ICT while also introducing students to the importance of Ethics. A research method that is committed to the study of real world cases allows students to perform research on Ethics, while simultaneously introducing technical distinctions from Engineering and ICT. These areas of study can be supplemented with the introduction of social and historical issues through the extensive use of layers of cases. This discussion presents a method that begins with the study of individual cases. The study of historical and individual cases is followed by the study of present cases. This is the foundation for a comparison of cases. The comparison of historical and present cases is the foundation for comparing historical and present cases to emerging cases, which are cases that are capable of developing in the present moment. The comparison of historical, present, and emerging cases presents a foundation for analyzing anticipated cases and for the introduction of Anticipatory Ethics. The method presented in this discussion introduces students in applied ethics classes to the analysis of technical and ethical issues emerging from historical and present cases and to use this background to project trajectories for anticipated cases that may potentially arise in the future. The need for the introduction of an anticipatory analysis is based upon the idea that the exponential growth of technology gives rise to unique cases that need to be addressed as they arise and as far as possible before they arise.
Wilson, R. L. (2021, April), Anticipatory Ethics as a Method for Teaching Engineering Ethics Paper presented at 2021 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Conference, Virtual. 10.18260/1-2--38292
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015