Asee peer logo

Aren't Units Part of the Problem?

Download Paper |

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Indianapolis, Indiana

Publication Date

June 15, 2014

Start Date

June 15, 2014

End Date

June 18, 2014

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Technical Session

Tagged Division

Industrial Engineering

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

24.197.1 - 24.197.14

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/20088

Download Count

24

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Matthew A Carr USN U.S. Naval Academy

visit author page

CAPT Matthew Carr is a Permanent Military Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the US Naval Academy, a nulcear-trained submarine officer, and a registered Professional Engineer.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Aren’t Units Part of the Problem?AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to address the connection between proficiency in unit analysis andproblem solving skills. The double entendre of the title is intentional. Continuing feedback fromAmerican industry, as regularly reported in ASEE literature and at ASEE conferences, indicatesa perceived weakness in the critical thinking and problem solving skills of our engineeringgraduates. Most of our graduates enter industry and must not only assimilate to the demands ofthe new work environment, but also must develop proficiency in the unit systems used by theirnew employers. In spite of the Metric Conversion Act of 1975, large portions of Americanindustry and commerce have resisted shifting to metric units. Personnel re-training costs, fear ofexpensive mishaps during transitions, the large preponderance of legacy systems and equipmentutilizing customary units on their gages and other instruments, and the intransigence of theAmerican people all contribute to maintaining traditional unit systems. On the other hand, oureducation system from the secondary level up through the university level has adopted SystemeInternational (SI) units in the science and engineering curricula. The SI system is often muchsimpler to use and students can often arrive at the correct numerical answer to a problem withoutconsidering dimensional homogeneity concepts. And SI is the specified language of ouracademics when publishing their work. More recently written engineering textbooks continuethis pattern. This has created a bilingual unit system challenge for our graduates that essentiallyshift mastering the customary units of their new employers to the workplace – they needproficiency in traditional units, but have mainly been exercised in SI. In light of industryfeedback, are we engineering educators doing a disservice to our students by neglecting orunderexposing them to how to perform engineering analyses in the units that are customary totheir prospective employers? Would those hiring our graduates be better served if we exercisedour students more in traditional unit systems? This paper explores these questions and providesmultiple examples of a systematic methodology that is proven in developing student competencein practical problem solving.

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015