Asee peer logo

Assessing Engineering Students’ Ability To Use The Mathematics They Have Learned

Download Paper |

Conference

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Students' Abilities and Attitudes

Tagged Division

Mathematics

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

15.201.1 - 15.201.10

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/16109

Download Count

34

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Maria Terrell Cornell University Math Dept.

author page

Robert Terrell Cornell University

author page

Lisa Schneider Cornell University

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Assessing Engineering Students’ Ability to Use the Mathematics They Have Learned

Abstract

A Mathematics Applications Inventory (MAI) is being developed by engineering and mathematics faculty at Cornell University to assess students’ ability to apply the mathematics they learn in freshman calculus to engineering-related problems. This paper reports on three aspects of this work: (1) Development of the first draft of the MAI, (2) Pilot testing the MAI, and (3) Preliminary analysis of the pilot test data.

To develop the MAI, faculty of second- and third-year engineering courses were surveyed about how key concepts and techniques from single variable differential and integral calculus are used in intermediate-level engineering courses. Based on their feedback, as well as feedback from advanced undergraduate engineering students, an initial set of test items was developed. The resulting MAI consists of five open-ended questions with eleven sub-questions. The test is designed to be administered during one hour in paper-and-pencil format.

The MAI was administered during the first week of the Fall 2009 semester as a pre-test to a sample of first-year engineering students (N=51). Based on a review of their performance, a subset of 14 participants was selected to participate in follow-up cognitive interviews to probe their thought processes relative to the MAI items.

The pilot test data are being analyzed to determine patterns in students’ abilities to apply the mathematics they have learned, to gain insight into common gaps in understanding related to the application of specific mathematical topic areas, and to understand patterns of responses and performance by other background and status variables such as gender, race, SAT scores, and level of mathematics preparation. These data are being used to refine the MAI items and to develop a multiple-choice version of the MAI. Ultimately, the MAI is intended to be used as a pretest/posttest instrument to determine whether curricular changes affect students’ ability to apply mathematics to problems set in engineering contexts.

Background

Entering engineering students at Cornell University have median SAT Math scores of approximately 750 and Verbal scores of approximately 685. Credit for the equivalent of first semester calculus is expected at entrance (i.e., the equivalent of a 4 or 5 on the AB Advanced Placement examination). The first mathematics course for half of the entering class, Math 1910, is the equivalent of second semester calculus, for the other half it is multivariable/vector calculus, Math 1920, or higher (Linear Algebra for Engineers, or Differential Equations for Engineers). By all the usual measures we have a very able and motivated group of students. Yet engineering faculty at our institution have reported consistently that students in introductory engineering courses have difficulty using even elementary mathematics to represent quantities and relationships between them. This inability to use the mathematics that they have apparently

Terrell, M., & Terrell, R., & Schneider, L. (2010, June), Assessing Engineering Students’ Ability To Use The Mathematics They Have Learned Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16109

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015