June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
11.237.1 - 11.237.16
Assessing Group Learning Using Wikis: An Application to Capstone Design
In this paper, we discuss the use of a wiki for documenting social knowledge in the context of an industrially-based capstone design course and for assessing group learning. Students create a knowledge management (KM) tool for the explicit purposes of sharing lessons learned with wider audiences and engaging in active group assessment, where students actively develop the product to be assessed. Because students are encouraged to verbalize in their own words concepts learned in class, the wiki reinforces learning and serves as a formative assessment tool, or perception check, for students and professors. This case analysis involved collecting feedback from key stakeholders, including Advisory Board and Industrial Sponsor interviews, student focus group discussions and assessment surveys. In addition, the wiki itself serves as a summative assessment tool. A difference approach was used to analyze rater perceptions of actual and expected performance. An average improvement score, based on a rubric, was obtained that minimizes unreliability for small, variable groups like advisory boards.
New, creative uses of web-based group platforms, such as wikis and weblogs in industry and education, have been adopted for project management, to support “folio thinking”1, to encourage reflective practice and to build communities of practice. This qualitative and quantitative study looks at the pilot semester of using social software in a well- established senior capstone design course to support collaborative knowledge management and group assessment. We want to answer the question: How do we assess team or group learning?
From this research question, we developed three project goals:
1. Leverage the group-editing capabilities of WSU Wiki to facilitate a new course dimension: collaborative knowledge management. 2. Pilot the use of social software as a tool for assessing group learning and performance. 3. Collect feedback from students, College Advisory Board members and Industrial Project Sponsors in order to assess student performance and meta-level project efficacy.
Background: The Capstone Industrial Design Clinic
Team-oriented student design3 has been part of this ABET-certified mechanical engineering program for many years. In its current form in the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University, for the past 10 years, student groups work on revenue-sponsored engineering projects ($60-$80,000 annually) for industry partners. The projects are completed in one semester. Students are responsible
Racicot, K., & Pezeshki, C. (2006, June), Assessing Group Learning Using Wikis: An Application To Capstone Design Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--207
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015