Assessing the Effectiveness of a Nanotechnology Educational Module Using the "Nanotechnology Awareness Instrument"
- Conference
- Location
-
New Orleans, Louisiana
- Publication Date
-
June 26, 2016
- Start Date
-
June 26, 2016
- End Date
-
June 29, 2016
- ISBN
-
978-0-692-68565-5
- ISSN
-
2153-5965
- Conference Session
- Tagged Topic
-
NSF Grantees Poster Session
- Page Count
-
7
- DOI
-
10.18260/p.26308
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/26308
- Download Count
-
576
Paper Authors
M. J. Klopfstein Oklahoma State University
Lisa Cota Oklahoma State University
Don A. Lucca Oklahoma State University
Xiaoliang Jin Oklahoma State University
Xiaoliang Jin received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of British Columbia, Canada, in 2012. Now he is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University, USA. His research interests include precision manufacturing processes, mechanics and dynamics of micro-machining, vibration assisted machining, and precision control.
Prabhakar R Pagilla Texas A&M University
Prabhakar Pagilla is a TEES Endowed Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley in 1996. His formal background and expertise are in the general areas of dynamic systems and control with applications in manufacturing and robotics. His research interests lie in modeling and control of roll-to-roll manufacturing systems; control of large-scale complex systems; robotics/mechatronics; and adaptive and robust control of nonlinear dynamic systems.
Abstract
The effectiveness of the introduction of an educational module to an Introduction to Engineering class was investigated. A lecture introducing nanotechnology was given to the students, and the students participated in a question-and-answer period following the lecture. The “Nanotechnology Awareness Instrument” of Dyehouse et al.1 was used to assess students' motivation for, awareness of, and exposure to nanotechnology. The survey contained thirty multiple choice questions divided into sections covering nanotechnology awareness, motivation, and exposure. The survey was given to the students prior to the lecture and again five weeks after the lecture. An Ordinal Pattern Analysis in Observation Oriented Modeling was used to evaluate differences in student scores on the Nanotechnology Awareness Instrument after the lecture as compared to their scores before the lecture. It was found that students’ awareness and exposure increased after the lecture however their motivation did not increase.
Klopfstein, M. J., & Cota, L., & Lucca, D. A., & Jin, X., & Pagilla, P. R. (2016, June), Assessing the Effectiveness of a Nanotechnology Educational Module Using the "Nanotechnology Awareness Instrument" Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26308
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015